Adherence Measures for Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Treated with Abiraterone Acetate plus Prednisone: Results of a Prospective, Cluster-Randomized Trial.

Residual androgen production causes tumor progression in metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. Abiraterone acetate (AA), a prodrug of abiraterone, is an oral CYP-17 inhibitor that blocks androgen production. It was hypothesized that adherence-enhancing measures (AEM) might be beneficial for mCRPC patients receiving abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AA + P). This multicenter, prospective, 2-arm trial allocated mCRPC patients who were progressive after docetaxel-based chemotherapy or asymptomatic/mildly symptomatic after failure of an androgen deprivation therapy to Arm A (with AEM) or Arm B (without AEM) by center-based cluster-randomization. The primary objective was to assess the influence of AEM on discontinuation rates and medication adherence in mCRPC patients treated with AA + P. A total of 360 patients were allocated to Arm A, and 315 patients to Arm B. At month 3, the rate of treatment discontinuation, not due to disease progression or the start of new cancer therapy, was low in both arms (A: 9.0% vs. B: 7.3%, OR = 1.230). Few patients had a medium/low Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-4) score (A: 6.4% vs. B: 9.1%, OR = 0.685). The results obtained did not suggest any clear adherence difference between Arm A and Arm B. In patients with mCRPC taking AA + P medication, adherence seemed to be generally high.

[Early- vs. late-onset treatment using abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in chemo-naïve, asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic patients with metastatic CRPC after androgen deprivation therapy]. / Frühe vs. spätere Therapie mit Abirateron plus Prednison bei chemotherapie-naiven, asymptomatischen bis mild symptomatischen Patienten mit metastasiertem CRPC nach Androgendeprivation.

BACKGROUND: Abiraterone acetate (AA) is a prodrug of abiraterone, which is an irreversible inhibitor of 17α-hydroxylase/C17, 20-lyase. Since 2011, abiraterone acetate has been available in combination with prednisone/prednisolone (AA + P) for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) after pre-treatment with docetaxel, and since 2012 for the treatment of chemotherapy-naïve asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic mCRPC patients. A revision of the guidelines of the European Association of Urology in 2014 redefining castration resistance gave rise to the question of when the treatment of mCRPC with abiraterone acetate plus prednisone should be initiated after prior hormone treatment and how successful it would be. This led us to observe an early-onset AA + P therapy cohort (EC) and a late-onset therapy cohort (LC) of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We designed a combined retrospective and prospective, multicentre, non-interventional two-cohort study to obtain data on the effectiveness and safety of an early-onset AA + P therapy in mCRPC patients in the clinical routine compared to a late therapy onset. The EC comprised patients who received AA + P immediately after castration resistance without a prior first-generation antiandrogen such as bicalutamide or flutamide. The LC included patients who, after castration resistance had occurred, started treatment with AA + P only after unsuccessful treatment with a first-generation antiandrogen. Patients with mCRPC who received AA + P therapy according to the physician's routine clinical practice decision were considered. The patients were consecutively included in the study on the basis of their medical records, with the treatment decision having been made independently of and before patient enrolment. Patients were documented or followed from the beginning of AA + P therapy until the start of a carcinoma-specific systemic follow-up therapy (retrospectively if before and prospectively if after start of data collection). Effectiveness analyses were done for all patients with at least two AA + P administrations and safety analyses for all treated patients. RESULTS: Of the 159 patients included, 44 received early therapy and 105 received later therapy with AA + P. 10 patients could not be clearly assigned and were summarised in a third cohort (missed early-onset therapy assignment; MEC). 56/159 patients (35.2 %) were still alive at study start and 103/159 patients (64.8 %) had already deceased (31/44 [70.5 %] in EC, 64/105 [61.0 %] in LC, and 8/10 [80.0 %] in MEC). 24/159 patients (15.1 %) were documented both retrospectively and prospectively. The median duration of AA + P treatment was 11.3 months for EC, 12.0 months for LC, and 8.3 months for MEC patients. The median time to next systemic cancer therapy or death was 12.3 months for EC and 12.8 months for LC patients (p = 0.2820). The median time to the next systemic cancer therapy alone (i. e. without the event 'death') was 22.7 months for EC and 23.3 months for LC patients (p = 0.5995). Median overall survival (OS) was 22.3 months for EC and 39.2 months for LC patients (p = 0.0232). The incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) was low. SAEs occurred in 3/44 EC (6.8 %), 4/105 LC (3.8 %), and 1/10 MEC patients (10.0 %). One SAE in EC and one in LC resulted in death. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to the new definition of castration resistance, AA + P was still more frequently used in daily clinical practice during the study observation period in patients treated with antiandrogens of the first generation after occurrence of castration resistance. Nevertheless, AA + P therapy appears to be effective and well tolerated during clinical routine in mCRPC patients. A comparison of the study results with earlier 'real-world' studies, however, has to take limiting factors into account. The observed difference in median overall survival might be explained by the imbalance of baseline characteristics between both cohorts with regard to number of patients, patients already deceased at start of documentation, patients with visceral metastases and patients with opioids at start of AA + P. For these reasons, patients in the EC initially might have had a poorer prognosis. A prospective randomised and controlled clinical trial would therefore be necessary to assess a possible difference in overall survival and response of the AA + P treatment with respect to therapy onset.

[Tolerability, compliance, quality of life, and clinical outcome during treatment with quinine sulfate in patients with nocturnal calf cramps. A multicenter non-interventional study (NIS) in adults]. / Chininsulfat in der Therapie nächtlicher Wadenkrämpfe: Verträglichkeit, Compliance, Lebensqualität und Einfluss auf Symptome : Eine multizentrische nichtinterventionelle Studie (NIS) bei Erwachsenen.

BACKGROUND: Frequent and painful nocturnal leg cramps (NLC) require an effective therapy to improve quality of life and sleep performance in patients. METHOD: In a multicenter, prospective, non-interventional study (NIS) data on the effectiveness, tolerability and safety of quinine sulfate were collected in daily medical management in adult patients with frequent and painful nocturnal leg cramps. RESULTS: In total 596 patients were included into the study. Of these, 568 patients finished the study as planned (95.3%). Number, duration and pain intensity of NLC were reduced in the majority of patients after 2 weeks of therapy with quinine sulfate 200 mg OD. Physicians rated global assessment of treatment effect as "good" and "very good" in 535 patients (92.4%) which was concurrent with the patients' rating ("good" and "very good" by 534 patients = 92.2%), based on the full analysis set of 579 patients. Furthermore, quality of life and sleep were improved. Adverse drug reactions were reported in 35/592 patients (5.9%). Severe adverse events were not observed. The total incidence of therapy-associated adverse effects was comparable in the subgroup of patients with concomitant ß-blocker therapy (149/592 patients, 25.2%; totally 10%, subgroup 10.1%). Efficacy and tolerability of quinine sulfate were evaluated as "very good" or "good" by the majority of physicians and patients. CONCLUSIONS: The present NIS confirms effectiveness and tolerability of the therapy with quinine sulfate in daily clinical routine for adult patients with frequent and painful nocturnal leg cramps.

Effect of simvastatin and/or pioglitazone on insulin resistance, insulin secretion, adiponectin, and proinsulin levels in nondiabetic patients at cardiovascular risk--the PIOSTAT Study.

We investigated the effect of pioglitazone in comparison with and in combination with simvastatin on insulin resistance, plasma adiponectin, postprandial plasma glucose, insulin, and intact proinsulin levels in a nondiabetic population at cardiovascular risk. One hundred twenty-five nondiabetic patients at cardiovascular risk were randomized to pioglitazone (PIO), pioglitazone and simvastatin (PIO/SIM), or simvastatin (SIM) treatments. Blood samples were taken for the measurement of adiponectin and lipid levels. In addition, an oral glucose load with the measurements of glucose, insulin, and intact proinsulin levels was performed. Adiponectin levels increased from 14.0+/-8.2 to 27.6+/-14.5 microg/mL (P<.0001) during PIO treatment and from 11.7+/-10.0 to 26.7+/-15.7 microg/mL (P<.0001) during PIO/SIM treatment. A decrease in adiponectin levels from 15.5+/-12.7 to 11.6+/-7.0 microg/mL (P<.05) was observed during SIM treatment. Although fasting intact proinsulin levels remained unchanged, the increase in postprandial intact proinsulin levels could be reduced from 29.5+/-21.4 to 22.1+/-17.5 pmol/L (P<.01) during PIO treatment and from 24.3+/-27.4 to 21.1+/-16.5 mmol/L (P<.05) during PIO/SIM treatment. Lipid parameters improved during SIM treatment but not during PIO treatment. Combined treatment with PIO/SIM was superior in improving overall cardiovascular risk profile than every single drug.

Prospective, randomized, controlled, and open study in primarily inoperable, stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients given sequential radiochemotherapy with or without epoetin alfa.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Induction chemotherapy is associated with anemia in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients undergoing radiotherapy. This randomized, open-label study compared the effect of sequential radiochemotherapy (RCHT) versus RCHT + epoetin alfa (RCHT + EPO), with respect to 2-year overall survival (OS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients ⩾18 years received sequential RCHT; one arm also received EPO (chemotherapy day 1, when Hb<12 g/dL). Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test, and Cox-regression methods were performed. RESULTS: Of the 385 patients randomized (RCHT + EPO: n = 195; RCHT: n = 190), 78 (RCTH + EPO: 46 [23.6%]; RCHT: 32 [16.8%]) were anemic at baseline. Two-year OS was higher in RCHT + EPO-treated versus RCHT-treated (28.5% [95% CI: 22.2-35.1%] versus 20.6% [95% CI: 15.1-26.8%] [p = 0.2278]), and requirement for RBC transfusion was lower (24/195 [12.3%] versus 61/190 [32.1%]). In anemic (baseline) patients (post hoc analysis), median survival was shorter in RCTH-treated (212 days) versus RCHT + EPO-treated (343 days) (Hazard ratio = 1.62 [95% CI: 0.99-2.63], p = 0.0525). Adverse events were documented in 72.7% (RCHT + EPO: 75.0%; RCHT: 70.5%) patients, and thrombovascular events (TVEs) in 45 patients (RCHT + EPO: 16.7%; RCHT: 7.9%; p = 0.0099). CONCLUSIONS: A statistically non-significant trend for 2-year OS was observed in a sub-group of EPO-treated NSCLC-patients with baseline anemia, although this trend was not maintained in the overall population with inoperable NSCLC.

Anti-inflammatory effects of pioglitazone and/or simvastatin in high cardiovascular risk patients with elevated high sensitivity C-reactive protein: the PIOSTAT Study.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to test the safety and efficacy of pioglitazone and simvastatin in combination versus each drug individually in non-diabetic subjects with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels. BACKGROUND: Low-grade inflammation is a pathogenic factor for atherosclerosis. High-sensitivity CRP, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9, and plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI)-1 are markers of inflammation. Statins and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-gamma agonists lower inflammatory markers and reduce CVD in type 2 diabetes. METHODS: In a 12-week, prospective, double-blind trial, 125 subjects were randomized to simvastatin or pioglitazone plus placebo or a simvastatin/pioglitazone combination. We tested changes in hs-CRP by analysis of covariance. A subgroup analysis was performed in patients with and without the metabolic syndrome (MetS). The correlation between changes in hs-CRP and homeostasis model assessment (HOMA; a measure of insulin resistance) was calculated with the Spearman's rank test. RESULTS: At baseline, there were no significant between-group differences. At 12 weeks, pioglitazone and simvastatin monotherapies significantly reduced hs-CRP (3.64 +/- 2.42 mg/l to 2.48 +/- 1.77 mg/l and 3.26 +/- 2.02 mg/l to 2.81 +/- 2.11 mg/l) and the combination regimen had an additive effect (from 3.49 +/- 1.97 mg/l to 2.06 +/- 1.42 mg/l, p < 0.001). For subgroups, the difference between monotherapy and combination therapy was only significant for simvastatin versus simvastatin plus pioglitazone in patients without MetS. Homeostasis model assessment decreased in those receiving pioglitazone, and the correlation between changes in HOMA and hs-CRP was significant (r = 0.43; p < 0.05). The PAI-1 decreased significantly in the pioglitazone groups only, and MMP-9 was also significantly lowered in the pioglitazone groups. No treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in any group. CONCLUSIONS: Pioglitazone, probably by reducing insulin resistance, has additive anti-inflammatory effects to simvastatin in non-diabetic subjects with CVD and high hs-CRP.