Sleep quality in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria and relation with Orexin-A, leptin, and ghrelin.

Background: Sleep can be affected in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). The mechanisms of sleep regulation remain poorly understood. Orexin-A, a neuroexcitatory peptide, plays a role in coordinating sleep-wake states. Ghrelin and leptin are involved in sleep regulation through the orexin system. Objective: The effects of orexin-A, ghrelin, and leptin on sleep quality in patients with CSU have not been investigated. We aimed to determine the effects of CSU on sleep quality and the association between serum orexin-A, ghrelin, and leptin levels, and sleep quality in patients with CSU. Methods: Thirty-three patients with CSU and 34 sex- and age-matched controls were included in the study. Serum orexin-A, leptin, and ghrelin levels, and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) scores were measured in patients with CSU and in the controls; also used were the chronic urticaria quality-of-life questionnaire score and the urticaria activity score used for 7 consecutive days. Results: Median (minimum-maximum) orexin-A, leptin, and ghrelin levels in patients were 385 pg/mL (90-495 pg/mL), 3.1 ng/mL (0-21.2 ng/mL), and 701.8 pg/mL (101.9-827.7 pg/mL), respectively. Median serum orexin-A and leptin levels were higher in the patients compared with the controls (p < 0.001 and p = 0.012, respectively), whereas the median serum ghrelin levels were similar to the controls (p = 0.616). The serum orexin-A level was positively correlated with ghrelin (r = 0.298, p = 0.014), PSQI sleep quality (r = 0.356, p = 0.003), and ESS (r = 0.357, p = 0.003). Conclusion: Serum orexin-A is associated with sleep quality in patients with CSU. Further studies are needed to elucidate the role of ghrelin and leptin on sleep quality in patients with CSU.

[Mycobacterium abscessus infection management: Macrolide and quinolone desensitization]. / Mycobacterium abscessus enfeksiyonu yönetimi: Makrolid ve kinolon desensitizasyonu.

Antibiotic hypersensitivity reactions can lead to marked morbidity, mortality and inadequate treatment options. Mycobacterium abscessus infection is a difficult management system for clinicians since it most commonly involves the lungs, progresses if untreated, and the organism is resistant to many antibiotics, as well as the agents used in treatment can cause undesirable side effects. Although macrolides are one of the most reliable antibiotic groups in terms of allergic reactions, early type hypersensitivity reactions against macrolides, one of the main antibiotics used in the treatment of Mycobacterium abscessus lung disease, may make the treatment management of the disease difficult. Due to the rapid increase in the use of quinolone in recent years, the frequency of developing allergic reactions with these agents also increases. In cases where antibiotic hypersensitivity is detected, the use of the responsible agent should be avoided, but desensitization may be necessary in cases without different treatment options. In this study, it was aimed to present a case of successful desensitization with clarithromycin and moxifloxacin in a patient who was diagnosed with Mycobacterium abscessus lung disease and developed anaphylaxis with clarithromycin and moxifloxacin after treatment was initiated.

Successful case of deferasirox slow desensitization in adults.

INTRODUCTION: When deferasirox is used in iron chelation therapy, maculopapular rash occurs in 10% of patients, but there is no accepted and implemented protocol for the management of these drug reactions in adults. CASE REPORT: A 23-year-old woman diagnosed with thalassemia major is presented. She had taken 1,500 mg oral deferasirox for 1 week. Five hours after the last dose, a pruritic maculopapular rash developed on the body, face, and hands. The rash spread to the whole body within 3 days. The absolute necessity for the patient to take the drug was clarified by the hematology department. The patient's history was evaluated. A delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction due to deferasirox was considered. MANAGEMENT: The slow desensitization protocol described in the literature and applied on a case-by-case basis in pediatric patients was modified to shorten the duration by determining appropriate doses for the current preparation. The desensitization process was started with 1/100,000 of the total dose and the therapeutic dose was reached with a 2- to 2.5-fold increase in dose. No pre-medication was applied. During the procedure, at a low dose of 0.1 mg, local flushing and erythema was observed around the auricle on the face. The reaction did not progress. CONCLUSION: Slow desensitization protocol for oral deferasirox was successfully applied in an adult patient.

Results of omalizumab treatment in chronic eosinophilic pneumonia: Real-life data.

Introduction: Recurrences occur when corticosteroid therapy is discontinued or reduced during the treatment of chronic eosinophilic pneumonia (CEP). The probability of recurrence is once in 50% of patients and twice or more in 25%. In such instances, new treatment options are deemed necessary. This study aims to assess the efficacy of omalizumab treatment as a steroid-sparing drug in patients with CEP. Materials and Methods: The clinical features of patients treated with omalizumab for recurrent CEP were evaluated retrospectively before and after treatment. All data from patients and diagnoses were reviewed. The effects of treatment on recurrence rate, oral corticosteroid (OCS) use and lung functions, peripheral eosinophil values, and symptom scores were evaluated. Radiological regression was also evaluated. Result: In the final analysis, we included ten patients with a median follow-up of 22 months after initiation of omalizumab. During this follow-up period, the results were associated with a significant reduction in the number of asthma attacks per year, the number of CEP relapses, the rate of hospitalization, the amount of corticosteroids consumed daily, and the total corticosteroid dose. In addition, improvement was observed in the symptom scores and lung functions of the patients. Systemic steroids were completely discontinued in two patients receiving omalizumab treatment. In other patients, the mean steroid dose was reduced by 77.2 percent in the first year of omalizumab treatment and 82 percent in the second year, respectively. Nevertheless, there was no elevation in peripheral eosinophil count, and radiological regression was observed. Conclusions: Omalizumab can be an effective treatment for CEP and can be used as a steroid-sparing agent.

What is the Best Way to Diagnose Possible Asthma Patients with Negative Bronchodilator Reversibility Tests?

Objective: The best method and strategy for the diagnosis of asthma remains unclear, especially in patients with negative bronchodilator reversibility test (BDRT). In our study, we aimed to investigate the diagnostic yield of peak expiratory flow (PEF) variability for this patient group. Methods: A total of 50 patients with suspected asthma, all with negative BDR test, were included in the study. Demographic information and symptoms were recorded and PEF variability was monitored for 2 weeks. Metacolinbronchial provocation test (mBPT) was performed. Asthma was diagnosed when PEF variability ≥20% and/or positive mBPT was observed. Results: 30 of 50 patients were diagnosed with asthma. After 1 month, 17 patients were evaluated for treatment outcomes. The sensitivity and specificity of PEF variability for different cut-off values (≥20%, >15% and >10%) were 61.5-83.3, 88.5-62.5 and 100-16.7, respectively. One of the most important findings of our study was the absence of variable airflow limitation or airway hyper reactivity in 39% patients with a previous diagnosis of asthma. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that a low baseline FEF25-75 value was an independent predictive factor for the diagnosis of asthma (p= 0.05). Conclusion: The most efficient diagnostic test for asthma is still unclear due to many factors. Our study is one of the few studies on this subject. Although current diagnostic recommendations generally recommend a PEF variability of 10% for the diagnosis of asthma, this threshold may not be appropriate for the BDR-negative patient group. Our results suggest using a threshold value of <15% for PEF variability when excluding asthma and ≥20% when confirming the diagnosis of asthma in patients with clinically suspected but unproven reversibility. Furthermore, FEF25-75 is considered to be an important diagnostic parameter that should be included in diagnostic recommendations for asthma.

Identification of Risk Factors and Cross-Reactivity of Local Anesthetics Hypersensitivity: Analysis of 14-Years' Experience.

PURPOSE: Local anesthetics (LA) are widely used and adverse drug reactions (ADR) occur in 2.5-10%, but hypersensitivity reactions are rare (ranging between 0% and 4.3%). Risk is so overestimated causing too many allergy clinic referrals. There are limited and also conflicting results over the management of LA allergy. We aimed to find out who should be referred to an allergy clinic for a LA allergy testing, to define the subjects with an increased risk of LA allergy and to assess the need for testing for identifying alternative LA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of patients referred to our clinic for diagnostic workup of LA hypersensitivity from 2006 to 2020. RESULTS: In our cohort of 398 patients, tests were positive in 14 (3.52%) of them. Personal history of ADR with LA was the only independent risk factor for positive test (RR=4.007, p=0.033). Presence of generalized cutaneous symptoms and hypotension during past reaction were independent predictors of positive test (RR=9.043, p=0.021 and RR=10.445, p=0.038, respectively). The negative predictive value of intradermal test at dilution of 1:100 for immediate-type reaction was high (97.56%). Also, we demonstrated cross-reactivity within the amide-group LAs and co-occurrence of immediate- and delayed-type reactions. CONCLUSION: Only patients with an LA-induced ADR should be referred to an allergy clinic. History of generalized cutaneous symptoms and/or hypotension during the reaction may define subjects with an increased risk of LA allergy. A stepwise test procedure may start with skin tests especially for these patients with increased risk factors. In presence of LA allergy, alternative LA should always be confirmed by performing a challenge test.

Bronchoscopic electrocautery therapy of a solitary endobronchial extramedullary plasmacytoma.

Extramedullary plasmacytomas are rare tumors. In majority of cases tumors arise in the head and neck region and endobronchial localization is extremely rare. The treatment is usually resection alone or combination of surgery with radiotherapy. Herein we present a case of solitary endobronchial plasmacytoma which was resected with bronchoscopic electrocautery, because of extremely rare occurrence of solitary endobronchial plasmacytoma and also the successful outcome of bronchoscopic electrocautery therapy.

Uso precoz de la ventilación mecánica no invasiva en pacientes con insuficiencia respiratoria hipercápnica aguda ingresados en una sala de neumología: estudio prospectivo / Early Use of Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation in Patients with Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure in a Respiratory Ward: A Prospective Study

FundamentoEn los últimos años, la localización óptima de los pacientes sometidos a ventilación mecánica no invasiva (VMNI) ha sido motivo de debate. El objetivo del presente estudio fue determinar la eficacia de esta técnica en pacientes con insuficiencia respiratoria hipercápnica aguda (IRHA), ingresados en una sala de neumología y los factores asociados a su fracaso.MétodosSe evaluaron prospectivamente 69 pacientes, tratados con VMNI, ingresados en una sala de neumología. Su eficacia se definió como la ausencia de necesidad de traslado a la unidad de cuidados intensivos (UCI) con el alta hospitalaria del paciente (grupo 1), definiéndose su fracaso como la necesidad de traslado a la UCI (grupo 2).ResultadosLa edad media fue significativamente mayor en el grupo 2. La causa de insuficiencia respiratoria fue una enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica (EPOC) en 51 pacientes, síndrome de obesidad-hipoventilación en 14 y cifoescoliosis en 4. La VMNI fue satisfactoria en 55 pacientes e ineficaz en 14. No se identificaron diferencias significativas entre ambos grupos para los valores pretratamiento de pH, PaCO2 y PaO2/FiO2. Después de 1 y 3h de VMNI, hubo una mejora significativa en el grupo 1. Después de 3h de VMNI, en el grupo 1, la frecuencia respiratoria disminuyó significativamente. La puntuación pretratamiento obtenida en la APACHE II, la frecuencia respiratoria, frecuencia de neumonía, complicaciones asociadas y enfermedades comórbidas fueron significativamente más altas en el grupo 2. La tasa de eficacia fue mayor en pacientes con una adhesión adecuada a la VMNI(AU)

ConclusiónLa VMNI puede aplicarse eficazmente a pacientes con IRHA ingresados en una sala de neumología. Los factores asociados a su fracaso son la ausencia de una mejora inicial de los parámetros de la gasometría y de la frecuencia respiratoria, la falta de adhesión a la VMNI, una edad más avanzada, la presencia de complicaciones asociadas, enfermedades comórbidas, neumonía y una mayor frecuencia respiratoria basal(AU)

BackgroundIn recent years, the optimal location for noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) has been a matter of debate. Our aim was to detect the effectiveness of NIMV in acute hypercapnic respiratory failure (AHRF) in respiratory ward and factors associated with failure.Methods69 patients treated with NIMV in respiratory ward were prospectively evaluated. The success of NIMV was defined as absence of need for intensive care unit (ICU) transfer with patient's dishcarge from hospital (group 1), failure of NIMV was defined as need for ICU transfer (group 2).ResultsThe mean age was significantly higher in group 2. The cause of respiratory failure was COPD in 51 patients, obesity-hypoventilation syndrome in 14 and kyphoscoliosis in 4 patients. NIMV was successful in 55 patients and unsuccessful in 14. There was no significant difference between the two groups for pretreatment pH, PaCO2 and PaO2/FiO2. After 1h and 3h of NIMV there was significant improvement in group 1. After 3h of NIMV, in group 1 respiratory rate was significantly decreased. The pretreatment APACHE II score, respiratory rate, frequency of pneumoniae, associated complication and comorbid disease was significantly higher in group 2. The success rate was higher in patients with good compliance to NIMV.ConclusionNIMV can be succesfully applied in patients with AHRF in respiratory ward. The associated factors with NIMV failure are absence of early improvement in blood gases and respiratory rate, bad compliance to NIMV, older age, presence of associated complication, comorbid disease, pneumonia and high baseline respiratory rate(AU)