Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Acta Derm Venereol ; 104: adv27985, 2024 Mar 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38501841

RESUMEN

Timely intervention reduces the risk of a poor prognosis in hand eczema, making early recognition of symptoms important in high-risk professions. However, limited data exist regarding the ability of cleaners and healthcare workers to recognize hand eczema. The aim of this study was to examine cleaners' and healthcare workers' ability to recognize hand eczema in clinical photographs and to assess the severity of the disease. Cleaners and healthcare workers completed a questionnaire consisting of 16 questions and participated in a structured interview referring to a validated photographic severity guide for chronic hand eczema, which comprised clinical photographs of hand eczema at varying levels of severity. Eighty cleaners and 201 healthcare workers (total N = 281) participated in the study. The rates of correctly identified hand eczema in clinical photographs (cleaners/ healthcare workers) were: 41.2%/57.7% (mild hand eczema), 81.2%/92.0% (moderate hand eczema), 85.0%/94.5% (severe hand eczema) and 82.5%/97.0% (very severe hand eczema). The proficiency of healthcare workers in recognizing hand eczema was significantly higher than that of cleaners. The results indicate that a large proportion of cleaners and healthcare workers fail to recognize mild hand eczema in clinical photographs. Healthcare workers had higher success rates in recognizing hand eczema in all severity categories. Symptom underestimation may lead to under-reporting of the true prevalence of hand eczema, with consequent loss of opportunities for prevention.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Profesional , Eccema , Dermatosis de la Mano , Humanos , Dermatitis Profesional/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Profesional/epidemiología , Dermatitis Profesional/prevención & control , Eccema/diagnóstico , Eccema/epidemiología , Personal de Salud , Fotograbar , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Dermatosis de la Mano/diagnóstico , Dermatosis de la Mano/epidemiología , Dermatosis de la Mano/prevención & control
2.
Acta Derm Venereol ; 103: adv00855, 2023 Jan 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36695751

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of treatment with Janus kinase inhibitors for alopecia areata, measured by change in Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score. A systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was performed using Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane library. All studies investigating the efficacy of treatments for alopecia areata were included. Primary outcomes were the proportion of patients with alopecia areata achieving 30%, 50%, 75%, 90% and 100% improvement in SALT score after treatment with a Janus kinase inhibitor. A meta-analysis was performed including all randomized controlled trials investigating Janus kinase inhibitors. A total of 37 studies matched the inclusion criteria and were included. Meta-analysis was performed based on 5 randomized studies. Regarding patients with alopecia areata defined as ≥ 50% scalp hair loss, baricitinib 4 mg once daily demonstrated the highest efficacy. However, among patients with alopecia areata defined as a SALT score ≥ 50, oral deuruxolitinib 12 mg twice daily demonstrated the highest efficacy. Deuruxolitinib and baricitinib appear to be promising drugs for the treatment of alopecia areata. However, the response depends on the dosage of the drug. More randomized trials, with identical inclusion criteria and dose and duration of treatment, are required to confirm these findings.


Asunto(s)
Alopecia Areata , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus , Humanos , Alopecia Areata/diagnóstico , Alopecia Areata/tratamiento farmacológico , Alopecia Areata/inducido químicamente , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus/efectos adversos , Alopecia/tratamiento farmacológico , Pirazoles/uso terapéutico
3.
Acta Derm Venereol ; 101(1): adv00356, 2021 Jan 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33320275

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to investigate the characteristics of patients co-infected with Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoea. A retrospective case-control study was performed, which included 399 co-infected patients seen at a sexually transmitted infection clinic in Copenhagen, Denmark. Case-control groups included 300 patients who tested positive only for N. gonorrhoea, 300 who tested positive only for C. trachomatis, and 300 who tested negative for both N. gonorrhoea and C. trachomatis in the same study period. For men, non-Danish origin (odds ratio (OR) 2.3, 95% confidence interval (Cl) 1.34-4.12), previous sexually transmitted infections with C . trachomatis (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.94-5.92) and N. gonorrhoea (OR 10.6, 95% CI 6.36-17.76), and higher number of sex partners (OR 1.7, 95% Cl 1.40-2.28) were significantly associated with diagnosis of co-infection. For women, previous sexually transmitted infections with C. trachomatis (OR 6.7, 95% CI 3.89-11.78) and N. gonorrhoea (OR 10.4, 95% CI 4.99-21.71), and higher number of sex partners (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.28-2.56) were significantly associated with a diagnosis of co-infection, whereas being of non-Danish origin was, in some cases, a protective factor (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.17-0.69). Furthermore, this study demonstrated sex-associated characteristics that should raise concern about co- infection, including: for men, being of non-Danish origin, men who have sex with men status, and higher age, and, for women, young age, in particular, and previous sexually transmitted infections.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Chlamydia , Coinfección , Gonorrea , Minorías Sexuales y de Género , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Infecciones por Chlamydia/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Chlamydia/epidemiología , Chlamydia trachomatis , Coinfección/epidemiología , Femenino , Gonorrea/diagnóstico , Gonorrea/epidemiología , Homosexualidad Masculina , Humanos , Masculino , Neisseria gonorrhoeae , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
4.
Contact Dermatitis ; 82(5): 272-278, 2020 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31967326

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Concerns have been raised that a chronic course of hand eczema (HE) could be fostered by a lack of efficient treatment at an early stage. OBJECTIVES: First, to assess the prevalence of systemic treatment in patients with chronic occupational HE (OHE) and relate this to demographic data, HE severity, and atopic dermatitis (AD). Second, to explore the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in the same population. METHODS: Baseline data were obtained from a registry-based study including patients with recognized OHE in a 2-year period in Denmark, comprising a total of 2703 workers. A follow-up questionnaire after 4 to 5 years included questions on disease severity and treatments. RESULTS: A total of 1565 participants responded to the questionnaire, and of these 1203 had ongoing HE at follow-up and were included in the study. In total, 10.0% had received systemic therapy, whereas this share was 13.3% in those with self-reported moderate-to-severe HE. Age >35 years, previous or current AD, and severe eczema were factors related to use of systemic treatment. Use of CAM was reported by 6.2% of the study population. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that chronicity of HE may be perpetuated by the lack of efficient treatment.


Asunto(s)
Terapias Complementarias , Dermatitis Profesional/epidemiología , Dermatitis Profesional/terapia , Eccema/epidemiología , Eccema/terapia , Dermatosis de la Mano/epidemiología , Dermatosis de la Mano/terapia , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Sistema de Registros , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA