RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Each year, 1.2 million intrapartum stillbirths occur globally. In Nepal, about 50 % of the total number of stillbirths occur during the intrapartum period. An understanding of the risk factors associated with intrapartum stillbirth will facilitate the development of preventative strategies to reduce the associated burden of death. This study was conducted in a tertiary-care setting with the aim to identify risk factors associated with intrapartum stillbirth. METHODS: A case-control study was completed from July 2012 to September 2013. All women who had an intrapartum stillbirth during the study period were included as cases, and 20 % of women with live births were randomly selected upon admission to create the referent population. Relevant information was retrieved from clinical records for case and referent women. In addition, interviews were completed with each woman to determine their demographic and obstetric history. RESULTS: During the study period, 4,476 women were enrolled as referents and 136 women had intrapartum stillbirths. The following factors were found to be associated with an increased risk for intrapartum stillbirth: poor familial wealth quintile (Adj OR 1.8, 95 % CI-1.1-3.4); less maternal education (Adj OR, 3.2 95 % CI-1.8-5.5); lack of antenatal care (Adj OR, 4.8 95 % CI 3.2-7.2); antepartum hemorrhage (Adj OR 2.1, 95 % CI 1.1-4.2); multiple births (Adj. OR-3.0, 95 % CI- 1.9-5.4); obstetric complication during labor (Adj. OR 4.5, 95 % CI-2.9-6.9); lack of fetal heart rate monitoring per protocol (Adj. OR-1.9, 95 % CI 1.5-2.4); lack of partogram use (Adj. OR-2.1, 95 % CI 1.1-4.1); small-for-gestational age (Adj. OR-1.8, 95 % CI-1.2-1.7); preterm birth (Adj. OR-5.4, 95 % CI 3.5-8.2); and being born preterm with a small-for-gestational age (Adj. OR-9.0, 95 % CI 7.3-15.5). CONCLUSION: Being born preterm with a small-for-gestational age was associated with the highest risk for intrapartum stillbirth. Inadequate fetal heart rate monitoring and partogram use are preventable risk factors associated with intrapartum stillbirth; by increasing adherence to these interventions the risk of intrapartum stillbirth can be reduced. The association of the lack of appropriate antenatal care with intrapartum stillbirth indicates that quality antenatal care may improve fetal health and outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN97846009.
Asunto(s)
Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Mortinato/epidemiología , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Incidencia , Recién Nacido , Edad Materna , Nepal/epidemiología , Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Atención Terciaria de Salud , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Women living with HIV/AIDS, in particular, have been positioned as a latent source of infection, and have captivated culpability and blame leading to a highly stigmatised and discriminated life. Despite the situation, women and their particular concerns have largely been ignored in HIV/AIDS research literature. This review aims to examine and analyze the feelings, experiences and perceptions of Women living with HIV/AIDS (WLHA) and will also access the role of support group as a coping strategy on the basis of 7 primary researches conducted in or on different parts of the world. METHODOLOGY: A systematic literature search was carried out on major data bases ASSIA, CINAHL, Science Direct, Web of Knowledge, Wiley Inter Science, AMED, Pub Med/Bio Med Central, MEDLINE and Cochrane Library. The articles included for review purpose were gauged against the pre-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria and quality assessment checklist resulting in a final 7 papers. FINDINGS/RESULTS: The findings were compiled into five thematic areas: (1) Disclosure as a sensitive issue; (2) Stigma and Discrimination associated with HIV/AIDS and the multidimensional effects on women's health and wellbeing; (3) Internalised Stigma; (4) Women living with HIV/AIDS experiences of being rejected, shunned and treated differently by physicians, family and close friends; (5) Support Group as among the best available interventions for stigma and discrimination. CONCLUSION: Support groups should be offered as a fundamental part of HIV/AIDS services and should be advocated as an effective and useful intervention. Further research is needed to examine the effect of support groups for women living with HIV/AIDS. A community based randomised controlled trial with support group as an intervention and a control group could provide further evidence of the value of support groups.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Inmunodeficiencia Adquirida/psicología , Adaptación Psicológica , Infecciones por VIH/psicología , Grupos de Autoayuda/organización & administración , Discriminación Social , Estigma Social , Estrés Psicológico/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Salud de la MujerRESUMEN
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Measuring maternal mortality in developing countries poses a major challenge. In Nepal, vital registration is extremely deficient. Currently available methods to measure maternal mortality, such as the sisterhood method, pose problems with respect to validity, precision, cost and time. We conducted this field study to test a community-based method (the motherhood method), to measure maternal and child mortality in a developing country setting. METHODS: Motherhood method was field tested to derive measures of maternal and child mortality at the district and sub-regional levels in Bara district, Nepal. Information on birth, death, risk factors and health outcomes was collected within a geographic area as in an unbiased census, but without visiting every household. The sources of information were a vaccination registry, focus group discussions with local health workers, and most importantly, interview in group setting with women who share social bonds formed by motherhood and aided by their peer memory. Such groups included all women who have given birth, including those whose babies died during the measurement period. RESULTS: A total of 15,161 births were elicited in the study period of two years. In the same period 49 maternal deaths, 713 infant deaths, 493 neonatal deaths and 679 perinatal deaths were also recorded. The maternal mortality ratio was 329 (95%CI: 243-434)/100,000 live birth, infant mortality rate was 48 (44-51)/1000LB, neonatal mortality rate was 33 (30-36)/1000LB, and perinatal mortality rate was 45 (42-48)/1000 total birth. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: The motherhood method estimated maternal, perinatal, neonatal and infant mortality rates and ratios. It has been field tested and validated against census data, and found to be efficient in terms of time and cost. Motherhood method can be applied in a time and cost-efficient manner to measure and monitor the progress in the reduction of maternal and child deaths. It can give current estimates of mortalities as well as averages over the past few years. It appears to be particularly well-suited to measuring and monitoring programmes in community and districts levels.