Neurologic Outcomes After Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this systematic review of the literature was to summarize neurologic outcomes following neonatal and pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. DATA SOURCES: We conducted electronic searches of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, Cochrane, and EMBASE. STUDY SELECTION: Inclusion criteria included publication dates 2000-2016, patient ages 0-18 years, and use of standardized measures to evaluate outcomes after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. DATA EXTRACTION: We identified 3,497 unique citations; 60 full-text articles were included in the final review. DATA SYNTHESIS: Studies evaluated patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (7), cardiac disease (8), cardiac arrest (13), and mixed populations (32). Follow-up was conducted at hospital discharge in 10 studies (17%) and at a median of 26 months (interquartile range, 8-61 mo) after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in 50 studies (83%). We found 55 outcome measures that assessed overall health and function (4), global cognitive ability (7), development (4), motor function (5), adaptive function (2), behavior/mood (6), hearing (2), quality of life (2), school achievement (5), speech and language (6), learning and memory (4), and attention and executive function (8). Overall, 10% to as many as 50% of children scored more than 2 SDS below the population mean on cognitive testing. Behavior problems were identified in 16-46% of children tested, and severe motor impairment was reported in 12% of children. Quality of life of former extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients evaluated at school age or adolescence ranged from similar to healthy peers, to 31-53% having scores more than 1 SD below the population mean. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review of the literature suggests that children who have undergone extracorporeal membrane oxygenation suffer from a wide range of disabilities. A meta-analysis was not feasible due to heterogeneity in pathologies, outcome measures, and age at follow-up, underscoring the importance of developing and employing a core set of outcomes measures in future extracorporeal membrane oxygenation studies.

Association of preprocedural ultrashort-term heart rate variability with clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A nested, case-control, pilot study.

Background: Because heart rate variability (HRV) has been linked to important clinical outcomes in various cardiovascular disease states, we investigated whether preprocedural ultrashort-term HRV (UST-HRV) differs between 1-year survivors and nonsurvivors after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Methods: In our single-center, retrospective, nested pilot study, we analyzed data from patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR. All patients had preprocedural UST-HRV measured before the administration of any medications or any intervention. To investigate whether preprocedural HRV is associated with 1-year survival, we performed a logistic regression analysis controlling for Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire 12 score. Results: In our parent cohort of 100 patients, 42 patients (28 survivors and 14 nonsurvivors) were included for analysis. Root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD) and standard deviation of NN intervals (SDNN) were lower in patients who survived to 1-year post TAVR compared to nonsurvivors [10 (IQR 8-23) vs 23 (IQR 17-33), P = 0.04 and 10 (IQR 7-16) vs 17 (IQR 11-40), P = 0.03, respectively]. Logistic regression demonstrated a trend in the association of preprocedure RMSSD with 1-year mortality and a 5% higher risk of 1-year mortality with each unit increment in UST-HRV using SDNN (OR 1.05; 95%CI 1.01-1.09, P = 0.02). Conclusion: Our data suggest an inverse relationship between preprocedural UST-HRV and 1-year survival post-TAVR. This finding highlights the potential complexity of HRV regulation in chronic vs acute illness. Prospective studies are needed to validate our findings and to determine whether UST-HRV can be used for risk stratification in patients with severe aortic stenosis.

Ambrisentan in portopulmonary hypertension: A multicenter, open-label trial.

BACKGROUND: Ambrisentan has shown effectiveness in the treatment of Group 1 pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Although portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH) is a subset of Group 1 PAH, few clinical trials have been testing PAH therapies in patients with PoPH. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ambrisentan in PoPH. METHODS: This study is a prospective, multicenter, open-label trial in which treatment-naive patients with PoPH with Child-Pugh class A/B were administered with ambrisentan for 24 weeks, followed by a long-term extension (24-28 weeks). The primary end-points were change in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and 6-minutes walk distance (6MWD) at 24 weeks, whereas secondary end-points included safety, World Health Organization (WHO) functional class (FC) and echocardiographic assessments. RESULTS: Of the 31 patients, 23 finished 24 weeks of ambrisentan therapy and 19 finished the extension. PVR decreased significantly (mean ± SD) (7.1 ± 5 vs 3.8 ± 1.8 Wood units, p < 0.001), whereas 6MWD remained unchanged (314 ± 94 vs 336 ± 108 m). Other hemodynamic parameters such as right atrial pressure (13 ± 8 vs 9 ± 4 mm Hg, p < 0.05), mean pulmonary arterial pressure (46 ± 13 vs. 38 ± 8 mm Hg, p < 0.01), cardiac index (2.6 ± 0.6 vs. 3.5 ± 0.7 liter/min/m2, p < 0.001) showed improvement, whereas pulmonary capillary wedge pressure remained unchanged. Of the 22 patients with WHO FC assessments at baseline and 24 weeks, WHO FC improved significantly (p = 0.005). Most frequent drug-related adverse events were edema (38.7%) and headache (22.5%). One episode of leg edema resulted into the permanent discontinuation of ambrisentan. CONCLUSIONS: Ambrisentan monotherapy in PoPH improves hemodynamics and FC at 24 weeks; however, it did not show any improvement in 6MWD. These preliminary outcomes should be interpreted with caution (Clinicaltrials.Gov:NCT01224210).