Eribulin Treatment for Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: The UK Experience - A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

INTRODUCTION: This study examined real-world data from patients who received eribulin for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) collected from 14 hospitals across the UK. METHODS: Anonymized data were collected retrospectively from patients with MBC who had received eribulin. The data included the hormone-receptor status, histological diagnosis, age, prior chemotherapy, response to eribulin, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Among 577 patients analyzed, the median age was 56 years, and most patients (73%) were estrogen-receptor positive. The median OS was 288 days (95% confidence interval [CI]: 261-315), and the PFS was 117 days (95% CI: 105-129). The median OS was higher among older patients (≥65 vs. <65 years: 325 days [95% CI: 264-385] vs. 285 days [95% CI: 252-317]; p = 0.028). The median OS was also higher in patients who received eribulin after fewer prior lines of chemotherapy (≤2 vs. >2 prior: 328 days [95% CI: 264-385] vs. 264 days [95% CI: 229-298]; p = 0.042). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: These retrospective data suggest that eribulin can be successfully used in older patients with MBC. Eribulin treatment was more effective in earlier-line settings, which, while predictable, supports consideration of eribulin as a second-line treatment option.

Chemotherapy for advanced endometrial cancer with carboplatin and epirubicin.

UNLABELLED: Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecological cancer in the Western world. In early-stage disease, surgery remains the mainstay of treatment. Adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy reduces the risk of pelvic recurrence, however, without improvement in overall survival. The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of carboplatin and epirubicin combination chemotherapy for patients with advanced and high-risk endometrial cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1999 and 2007, 43 patients with endometrial cancer were treated with carboplatin and epirubicin. Two groups were identified: Group 1 (n=34) included patients with stage III endometrial cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy; and group 2 included those with metastatic endometrial cancer (n=9). RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 37 months, disease in 19 patients had progressed/relapsed (12 patients from group 1; 7 from group 2) and 23 patients had died (15 from group 1; 8 from group 2). The median time-to-progression was 62 months and median overall survival was 64 months. The median survival for patients in group 1 was 69 months and for those in group 2 was 22 months. Ten patients (27.9%) experienced grade 3 or 4 toxicities. There were no cases of treatment-related cardiac failure or neuropathy. CONCLUSION: Cisplatin, carboplatin, anthracyclines and taxanes are the most active agents in endometrial cancer. Combination chemotherapy leads to better progression-free survival and overall survival, however, this is at the expense of increased toxicity. RESULTS from our study show that the combination of carboplatin and epirubicin is an effective alternative regimen for patients with advanced endometrial cancer. In addition, treatment-related toxicity is minimal when compared to anthracyclines and platinum agents. There is a particular advantage of this regimen over taxane-based regimens, including minimal neuropathy, less use of steroids and low risk of allergic reaction and alopecia.