Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 12 de 12
Filtrar
Más filtros

País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Paediatr Respir Rev ; 36: 136-141, 2020 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31679983

RESUMEN

Lung ultrasound (LUS), a non-invasive non-ionizing radiation tool, has become essential at the bedside in both adults and children, particularly in the critically ill. This manuscript reviews normal LUS patterns and the most important pathologies that LUS allows to diagnose. Normal LUS is represented by the pleural line, the lung-sliding and the A-lines and B-lines. These two last findings are artifacts derived from the pleural line. Pleural effusion appears as an anechoic collection. Pneumothorax is suspected when only A-lines are present, without lung-sliding and B-lines. Alveolo-interstitial syndrome is characterized by different degrees of confluent B-lines and can be present in different pathologies such as pulmonary edema and acute respiratory distress syndrome. The distribution of B-lines helps to differentiate between them. LUS is useful to evaluate the response to lung recruitment in pathologies such as acute respiratory distress syndrome or acute chest syndrome. The distribution of B-lines also appears to be useful to monitor the response to antibiotics in pneumonia. However, further studies are needed to further ascertain this evidence. LUS is also useful to guide thoracocentesis.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagen , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Pruebas en el Punto de Atención , Ultrasonografía , Síndrome Torácico Agudo/diagnóstico por imagen , Niño , Humanos , Derrame Pleural/diagnóstico por imagen , Neumotórax/diagnóstico por imagen , Edema Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagen , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/diagnóstico por imagen , Cirugía Asistida por Computador , Toracocentesis/métodos
2.
Children (Basel) ; 9(6)2022 May 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35740726

RESUMEN

The use of recruitment maneuvers (RMs) is suggested to improve severe oxygenation failure in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Lung ultrasound (LUS) is a non-invasive, safe, and easily repeatable tool. It could be used to monitor the lung recruitment process in real-time. This paper aims to evaluate bedside LUS for assessing PEEP-induced pulmonary reaeration during RMs in pediatric patients. A case of a child with severe ARDS due to Haemophilus influenzae infection is presented. Due to his poor clinical, laboratory, and radiological evolution, he was placed on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Despite all measures, severe pulmonary collapse prevented proper improvement. Thus, RMs were indicated, and bedside LUS was successfully used for monitoring and assessing lung recruitment. The initial lung evaluation before the maneuver showed a tissue pattern characterized by a severe loss of lung aeration with dynamic air bronchograms and multiple coalescent B-lines. While raising a PEEP of 30 mmH2O, LUS showed the presence of A-lines, which was considered a predictor of reaeration in response to the recruitment maneuver. The LUS pattern could be used to assess modifications in the lung aeration, evaluate the effectiveness of RMs, and prevent lung overdistension.

3.
An Pediatr (Engl Ed) ; 94(3): 144-152, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32063513

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Ultrasound (US) guidance increases the success rate and decreases complications during central venous catheterisation (CVC). The benefits of US guidance in arterial catheterisation are less clear. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of US-guided arterial catheterisation with the traditional landmark (LM) technique in critically ill children. METHODS: A prospective multicentre study was carried out in 18 Paediatric Intensive Care units in Spain during a 6-months period. Ultrasound guided and landmark techniques were compared in terms of cannulation technical success and immediate mechanical complications. RESULTS: A total of 161 procedures were performed on 128 patients (78 procedures in the US group and 83 in the LM groups). The median (interquartile range) age and weight of the cohort was 11months (2-52), and 10kg (4-17), respectively. More than half (59.6%) were male. US was used mainly in big (number of beds 11 [8-16] vs 6 [4-10], p < 0,001) and high complexity intensive care units (cardiac surgery program 76.9% vs. 25.6%, P<.001) as well as in smaller children [weight 5.7kg (3.8-13) vs 11.5kg (4.9-22.7), P<.001]. Almost half (49.7%) of the procedures were performed by an inexperienced operator (paediatric resident, or staff with less than 5years of clinical experience in the PICU), and only 24.4% had performed more than 50 US-guided vascular access procedures before the study. There were no significant differences between US and LM techniques in terms of first-attempt success (35.8% vs 33.7%, P=.773), overall success (75.6% vs 71.1%, P=.514), number of puncture attempts [2 (1-4) vs 2 (1-3), P=.667] and complications (16.6% vs 25.6%, P=.243). Adjustment by potential confounders using multivariate regression models did not modify these results. Subgroup analyses showed that US outperformed LM technique in terms of overall success (83.7% vs 62.7%, P=.036) and complications (10,8% vs 32.5%, P=.020) only when procedures where performed by less-experienced operators. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective observational multicentre study, US did not improve arterial cannulation outcomes compared to the traditional LM technique in critically ill children. US-guided arterial cannulation may offer advantages when cannulation is performed by inexperienced operators.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Palpación , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos
4.
Rev. cuba. pediatr ; 962024. tab
Artículo en Español | LILACS, CUMED | ID: biblio-1550960

RESUMEN

Introducción: Los pacientes críticos pediátricos son susceptibles de presentar alteraciones del flujo sanguíneo cerebral que impliquen un deterioro de su estado de salud funcional. Objetivo: Identificar factores predictores de mayor riesgo de mala evolución funcional en pacientes pediátricos críticos con sepsis. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio de cohortes retrospectivo con menores de 18 años de edad con sepsis, ingresados en la unidad de cuidados intensivos pediátricos. Se recogieron variables epidemiológicas, clínicas y del estado de salud funcional previas al ingreso, al alta y a los 6 meses. El estado de salud funcional se evaluó mediante la escala de categorías de estado global y cerebral pediátrico. Se evaluó el cambio del estado funcional entre el ingreso y a los 6 meses del alta. Se realizó un análisis univariante para comparar grupos considerando el mal pronóstico y el cambio del estado funcional y su relación con las variables. Resultados: Se incluyeron 46 pacientes. A los 6 meses del alta, cuatro (8,7 por ciento) presentaron mal pronóstico funcional y ocho (17,4 por ciento) empeoramiento funcional respecto al ingreso. No se encontraron asociaciones entre las variables predictoras y la morbilidad, aunque se observó cierta tendencia en algunas como mayor soporte inotrópico (VIS > 20: 12,5 por ciento vs. 50 por ciento, p= 0,075), extracorpóreo y de reemplazo renal (25 por ciento vs. 2,6 por ciento, p= 0,074) y estancia hospitalaria más prolongada (50 por ciento vs. 15,8 por ciento , p= 0,055). Conclusiones: El soporte en la unidad de cuidados intensivos pediátricos no fue un predictor de morbilidad funcional en la muestra(AU)


Introduction: Critically ill pediatric patients are susceptible to cerebral blood flow alterations that imply a deterioration of their functional health status. Objective: To identify predictors of a higher risk of poor functional outcome in critically ill pediatric patients with sepsis. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted with children under 18 years of age with sepsis, who were admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit. Epidemiological, clinical, and functional health status variables were collected prior to admission, discharge, and after 6 months. Functional health status was assessed using the Pediatric Global State and Brain Status Category Scale. The change in performance status between admission and 6 months after discharge was assessed. A univariate analysis was performed to compare groups considering poor prognosis and change in functional status and their relationship with the variables. Results: A total of 46 patients were included. At 6 months after discharge, four (8.7 percent) had a poor functional prognosis and eight (17.4 percent) had functional worsening at admission. No associations were found between the predictor variables and morbidity, although some trends were observed in some variables, such as greater inotropic support (SIV > 20: 12.5 percent vs. 50 percent, p = 0.075), extracorporeal and renal replacement (25 percent vs. 2.6 , percent p = 0.074), and longer hospital stay (50 percent vs. 15.8 percent , p = 0.055). Conclusions: Support in the pediatric intensive care unit was not a predictor of functional morbidity in the sample(AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Niño , Adolescente , Circulación Cerebrovascular , Estado de Salud , Factores de Riesgo , Sepsis/epidemiología , Pacientes , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Cohortes , Cuidados Críticos/métodos
5.
Neonatology ; 116(2): 140-146, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31096216

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN) is a neonatal syndrome associated with significant morbidity and mortality that is caused by the failure of postnatal drop in pulmonary vascular resistance. In extreme cases, patients may require extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy (ECMO). The aim of this study was to explore lung ultrasound (LUS) patterns in newborns with PPHN requiring ECMO. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2014 to January 2018, LUS was performed on patients with PPHN admitted for ECMO treatment. PPHN diagnosis was based on clinical and echocardiographic findings. LUS was performed before patients underwent ECMO cannulation. An underlying diagnosis was made taking into account the patient's complete medical history, excluding LUS information. A blinded physician, unaware of the patient's clinical condition, analyzed the stored ultrasound images. Results were then compared with chest x-ray (CXR) diagnoses. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were recruited; 12 were male (70.6%). The median gestational age was 38.7 weeks, with 13 term newborns (76.5%). Twelve were cannulated for VA ECMO, with a median ECMO run of 111.2 h. Six patients (35%) survived. Patients with alveolar capillary dysplasia with misaligned pulmonary veins, fetal ductus arteriosus constriction, or sepsis had normal LUS patterns (A-lines with lung sliding). LUS showed a better sensitivity (88.9%) and specificity (85%) than CXR (55.6 and 77.5%, respectively) in identifying patients with nonparenchymal lung disease. CONCLUSIONS: LUS can provide essential information to help diagnose the underlying cause of PPHN in an earlier and more effective way than CXR. LUS is suitable for routine utilization in the intensive care unit.


Asunto(s)
Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Síndrome de Circulación Fetal Persistente/diagnóstico por imagen , Síndrome de Circulación Fetal Persistente/etiología , Ultrasonografía/métodos , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal , Masculino , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Radiografía , Tórax/diagnóstico por imagen
6.
Intensive Care Med ; 44(1): 61-72, 2018 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29196794

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To assess whether ultrasound guidance improves central venous catheter placement outcomes compared to the landmark technique in critically ill children. METHODS: A prospective multicentre observational study was carried out in 26 paediatric intensive care units over 6 months. Children 0-18 years old who received a temporary central venous catheter, inserted using either ultrasound or landmark techniques, were eligible. The primary outcome was the first-attempt success rate. Secondary outcomes included overall placement success, number of puncture attempts, number of procedures requiring multiple punctures (> 3 punctures), number of procedures requiring punctures at more than one vein site and immediate mechanical complications. To account for potential confounding factors, we used propensity scores. Our primary analysis was based on 1:1 propensity score matching. The association between cannulation technique and outcomes in the matched cohort was estimated using generalized estimating equations and mixed-effects models to account for patient-level and hospital-level confounders. RESULTS: Five hundred central venous catheter-placement procedures involving 354 patients were included. Ultrasound was used for 323 procedures, and the landmark technique was used for 177. Two hundred and sixty-six procedures were matched (133 in the ultrasound group and 133 in the landmark group). Ultrasound was associated with an increase in the first-attempt success rate [46.6 vs. 30%, odds ratio 2.09 (1.26-3.46); p < 0.001], a reduced number of puncture attempts [2 (1-3) vs. 2 (1-4), B coefficient - 0.51 (95% confidence interval - 1.01 to - 0.03), p = 0.035], and fewer overall mechanical complications [12 vs. 22.5%, odds ratio 0.47 (95% confidence interval 0.24-0.91), p = 0.025] in the matched cohort. The number of puncture attempts was the main factor associated with overall complications. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the landmark technique, ultrasound guidance was associated with an increased first-attempt success rate, a reduced number of puncture attempts, and fewer complications during central venous catheter placement in critically ill children.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central , Enfermedad Crítica , Adolescente , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Catéteres Venosos Centrales , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Estudios Prospectivos , España , Ultrasonografía Intervencional
7.
Pediatr Qual Saf ; 2(1): e009, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30229149

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: This study objective was to identify, select, and define a basic set of quality indicators for pediatric intensive care in Spain. METHODS: (1) Review of the literature to identify quality indicators and their defining elements and (2) selection of indicators by consensus of a group of experts using basic Delphi methodology (2 rounds) and forms distributed by email among experts from the Spanish society of pediatric intensive care. RESULTS: We selected quality indicators according to their relevance and feasibility and the experts' agreement on their incorporation in the final set. We included only those indicators whose assessment was within the highest tertile and greater than or equal to 70% evaluator agreement in the final selection. Starting from an initially proposed set of 136 indicators, 31 experts first selected 43 indicators for inclusion in the second round. Twenty indicators were selected for the final set. This "top 20" set comprised 9 process indicators, 9 of results (especially treatment-associated adverse effects), and 2 indicators of structure. Several of them are classical indicators in intensive care medicine (rates of hospital-acquired infections, pressure ulcers, etc.), whereas others are specifically pediatric (eg, unrestricted parent visitation or training the parents of technology-dependent children). CONCLUSIONS: We reached a consensus on a set of 20 essential quality indicators for pediatric intensive care in Spain. A significant subset reflects the peculiarities of pediatric care. We consider this subset as a starting point for future projects of network collaboration between pediatric intensive care units in Spain.

10.
Rev. cuba. pediatr ; 93(4)dic. 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1409075

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT Introduction: The use of corticosteroids has been shown not to improve the prognosis of patients with bronchiolitis, but it could be assumed that steroids will reduce inflammation. Objective: This study aimed to assess whether corticoid therapy influenced the inflammatory and clinical response of critically ill infants. Methods: Prospective, randomized, double blind placebo-controlled trial of glucocorticoids (GCT) in infants of less than 12 months with severe or moderate bronchiolitis. Patients were randomized to receive systemic corticoid therapy (low dose for 7 days) or placebo. The main outcomes were: a) levels of lymphocyte subsets; b) levels of IL-2, IL-12, and IFNγ as pro-inflammatory factors, and c) levels of IL-4 and IL-10 as anti-inflammatory response. Secondary outcomes related with the clinical response were also analyzed. Results: 97 patients were randomized. Evolution of lymphocyte subsets was similar in both groups. Pro-inflammatory interleukins and interferon decreased, but without differences. Anti-inflammatory interleukins showed a significant decrease from baseline to the end of the study, and IL-10 values were significantly lower (p = 0.046) in the GCT group [1.82 pg/ml (1.2-3.5)] vs non-GCT [4 pg/ml (1.5-6.3)]. GCT group showed a lower time of mechanical ventilation and of hospitalization, but without statistically significant differences. No cases of severe adverse reaction to steroids were detected. Conclusions: Administration of systemic GCT did not modify the inflammatory nor the clinical response of patients with severe bronchiolitis, except for IL-10 levels that were significantly lower in the GCT group. This can open a line of investigation about the relation of IL-10 and response to bronchiolitis.


RESUMEN Introducción: Se ha demostrado que los glucocorticoides no mejoran el pronóstico de pacientes con bronquiolitis, pero se podría suponer que reducen la inflamación. Objetivo: Evaluar si los glucocorticoides influyen en la respuesta inflamatoria y clínica de los lactantes críticos. Métodos: Ensayo prospectivo, aleatorizado, doble ciego, controlado con placebo en lactantes < 12 meses con bronquiolitis grave y administración de glucocorticoides sistémicos (dosis bajas 7 días). Se examinaron: a) concentraciones de subconjuntos de linfocitos; b) concentraciones de IL-2, IL-12 e IFNγ como factores proinflamatorios, y c) concentraciones de IL-4 e IL-10 como respuesta antiinflamatoria. También se analizaron los resultados relacionados con la respuesta clínica. Resultados: Se aleatorizaron 97 pacientes. La evolución de los subconjuntos de linfocitos fue similar en ambos grupos. Disminuyeron las interleucinas proinflamatorias y el interferón, pero sin diferencias. Las interleucinas antiinflamatorias mostraron una disminución significativa desde el inicio hasta el final del estudio, y los valores de IL-10 fueron significativamente más bajos (p= 0,046) en el grupo de glucocorticoides [1,82 pg/ml (1,2-3,5)] frente a los no glucocorticoides [4 pg/ml (1,5 - 6,3)]. El grupo glucocorticoides mostró menor tiempo de ventilación mecánica y de hospitalización, pero sin diferencias significativas. No se detectaron reacciones adversas graves a glucocorticoides. Conclusiones: La administración de glucocorticoides sistémicos no modificó la respuesta inflamatoria ni clínica de los pacientes con bronquiolitis severa, excepto las concentraciones de IL-10 que fueron significativamente menores en el grupo de glucocorticoides. Esto puede abrir una línea de investigación sobre la relación de IL-10 y la respuesta a la bronquiolitis.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA