Transcranial Doppler to detect right-to-left shunt in cryptogenic acute ischemic stroke.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to confirm the sensitivity and specificity of contrast transcranial Doppler (cTCD) in the detection of right-to-left shunt (RLS) compared to the current reference standard (i.e., transesophageal echocardiography-TEE) in patients aged <55 years with a cryptogenic acute ischemic stroke (AIS) or high-risk (ABCD2 score ≥4) transient ischemic attack (TIA), and to calculate the real life delay in detecting RLS by cTCD versus TEE in a tertiary care academic stroke center. METHODS: Consecutive 16- to 54-year-old patients with AIS or high-risk TIA underwent complete diagnostic workup which included, in case of undetermined etiology, cTCD and TEE. Sensitivity and specificity of cTCD, RLS characteristics, and median delay between the two tests were calculated. RESULTS: Of the 98 included patients, 52 (53%) had a cryptogenic cerebrovascular ischemic event, which displayed a 56% prevalence of RLS related to a patent foramen ovale (PFO) mainly with a high-grade shunt. When comparing TCD with "bubble test" to TEE, sensitivity and specificity were both 100%. Median delays from symptom onset to examination were 2 (min-max 1-10) and 21 (min-max 1-60) days, respectively, for cTCD and TEE. No adverse event occurred during or after cTDC examination. CONCLUSIONS: Transcranial Doppler with "bubble test" appears as the best screening test for the detection of RLS in young and middle-aged adults with cryptogenic acute cerebral ischemic events to select patients potentially suitable for closure procedure after TEE confirmation.

Management of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients according to guidelines after educative measures.

Guidelines for venous thromboembolism treatment with curative anticoagulation in cancer patients are poorly respected. Yet, venous thromboembolism is the second leading cause of death in cancer patients, after cancer progression. The aim of this study was to re-evaluate the application of these guidelines after the implementation of educational measures for patients and caregivers, and also to assess the acceptability and tolerance of treatment by patients. On the one hand, a prospective observational study conducted in cancer patients with VTE allowed to assess the rate of compliance to guidelines. These phone calls with patients also provided information on their perception of their treatment. On the other hand, surveys were sent to healthcare professionals before and after educative actions took place (information meetings and information sheets distribution) in order to evaluate the evolution of their knowledge about guidelines. Among the 110 patients included in the study, 71.8% received treatment according to guidelines: choice of the anticoagulant (low-molecular-weight heparin or antivitamin K if contraindicated) and right period of treatment. Among the patients, 84.1% were willing to continue treatment beyond 6 months. Healthcare professionals' knowledge about guidelines has increased significantly (from 20% to 42%) following the information meetings and information sheets distribution. These educative actions seem to have a positive impact on knowledge of the recommendations and their implementation.