Hazard Profiling of Commercially Relevant Quantum Dot Components Revealed Synergistic Interactions between Heavy Metals and Polymers.

Commercially used quantum dots (QDs) exemplify complex nanomaterials with multiple components, though little is known about the type of interactions between these components in determining the overall toxicity of this material. We synthesized and characterized a functional QD (CdSe/ZnS_P&E) that was identical in structure and composition to a patented and commercially applied QD and the combinations of its components (CdSe, CdSe/ZnS, ZnS, CdSe_P&E, ZnS_P&E, and P&E). Cells exposed to incremental concentrations of these materials were investigated for cell viability and cellular perturbations, contributing to a final common pathway of cell death using high-content screening assays in model human intestinal epithelial cells (HIEC-6). The concentrations that resulted in a loss of 20% cell viability (EC20 values) for each tested component were used for estimating the combination index (CI) to evaluate synergistic or antagonistic effects between the components. Complete QD (core/shell-polymer) showed the highest toxic potential due to synergistic interactions between core and surface functional groups. The cationic polymer coating enhanced cellular uptake of the QD, ensuing lysosome acidification and release of heavy metal ions to the intracellular milieu, and caused oxidative stress and cytotoxicity. Overall, this study advances our understanding of the collective contribution of individual components of a functional QD toward its toxic potential and emphasizes the need to study multilayered nanomaterials in their entirety for hazard characterization.

Alternatives assessment: An analysis on progress and future needs for research and practice.

Alternatives assessment is a science-policy approach to support the informed substitution of chemicals of concern in consumer products and industries, with the intent of avoiding regrettable substitution and facilitating the transition to safer, more sustainable chemicals and products. The field of alternatives assessment has grown steadily in recent decades, particularly after the publication of specific frameworks and the inclusion of substitution and alternatives assessment requirements in a number of policy contexts. Previously, 14 research and practice needs for the field were outlined across five critical areas: comparative hazard assessment, comparative exposure characterization, lifecycle considerations, decision-making and decision analysis, and professional practice. The aim of the current article is twofold: to highlight methodological advances in the growing field of alternatives assessment based on identified research and practice needs and to propose areas for future developments. We assess advances in the field based on the analysis of a broad literature review that captured 154 sources published from 2013 to 2022. The results indicate that research conducted advanced many of the needs identified, but several remain underaddressed. Although the field has clearly grown and taken root over the past decade, there are still research and practice gaps, most notably on the hazard assessment of mixtures or different forms of chemicals, the integration of lifecycle considerations, and the development of practical approaches to address trade-offs in decision-making. We propose modifications to four of the prior research and practice needs in addition to new needs, including the development of standardized hazard assessment approaches for chemical mixtures as well as better integration of equity and/or justice considerations into assessments. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2024;20:1337-1354. © 2023 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).