RESUMEN
Dengue is one of the commonest causes of undifferentiated acute febrile illness in India as well as South East Asia. Nearly two-fifths of the world population is at risk of infection, and nearly 96 million infections reported worldwide, it is a major cause of concern across the globe. The ISCCM leadership felt that there have been no new directives/guidelines except the MOH guidelines for the management of dengue fever since 2014. Under the auspices of the Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine (ISCCM), an expert group of 14 intensivists from across the country, was formed. The task force members formulated questions that needed to be answered. These questions were validated by the members of ISCCM attending research conclave 2023. All the members systematically searched PubMed, MEDLINE, and Science Direct for original articles on different aspects of dengue management between January 1, 2000, and July 1, 2023. From the collected articles, duplicates were removed. Based on the evidence collected, the expert group members prepared statements/answers to the questions. Since most of the evidence is of moderate to low quality, a consensus was generated amongst the members of the task force. Each statement was agreed upon by 70% of the task force. The statements presented in the article are consensus statements as answers to queries raised. How to cite this article: Bhalla A, Singh H, Suri V, Yaddanapudi L, Poddar B, Ghawat R, et al. ISCCM Position Statement: Management of Severe Dengue in Intensive Care Unit. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(S2):S42-S58.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We aimed to study organizational aspects, case mix, and practices in Indian intensive care units (ICUs) from 2018 to 2019, following the Indian Intensive Care Case Mix and Practice Patterns Study (INDICAPS) of 2010-2011. METHODS: An observational, 4-day point prevalence study was performed between 2018 and 2019. ICU, patient characteristics, and interventions were recorded for 24 hours, and ICU outcomes till 30 days after the study day. Adherence to selected compliance measures was determined. Data were analyzed for 4,669 adult patients from 132 ICUs. RESULTS: On the study day, mean age, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE II), and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores were 56.9 ± 17.41 years, 16.7 ± 9.8, and 4.4 ± 3.6, respectively. Moreover, 24% and 22.2% of patients received mechanical ventilation (MV) and vasopressors or inotropes (VIs), respectively. On the study days, 1,195 patients (25.6%) were infected and 1,368 patients (29.3%) had sepsis during their ICU stay. ICU mortality was 1,092 out of 4,669 (23.4%), including 737 deaths and 355 terminal discharges (TDs) from ICU. Compliance for process measures related to MV ranged between 62.7 and 85.3%, 11.2 and 47.4% for monitoring delirium, sedation, and analgesia, and 7.7 and 25.3% for inappropriate transfusion of blood products. Only 34.8% of ICUs routinely used capnography. Large hospitals with ≥500 beds, closed ICUs, the APACHE II and SOFA scores, medical admissions, the presence of cancer or cirrhosis of the liver, the presence of infection on the study day, and the need for MV or VIs were independent predictors of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital size and closed ICUs are independently associated with worse outcomes. The proportion of TDs remains high. There is a scope for improvements in processes of care.Registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03631927). HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Divatia JV, Mehta Y, Govil D, Zirpe K, Amin PR, Ramakrishnan N, et al. Intensive Care in India in 2018-2019: The Second Indian Intensive Care Case Mix and Practice Patterns Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(10):1093-1107.
RESUMEN
Bajan K. Rapid Emergency Medicine Score-Reinventing Prognostication in Emergency Care. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(6):378-379.