Drug Use Evaluation of Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) in Patients With Advanced Cirrhosis.

OBJECTIVES: Low molecular weight heparin and vitamin K antagonists are commonly used in cirrhotic patients requiring anticoagulation. However, their monitoring with anti-factor Xa and international normalized ratio (INR) may not be reliable in cirrhosis. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) do not need laboratory monitoring, making these agents a favorable alternative. However, apixaban and rivaroxaban have been avoided in advanced liver disease due to their metabolism in the liver. The purpose of this medication use evaluation was to assess the use of DOACs, specifically apixaban and rivaroxaban, in patients with cirrhosis. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, single-center study. Inpatients who had a diagnosis of cirrhosis and received at least one dose of a DOAC (apixaban or rivaroxaban) from April 2016 through June 2020 at our hospital were included in the analysis. Data collected included the reason for admission, Child-Pugh classification, renal function, if this was a home medication or newly started as an inpatient medication, indication, and dosing. The clinical efficacy outcome (new venous thromboembolic event (VTE) or progression of old VTE), and clinical safety outcome (bleeding event) were analyzed. RESULTS: 41 patients with cirrhosis were treated with apixaban or rivaroxaban. Based on the Child-Pugh classification, 29.3% (n=12/41) were placed on a DOAC outside of the FDA prescribing recommendations. In this subpopulation, 8.3% (n=1/12) patients had venous thromboembolism (VTE) and 16.6% (n=2/12) had bleeding events. Overall, 7.3% patients (n=3/41) had VTE and 4.8% (n=2/41) had bleeding events. In the Apixaban for the Initial Management of Pulmonary Embolism and Deep-Vein Thrombosis as First-Line Therapy (AMPLIFY) trial comparing the efficacy and safety profile of apixaban with enoxaparin/warfarin therapy in acute VTE, 2.3% of patients had VTE and 15% had bleeding events. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that it may be possible to safely use DOACs in patients with advanced cirrhosis. Further studies are needed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of DOACs in this patient population, as our study was limited by the small sample size and its retrospective design.

Safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with preexisting autoimmune disorders.

In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been approved for a growing number of cancer types. Approximately a quarter of cancer patients have a concomitant diagnosis of autoimmune disorders (AID). Activation of the immune system with ICIs poses a potential risk of AID worsening, thus, the majority of the ICI clinical trials excluded these patients from the study. There is a paucity of data regarding the benefits and risks of ICIs in cancer patients with AIDs. The primary objectives of this study were to determine the incidence of immunotherapy-related AID worsening and all immunotherapy-related adverse events (irAEs). Secondary outcomes were time to AID worsening and survival difference. All adult patients (age >=18 years) with solid malignancy who received ICIs between Jan 2016 and June 2019 were identified using the University of Louisville pharmacy database. Medical records were reviewed to include all the patients with preexisting AIDs. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the incidence of AID worsening and all irAEs. Baseline characteristics were compared between cancer patients with vs without AID worsening using Pearson chi2 and Student's t-test, where appropriate. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to compare survival between the 2 groups. A total of 40 patients with AIDs were identified during the study period. The cancer types were melanoma (57.5%), lung (15%), breast (5%), and others (22.5%). AIDs were rheumatological (52.5%), dermatologic (20%), gastroenterological (12.5%), neurologic (12.5%), and hematological (2.5%). The incidence of all irAEs was 60% (grade >=3 in 20%) and AID worsening was 40% (grade >=3 in 15%). The median time from ICI initiation to AID worsening was 94.5 (range 21-431) days. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, adjusted for demographics, cancer type, and stage, survival was similar for patients who had AID worsening vs those who did not (HR 0.30 (95%CI 0.06-1.40, P = 0.128). In our single-institution study, cancer patients with preexisting AID do have an increased risk of irAEs with high-grade toxicities in 20% compared to historically reported 5% in the general cancer population. About 15% of patients reported grade >=3 worsening of their AIDs. Although the risk of irAEs is numerically higher in patients with AIDs, it may be acceptable to the patients if the potential benefits of ICIs outweigh the risks.

A Rare Case of Escherichia coli Chest Wall Abscess With Rib Osteomyelitis in a Patient With Crohn's Disease.

Primary chest wall abscess due to hematogenous spread is very rare and has seldom been documented in the literature, with most reported cases attributed to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Prompt diagnosis and management with antibiotics, and evacuation of the abscess, is imperative as the infection can lead to systemic or disseminated infection, including erosion into surrounding bone if left untreated. We describe the case of a 67-year-old female with severe Crohn's disease receiving anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) therapy, Etanercept presenting with localized Escherichia coli (E. coli) chest wall abscess with erosion into the surrounding rib. This case highlights a rare clinical entity, chest wall abscess, which is also an unusual site of E. coli infection. Only three previous cases of E. coli primary chest wall abscess can be found in the published literature. This case also highlights a possible association of severe Crohn's disease predisposing to complicated soft tissue infection.