RESUMEN
Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a prevalent and intricate health condition affecting a significant global population, characterized by a cluster of metabolic and hormonal disorders disrupting lipid and glucose metabolism pathways. Clinical manifestations encompass obesity, dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, and hypertension, contributing to heightened risks of diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. Existing medications often fall short in addressing the syndrome's multifaceted nature, leading to suboptimal treatment outcomes and potential long-term health risks. This scenario underscores the pressing need for innovative therapeutic approaches in MetS management. RNA-based treatments, employing small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), microRNAs (miRNAs), and antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs), emerge as promising strategies to target underlying biological abnormalities. However, a summary of research available on the role of RNA-based therapeutics in MetS and related co-morbidities is limited. Murine models and human studies have been separately interrogated to determine whether there have been recent advancements in RNA-based therapeutics to offer a comprehensive understanding of treatment available for MetS. In a narrative fashion, we searched for relevant articles pertaining to MetS co-morbidities such as cardiovascular disease, fatty liver disease, dementia, colorectal cancer, and endocrine abnormalities. We emphasize the urgency of exploring novel therapeutic avenues to address the intricate pathophysiology of MetS and underscore the potential of RNA-based treatments, coupled with advanced delivery systems, as a transformative approach for achieving more comprehensive and efficacious outcomes in MetS patients.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Hipertensión , Resistencia a la Insulina , Síndrome Metabólico , MicroARNs , Humanos , Animales , Ratones , Síndrome Metabólico/genética , Síndrome Metabólico/terapia , Síndrome Metabólico/complicaciones , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Obesidad/complicaciones , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/complicaciones , MicroARNs/uso terapéutico , ARN Interferente Pequeño/genética , ARN Interferente Pequeño/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with chemotherapy-induced cardiomyopathy (CIC). METHODS: With the increasing incidence of CIC, the association of CRT with improvement in clinical outcomes, echocardiographic parameters, and New York Heart Classification (NYHA) class was assessed through this qualitative systematic review. RESULTS: The five studies included a total of 169 patients who underwent CRT after CIC, and of these, 61 (36.1%) patients were males. All studies showed an improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), among other echocardiographic parameters of LV volume. However, these findings are limited by short follow-up periods, small sample sizes, and the absence of a control group. CONCLUSION: CRT was associated with improvement in all patient parameters with CIC.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca , Cardiomiopatías , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Volumen Sistólico , Función Ventricular Izquierda , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/inducido químicamente , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Electrocardiografía , Cardiomiopatías/inducido químicamente , Cardiomiopatías/diagnóstico por imagen , Cardiomiopatías/terapia , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Treatment options for multicentric Castleman disease (MCD) remain limited. The only FDA-approved drug is siltuximab for idiopathic MCD (iMCD), but the response rate with siltuximab is less than 50%. We performed a systematic review to examine the efficacy and safety of various regimens used for the treatment of MCD. METHODS: A database search on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Clinicaltrials.gov using the terms "Castleman disease," "treatment outcome," and "patient safety" was done. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Results from a randomized controlled trial and an extension study highlighted the efficacy and long-term safety of siltuximab for iMCD; other trials showed tocilizumab to be a suitable alternative. A recent trial reported high response rates with thalidomide in iMCD patients. Promising results were reported for bortezomib in relapsed/ refractory MCD. For human herpesvirus-8 (HHV8)-associated MCD, rituximab along with doxorubicin therapy followed by maintenance with zidovudine and valganciclovir is the most effective therapy. A single-arm trial has highlighted the potential role of tocilizumab in HHV8-MCD. Data for these regimens are limited and mostly comprise nonrandomized trials. Further research on emerging agents could have a major impact on the treatment of this rare disease.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Castleman , Herpesvirus Humano 8 , Enfermedad de Castleman/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Castleman/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Rituximab/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is an underdiagnosed cause of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) that usually presents in young female patients. Risk factors include female sex, physical and emotional stressors, and fibromuscular dysplasia, and diagnosis is usually made by coronary angiography aided by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) or optical coherence tomography (OCT). While conservative treatment is usually preferred over percutaneous coronary intervention or surgery, medical management of SCAD has been under debate. This comprehensive review aims to summarize findings from recent studies exploring various medical treatment approaches for the management of SCAD. Antiplatelet therapy with aspirin is generally safe and beneficial for SCAD patients, with dual antiplatelet (DAPT) being recommended for patients undergoing PCI. In the absence of intervention, DAPT may be given for a short period followed by a longer single-antiplatelet (SAPT) therapy with aspirin. Beta-blockers appear to be safe and effective for SCAD patients. On the other hand, fibrinolytics, anticoagulants, and glycoprotein IIa/IIIb inhibitors are contraindicated. Cardiovascular medications such as renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and statins are not recommended in the absence of left ventricular dysfunction. Hormonal therapy is contraindicated for patients who develop SCAD during pregnancy and future pregnancy is discouraged in that patient population.
Asunto(s)
Anomalías de los Vasos Coronarios , Enfermedades Vasculares , Enfermedades Vasculares/congénito , Humanos , Enfermedades Vasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Vasculares/etiología , Anomalías de los Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico , Anomalías de los Vasos Coronarios/terapia , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Angiografía Coronaria/métodos , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
AIMS: The once-weekly insulin icodec, a new basal insulin analog, may positively support a reduction in injection frequency and improve adherence to therapy in type 2 diabetes (T2D). This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of insulin icodec compared with those of once-daily glargine U100. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library from inception till September 2023. Data about clinical outcomes in both groups were extracted. Forest plots were generated using the random-effects model by pooling odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs). RESULTS: Five randomised controlled trials and 2019 individuals with T2DM were included. In the pooled analysis, time in range was significantly higher (MD = 4.35; 95% CI: 1.65 to 7.05; p = 0.002) in the icodec group than in the once-daily glargine group. The HbA1c levels were significantly reduced (MD = -0.13; 95% CI: -0.24 to -0.03; p = 0.02) in the weekly icodec group compared with those in the once-daily glargine group. The weight gain was significantly less in the glargine group than in the weekly icodec group (MD = 0.41; 95% CI: 0.04 to 0.78; p = 0.03); however, in the subgroup analysis, this change became statistically insignificant in both insulin-naïve and previously insulin-treated individuals. The results were comparable across two groups for fasting plasma glucose levels, hypoglycaemia alert (Level 1), clinically significant (Level 2) or severe hypoglycaemia (Level 3), and adverse events. CONCLUSION: Insulin icodec was associated with a reduction in glycated haemoglobin levels and higher time in range, with a similar safety profile as compared to insulin glargine U100. However, further evidence is still needed to reach a definitive conclusion.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Esquema de Medicación , Hipoglucemiantes , Insulina Glargina , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Humanos , Glucemia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangre , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Hipoglucemiantes/administración & dosificación , Insulina/administración & dosificación , Insulina/análogos & derivados , Insulina Glargina/administración & dosificación , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Cerebral Embolic Protection Device (CEPD) captures emboli during Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR). With recently published pivotal trials and multiple cohort studies reporting new data, there is a need to re-calibrate available statistical evidence. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted across databases from inception till February 2023. Dichotomous outcomes were pooled using Odds Ratio (OR), while continuous outcomes were pooled using Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) along with 95% corresponding intervals (95% CIs). RESULTS: Data was included from 17 studies (7 RCTs, 10 cohorts, n = 155,829). Use of CEPD was associated with significantly reduced odds of stroke (OR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.43-0.85, p = 0.003). There was no significant difference in disabling stroke (p = 0.25), non-disabling stroke (p = 0.72), and 30-day mortality (p = 0.10) between the two groups. There were no significant differences between the two groups for Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DW-MRI) findings, acute kidney injury, risk of pacemaker implantation life-threatening bleed, major bleed, minor bleed, worsening National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and vascular complications (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The use of CEPD during TAVR reduced the incidence of all-stroke (p = 0.003); however, there were no significant differences in any of the other pooled outcomes (p > 0.05). REGISTRATION: The protocol of this meta-analysis was registered with the Open Science framework [https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7W564] before data acquisition was started.
RESUMEN
This systematic review will provide a comprehensive assessment of the evidence on PICSO in STEMI patients, and it will help to determine the role of this novel technique in the management of STEMI. The review searched for the relevant articles in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases regarding PC-ICSO. Four cohort studies were eligible to be included in the quantitative analysis. In the pooled analysis, the use of PICSO was associated with a significant reduction in infarct size (SMD = -0.44, 95% CI = -0.76,-0.13, p = 0.004). PICSO administration was associated with a reduced risk of developing microvascular resistance (RR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.62,0.92, p = 0.0051). The post-procedural Index of Microvascular Occlusion (MVO) was lower in the PICSO treated compared to the control group and this result was homogenous and statistically significant (SMD = -0.35, 95% CI = -0.68-0.01, p = 0.03, I2 = 0%). Compared to matched controls, the use of PICSO was associated with higher Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) at the longest follow-up (SMD = 0.328, 95% CI = 0.03, 0.06, p = 0.03, I2 = 0%). This review suggested that PICSO can be used during PPCI in STEMI with improved outcomes of infarct size, LVEF, and microvascular perfusion.
RESUMEN
Introduction: Monkeypox (mpox) is an evolving infectious disease caused by the monkeypox virus (MPXV). On July 23, 2022, the WHO declared the recent mpox outbreaks a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC), which terminated on May 11, 2023. As of July 11, 2023, 88,288 confirmed cases and 149 deaths have been reported from 112 countries and territories. Currently, mpox is not a PHEIC, as the outbreak and its impacts are nearly over. Nurses played significant roles during the mpox 2022 outbreak as frontline workers. Purpose: In light of the impending mpox global outbreak in 2022, this brief report provides an update on the enormous difficulties faced by frontline nurses while playing a crucial role in handling the mpox outbreak and some potential solutions to these difficulties. The methodological framework employed in this narrative brief report involves conducting a comprehensive analysis and synthesis of relevant literature and hypothetical scenarios. The aim is to put forth practical strategies that can effectively tackle the difficulties encountered by frontline nurses in the context of the mpox outbreak. Additionally, the report seeks to envision a healthcare system that is more resilient in the face of future challenges. Conclusion: It is important to understand the challenges the nurses face from their perspective. As frontline health care workers, the various health issues of nurses and their concerns must be taken care of appropriately by adopting optimum health service practices, adequate safety measures, recommended precautionary measures, and boosting them mentally while handling mpox patients. Counseling and the arrangement of workshops are required. Appropriate care should be taken to address the various health issues concerning nurses by adopting health service practices at optimum levels. Side by side, recommended safety and precautionary measures should be followed.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Prescription writing is an important component of healthcare delivery and can directly influence patient safety and treatment outcomes. Prescription errors are common in developing countries because of the lack of national guidelines. This two-cycle clinical audit assessed the impact of educational interventions on improving prescription writing practices. METHODS: A cross-sectional prospective clinical audit was conducted in the Out Patients Department (OPD) of the District Head Quarters (DHQ) Hospital in Bhimber, Azad Jammu, and Kashmir. A total of 100 randomly selected prescriptions were reviewed for each cycle from July to August 2023. We recorded compliance with WHO guidelines for prescription writing before and after the educational intervention. Microsoft Excel and SPSS version 25.0 were used for statistical analysis. Categorical variables were analyzed using frequencies and percentages. RESULTS: An improvement in compliance was observed during the 2nd audit cycle, after the educational intervention. The greatest improvement was observed in documenting the allergic status of patients (62%) and the direction of drug administration (40%). We also observed improvements in the treatment duration (>10%), patient weight, physician registration number, diagnosis, and follow-up advice. The legibility of prescriptions also improved during the 2nd audit cycle. CONCLUSION: This study shows that integrating an educational intervention into a clinical audit can improve prescription writing practices and ultimately result in better quality of care for patients.
RESUMEN
Hepatitis A virus (HAV) infection can cause extra-hepatic manifestations like myocarditis. An 8-year-old female with HAV infection presented with fever, abdominal pain, vomiting, and icterus. She developed viral myocarditis with complete AV dissociation on ECG and was treated with a temporary pacemaker, but her condition worsened, and she died. Hepatitis A viral infection can be associated with viral myocarditis and complete heart block that can lead to cardiogenic shock and death eventually.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Anemia is associated with worse clinical outcomes in cardiac patients. We aim to investigate the clinical outcomes and readmission rates in anemic patients undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) for severe mitral valve regurgitation (MR). METHODS: The National Readmissions Database (NRD) from 2015 to 2018 was queried using the ICD-10 codes to identify patients admitted for TEER. Patients were divided into anemic and non-anemic sub-groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Cardiovascular outcomes were assessed between cohorts at index admission and readmissions at 30, 90, and 180 days. STATA v.17 was used for analysis (StataCorp LLC, Texas, USA). RESULTS: Our final cohort included 28,995 patients who had undergone TEER in the United States between 2016 and 2019. About 1,434 (4.9%) had a diagnosis of anemia. The mean age of patients who had TEER with anemia and TEER without anemia was 76.9 ± 10.8 vs. 77.7 ± 10.2, respectively. In the adjusted model, anemic patients had higher odds of acute kidney injury (AKI) (aOR 2.21; 95% [CI 1.81-2.6; p<0.001]), HF (aOR 1.75; 95% [CI 1.28-2.3; p<0.001]), myocardial infarction (MI) (aOR 1.54; 95% [CI 1.01-2.33; p<0.041]), major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) (aOR 1.72; 95% [CI 1.2-9-2.3; p<0.001]), and net adverse event (aOR 1.85; 95% [CI 1.32-2.59; p<0.001]). The anemic group's readmission rate was overall higher at 30, 90, and 180 days from 2016 to 2019. CONCLUSION: Anemia was associated with increased adverse clinical outcomes and more extended hospital stays in patients with anemia who had undergone TEER procedures compared to the non-anemic group.
RESUMEN
Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is a rare lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma which may predispose individuals to development of secondary malignancies (SMs). The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database is a comprehensive registry of cancer patients in the United States reporting on a wide set of demographic variables. Using the SEER-18 dataset, analyzing patients from 2000 to 2018, we aimed to assess the incidence of SMs in WM patients. Patient characteristics such as gender, age, race, and latency were identified, and respective standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and absolute excess risks (AERs) were calculated to compare to the general population. Of the 4,112 eligible WM patients identified, SMs were reported in 699 (17%) patients. The overall risk of developing SM, second primary malignancy, and secondary hematological malignancy was significantly higher in WM patients compared to the general population. Our findings show that WM patients had a 53% higher risk of SMs relative to the general population, and an AER of 102.69 per 10,000. Although the exact mechanism is unclear, the risk of SM development may be due to genetic predisposition, immune dysregulation, or treatment-induced immune suppression.
RESUMEN
Background: Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), a high-resolution imaging modality, guides stent implantation during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, OCT-guided PCI safety and efficacy data is limited. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing OCT-guided PCI to Angiography-guided PCI from inception to August 2023. A random-effects model was used to pool risk ratios (RRs), mean differences (MDs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for clinical endpoints. Results: Our analysis included 5,139 patients from 11 studies. OCT-guided PCI resulted in a higher minimum stent area (MD = 0.35 [95 % CI, 0.21-0.49]; p < 0.00001), significantly reduced risk of cardiovascular mortality (RR = 0.56 [95 % CI, = 0.32-0.99]; p = 0.04), stent thrombosis (RR = 0.56 [95 % CI, 0.32-0.96]; p = 0.04), stent malapposition RR = 0.79 [95 % CI, 0.71-0.88]; p = < 0.0001) and major edge dissection (RR = 0.47 [95 % CI, 0.34-0.65]; p = <0.00001). However, no statistically significant difference was observed for all-cause mortality (RR = 0.71; p = 0.06), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) [RR = 0.80; p = 0.10], myocardial infarction (MI) [RR = 0.84; p = 0.16], target lesion revascularization (TLR) [RR = 0.94; p = 0.68], and target vessel revascularization (TVR) [RR = 0.91; p = 0.52]. Conclusion: OCT-guided PCI led to an increased MSA and decreased cardiovascular mortality, stent thrombosis, stent malapposition, and major edge dissection. The incidence of all-cause mortality, MACE, MI, TLR, and TVR remained comparable across the two groups.
RESUMEN
Background: Recent guidelines suggest that antiplatelet therapy (APT) is the standard of care in the absence of long-term oral anticoagulation (OAC) indications in patients post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The superiority of one method over the other remains controversial. Materials and methods: Several databases, including MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and EMBASE, were electronically searched. The primary endpoint was the all-cause mortality (ACM) rate. Secondary endpoints included cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke/TIA, haemorrhagic stroke, bleeding events, systemic embolism, and valve thrombosis in post-TAVR patients receiving APT and oral anticoagulants (OACs). Forest plots were generated using Review Manager version 5.4, with a p value less than 0.05 indicating statistical significance. Subgroup analysis was performed to explore potential sources of heterogeneity. Results: Twelve studies were selected. No significant differences were observed in APT and OAC group for ACM [risk ratio (RR): 0.67; 95% CI:0.45-1.01; P=0.05], cardiovascular death [RR:0.91; 95% CI:0.73-1.14; P=0.42], MI [RR:1.69; 95% CI:0.43-6.72; P=0.46], Stroke/TIA [RR:0.79; 95% CI:0.58-1.06; P=0.12], ischaemic stroke [RR:0.83; 95% CI:0.50-1.37; P=0.47], haemorrhagic stroke [RR:1.08; 95% CI: 0.23-5.15; P=0.92], major bleeding [RR:0.79; 95% CI:0.51-1.21; P=0.28], minor bleeding [RR:1.09; 95% CI: 0.80-1.47; P=0.58], life-threatening bleeding [RR:0.85; 95% CI:0.55-1.30; P=0.45], any bleeding [RR:0.98; 95% CI:0.83-1.15; P=0.78], and systemic embolism [RR:0.87; 95% CI:0.44-1.70; P=0.68]. The risk of valve thrombosis was higher in patients receiving APT than in those receiving OAC [RR:2.61; 95% CI:1.56-4.36; P =0.0002]. Conclusions: Although the risk of valve thrombosis increased in patients receiving APT, the risk of other endpoints was comparable between the two groups.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Long-term follow-up results of various trials comparing Zotarolimus eluting stents (ZES) with Everolimus eluting stents (EES) have been published recently. Additionally, over the last decade, there have been new trials comparing the ZES with various commercially available EES. We aim to conduct an updated meta-analysis in light of new evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to provide comprehensive evidence regarding the temporal trends in the clinical outcomes. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase. RCTs comparing ZES with EES for short (<2 years), intermediate (2-3 years), and long-term follow-ups (3-5 years) were included. Relative risk was used to pool the dichotomous outcomes using the random effects model employing the inverse variance method. All statistical analysis was conducted using Revman 5.4. RESULTS: A total of 18 studies reporting data at different follow-ups for nine trials (n = 14319) were included. At short-term follow-up (<2 years), there were no significant differences between the two types of stents (all-cause death, cardiac death, Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), target vessel myocardial infarction, definite or probable stent thrombosis or safety outcomes (target vessel revascularization, target lesion revascularization, target vessel failure, target lesion failure). At intermediate follow-up (2-3 years), EES was superior to ZES for reducing target lesion revascularization (RR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.05-1.58, p < 0.05). At long-term follow-up (3-5 years), there were no significant differences between the two groups for any of the pooled outcomes (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: ZES and EES have similar safety and efficacy at short, intermediate, and long-term follow-ups.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Everolimus , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Sirolimus , Humanos , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Everolimus/administración & dosificación , Everolimus/farmacología , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/instrumentación , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Diseño de Prótesis , Factores de Riesgo , Sirolimus/análogos & derivados , Sirolimus/administración & dosificación , Sirolimus/farmacología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Hepatitis is a major public health issue in Pakistan, with an estimated 11.55% prevalence of HCV infection in the adult population. The country ranks second globally in terms of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections, with approximately one in every 20 Pakistanis already infected. The mortality rates due to HBV and HCV stand at 563,000 and 366,000 annually, respectively. However, the absence of a national registry or database system and the lack of coordination among provinces pose significant obstacles in combating this disease effectively. To address this issue, the establishment of a centralized national database registry is crucial, allowing comprehensive analysis, tracking of hepatitis prevalence, and identification of high-risk areas for targeted interventions. By fostering collaboration among provinces, the government, and non-governmental organizations, the registry would facilitate joint decision-making, minimize duplication of efforts, and address inconsistencies in diagnosis and treatment. Collaborating with student-run organizations and leveraging enhanced laboratory capacities post-COVID era can strengthen the hepatitis control program. The centralized approach and unified efforts are necessary to achieve the goal of a hepatitis-free Pakistan, where a healthier future can be realized.
RESUMEN
Chronic subdural hematomas are typically observed in elderly patients receiving antithrombotic and/or anticoagulant therapy. In contrast, acute subdural and extradural hematomas are often observed in young people with traumatic brain injury. The coexistence of ipsilateral chronic subdural and extradural hematomas is rare. Depending on the Glasgow Coma Scale and neuroimaging findings, early surgical intervention is mandatory, as seen in our patient. Early surgical evacuation of a traumatic extradural and chronic subdural hematoma should be done. Also, antithrombotic drug use can lead to chronic subdural hematoma.
RESUMEN
Electronic cigarettes, or "vaping," are battery-operated devices that heat a liquid containing propylene glycol, nicotine, and some flavoring agents, which aerosolize to produce vapors that the user inhales. They were introduced in 2003 and became popular worldwide as a less irritating alternative to combustible cigarettes. While they were initially advertised as smoking cessation aids, their use has taken the shape of an epidemic in some regions of the world. Vaping prevalence is high in South Asia, where a significant number of people use tobacco and smokeless tobacco. According to data from Pakistan, 6.2% of the population uses vaping/e-cigarettes, while 15.9 million (12.4%) use smokeless tobacco. Vaping may be a safer alternative to cigarette smoking, as e-cigarettes do not contain all the toxins that regular cigarettes do, and the aerosol from e-cigarettes has no appreciable cytotoxic, genotoxic, or inflammatory effects when inhaled. However, nicotine addiction is a concern, as it is the main culprit behind smoking addiction, and e-cigarettes may become a new pathway toward nicotine addiction. Hence, their effectiveness in smoking cessation is still debatable, and their role as a tool for smoking cessation needs further research.
RESUMEN
Objective: This study aimed to compare two protocols of deflation with increased intervals versus late deflation with smaller intervals for distal radial artery occlusion device (DROAD) removal to assess for radial artery occlusion (RAO). Methods: All patients who underwent PCI with distal radial access were enrolled in the study. The DROAD was applied using an occlusive hemostasis method. Patients were assigned to either protocol 1 or protocol 2 at the primary physician's discretion. Protocol 1 involved the removal of 2 ml of air starting 1 h after the sheath removal and then the removal of 2 ml every 30 min until the band came off. Protocol 2 involved the removal of 4 ml of air 2 h after the sheath removal and then a further 4 ml of air every 15 min until the band came off. Results: A total of 446 patients were enrolled in this study (mean age; 61 ± 6 (Group 1) and 60 ± 5 (Group 2); females 45.83% (Group 1) and 46.34% (Group 2)). The baseline characteristics were the same, including mean hemostasis time (256 ± 25 min (Group 1) and 254 ± 28 min (Group 2), P-value = 0.611). Primary and secondary endpoints did not reach significance in either group (RAO; 21 (8.71) Group 1 and 18 (8.78) Group 2 (P-value = 0.932)). Age (OR (95%CI): 1.07 (0.57-1.45); P-value = 0.031), female gender (OR (95%CI): 1.42 (0.93-1.74); P-value = 0.012), distal artery diameter (OR (95%CI): 0.57 (0.21-0.93); P-value = 0.005), procedure time (OR (95%CI): 2.64 (0.95-4.32); P-value = 0.001), and sheath size (OR (95%CI): 2.47 (1.43-3.76); P-value = 0.044) were predictors of RAO in our cohort. Conclusion: This investigation shows no difference in the incidence of RAO with the standard versus accelerated deflation protocol after PCI. However, local vascular complications, including hematoma were increased with the accelerated protocol.
RESUMEN
Convalescent plasma therapy has gained worldwide notoriety since its inception as a form of soul treatment for terminally ill patients. This study investigates the link between knowledge, attitude, and practice of plasma donation while simultaneously probing the moderative role of age and gender in this context. Method: A cross-sectional study was undertaken in Rawalpindi, Pakistan, on COVID-19-recovered patients (coronavirus disease 2019). In all, 383 persons were chosen using simple random sampling. A prestructured questionnaire was first validated and then used as a tool for data collection. jMetrik version 4.1.1 and SPSS version 26 were used to enter and analyze the data. Reliability analysis, hierarchal regression, and logistic regression analysis were applied. Results: A total of 85.1% and 58.2% of 383 individuals had a favorable attitude and sufficient knowledge toward plasma donation, respectively. Plasma donation was observed in 109 (28.5%) of the individuals. Plasma donation practice was shown to be strongly related to plasma donation attitude [adjusted odds ratio (AOR)=4.48; P<0.05] and knowledge (AOR=3.78; P<0.001). Females who had more plasma donation knowledge and attitude tend to donate more compared to males. However, no interactional effect of gender×knowledge and attitude, and age×knowledge and attitude was found with plasma donation practice. Conclusion: Plasma donation was uncommon, even though the majority of individuals had a good mindset and were well-informed. Fear of getting a health problem was linked to the decreased practice.