RESUMEN
The NCCN Guidelines for Cutaneous Melanoma (termed Melanoma: Cutaneous) provide multidisciplinary recommendations for diagnostic workup, staging, and treatment of patients. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on the update to neoadjuvant systemic therapy options and summarize the new clinical data evaluated by the NCCN panel for the recommended therapies in Version 2.2024 of the NCCN Guidelines for Cutaneous Melanoma.
Asunto(s)
Melanoma , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Humanos , Melanoma/terapia , Melanoma/diagnóstico , Melanoma/patología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/terapia , Neoplasias Cutáneas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Oncología Médica/normas , Oncología Médica/métodosRESUMEN
Purpose: To report a case of metastatic uveal melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibition in which serial circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) was assessed throughout treatment. Observations: A 33-year-old man was diagnosed with metastatic uveal melanoma and initially had progression of disease following hepatic embolization and nivolumab/ipilimumab. At the time, plasma ctDNA GNA11 and SF3B1 were measurable and repeat ctDNA showed increased variant allele frequency following further progression of disease on vorinostat. Following additional nivolumab/ipilimumab, radiographic response was noted and repeat ctDNA became undetectable and remained so at 27 months follow up. Conclusions and importance: Clearance of cell free DNA in metastatic uveal melanoma may be associated with radiographic response to immune checkpoint inhibitors.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cutaneous metastases (CMs) are a manifestation of advanced cancer and can be treated with oncolytic immunotherapy. Laboratory studies suggest radiotherapy (RT) may facilitate response to immunotherapy. We hypothesized that oncolytic immunotherapy with talimogene lapherparepvec (T-VEC, an oncolytic immunotherapy that expresses granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor) and RT would produce response in non-targeted metastases. METHODS: A randomized phase 2 trial of T-VEC+/-RT was conducted. Eligible patients hadâ¯≥â¯1 CM from a solid tumor amenable to T-VEC and RT and another measurable metastasis. Tumor and overall response was assessed using modified World Health Organization (mWHO) criteria. Adverse events and quality of life (QOL) were characterized using CTCAE v4.0 and Skindex-16, respectively. Correlative analyses of tumor genomics and immune system were performed. RESULTS: 19 patients were randomized to receive T-VEC (nâ¯=â¯9) or T-VEC+RT (nâ¯=â¯10). One patient in each arm demonstrated complete response in the largest non-targeted metastasis. The trial was closed after the first stage of enrollment because of no overall mWHO responses, slow accrual and the COVID19 pandemic. AEs were consistent with prior reports of T-VEC. Skin related QOL was poor before and after treatment. Median progression free survival was 1.2 and 2.5â¯months in the T-VEC and T-VEC+RT arms; median overall survival was 4.9 and 17.3â¯months in the T-VEC and T-VEC+RT arms. Analyses of peripheral blood cells and cytokines demonstrated responders exhibited several outlying lymphocyte and cytokine parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Low overall response rate, slow accrual, and the COVID19 pandemic led to closure of this trial. Responses in non-injected and non-irradiated metastases were infrequent.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Locally advanced, unresectable basal cell carcinoma (LA BCC) can be treated with radiation therapy (RT), but locoregional control (LRC) rates are unsatisfactory. Vismodegib is a hedgehog pathway inhibitor (HPI) active in BCC that may radiosensitize BCC. We evaluated the combination of vismodegib and RT for patients with LA BCC. METHODS: In this multicenter, single-arm, phase II study, patients with unresectable LA BCC received 12 weeks of induction vismodegib, followed by 7 weeks of concurrent vismodegib and RT. The primary end point was LRC rate at 1 year after the end of treatment. Secondary end points included objective response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety, and patient-reported quality of life (PRQOL). RESULTS: Twenty-four patients received vismodegib; five were unable to complete 12 weeks of induction therapy. LRC was achieved in 91% (95% CI, 68 to 98) of patients at 1 year. The response rate was 63% (95% CI, 38 to 84) after induction vismodegib and 83% (95% CI, 59 to 96) after concurrent vismodegib and RT. With a median follow-up of 5.7 years, 1-year PFS and OS rates were 100% and 96%, and at 5 years PFS and OS rates were 78% and 83%, respectively. Distant metastasis or BCC-related death has not been observed. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were dysgeusia, fatigue, and myalgias occurring in 83%, 75%, and 75% of patients. No grade 4 to 5 treatment-related AEs occurred. PRQOL demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements in all subscales, with emotions and functioning improvements persisting for a year after the end of treatment. CONCLUSION: In patients with unresectable LA BCC, the combination of vismodegib and RT yielded high rates of LRC and PFS and durable improvements in PRQOL.
Asunto(s)
Anilidas , Carcinoma Basocelular , Piridinas , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Humanos , Anilidas/uso terapéutico , Anilidas/efectos adversos , Anilidas/administración & dosificación , Piridinas/uso terapéutico , Piridinas/efectos adversos , Piridinas/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma Basocelular/patología , Carcinoma Basocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Cutáneas/mortalidad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Calidad de Vida , Adulto , Quimioradioterapia/efectos adversos , Supervivencia sin ProgresiónRESUMEN
The initial favorable efficacy and safety profile for Alpha DaRT have been demonstrated (NCT04377360); however, the longer-term safety and durability of the treatment are unknown. This pooled analysis of four prospective trials evaluated the long-term safety and efficacy of Alpha DaRT for the treatment of head and neck or skin tumors. A total of 81 lesions in 71 patients were treated across six international institutions, with a median follow-up of 14.1 months (range: 2-51 months). Alpha DaRT sources were delivered via a percutaneous interstitial technique and placed to irradiate the tumor volume with the margin. The sources were removed two to three weeks following implantation. A complete response was observed in 89% of treated lesions (n = 72) and a partial response in 10% (n = 8). The two-year actuarial local recurrence-free survival was 77% [95% CI 63-87]. Variables, including recurrent versus non-recurrent lesions, baseline tumor size, or histology, did not impact long-term outcomes. Twenty-seven percent of patients developed related acute grade 2 or higher toxicities, which resolved with conservative measures. No grade 2 or higher late toxicities were observed. These data support the favorable safety profile of Alpha DaRT, which is currently being explored in a pivotal US trial.
RESUMEN
Immunotherapeutic agents have revolutionized cancer treatment over the past decade. However, most patients fail to respond to immunotherapy alone. A growing body of preclinical studies highlights the potential for synergy between radiation therapy and immunotherapy, but the outcomes of clinical studies have been mixed. This review summarizes the current state of immunotherapy and radiation combination therapy across cancers, highlighting existing challenges and promising areas for future investigation.