Oral anticoagulation therapy in atrial fibrillation patients at high risk of bleeding: Clinical characteristics and treatment strategies based on data from the Polish multicenter register of atrial fibrillation (POL-AF).

BACKGROUND: Despite its benefits, oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with hemorrhagic complications. AIMS: We aimed to evaluate clinical characteristics of AF patients at high risk of bleeding and the frequency of OAC use as well as identify factors that predict nonuse of OACs in these patients. METHODS: Consecutive AF patients hospitalized for urgent or planned reasons in cardiac centers were prospectively included in the registry in 2019. Patients with HAS-BLED ≥3 (high HAS-BLED group) were assumed to have a high risk of bleeding. RESULTS: Among 3598 patients enrolled in the study, 29.2% were at high risk of bleeding (44.7% female; median [Q1-Q3] age 72 [65-81], CHA2DS2-VASc score 5 [4-6], HAS-BLED 3 [3-4]). In this group, 14.5% of patients did not receive OACs, 68% received NOACs, and 17.5% VKAs. In multivariable analysis, the independent predictors of nonuse of oral OACs were as follows: creatinine level (odds ratio [OR], 1.441; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.174-1.768; P <0.001), a history of gastrointestinal bleeding (OR, 2.918; 95% CI, 1.395-6.103; P = 0.004), malignant neoplasm (OR, 3.127; 95% CI, 1.332-7.343; P = 0.009), and a history of strokes or transient ischemic attacks (OR, 0.327; 95% CI, 0.166-0.642; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: OACs were used much less frequently in the group with a high HAS-BLED score than in the group with a low score. Independent predictors of nonuse of OACs were creatinine levels, a history of gastrointestinal bleeding, and malignant neoplasms. A history of stroke or transient ischemic attack increased the chances of receiving therapy.

Association of Hyperuricemia with Impaired Left Ventricular Systolic Function in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Preserved Kidney Function: Analysis of the POL-AF Registry Cohort.

Hyperuricemia is associated with the risk of developing atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure. However, coexisting chronic kidney disease and certain cardiovascular drugs make it difficult to determine whether hyperuricemia is a risk factor or merely a marker of pathology. We retrieved data from the Polish Atrial Fibrillation (POL-AF) registry, which included consecutive patients hospitalized with AF from January to December, 2019. We included 829 patients (mean age: 72.7 ± 11.1 years) with data on serum uric acid (UA, mean: 6.56 ± 1.78 mg/dL) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. We found that UA and ejection fraction (EF) were significantly correlated (r = −0.15, p < 0.05), but not EF and eGFR or eGFR and UA. A multiple regression analysis adjusted for age, body mass index, eGFR, and UA, showed that UA was significantly associated with a reduced EF (R2: 0.021; p < 0.001). The UA cut-off indicative of an EF < 40% was 6.69 mg/dL (AUC, area under the curve: 0.607; 95% CI: 0.554−0.660; p = 0.001). Among drugs known to effect UA concentrations, we found that only diuretics were used more frequently in patients with high UA (above the median) than in patients with low UA (77.5% vs. 67%, p < 0.001). Among patients that used diuretics, UA remained significantly correlated with EF. Thus, we showed that reduced EF was associated with UA in patients with AF and normal renal function, independent of eGFR and diuretic use.

Do Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and a History of Ischemic Stroke Overuse Reduced Doses of NOACs?-Results of the Polish Atrial Fibrillation (POL-AF) Registry.

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to assess if patients with AF (atrial fibrillation) and a history of ischemic stroke (IS) excessively receive reduced doses of NOACs (non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants). METHODS: The Polish AF (POL-AF) registry is a prospective, observational, multicenter study, including patients with AF from 10 cardiology hospital centers. In this study we focused on patients with IS in their past. RESULTS: Among 3999 patients enrolled in the POL-AF registry, 479 (12%) had a previous history of IS. Compared to patients without IS history, post-stroke subjects had a higher CHA2DS2-VASc score (median score 7 vs. 4, p < 0.05). Of these subjects, 439 (92%) had anticoagulation therapy, 83 (18.9%) were treated with a vitamin K antagonist (VKA), 135 (30.8%) with rivaroxaban, 112 (25.5%) with dabigatran, and 109 (24.8%) with apixaban. There were a significant number of patients after IS with reduced doses of NOACs (48.9% for rivaroxaban, 45.5% for dabigatran, and 36.7% for apixaban). In many cases, patients were prescribed reduced doses of NOACs without any indication for reduction (28.8% of rivaroxaban use, 56.9% of dabigatran use, and 60.0% of apixaban use-out of reduced dosage groups, p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of AF patients received reduced doses of NOAC after ischemic stroke in a sizeable number of cases, without indication for dose reduction.

District versus academic hospitals: clinical outcomes of patients with atrial fibrillation.

Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with increased hospitalization. Objectives: We aimed to compare long-term outcomes in patients with AF hospitalized in academic and district hospitals. Patients and methods: This retrospective observational study included data from the Multicenter Experience in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Treated with Oral Anticoagulants (CRAFT; NCT02987062) study which included AF patients hospitalized between 2011 and 2016 in academic and district hospitals. The primary end point was a major adverse event (MAE) defined as all-cause death and thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events during the median 4-year follow-up. Results: We analyzed 2983 patients with AF: 2271 (76%) from academic and 712 (24%) from district hospitals. Patients treated in district hospitals, as compared with patients treated in academic hospitals, more often experienced MAEs (53% vs 37%; P <⁠0.001), all-cause death (40% vs 24%; P <⁠0.001), and thromboembolic events (13% vs 7.8%; P <⁠0.001), with similar rates of hemorrhagic events (15% vs 15%; P = 1.00). In multivariable logistic regression, female sex, coronary artery disease, smoking, and antiplatelet drug therapy were associated with greater likelihood of thromboembolic events in academic hospitals. Heart failure, renal failure, and vitamin K antagonist (in academic hospitals), and coronary artery disease (in district hospitals) were associated with greater likelihood of hemorrhagic events. District (vs academic) conditions were associated with higher risk of MAEs and all-cause death in men and those with low risk of bleeding, and with higher incidence of thromboembolic events in women, elderly patients, and those with high risk of bleeding and with diabetes. Conclusions: Patients with AF treated at district hospitals had worse long-term outcomes than those treated in academic conditions.

Antithrombotic Management and Long-Term Outcomes of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. Insights from CRAFT Trial.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare long-term outcomes in Polish patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) according to oral anticoagulation (OAC) type and to evaluate the predictive value of common thromboembolic and bleeding risk scores. METHODS: Data from the CRAFT trial (NCT02987062) were included. The primary study endpoint was major adverse event (MAE; all-cause death, thromboembolic and hemorrhagic event) during the mean four-year follow-up period. RESULTS: Out of 2983 patients with available follow-up data, 1686 (56%) were prescribed with vitamin K antagonist (VKA), 891 (30%) with rivaroxaban and 406 (14%) with dabigatran. Predominance of elderly and female patients with previous history of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events was observed within rivaroxaban (vs. other OAC) group. Higher rate of MAEs and its components was observed in patients on VKA followed by rivaroxaban as compared to patients on dabigatran (43% vs. 42% vs. 31%, p < 0.01). After group matching based on clinical characteristics, higher risk of hemorrhagic events in VKA (vs. dabigatran) and rivaroxaban (vs. dabigatran) group were observed. The available thromboembolic (CHA2DS2-VASs, ATRIA, R2CHADS2) and bleeding (HAS-BLED, ATRIA, ORBIT) risk scores showed poor prediction value. CONCLUSIONS: Despite no difference in the thromboembolic event rate, treatment with VKA and rivaroxaban was associated with a significant increase in the risk of hemorrhagic events.

Why Did All Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and High Risk of Stroke Not Receive Oral Anticoagulants? Results of the Polish Atrial Fibrillation (POL-AF) Registry.

BACKGROUND: Most atrial fibrillation (AF) patients are at high risk of thromboembolic, and the use of oral anticoagulants (OACs) is advised in such cases. The aim of the study was to evaluate the frequency at which OACs were used in patients with AF and high risk thromboembolic complications, and identify factors that result in OACs not being used in the researched group of patients. METHODS: The prospective, multicenter and non-interventional POL-AF registry is a study that includes AF patients from ten Polish cardiology centers. They were consecutively hospitalized between January and December of 2019. All the patients in the study were of high stroke risk. RESULTS: A total of 3614 patients with AF and high stroke risk were included. Among the total study population, 91.5% received OAC therapy; antiplatelet therapy was prescribed for 3.7% of patients, heparin for 2.7%, and 2.1% of patients did not receive any stroke prevention therapy. Independent predictors of no OAC prescription were intracranial bleeding (OR 0.15, 95%CI 0.07-0.35, p < 0.001), gastrointestinal bleeding (OR 0.25, 95%CI 0.17-0.37, p < 0.001), cancer (OR 0.37, 95%CI 0.25-0.55, p < 0.001), hospitalization due to acute coronary syndrome (OR 0.48, 95%CI 0.33-0.69, p < 0.001), and anemia (OR 0.62, 95%CI 0.48-0.81, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Most AF patients with a high thromboembolic risk received OACs. The factors predisposing a lack of OAC use in these patients were conditions that significantly increased the risk of bleeding complications.

Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Patients in the Polish Atrial Fibrillation (POL-AF) Registry.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) can cause severe symptoms, but it is frequently asymptomatic. We aimed to compare the clinical features of patients with asymptomatic and symptomatic AF. METHODS: A prospective, observational, multicenter study was performed (the Polish Atrial Fibrillation (POL-AF) registry). Consecutive hospitalized AF patients over 18 years of age were enrolled at ten centers. The data were collected for two weeks during each month of 2019. RESULTS: A total of 2785 patients were analyzed, of whom 1360 were asymptomatic (48.8%). Asymptomatic patients were more frequently observed to have coronary artery disease (57.5% vs. 49.1%, p < 0.0001), heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (39.8% vs. 26.5%, p < 0.0001), a previous thromboembolic event (18.2% vs. 13.1%, p = 0.0002), and paroxysmal AF (52.3% vs. 45.2%, p = 0.0002). In multivariate analysis, history of electrical cardioversion, paroxysmal AF, heart failure, coronary artery disease, previous thromboembolic event, and higher left ventricular ejection fraction were predictors of a lack of AF symptoms. First-diagnosed AF was a predictor of AF symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison to symptomatic patients, more of those hospitalized with asymptomatic AF had been previously diagnosed with this arrhythmia and other cardiovascular diseases. However, they presented with better left ventricular function and were more frequently treated with cardiovascular medicines.

Characteristics and Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation with Respect to the Presence or Absence of Heart Failure. Insights from the Multicenter Polish Atrial Fibrillation (POL-AF) Registry.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to assess characteristics and treatment of AF patients with and without heart failure (HF). METHODS: The prospective, observational Polish Atrial Fibrillation (POL-AF) Registry included consecutive patients with AF hospitalized in 10 Polish cardiology centers in 2019-2020. RESULTS: Among 3999 AF patients, 2822 (71%) had HF (AF/HF group). Half of AF/HF patients had preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Compared to patients without HF (AF/non-HF), AF/HF patients were older, more often male, more often had permanent AF, and had more comorbidities. Of AF/HF patients, 98% had class I indications to oral anticoagulation (OAC). Still, 16% of patients were not treated with OAC at hospital admission, and 9%-at discharge (regardless of the presence of HF and its subtypes). Of patients not receiving OAC upon admission, 61% were prescribed OAC (most often apixaban) at discharge. AF/non-HF patients more often converted from AF at admission to sinus rhythm at discharge compared to AF/HF patients (55% vs. 30%), despite cardioversion performed as often in both groups. Class I antiarrhythmics were more often prescribed in AF/non-HF than in AF/HF group (13% vs. 8%), but still as many as 15% of HFpEF patients received them. CONCLUSIONS: Over 70% of hospitalized AF patients have coexisting HF. A significant number of AF patients does not receive the recommended OAC.

Hyperuricemia as a Marker of Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Results of the POL-AF Registry Study.

Background: Hyperuricemia is an established risk factor for cardiovascular disease, including atrial fibrillation (AF). The prevalence of hyperuricemia and its clinical significance in patients with already diagnosed AF remain unexplored. Methods: The Polish Atrial Fibrillation (POL-AF) registry includes consecutive patients with AF hospitalized in 10 Polish cardiology centers from January to December 2019. This analysis included patients in whom serum uric acid (SUA) was measured. Results: From 3999 POL-AF patients, 1613 were included in the analysis. The mean age of the subjects was 72 ± 11.6 years, and the mean SUA was 6.88 ± 1.93 mg/dL. Hyperuricemia was found in 43% of respondents. Eighty-four percent of the respondents were assigned to the high cardiovascular risk group, and 45% of these had SUA >7 mg/dL. Comparison of the extreme SUA groups (<5 mg/dL vs. >7 mg/dL) showed significant differences in renal parameters, total cholesterol concentration, and left ventricular ejection fraction (EF). Multivariate regression analysis showed that SUA >7 mg/dL (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.32-2.30) and GFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (OR 1.94, 95% CI 1.46-2.48) are significant markers of EF <40% in the study population. Female sex was a protective factor (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.56-0.97). The cut-off point for SUA with 60% sensitivity and specificity indicative of an EF <40% was 6.9 mg/dL. Conclusions: Although rarely assessed, hyperuricemia appears to be common in patients with AF. High SUA levels may be a significant biomarker of reduced left ventricular EF in AF patients.

Antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, including compliance with current guidelines-data from the POLish Atrial Fibrillation (POL-AF) Registry.

BACKGROUND: Although triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT) is recommended in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), guidelines allow an option of dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT). This study assesses the everyday practice of 10 cardiology departments in antithrombotic therapy in AF patients undergoing PCI and its agreement with current guidelines. METHODS: This analysis included medical data of AF patients enrolled in the prospective, observational registry (The POLish Atrial Fibrillation-POL-AF) that underwent PCI [elective or due to acute coronary syndrome (ACS)]. RESULTS: Of the 3,999 consecutive subjects included, a final analysis was performed on 359 patients that underwent PCI: 148 with urgent PCI due to ACSand 211 patients with elective PCI. Eighty patients in the ACS-group and 120 patients in the elective-PCI group were treated with TAT, although guidelines also allowed DAT. Of 316 patients treated with oral anticoagulants as a part of combination therapy, 275 were on non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC). Reduced doses of NOAC were used in 74 patients treated with rivaroxaban, 60 patients with dabigatran, and 54 patients with apixaban. The proportion of patients treated with reduced NOAC doses adequately to the guidelines was 29%, 100%, and 33% for rivaroxaban, dabigatran, and apixaban, respectively. Inappropriate low doses of NOACs were used in 71% of subjects on rivaroxaban and 67% on apixaban. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with AF undergoing PCI, NOACs are definitely preferred over vitamin-K antagonists (VKAs) in TAT/DAT, and an aggressive antithrombotic strategy with TAT is frequently chosen even if DAT is permissible by the guidelines. Label adherence of using reduced NOAC dose during combination therapy is not satisfactory for apixaban and rivaroxaban and probably results from too cautious an approach to the known indications for reduced therapy. The study is registered in the database Clinical Trials-NCT04419012.

Randomized controlled clinical trials versus real-life atrial fibrillation patients treated with oral anticoagulants. Do we treat the same patients?

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to compare clinical characteristics of real-life atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with populations included in randomized clinical trials (ROCKET AF and RE-LY). METHODS: The analysis included 3528 patients who are participants of the ongoing, multicentre, retrospective CRAFT study. The study is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02987062. The study is based on a retrospective analysis of hospital records of AF patients treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) (acenocoumarol, warfarin) and non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) (dabigatran, rivaroxaban). CHADS2 score was used for risk of stroke stratification. RESULTS: VKA was prescribed in 1973 (56.0%), while NOAC in 1549 (44.0%), including dabigatran - 504 (14.3%) and rivaroxaban - 1051 (29.8%), of the 3528 patients. VKA patients in the CRAFT study were at significantly lower risk of stroke (CHADS2 1.9 ± 1.3), compared with the VKA population from the RE-LY (2.1 ± 1.1) and the ROCKET-AF (3.5 ± 1.0). Patients in the CRAFT study treated with NOAC (CHADS2 for patients on dabigatran 150 mg - 1.3 ± 1.2 and on rivaroxaban - 2.2 ± 1.4) had lower risk than patients from the RE-LY (2.2 ± 1.2) and the ROCKET AF (3.5 ± 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: Real-world patients had a lower risk of stroke than patients included in the RE-LY and ROCKET AF trials.

Trends in the Prescription of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants for Atrial Fibrillation: Results of the Polish Atrial Fibrillation (POL-AF) Registry.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines do not suggest in which groups of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) individual non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) should be used for the prevention of thromboembolic complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency of use of apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban, and attempt to identify factors predisposing their administration. METHODS: The Polish Atrial Fibrillation (POL-AF) registry is a prospective, non-interventional study, including consecutive patients with AF hospitalized in ten Polish cardiology centers during the period ranging from January to December 2019. In this study, all patients were treated with NOACs. RESULTS: Among the 2971 patients included in the analysis, 40.4% were treated with rivaroxaban, 32% with apixaban, and 27.6% with dabigatran. The mean age of the total population was 72 ± 11.5 years and 43% were female. A reduced dose of NOAC was used in 35% of patients treated with apixaban, 39.7% of patients treated with dabigatran, and 34.4% of patients treated with rivaroxaban. Independent predictors of the use of apixaban were previous bleeding (OR 2.37, CI 1.67­3.38), GFR < 60 mL/min (OR 1.38, CI 1.25­1.64), heart failure (OR 1.38, CI 1.14­1.67) and age (per 5 years) (OR 1.14, CI 1.09­1.19). GFR < 60 mL/min (OR 0.79, CI 0.66­0.95), female (OR 0.8, CI 0.67­0.96) and age (per 5 years) (OR 0.95, CI 0.91­0.99) diminished the chance of using dabigatran. Previous bleeding (OR 0.43, CI 0.28­0.64), vascular disease (OR 0.84, CI 0.70­0.99), and age (per 5 years) (OR 0.94, CI 0.90­0.97) diminished the chance of choosing rivaroxaban. CONCLUSIONS: In hospitalized patients with AF, the most frequently chosen NOAC was rivaroxaban. Apixaban was chosen more often in patients after bleeding, and in those who were advanced in years, with heart failure and impaired renal function. Impaired renal function and female gender were factors that diminished the chance of using dabigatran. Previous bleeding and vascular disease was the factor that diminished the chance of using rivaroxaban. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban have been used less frequently in elderly patients.

Comparative effectiveness of torasemide versus furosemide in symptomatic therapy in heart failure patients: Preliminary results from the randomized TORNADO trial.

BACKGROUND: Recent reports suggest that torasemide might be more beneficial than furosemide in patients with symptomatic heart failure (HF). The aim was to compare the effects of torasemide and furosemide on clinical outcomes in HF patients. METHODS: This study pilot consisted of data from the ongoing multicenter, randomized, unblinded endpoint phase IV TORNADO (NCT01942109) study. HF patients in New York Heart Association (NYHA) II-IV class with a stable dose of furosemide were randomized to treatment with equipotential dose of torasemide (4:1) or continuation of unchanged dose of furosemide. On enrollment and control visit (3 months after enrollment) clinical examination, 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and assessment of fluid retention by ZOE Fluid Status Monitor were performed. The primary endpoint was a composite of improvement of NYHA class, improvement of at least 50 m during 6MWT and decrease in fluid retention of at least 0.5 W after 3-months follow-up. RESULTS: The study group included 40 patients (median age 66 years; 77.5% male). During follow-up 7 patients were hospitalized for HF worsening (3 in torasemide and 4 in furosemide-treated patients). The primary endpoint reached 15 (94%) and 14 (58%) patients on torasemide and furosemide, respectively (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In HF patients treated with torasemide fluid overload and symptoms improved more than in the furosemide group. This positive effect occurred already within 3-month observation.

District versus academic hospitals: differences in the clinical characteristics of patients with atrial fibrillation without valvular heart disease treated with oral anticoagulants

INTRODUCTION Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia with a significant risk of morbidity and mortality. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants are the first­line drugs in stroke prevention in patients with AF. Oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy may differ between medical centers. OBJECTIVES We compared the clinical characteristics of AF patients treated with OAC in a district and an academic hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS We analyzed 3528 patients from the multicenter retrospective CRAFT study: 2666 patients from the academic hospital and 862 patients from the district hospital. Their baseline clinical characteristics were compared. RESULTS Patients treated in the district hospital were older (mean [SD] age, 73.9 [10.3] years vs 66.0 [13.4] years; P <0.001) and more likely female (49.1% vs 37.4%; P <0.001). Patients treated in the academic hospital more frequently had paroxysmal AF, while those in the district hospital, permanent AF. The latter group was also more likely to have comorbidities and a higher frequency of previous bleeding episodes or anemia. The groups did not differ regarding kidney function. In both groups, patients were significantly more likely to be on rivaroxaban than on dabigatran. The group treated in the district hospital were at higher risk of thromboembolic events than the other gruop (mean [SD] CHA2DS2VASc score, 4.6 [1.7] vs 3.05 [2.0]; P <0.001), as well as of hemorrhagic events (mean [SD] HASBLED score, 0.6 [0.7] vs 0.4 [0.6]; P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS Patients with AF treated with OACs in the district and academic hospitals have different clinical characteristics. Patients treated in the district hospital were older, had more comorbidities, more frequently had permanent AF, and were at higher risk of thromboembolic and bleeding events than patients treated in the academic hospital.

Clinical characteristics and thromboembolic risk of atrial fibrillation patients with and without congestive heart failure. Results from the CRATF study.

Congestive heart failure (CHF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently coexist and are associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events.To compare baseline characteristics, comorbidities and pharmacotherapy in AF patients with concomitant CHF to those without CHF.The study included 3506 real-life AF patients with (37.1%) and without CHF - participants of the multicentre, retrospective MultiCenter expeRience in AFib patients Treated with OAC (CRAFT) trial (NCT02987062).All patients were treated with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) or vitamin K antagonists (VKA). The frequency of NOAC among patients with and without CHF was 45.6% and 43.2%, respectively (P = .17). Patients with CHF were older (73.3 vs 64.7 years, P <.001), less likely to be women (37.4% vs 42%, P = .007), had higher CHA2DS2-VASc score (3.8 ±â€Š1.7 vs 2.6 ±â€Š1.8, P <.001), more often had permanent AF (53.0% vs 13.4%, P <.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (16.7% vs 4.9%, P <.001), coronary artery disease (64.3% vs 29.8%, P <.001), peripheral vascular disease (65.3% vs 31.4%, P <.001), chronic kidney disease (43.1% vs 10.0%, P <.001), liver fibrosis (5.7% vs 2.6%, P <.001), neoplasm (9.6% vs 7.3%, P = .05), history of composite of stroke, transient ischemic attack or systemic embolization (16.2% vs 10.7%, P <.001), pacemaker (27.4% vs 22.1%, P = .004), implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (22.7% vs 0.8%, P <.001) or transaortic valve implantation (4.0% vs 0.8%, P <.001), cardiac resynchronization therapy (8.7% vs 0.3%, P <.001), composite of kidney transplantation, hemodialysis or creatinine level > 2.26 mg/dL (3.6% vs 0.8%, P <.001) and had less often hypertension (69.4% vs 72.5%, P = .05).Patients with AF and CHF had a higher thromboembolic risk and had more concomitant diseases.

Comparison of clinical characteristics of real-life atrial fibrillation patients treated with vitamin K antagonists, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban: results from the CRAFT study.

BACKGROUND: The first-line drugs for the treatment of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) are non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), which are preferred over vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). There is some evidence that there are dis-crepancies between everyday clinical practice and the guidelines. AIM: The study aimed to compare the characteristics of patients on VKAs, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban in everyday practice (i.e. baseline characteristics, drug doses, risk factors for bleeding and thromboembolic events). Additionally, we assessed the frequency of prescription of different oral anticoagulants (OACs) in recent years. METHODS: This study consisted of data from the multicentre CRAFT (MultiCentre expeRience in AFib patients Treated with OAC) study (NCT02987062). This was a retrospective analysis of hospital records of AF patients (hospitalised in the years 2011-2016) treated with VKAs (acenocoumarol, warfarin) and NOACs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban). A total of 3528 patients with non-valvular AF were enrolled in the CRAFT study. RESULTS: The total cohort consisted of 1973 patients on VKA, 504 patients on dabigatran, and 1051 patients on rivaroxaban. Patients on rivaroxaban were older (70.5 ± 13.1 years) and more often female (47.9%), compared with those on VKAs (67.0 ± 12.8 years, p < 0.001; 35.5%, p < 0.001) and on dabigatran (66.0 ± 13.9 years, p < 0.001; 38.9%, p = 0.001). Among NOACs, patients with persistent and permanent AF were more likely to receive rivaroxaban (54.7% and 73.4%, re-spectively) than dabigatran (45.3%, p < 0.001 and 26.6%, p = 0.002, respectively). Patients on rivaroxaban had higher risk of thromboembolic events (CHA2DS2VASc 3.9 ± 2.0, CHADS2 2.2 ± 1.4) than those on VKAs (3.3 ± 2.0, 1.9 ± 1.3) and on dabigatran (3.1 ± 2.0, 1.8 ± 1.3). Patients on rivaroxaban had also a higher rate of prior major bleeding (11.2%) than those on VKAs (6.7%, p < 0.001) and on dabigatran (7.3%, p = 0.02). Patients on lower doses of dabigatran and rivaroxaban had a significantly higher risk of thromboembolic and bleeding events. Use of VKAs in the year 2011 was reported in over 96% of patients on OACs, but this proportion decreased to 34.6% in 2016. In the last analysed year (2016) AF patients were treated mainly with NOACs - dabigatran (24.2%) and rivaroxaban (41.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The prescription of VKAs declined significantly after the introduction of NOACs. Patients treated with different OACs demonstrated a distinct baseline clinical profile. The highest risk of thromboembolic events and incidence of major bleedings was observed in patients on rivaroxaban, in comparison to patients on VKAs and dabigatran. Among NOACs, patients treated with lower doses of dabigatran and rivaroxaban were older and had a significantly higher risk of thromboembolic and bleeding events.

Anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation patients in the clinical practice of a single district hospital in Poland.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Retrospective evaluation of stroke risk in all patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) admitted to cardiology, internal medicine, and neurology wards in a single Polish district hospital in 2006 and 2010 using two risk stratification schemes, CHADS2 vs. CHA2DS2VASc risk scores and identification of independent predictors of guideline-compliant oral anticoagulant (OAC) treatment. METHODS: We analysed case records of 613 patients with AF (including 300 patients in 2006 and 313 patients in 2010) treated in a district hospital - the John Paul II Western Hospital (Szpital Zachodni) in Grodzisk Mazowiecki, to evaluate their stroke risk and therapy prescribed at discharge. RESULTS: The mean patient age in the overall study population (49% of men) was 74.3 years (74.8, 77.5, and 71.9 years, respectively, in patients with paroxysmal, permanent and persistent AF). Patients > 75 years old comprised 58.6% of the study group, and those < 65 years old comprised 16.6% of the study group. The most common concomitant diseases were hypertension (65.9%), chronic heart failure (61.7%), coronary artery disease (43.1%), at least moderate mitral and/or tricuspid regurgitation (36.4%), and peripheral arterial disease (36%). Indications for OAC treatment were present in 85% (using the CHADS2 score) or 95% (using the CHA2DS2VASc score) patients but this therapy was prescribed at discharge in only 39% of the study group (240 patients). Compared to patients who were not prescribed OAC, those prescribed OAC treatment were younger, more often male, with permanent AF, valvular heart disease, and hypertension. In patients without OAC treatment at discharge, the following conditions were found more frequently than in patients prescribed OAC treatment: paroxysmal AF(49.8% vs. 33.3% in OAC patients), established coronary artery disease (46.1% vs. 38.3%), previous myocardial infarction (27%vs. 18.7%), prior coronary revascularisation (11.2% vs. 6.6%), alcohol abuse (4.2% vs. 0.8%), renal failure (31.6% vs. 21.6%), and stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA; 19.3% vs. 12%). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, we identified 5 independent predictive factors associated with prescribing OAC at discharge, including persistent AF vs. paroxysmal AF (odd sratio [OR] = 5.27), permanent AF vs. paroxysmal AF (OR = 1.86), hypertension (OR = 1.50), previous stroke and/or TIA (OR = 0.59), and age > 75 years vs. < 65 years (OR = 0.53). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a high stroke risk as determined by both scores, only 39% of patients received OAC. In the studied population, independent predictors for prescribing OAC at discharge included arterial hypertension (in accordance with the guidelines) and younger patient age, no history of stroke/TIA, and AF other than paroxysmal. The practice of OAC and/or antiplatelet therapy use in AF patients discharged from a Polish district hospital was not compliant with the current ESC guidelines either in 2006 or in 2010.