DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection for the Treatment of Glabellar Lines: Efficacy Results From SAKURA 3, a Large, Open-Label, Phase 3 Safety Study.

BACKGROUND: DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection (DAXI) is botulinum toxin Type A formulated with a novel peptide excipient. Two pivotal, single-treatment, placebo-controlled trials demonstrated efficacy and safety for moderate or severe glabellar lines. OBJECTIVE: To further evaluate DAXI in a large, open-label, repeat-treatment study. METHODS: Subjects (n = 2,691) were enrolled from the preceding pivotal trials or de novo and received 40U DAXI. Those who received repeat treatments could be retreated when they returned to baseline on the Investigator Global Assessment-Frown Wrinkle Severity (IGA-FWS) and Patient FWS (PFWS) scales at/after 12 weeks and up to 36 weeks after treatment. RESULTS: High (>96%) response rates (none or mild severity) on the IGA-FWS scale were seen after each of the 3 treatments, with peak response between Weeks 2 to 4. At Week 24, ≥32% had a response of none or mild severity. Peak response rates of ≥92% were observed at Weeks 2 to 4 on the PFWS scale. The median duration for return to moderate or severe severity was 24 weeks. The safety profile was favorable and consistent with previous trials. CONCLUSION: DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection efficacy was highly consistent across treatment cycles. These results confirm the previously observed efficacy rates and duration of response.

A Randomized, Comparator-Controlled Study of HARC for Cheek Augmentation and Correction of Midface Contour Deficiencies.

BACKGROUND: HARC is a soft and flexible hyaluronic acid filler containing lidocaine, manufactured using XpresHAn® technology, restoring natural-looking volume and soft contours. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate safety and effectiveness of HARC for cheek augmentation and correction of midface contour deficiencies compared to a control product HAJV (hereafter referred to as Control). Primary objective was to demonstrate non-inferiority of HARC compared to the Control, by blinded evaluation of change from baseline in midface fullness 12 weeks after last injection, using a 4 grade midface volume scale (MMVS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects over the age of 21 with loss of fullness in the midface area (MMVS score 2, 3, or 4) were randomized 2:1 to treatment with HARC(n=142) or Control (n=68). Optional touch-up was allowed after 4 weeks. Study assessments included MMVS, aesthetic improvement, subject satisfaction, and safety. Subjects were followed for 48 weeks. RESULTS: Overall, most subjects were female (89%) and mean age was 53 years (range 24-80). Total mean volume injected was 4.3 mL for HARC and 4.9 mL for Control. Primary objective was met; mean change from baseline in MMVS score at week 12: -1.4 (HARC), -1.3 (Control), 95% CI: -0.22, 0.06. HARC effectiveness was supported by a high degree of aesthetic improvement and subject satisfaction throughout 48 weeks. Related adverse events were generally mild and transient. CONCLUSIONS:  HARC was well tolerated and non-inferior to Control for correction of midface fullness at 12 weeks after last injection. Aesthetic improvement and subject satisfaction were high and lasted through week 48.  J Drugs Dermatol. 2021;20(9):949-956. doi:10.36849/JDD.6191.

The Second of Two One-Year, Multicenter, Open-Label, Repeat-Dose, Phase II Safety Studies of PrabotulinumtoxinA for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines in Adult Patients.

BACKGROUND: PrabotulinumtoxinA is a 900-kDa botulinum toxin type A produced by Clostridium botulinum. OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to investigate the safety of prabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of glabellar lines. METHODS: This was a multicenter, open-label, repeat-dose, 1-year phase II safety study. Adults with moderate to severe glabellar lines at maximum frown, as independently assessed by both investigator and patient on the validated 4-point photonumeric Glabellar Line Scale (0 = no lines, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe), were enrolled. On day 0, patients received an initial treatment (IT) of 20 U prabotulinumtoxinA (4 U/0.1 mL final vacuum-dried formulation injected into 5 glabellar sites). On and after day 90, patients received a repeat treatment (RT) if their Glabellar Line Scale score was ≥2 at maximum frown by investigator assessment. Safety outcomes were evaluated throughout the study. RESULTS: The 570 study patients received a median total dose of 60 U, that is, 3 treatments. Sixty-one patients (10.7%) experienced adverse events (AEs) assessed as possibly study drug related; 6.5% experienced study drug-related AEs after the IT. With each RT, progressively lower percentages of patients experienced study drug-related AEs. Eight patients (1.4%) experienced study drug-related AEs of special interest: 5 experienced eyelid ptosis (0.9%), 3 eyebrow ptosis (0.5%), 1 blepharospasm (0.2%), and 1 blurred vision (0.2%). Seven patients (1.2%) experienced serious AEs, but none were study drug related. A total of 4060 serum samples were tested for antibotulinum toxin antibodies; no seroconversion was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The safety of RTs of 20 U of prabotulinumtoxinA for moderate to severe glabellar lines was confirmed in this second phase II study based on a broad range of outcomes.

Efficacy and safety of topical sofpironium bromide gel for the treatment of axillary hyperhidrosis: A phase II, randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial.

BACKGROUND: Primary axillary hyperhidrosis has limited noninvasive, effective, and well-tolerated treatment options. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the topical treatment of axillary hyperhidrosis with the novel anticholinergic sofpironium bromide. METHODS: A phase II, multicenter, randomized, controlled, double-blinded study. Participants were randomized to 1 of 3 dosages or vehicle, with daily treatment for 42 days. Coprimary end points were the percentage of participants exhibiting ≥1-point improvement in the Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Measure-Axillary (HDSM-Ax) score by logistic regression, and change in HDSM-Ax as a continuous measure by analysis of covariance. Pair-wise comparisons were 1-sided with α = 0.10. RESULTS: At the end of therapy, 70%, 79%, 76%, and 54% of participants in the 5%, 10%, 15%, and vehicle groups exhibited ≥1-point improvement in HDSM-Ax (P < .05). Least-square mean (SE) changes in HDSM-Ax were -2.02 (0.14), -2.09 (0.14), 2.10 (0.14), and -1.30 (0.14) (all P ≤ .0001). Most treatment-related adverse events were mild or moderate. LIMITATIONS: Not powered to detect changes in gravimetric sweat production. CONCLUSION: Sofpironium bromide gel produced meaningful reductions in hyperhidrosis severity and had an acceptable safety profile.

Efficacy, Safety, and Subject Satisfaction After AbobotulinumtoxinA Treatment for Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines.

BACKGROUND: The aesthetic use of botulinum toxins is widely accepted in routine treatment of glabellar lines. OBJECTIVE: To strengthen existing efficacy and safety data, and examine subject satisfaction concerning abobotulinumtoxinA (ABO) treatment for moderate to severe glabellar lines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 150-day prospective, single-dose, multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of 300 subjects treated with ABO (50 Units [U]). Response was defined as having no or mild glabellar lines after treatment (primary objective was Day 30 response). Glabellar line severity, onset and duration of effect, satisfaction, treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were assessed. RESULTS: Median time to onset of effect was 2 days. Day 30, ABO treatment response was 89% and 85% for investigator and subject assessments, respectively (p < .001 vs placebo). At Day 120, 60% of subjects demonstrated ≥1 grade improvement and 45% at Day 150. Subject satisfaction concerning glabellar line appearance was high (93%) at Day 14 and maintained by 35% through Day 150 with ABO treatment. No serious AEs were related to study treatment. CONCLUSION: Most ABO-treated subjects sustained ≥1 grade glabellar line improvements over 120 days, and satisfaction was maintained by >30% of subjects throughout 150 days. ABO was well tolerated.

Attitudes Toward Submental Fat Among Adults in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Excess submental fat (SMF) can cause submental fullness resulting in negative perceptions of individuals. However, the impact of SMF on perceptions of social traits has not been well studied. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the impact of SMF on external value judgments in adults in the United States. METHODS: Respondents completed an online survey in which they reacted to statements about individuals with varying grades of SMF. Attributes were rated on a scale from 0 to 100 with higher scores for more positive attributes. RESULTS: Similar proportions of respondents (N = 1996) indicated that women and men with double chins were less attractive than those without (91% and 90%, respectively). A double chin was more likely to be noticed on a woman than on a man (78% of respondents). With increasing SMF, individuals were perceived as significantly less likeable, intelligent, happy, active, and easygoing. Those with greater amounts of SMF were rated as significantly less attractive than those with less SMF. For all attributes, male respondents rated all individuals lower than female respondents did. CONCLUSION: Results from this study provide further evidence of negative perceptions of individuals with SMF. Aesthetics of the submental area, especially SMF, likely impact the overall assessment of attractiveness and social attributes.

Personal (Self) Perceptions of Submental Fat Among Adults in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Satisfaction with discrete facial areas influences self-perceptions of attractiveness, self-esteem, and quality of life. Currently, there is a lack of understanding of how the submental area impacts feelings and behaviors. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the effects of submental fat (SMF) on feelings/emotions and actions/behavior among adults in the United States. METHODS: Online health-based surveys recruited approximately 400 adults (18-65 years) in each of 5 categories based on the respondent's assessment of their SMF. Respondents either agreed or disagreed with 17 statements regarding their feelings/emotions and actions/behaviors related to the area underneath their chin. RESULTS: Overall, 1996 respondents were included (equal distribution of males/females; mean age, 41.9 years). Even a slight amount of chin fat was associated with negative feelings and behaviors. As SMF increased, so did the number of respondents reporting negative self-perceptions such as being embarrassed by the area under their chin. In general, a greater percentage of female compared with male respondents reported negative feelings and behavioral changes due to their submental area. CONCLUSION: Excess SMF can have a substantial negative effect on a person's feelings of attractiveness and behaviors. Reduction of SMF may not only improve one's appearance, but also may enhance one's self-esteem.

Noncollagen Dermal Fillers: A Summary of the Clinical Trials Used for Their FDA Approval.

BACKGROUND: Many noncollagen dermal fillers (NCDFs) have been approved by the FDA and are currently the second-most performed noninvasive cosmetic procedure. OBJECTIVE: To summarize and compare the clinical trials reviewed by the United States FDA in the approval of NCDFs. METHODS: The FDA Premarket Approval (PMA) site was queried, and the year of approval, indication, design, primary end points, touch-ups, retreatments, and study duration were extracted and tabulated. RESULTS: Twenty-one FDA-approved NCDFs from 2003 to 2018 and 24 Summary of Safety and Effectiveness documents were reviewed. Differences in the trial design and in reporting of data make comparisons difficult. This article provides comparative tables to make interpreting the various trial results more straightforward. LIMITATIONS: Primary efficacy end points and the way that filler volumes were reported varied by company. This article does not focus on secondary end points or safety data. CONCLUSION: A comprehensive and comparative review of clinical trials of NCDFs by the FDA demonstrates that differences in data reporting, especially for touch-ups and retreatments, make filler duration difficult to compare and interpret. Understanding of the trial design will allow the clinician to become more astute and allow for better management of patient expectations in clinical practice.

Open Label Study Evaluating Efficacy, Safety, and Effects on Perception of Age After Injectable 20 mg/mL Hyaluronic Acid Gel for Volumization of Facial Temples

Objective: To study the safety, efficacy, optimal volume, and longevity of an injectable hyaluronic acid (HA) gel dermal filler to treat facial temporal fossa fat loss. Methods and materials: This open-label, single-site, 12-month study used 20 mg/mL HA gel to correct volume loss in both temples in 30 subjects. Touch-ups were allowed at week 2. At each visit, the investigator completed a Frontal Temporal Fossa Scale and a 7-point satisfaction scale. Subjects completed a 7-point satisfaction scale, Subject Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), and self-perception of age assessment. Photos were taken at each visit. Results: Subjects who returned for the one-month visit (29) achieved a ≥ 1-point improvement on the Temporal Fossa Scale in both temples. At month 12, 98% of the temples maintained a ≥ 1-grade, 18% showed a 3-grade, 34% showed a 2-grade, and 46% showed a 1-grade improvement. All subjects received an average of 1.1 mL per temple. Mild to moderate jaw pain after injections was noted by 40% of patients. The pain was reported to occur during mastication. There was no correlation between the amount of the study device injected and the incidence of jaw pain, which did not occur at the touch-up injections and was self-limited. Injections were well tolerated, and no patients developed vascular compromise, vascular events, or visual disturbances. Conclusion: HA gel (20 mg/mL) is safe and efficacious when used in the facial temporal fossa. The results lasted at least 12 months in 98% of subjects. Most subjects perceived themselves as looking younger than at baseline. J Drugs Dermatol. 2019;18(1):67-74.

Safety and efficacy of hydrogen peroxide topical solution, 40% (w/w), in patients with seborrheic keratoses: Results from 2 identical, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 studies (A-101-SEBK-301/302).

BACKGROUND: Approved topical treatments for seborrheic keratoses (SKs) are an unmet need. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of 40% hydrogen peroxide topical solution (HP40) versus vehicle for the treatment of SKs (A-101-SEBK). METHODS: A total of 937 patients with 4 SKs each (≥1 lesion each on the face and on the trunk and/or an extremity) were randomized 1:1 to HP40 or vehicle. At each visit, SKs were graded using the Physician's Lesion Assessment (PLA) scale (0, clear; 1, nearly clear; 2, ≤1 mm thick; and 3, >1 mm thick). After 1 treatment, SKs with a PLA score higher than 0 were re-treated 3 weeks later. RESULTS: At day 106, significantly more patients treated with HP40 than with vehicle achieved a PLA score of 0 on all 4 SKs (study 1, 4% vs 0%; study 2, 8% vs 0% [both P < .01]) and on 3 of 4 SKs (study 1, 13% vs 0%; study 2, 23% vs 0% [both P < .0001]). A higher mean per-patient percentage of SKs were clear (study 1, 25% vs 2%; study 2, 34% vs 1%) and clear or nearly clear (study 1, 47% vs 10%; study 2, 54% vs 5%) with HP40 than with vehicle. Local skin reactions were largely mild and resolved by day 106. LIMITATIONS: The optimal number of treatment sessions was not evaluated. CONCLUSION: Application of HP40 was well tolerated and effective in the removal of SKs.

Efficacy and safety of oxymetazoline cream 1.0% for treatment of persistent facial erythema associated with rosacea: Findings from the 52-week open label REVEAL trial.

BACKGROUND: Limited treatments are available for persistent erythema of rosacea. OBJECTIVE: To examine the long-term safety and efficacy of oxymetazoline cream 1.0% in patients with rosacea with moderate-to-severe persistent erythema. METHODS: Patients applied oxymetazoline once daily for 52 weeks. Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), skin blanching, inflammatory lesion counts, telangiectasia, disease severity, and rebound effect. Efficacy was assessed by the Clinician Erythema Assessment and Subject Self-Assessment composite score at 3 and 6 hours after the dose on day 1 and at weeks 4, 26, and 52. RESULTS: Among 440 patients, 8.2% reported treatment-related TEAEs; the most common were application-site dermatitis, paresthesia, pain, and pruritus. The rate of discontinuation due to adverse events (mostly application-site TEAEs) was 3.2%. No clinically meaningful changes were observed in skin blanching, inflammatory lesions, or telangiectasia. At week 52, 36.7%, and 43.4% of patients achieved a 2-grade or greater composite improvement from baseline in both Clinician Erythema Assessment and Subject Self-Assessment 3 and 6 hours after a dose, respectively. Less than 1% of patients experienced a rebound effect following treatment cessation. LIMITATIONS: A vehicle-control group was not included. CONCLUSION: This long-term study demonstrated sustained safety, tolerability, and efficacy of oxymetazoline for moderate-to-severe persistent erythema of rosacea.

WITHDRAWN: Efficacy and safety of topical oxymetazoline cream 1.0% for treatment of persistent facial erythema associated with rosacea: findings from the 2 phase 3, 29-day, randomized, controlled REVEAL trials.

This article has been withdrawn at the request of the author(s) and/or editor. The Publisher apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal.

Comparison of Hyaluronic Acid Gel With (HARDL) and Without Lidocaine (HAJUP) in the Treatment of Moderate-To-Severe Nasolabial Folds: A Randomized, Evaluator-Blinded Study.

BACKGROUND: Injectable fillers, such as those containing hyaluronic acid (HA), are increasingly used to smooth age-related facial creases and wrinkles. OBJECTIVE: To compare efficacy and safety of a HA gel with lidocaine formulated by XpresHAn Technology (HARDL) with a HA gel without lidocaine produced by Hylacross technology (HAJUP) in the treatment of moderate-to-severe nasolabial folds. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects (n = 162) received initial and touch-up injections with HARDL and HAJUP on either side of the face. Investigator- and subject-assessed wrinkle severity was measured up to 48 weeks after final injection. RESULTS: Mean (SD) Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale was improved by 1.1 (0.75) and 1.1 (0.68) with HARDL and HAJUP, respectively, at 24 weeks; improvements were sustained up to Week 48 with both treatments. Noninferiority of HARDL was demonstrated (mean difference -0.09 [95% confidence interval: -0.18 to -0.01], p = .032) at 24 weeks. Adverse events were reported in 43% subjects, 12% were treatment related, with a similar distribution for both treatments. CONCLUSION: Effectiveness and safety profiles of HARDL and HAJUP were comparable.

A Multicenter, Double-Blinded, Randomized, Split-Face Study of the Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Hyaluronic Acid Gel for the Correction of Nasolabial Folds.

BACKGROUND: Injectable hyaluronic acid is frequently used to correct volume loss in nasolabial folds. OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of a novel hyaluronic acid gel to a non-animal stabilized hyaluronic acid (Comparator) gel for the correction of nasolabial folds (NLF). METHODS: Qualified subjects had NLF with a Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) score of 3 or 4 (moderate or severe). NLFs were treated with Test Product on one side of the face and Comparator on the other side of the face (facial side randomly assigned). Improvement from baseline was evaluated at weeks 1, 2, 4, 12, and 24 weeks. The primary study endpoint was the mean change in WSRS score from baseline to week 24. RESULTS: The mean changes in WSRS score from baseline were 1.02 ±0.689 for Test Product and 0.91±0.762 for Comparator. The mean difference in change from baseline in WSRS scoring (Comparator minus Test Product) at week 24 was -0.11 (-0.225-0.001, 95% confidence interval [CI]). The upper boundary (0.001) of the 95% CI was less than the prespecified non-inferiority limit of 0.50, indicating that the Test Product was non-inferior to the Comparator. No subject discontinued the study due to adverse events. CONCLUSION: The Test Product is safe and non-inferior to the Comparator for the correction of nasolabial folds. The Test Product was associated with less swelling, pain, and overall severity of treatment-emergent adverse events than the Comparator.

J Drugs Dermatol. 2018;17(1):66-73.

Pivotal Trial of the Efficacy and Safety of Oxymetazoline Cream 1.0% for the Treatment of Persistent Facial Erythema Associated With Rosacea: Findings from the Second REVEAL Trial.

Rosacea is a chronic dermatologic condition with limited treatment options, particularly for persistent erythema. This pivotal phase 3 study evaluated oxymetazoline, an a1A-adrenoceptor agonist, for the treatment of moderate to severe persistent erythema of rosacea. Eligible patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive oxymetazoline cream 1.0% or vehicle applied topically to the face once daily for 29 days. The primary efficacy outcome was ≥2-grade improvement from baseline on both Clinician Erythema Assessment (CEA) and Subject Self-Assessment for rosacea facial redness (SSA) (composite success) at 3, 6, 9, and 12 hours postdose on day 29. Digital image analysis of rosacea facial erythema was evaluated as a secondary efficacy outcome measure. Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and dermal tolerability. Patients were followed for 28 days posttreatment to assess worsening of erythema (1-grade increase in severity from baseline on composite CEA/SSA in patients with moderate erythema at baseline; rebound effect). The study included 445 patients (mean age: 50.3 years; 78.7% female); most had moderate erythema at baseline (84.0% on CEA; 91.5% on SSA). The proportion of patients achieving the primary efficacy outcome was significantly greater with oxymetazoline versus vehicle (P=0.001). Similar results favoring oxymetazoline over vehicle were observed for the individual CEA and SSA scores (P less than 0.001 and P=0.011, respectively). Median reduction in rosacea facial erythema on day 29 as assessed by digital image analysis also favored oxymetazoline over vehicle (P less than 0.001). Safety results were similar between oxymetazoline and vehicle; discontinuations due to TEAEs were low (2.7% vs 0.5%). Following cessation of treatment, 2 (1.2%) patients in the oxymetazoline group and no patient in the vehicle group had rebound effect compared with their day 1 baseline score. Topical oxymetazoline applied to the face once daily for 29 days was effective, safe, and well tolerated in the treatment of moderate to severe persistent facial erythema of rosacea.

J Drugs Dermatol. 2018;17(3):290-298.

Topical Oxymetazoline Cream 1.0% for Persistent Facial Erythema Associated With Rosacea: Pooled Analysis of the Two Phase 3, 29-Day, Randomized, Controlled REVEAL Trials

Background: Rosacea is a chronic dermatologic condition with limited treatment options. Methods: Data were pooled from two identically designed phase 3 trials. Patients with moderate to severe persistent erythema of rosacea were randomized to receive oxymetazoline cream 1.0% or vehicle once daily for 29 days and were followed for 28 days posttreatment. The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of patients with ≥2-grade improvement from baseline on both Clinician Erythema Assessment (CEA) and Subject Self-Assessment (SSA) at 3, 6, 9, and 12 hours postdose, day 29. Results: The pooled population included 885 patients (78.8% female); 85.8% and 91.2% had moderate erythema based on CEA and SSA, respectively. The primary outcome was achieved by significantly more patients in the oxymetazoline than vehicle group (P<0.001). Individual CEA and SSA scores and reduction in facial erythema (digital image analysis) favored oxymetazoline over vehicle (P<0.001). The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was low (oxymetazoline, 16.4%; vehicle, 11.8%). No clinically relevant erythema worsening (based on CEA and SSA) was observed during the 28-day posttreatment follow-up period (oxymetazoline, 1.7%; vehicle, 0.6%). Conclusion: Oxymetazoline effectively reduced moderate to severe persistent facial erythema of rosacea and was well tolerated. J Drugs Dermatol. 2018;17(11):1201-1208.

Duration of Clinical Efficacy of OnabotulinumtoxinA in Crow's Feet Lines: Results from Two Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: Duration of esthetic treatments may contribute to subject satisfaction. OBJECTIVE: Describe response duration with onabotulinumtoxinA in crow's feet lines (CFL) and the association of duration with perception of improvement. METHODS: Subjects from 2 double-blind, placebo-controlled trials received onabotulinumtoxinA 24 U in CFL; Study 2 subjects could also receive 20 U in glabella. At Day 30, responders achieved ≥1-grade improvement in Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS) scores. Median duration of effect for responders and for responders stratified by Subject's Global Assessment of Change in CFL (SGA-CFL) was determined. RESULTS: Of 1,362 subjects, 833 received onabotulinumtoxinA. In Study 2, 305 subjects also received 20 U in glabella. In Study 1 (150-day follow-up), per investigator and subject assessments, respectively, median response duration was 125 and 144 days for dynamic lines and 137 and 148 days for static lines. Median response duration for dynamic and static lines in Study 2 (120-day follow-up) was 119 to 121 days per investigator and subject assessments. Subjects reporting greater improvement on the SGA-CFL tended to have a longer duration of response on investigator FWS scores at maximum smile. CONCLUSION: Response duration with onabotulinumtoxinA in CFL was ≥4 months. Subject perception of CFL improvement may be associated with response duration.

Evaluation of Micro-Focused Ultrasound for Lifting and Tightening Neck Laxity.

BACKGROUND: A novel device using micro-focused ultrasound with high-resolution ultrasound visualization (MFU-V) produces non-invasive lifting and tightening of lax skin on the face and neck when treatment is delivered at a single focal depth (Ulthera® System; Ulthera, Inc., Mesa, AZ).
OBJECTIVE: The following study was performed to test the hypothesis that customized application of MFU-V at two focal depths will produce clinical results that are superior to treatment at a single focal depth.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: Adult subjects (N=71) with skin laxity in the lower face and neck were enrolled; 64 met all entrance criteria and received treatment. On the basis of physical and anatomical characteristics, patients were assigned in nonrandomized fashion to one of three treatment groups to undergo treatment on the submental, submandibular, lower neck, and platysmal areas with MFU-V at single or dual depths.
RESULTS: Among evaluable subjects (N=64), investigator-assessment and subject-self-assessment demonstrated improved aesthetic changes at 60, 90, and 180 days after treatment. Overall, subjects that received MFU-V at two focal depths to the entire treatment area achieved slightly greater aesthetic improvement than subjects receiving MFU-V at single focal depths. There were no unexpected adverse events.
CONCLUSION: Applying treatment with MFU-V at two focal depths may provide improved aesthetic results in some subjects.

J Drugs Dermatol. 2016;15(5):607-614.

Cosmeceuticals in skin of color.

Patients with skin of color have similar skin care needs as lighter-skin patients. However, they are less likely to use sun protection on a daily basis, which leads to an increased risk of dyschromia, skin cancer, and other disorders. This article discusses the importance of a correct and consistent skin care regimen and the various cutaneous issues that should be considered when prescribing a skin care regimen for patients with darker skin types. Adopting a standardized methodology to identify affordable, efficacious products and to streamline the process of skin-type diagnosis, skin care regimen prescribing, patient communication, and staff education will result in improved patient outcomes and increased patient satisfaction.