Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 77: 306-314, 2021 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34437976

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is an established treatment for many patients with infra-renal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Reporting standards were published in 2002 to ensure consistent measurement and reporting of outcomes following EVAR. We aimed to assess the range of clinical outcomes reported after EVAR and whether recent studies adhere to established reporting standards. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and Embase from January 2014 until December 2018, using terms for 'EVAR' and 'AAA'. We included prospective studies and randomised controlled trials which reported clinical outcomes of elective infra-renal AAA repair. Data on clinical outcome reporting were extracted and compared with established reporting standards. RESULTS: 84 studies were included. Technical success was reported in 49 (58.3%) studies, but only defined in 40 (47.6%), with 22 distinct definitions. Clinical success was reported and defined in 19 (22.6%) studies. Aneurysm rupture was reported in 27 (32.1%) studies and death from rupture in 11 (13.1%) studies. All-cause and aneurysm-related mortality were reported in 72 (85.7%) and 52 (61.9%) studies, respectively. Endoleak type I (n = 61, 72.6%) and II (n = 52, 61.9%) were more commonly reported than type III (n = 45, 53.6%) or IV (n = 13, 15.5%). Complications and mortality were reported by a mean of 18 (21.4%) and 42 (50%) studies, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A wide variety of clinical outcomes were reported following EVAR. Few studies adhered to reporting guidelines. We recommend modification of reporting standards to reflect advances in endovascular technology and creation of a core outcome set for EVAR.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Reportes Públicos de Datos en Atención de Salud , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/normas , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Procedimientos Endovasculares/normas , Adhesión a Directriz , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
World J Hepatol ; 11(3): 305-317, 2019 Mar 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30967908

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Preoperative supplementation with immunonutrients, including arginine and n-3 fatty acids, has been shown in a number of systematic reviews to reduce infectious complications in patients who have undergone gastrointestinal surgery. Limited information, however, is available on the benefits of nutritional supplementation enriched with arginine and n-3 fatty acids in patients undergoing liver resection. AIM: To evaluate the effects of preoperative nutritional supplementation enriched with arginine and n-3 fatty acids on inflammatory and immunologic markers and clinical outcome in patients undergoing liver resection. METHODS: Thirty-four patients undergoing liver resection were randomized to either five days of preoperative Impact® [1020 kcal/d, immunonutrition (IMN) group], or standard care [no supplementation, standard care (STD) group]. Nutritional status was measured at study entry by subjective global assessment (SGA). Functional assessments (grip strength, fatigue and performance status) were carried out at study entry, on the day prior to surgery, and on postoperative day (POD) 7 and 30. Inflammatory and immune markers were measured at study entry, on the day prior to surgery, and POD 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 30. Postoperative complications were recorded prospectively until POD30. RESULTS: A total of 32 patients (17 IMN and 15 STD) were analysed. All except four patients were SGA class A. The plasma ratio of (eicosapentaenoic acid plus docosahexaenoic acid) to arachidonic acid was higher in IMN patients on the day prior to surgery and POD 1, 3, 5 and 7 (P < 0.05). Plasma interleukin (IL)-6 concentrations were elevated in the IMN group (P = 0.017 for POD7). No treatment effect was detected for functional measures, immune response (white cell count and total lymphocytes) or markers of inflammation (C-reactive protein, tumour necrosis factor-α, IL-8, IL-10). There were 10 patients with infectious complications in the IMN group and 4 in the STD group (P = 0.087). Median hospital stay was 9 (range 4-49) d in the IMN group and 8 (3-34) d in the STD group (P = 0.476). CONCLUSION: In well-nourished patients undergoing elective liver resection, this study failed to show any benefit of preoperative immunonutrition.

3.
World J Gastroenterol ; 22(19): 4673-84, 2016 May 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27217699

RESUMEN

AIM: To assess the effects of ischemic preconditioning (IPC, 10-min ischemia/10-min reperfusion) on steatotic liver mitochondrial function after normothermic ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). METHODS: Sixty male Sprague-Dawley rats were fed 8-wk with either control chow or high-fat/high-sucrose diet inducing > 60% mixed steatosis. Three groups (n = 10/group) for each dietary state were tested: (1) the IRI group underwent 60 min partial hepatic ischemia and 4 h reperfusion; (2) the IPC group underwent IPC prior to same standard IRI; and (3) sham underwent the same surgery without IRI or IPC. Hepatic mitochondrial function was analyzed by oxygraphs. Mitochondrial Complex-I, Complex-II enzyme activity, serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and histological injury were measured. RESULTS: Steatotic-IRI livers had a greater increase in ALT (2476 ± 166 vs 1457 ± 103 IU/L, P < 0.01) and histological injury following IRI compared to the lean liver group. Steatotic-IRI demonstrated lower Complex-I activity at baseline [78.4 ± 2.5 vs 116.4 ± 6.0 nmol/(min.mg protein), P < 0.001] and following IRI [28.0 ± 6.2 vs 104.3 ± 12.6 nmol/(min.mg protein), P < 0.001]. Steatotic-IRI also demonstrated impaired Complex-I function post-IRI compared to the lean liver IRI group. Complex-II activity was unaffected by hepatic steatosis or IRI. Lean liver mitochondrial function was unchanged following IRI. IPC normalized ALT and histological injury in steatotic livers but had no effect on overall steatotic liver mitochondrial function or individual mitochondrial complex enzyme activities. CONCLUSION: Warm IRI impairs steatotic liver Complex-I activity and function. The protective effects of IPC in steatotic livers may not be mediated through mitochondria.


Asunto(s)
Complejo I de Transporte de Electrón/metabolismo , Precondicionamiento Isquémico/métodos , Hígado/enzimología , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/terapia , Daño por Reperfusión/prevención & control , Alanina Transaminasa/sangre , Animales , Dieta Alta en Grasa , Sacarosa en la Dieta , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Regulación hacia Abajo , Hígado/patología , Masculino , Mitocondrias Hepáticas/enzimología , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/sangre , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/enzimología , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/patología , Ratas Sprague-Dawley , Daño por Reperfusión/sangre , Daño por Reperfusión/enzimología , Daño por Reperfusión/patología , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA