RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic resection of adenomas prevents colorectal cancer, but the optimal technique for larger lesions is controversial. Piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) has a low adverse event (AE) rate but a variable recurrence rate necessitating early follow-up. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) can reduce recurrence but may increase AEs. OBJECTIVE: To compare ESD and EMR for large colonic adenomas. DESIGN: Participant-masked, parallel-group, superiority, randomized controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03962868). SETTING: Multicenter study involving 6 French referral centers from November 2019 to February 2021. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with large (≥25 mm) benign colonic lesions referred for resection. INTERVENTION: The patients were randomly assigned by computer 1:1 (stratification by lesion location and center) to ESD or EMR. MEASUREMENTS: The primary end point was 6-month local recurrence (neoplastic tissue on endoscopic assessment and scar biopsy). The secondary end points were technical failure, en bloc R0 resection, and cumulative AEs. RESULTS: In total, 360 patients were randomly assigned to ESD (n = 178) or EMR (n = 182). In the primary analysis set (n = 318 lesions in 318 patients), recurrence occurred after 1 of 161 ESDs (0.6%) and 8 of 157 EMRs (5.1%) (relative risk, 0.12 [95% CI, 0.01 to 0.96]). No recurrence occurred in R0-resected cases (90%) after ESD. The AEs occurred more often after ESD than EMR (35.6% vs. 24.5%, respectively; relative risk, 1.4 [CI, 1.0 to 2.0]). LIMITATION: Procedures were performed under general anesthesia during hospitalization in accordance with the French health system. CONCLUSION: Compared with EMR, ESD reduces the 6-month recurrence rate, obviating the need for systematic early follow-up colonoscopy at the cost of more AEs. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: French Ministry of Health.
Asunto(s)
Adenoma , Neoplasias del Colon , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Humanos , Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Colonoscopía/efectos adversos , Colonoscopía/métodos , Biopsia , Adenoma/cirugía , Adenoma/patología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Mucosa Intestinal/patología , Mucosa Intestinal/cirugía , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The adoption of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is still limited in the West. A recent randomized trial showed that ESD is more effective and only slightly riskier than piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection; reproducibility outside expert centers was questioned. We evaluated the results according to the annual case volume in a multicentric prospective cohort. METHODS: Between September 2019 and September 2022, colorectal ESD was consecutively performed at 13 participating centers classified as low volume (LV), middle volume (MV), and high volume (HV). The main procedural outcomes were assessed. Multivariate and propensity score matching analyses were performed. RESULTS: Three thousand seven hundred seventy ESDs were included. HV centers treated larger and more often colonic lesions than MV and LV centers. En bloc , R0, and curative resection rates were 95.2%, 87.4%, and 83.2%, respectively, and were higher at HV than at MV and LV centers. HV centers also achieved a faster dissection speed. Delayed bleeding and surgery for complications rates were 5.4% and 0.8%, respectively, without significant differences. The perforation rate (overall: 9%) was higher at MV than at LV and HV centers. Lesion characteristics, but not volume center, were independently associated with both R1 resection and perforation. However, after propensity score matching, R0 rates were significantly higher at HV than at LV centers, and perforation rates were significantly higher at MV than at HV centers. DISCUSSION: Colorectal ESD can be successfully implemented in the West, even in nonexpert centers. However, difficult lesions must still be referred to experts.
RESUMEN
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is the second most common malignant primary liver cancer. iCCA may develop on an underlying chronic liver disease and its incidence is growing in relation with the epidemics of obesity and metabolic diseases. In contrast, perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) may follow a history of chronic inflammatory diseases of the biliary tract. The initial management of CCAs is often complex and requires multidisciplinary expertise. The French Association for the Study of the Liver wished to organize guidelines in order to summarize the best evidence available about several key points in iCCA and pCCA. These guidelines have been elaborated based on the level of evidence available in the literature and each recommendation has been analysed, discussed and voted by the panel of experts. They describe the epidemiology of CCA as well as how patients with iCCA or pCCA should be managed from diagnosis to treatment. The most recent developments of personalized medicine and use of targeted therapies are also highlighted.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Several endoscopic treatments for iatrogenic perforations are currently available, with some limitations in terms of size, location, complexity, or cost. Our aims were to introduce a novel technique for closure, using an endoloop and clips, to assess its rate of technical success and post-resection complications. METHODS: For closure of large perforations (diameter ≥ 10 mm), two similar techniques were implemented, using a single-channel endoscope. An endoloop was deployed through the operating channel or towed by an endoclip alongside the endoscope. Several clips were utilized to fix it on the muscular layer of defect's margins. The defect was closed, by fastening the loop either directly or after being reattached to the mobile hook. RESULTS: This analysis included eleven patients (72% women, median age 68 years). Eight colorectal, one appendiceal, and two gastric lesions were resected, with a median perforation size of 15 mm. As confirmed by computed tomography, closure of wall defects was achieved successfully in all cases, using a median of 6 clips. Pneumoperitoneum was evacuated in 4 cases. The median hospitalization duration was 4 days, prophylactic antibiotics being prescribed for a median of 7 days. One patient had a small abdominal collection, without requiring drainage, while another presented post-resection bleeding from the mucosal defect. CONCLUSION: The novel techniques, utilizing a single-channel endoscope, clips, and an endoloop, ensuring an edge-to-edge suture of muscular layer, proved to be safe, reproducible, and easy to implement. They exhibit an excellent technical success rate and a minimal incidence of non-severe complications.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Resección Endoscópica de la Mucosa , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Masculino , Endoscopía , Instrumentos Quirúrgicos , Técnicas de Sutura , Membrana MucosaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Laparoscopic approach of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) is still challenging. We report the original use of a endoscopic hepaticogastrostomy (EHG) for definite biliary drainage in order to avoid biliary reconstruction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A 70-year-old man presenting with jaundice was referred for resection of a Bismuth type IIIa PHC. Repeated endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography failed to drain the future liver remnant, enabling only right anterior liver section drainage. EHG was performed three weeks before surgery. A hepatogastric anastomosis was created, placing a half-coated self-expanding endoprosthesis between biliary duct of segment 2 and the lesser gastric curvature. RESULTS: A laparoscopic right hepatectomy extended to segment 1, common bile duct, and hepatic pedicle lymphadenectomy was performed. The left hepatic duct was sectioned and ligated downstream to the biliary confluence of segment 2-3 and 4 allowing exclusive biliary flow through the EHG. The patient was disease free at 12 months, postoperative outcomes were uneventful except three readmissions for acute cholangitis due to prosthesis obstruction. CONCLUSIONS: EHG may be used as definite biliary drainage technique in laparoscopic PHC resection, at the expense of prosthesis obstruction and cholangitis.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares , Colangiocarcinoma , Colangitis , Tumor de Klatskin , Laparoscopía , Masculino , Humanos , Anciano , Tumor de Klatskin/diagnóstico por imagen , Tumor de Klatskin/cirugía , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/cirugía , Hígado , Drenaje/métodos , Hepatectomía/métodos , Colangitis/cirugía , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Colangiocarcinoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Colangiocarcinoma/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) is emerging as a safe and effective treatment for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. We aimed to compare EUS-RFA and surgical resection for the treatment of pancreatic insulinoma (PI). METHODS: Patients with sporadic PI who underwent EUS-RFA at 23 centers or surgical resection at 8 high-volume pancreatic surgery institutions between 2014 and 2022 were retrospectively identified and outcomes compared using a propensity-matching analysis. Primary outcome was safety. Secondary outcomes were clinical efficacy, hospital stay, and recurrence rate after EUS-RFA. RESULTS: Using propensity score matching, 89 patients were allocated in each group (1:1), and were evenly distributed in terms of age, sex, Charlson comorbidity index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, body mass index, distance between lesion and main pancreatic duct, lesion site, size, and grade. Adverse event (AE) rate was 18.0% and 61.8% after EUS-RFA and surgery, respectively (P < .001). No severe AEs were observed in the EUS-RFA group compared with 15.7% after surgery (P < .0001). Clinical efficacy was 100% after surgery and 95.5% after EUS-RFA (P = .160). However, the mean duration of follow-up time was shorter in the EUS-RFA group (median, 23 months; interquartile range, 14-31 months vs 37 months; interquartile range, 17.5-67 months in the surgical group; P < .0001). Hospital stay was significantly longer in the surgical group (11.1 ± 9.7 vs 3.0 ± 2.5 days in the EUS-RFA group; P < .0001). Fifteen lesions (16.9%) recurred after EUS-RFA and underwent a successful repeat EUS-RFA (11 patients) or surgical resection (4 patients). CONCLUSION: EUS-RFA is safer than surgery and highly effective for the treatment of PI. If confirmed in a randomized study, EUS-RFA treatment can become first-line therapy for sporadic PI.
Asunto(s)
Ablación por Catéter , Insulinoma , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Ablación por Radiofrecuencia , Humanos , Insulinoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Insulinoma/cirugía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía IntervencionalRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) has been described as a potentially curative option for solid and cystic pancreatic neoplasms. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of pancreatic EUS-RFA in a large study population. METHODS: A retrospective study retrieving all consecutive patients who underwent pancreatic EUS-RFA during 2019 and 2020 in France was conducted. Indication, procedural characteristics, early and late adverse events (AEs), and clinical outcomes were recorded. Risk factors for AEs and factors related to complete tumor ablation were assessed on univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: One hundred patients (54% men, 64.8 ± 17.6 years old) affected by 104 neoplasms were included. Sixty-four neoplasms were neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs), 23 were metastases, and 10 were intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms with mural nodules. No procedure-related mortality was observed, and 22 AEs were reported. Proximity of pancreatic neoplasms (≤1 mm) to the main pancreatic duct was the only independent risk factor for AEs (odds ratio [OR), 4.10; 95% confidence interval [CI), 1.02-15.22; P = .04). Fifty-nine patients (60.2%) achieved a complete tumor response, 31 (31.6%) a partial response, and 9 (9.2%) achieved no response. On multivariate analysis, NENs (OR, 7.95; 95% CI, 1.66-51.79; P < .001) and neoplasm size <20 mm (OR, 5.26; 95% CI, 2.17-14.29; P < .001) were independently related to complete tumor ablation. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this large study confirm an overall acceptable safety profile for pancreatic EUS-RFA. Close proximity (≤1 mm) to the main pancreatic duct represents an independent risk factor for AEs. Good clinical outcomes in terms of tumor ablation were observed, especially for small NENs.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Quísticas, Mucinosas y Serosas , Tumores Neuroendocrinos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Ablación por Radiofrecuencia , Masculino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Ablación por Radiofrecuencia/métodos , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/cirugía , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic techniques allow resections of deep submucosal invasion rectal carcinoma, but mostly are facing issues such as costs, follow-up care or size limit. Our aim was to design a new endoscopic technique, which retains the advantages over surgical resections while eliminating the disadvantages mentioned above. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We propose a technique for the resection of the superficial rectal tumours, with highly suspicious deep submucosal invasion. It combines steps of endoscopic submucosal dissection, muscular resection and edge-to-edge suture of the muscular layers, finally performing the equivalent of a "transanal endoscopic microsurgery" with a flexible colonoscope (F-TEM). RESULTS: A 60-year-old patient was referred to our unit, following the discovery of a 15 mm distal rectum adenocarcinoma. The computed tomography and the endoscopic ultrasound examination revealed a T1 tumour, without secondary lesions. Considering that the initial endoscopic evaluation highlighted a depressed central part of the lesion, with several avascular zones, an F-TEM was performed, without severe complication. The histopathological examination revealed negative resection margins, without risk factors for lymph node metastasis, no adjuvant therapy being proposed. CONCLUSION: F-TEM allows endoscopic resection of highly suspicious deep submucosal invasion T1 rectal carcinoma and it proves to be a feasible alternative to surgical resection or other endoscopic treatments as endoscopic submucosal dissection or intermuscular dissection.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma , Resección Endoscópica de la Mucosa , Neoplasias del Recto , Microcirugía Endoscópica Transanal , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Microcirugia/métodos , Neoplasias del Recto/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Microcirugía Endoscópica Transanal/métodos , Carcinoma/cirugía , Colonoscopios , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resección Endoscópica de la Mucosa/métodosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The aims of this retrospective multicenter study were to assess the technical success and adverse events of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures in children in French and Belgian centers. METHODS: All children aged 1 day to 17 years who underwent ERCP between January 2008 and March 2019 in 15 tertiary care hospitals were retrospectively included. RESULTS: 271 children underwent 470 ERCP procedures. Clinical long-term follow-up was available for 72â% of our patients (340/470 procedures). The median age at intervention was 10.9 years. ERCP was therapeutic in 90â% (423/470) and diagnostic in cases of neonatal cholestasis in 10â% of the patients. The most common biliary indication was choledocholithiasis; the most common pancreatic indication was chronic pancreatitis. Biliary cannulation was successful in 92â% of cases (270/294); pancreatic cannulation in 96â% of cases (169/176); and planned therapeutic procedures in 92â% of cases (388/423). The overall complication rate was 19â% (65/340). The most common complication was post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) in 12â% of cases (40/340) and sepsis in 5â% (18/340). On univariate analyses, pancreatic stent removal was protective against PEP (odds ratio [OR] 0.1, 95â% confidence interval [CI] 0.01â-â0.75; Pâ=â0.03), and sepsis was associated with history of liver transplantation (OR 7.27, 95â%CI 1.7â-â31.05; Pâ=â0.01). Five patients had post-ERCP hemorrhage and two had intestinal perforation. All complications were managed with supportive medical care. There was no procedure-related mortality. CONCLUSION: Our cohort demonstrates that ERCP can be performed safely with high success rates in many pancreaticobiliary diseases of children. The rate of adverse events was similar to that in previous reports.
Asunto(s)
Coledocolitiasis , Pancreatitis , Cateterismo , Niño , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Pancreatitis/epidemiología , Pancreatitis/etiología , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has majorly affected medical activity around the world. We sought to measure the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy activity in France. METHODS: We performed a web-based survey, including 35 questions on the responders and their endoscopic practice, from 23 March to 27 March 2020, sent to the 3300 French gastroenterologists practicing endoscopy. RESULTS: 694 GI endoscopists (21â%) provided analyzable data; of these, 29.4â% (204/694) were involved in the management of COVID-19 patients outside the endoscopy department. During the study period, 98.7â% (685/694) of endoscopists had had to cancel procedures. There were 89 gastroenterologists (12.8â%) who reported symptoms compatible with COVID-19 infection, and a positive PCR test was recorded in 12/197 (6.1â%) vs. 3/497 (0.6â%) endoscopists in the high vs. low prevalence areas, respectively (Pâ<â0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic led to a major reduction in the volume of GI endoscopies performed in France in March 2020.âThe prolonged limited access to GI endoscopy could lead to a delay in the management of patients with GI cancers.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/transmisión , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal/estadística & datos numéricos , Gastroenterología/estadística & datos numéricos , Departamentos de Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Exposición Profesional , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/prevención & control , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Equipo de Protección Personal/provisión & distribución , Prevalencia , SARS-CoV-2 , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Esophageal peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is the treatment of reference of major obstructive esophageal motility disorders but the detection of early complications remains challenging. Our aim was to report the radiological findings on meglumine diatrizoate esophagograms after esophageal POEM and identify variables associated with patient outcomes. METHODS: The imaging and clinical files of 106 patients who underwent POEM for achalasia or other major obstructive esophageal motility disorders were retrospectively analyzed. Post POEM esophagograms were reviewed for the presence of pneumoperitoneum, pleural effusion, extraesophageal contrast leakage, and dislocated clips. Associations between length of hospital stay and radiological findings were searched for using a Cox multivariate analysis. RESULTS: A total of 106 patients (M/F = 56/50; mean age = 50 ± 2 [SD] years) underwent 106 POEM procedures with a meglumine diatrizoate esophagogram on postoperative day 1. Overall median hospital stay was 3 days (range 1-20 days). Pneumoperitoneum, pleural effusion, extraesophageal contrast leakage, and dislocated clips were observed in 90/106 (84.9%), 12/106 (11.3%), 4/106 (3.8%), and 0/106 (0%) patients, respectively. At multivariate analysis, pleural effusion (p = 0.005; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.35 [95% CI 0.17-0.73]) and extraesophageal contrast leakage (p = 0.039; aHR = 0.27 [95% CI 0.08-0.94]) were associated with a prolonged hospital stay. Pneumoperitoneum was not associated with unfavorable outcome (p = 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Pneumoperitoneum is a common finding after POEM and is not indicative of unfavorable patient outcome. Conversely, post POEM pleural effusion and extraesophageal contrast leakage are associated with a longer hospital stay. KEY POINTS: ⢠Water-soluble esophagogram is a valid diagnostic modality to diagnose early complications after esophageal endoscopic myotomy for esophageal motility disorders. ⢠At multivariate analysis, pleural effusion and extraesophageal contrast leakage are associated with a prolonged hospital stay after peroral endoscopic myotomy. ⢠Pneumoperitoneum is not associated with unfavorable outcome after peroral endoscopic myotomy.
Asunto(s)
Medios de Contraste , Diatrizoato de Meglumina , Trastornos de la Motilidad Esofágica/cirugía , Esófago/diagnóstico por imagen , Tiempo de Internación , Miotomía/efectos adversos , Cirugía Endoscópica por Orificios Naturales/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Anciano , Acalasia del Esófago/cirugía , Trastornos de la Motilidad Esofágica/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Miotomía/métodos , Cirugía Endoscópica por Orificios Naturales/métodos , Neumoperitoneo/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Peroralcholangio-pancreatoscopy (POCP) is used for diagnosis and treatment of biliopancreatic disease when standard endoscopy (ERCP) or pre-operative imaging workup failed. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic and therapeutic performance of POCP in complex biliary and pancreatic diseases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with indeterminate biliary or pancreatic duct (PD) strictures, and patients with failure of complex biliary or pancreatic stones removal, were enrolled (six centers). The primary endpoint evaluated malignancy diagnostic performances (accuracy, sensitivity, specificity) and therapeutic performances (biliary or pancreatic stones extraction). Secondary endpoints evaluated: technical success in lesion visualization, ease of maneuvering, image quality and 30-days complications. RESULTS: From November 2016 to March 2018, 66 patients were included: 29/37 women/men, median age (IQR): 73 (64-82). Fifty-three patients had diagnostic POCP and 13 patients therapeutic POCP. One endoscopist with one or two endoscopy nurses performed 94% of the POCP. The 'POCP visual impression' of malignancy showed 92.0% sensitivity, 92.9â% specificity and 92.5â% overall accuracy compared with the final diagnosis. 'POCP-guided samples histological analysis' showed 75.0â% sensitivity and 91.6% specificity. The technical success for lesion visualization was 98.5%. The median VAS scores for insertions in bile and PD were respectively 9.0 (8.1-9.6) and 9.0 (8.8-10.0). Median VAS score for access to the lesion and image quality were respectively 9.0 (7.7-9.6) and 9.0 (7.9-9.7). Only three 30-day minor complications occurred without any major complications. CONCLUSIONS: POCP was an effective, safe and easy-to-use tool in routine clinical practice for the management of complex diagnostic and therapeutic biliary and pancreatic diseases (NCT03190343).
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Pancreáticas , Biopsia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Páncreas , Enfermedades Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Pancreáticas/cirugía , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Zenker's diverticulum (ZD) is the most common type of diverticulum in the esophagus. The endoscopic septotomy of the diverticular wall has become a widely accepted treatment modality, but the recurrence rate is unclear. Our aim was to assess short-term and long-term success rates after flexible endoscopic septotomy for the treatment of ZD. METHODS: All consecutive patients treated at our department for a ZD between November 2014 and September 2018 were included. Endoscopic septotomy was conducted using a diverticuloscope or a distal attachment cap. Data were retrospectively analyzed from a prospectively collected database. We collected data concerning patients, endoscopic procedures, and short-term clinical outcomes. All patients were reached by phone between October and December 2018 to assess long-term results. RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients were referred to our department for a ZD. Sixty patients were treated using a diverticuloscope and 17 patients with a distal attachment cap. For all 77 patients, the myotomy was technically successful. Three patients treated with a diverticuloscope reported complications. Initial treatment success was 93%. After a mean (±SEM) follow up of 23 ± 2 months, 66% of patients had persistent clinical remission. The rate of long-term treatment success was 72% in treatment-naïve and 50% in previously treated patients (P = 0.13). Treatment success was 68% in patients treated with the diverticuloscope versus 60% in the group treated with a cap (P = 0.75). CONCLUSION: The flexible endoscopic septotomy for the treatment of ZD is a safe and effective treatment of ZD, with or without a diverticuloscope.
Asunto(s)
Endoscopios Gastrointestinales , Esofagectomía/instrumentación , Docilidad , Divertículo de Zenker/cirugía , Anciano , Esofagectomía/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Seguridad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoAsunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Endoscopía , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal , Humanos , Control de InfeccionesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Endoscopic access to the common bile duct (CBD) remains difficult in 10% of cases, requiring alternative techniques .CBD access was difficult after either five unsuccessful attempts, five unintentional insertions into the pancreatic duct or >10-min-long unsuccessful attempts. This retrospective study with historical controls aimed to evaluate the benefit of the double guidewire (DGW) technique after failure of standard CBD cannulation. METHODS: From January 2012 to December 2014, all patients requiring therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with difficult access to CBD were included in a Studied group. This group was compared to a historical ERCP control group from January 2009 to December 2011. In the Studied group, a sequential strategy including DGW technique was done when the guidewire was unintentionally passed into the pancreatic duct. In the control group, only pre-cut technique was used. RESULTS: Among the 538 patients with naive papilla eligible for ERCP, 73 had difficult CBD access. Successful CBD access rate was higher in the Studied group: 91% (50/55) versus 67% (12/18) P = 0.0215. Complication rates were similar in both groups: 28% versus 20%, P = 0.5207. LOS was shorter in the Studied group (9.2 ± 8.5 vs 14.4 ± 7.4 days, P = 0.0028). Post-ERCP cholangitis were lower in the Studied group: 2% (1/55) versus 22% (4/18), P = 0.0118. CONCLUSION: After standard cannulation failure, DGW technique increased successful CBD access rate and decreased LOS without increasing complications.