Soluble Syndecan-1: A Novel Biomarker of Small Bowel Mucosal Damage in Children with Celiac Disease.

BACKGROUND: Syndecan-1 (SDC1) is essential for maintaining normal epithelial barrier. Shedding of SDC1 ectodomain, reflected by serum soluble syndecan-1 (SSDC1) levels, is regulated by inflammation. Increased intestinal permeability plays a central role in celiac disease (CD). The association between SSDC1 levels and mucosal damage in CD has not been evaluated. AIMS: To evaluate serum SSDC1 levels in children with CD and to determine its relationship with histological grading classified by modified Marsh criteria. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional, pilot study, in which serum SSDC1 was analyzed by ELISA in a cohort of 49 untreated children with CD and 15 children with nonspecific abdominal pain (AP). CD was diagnosed based on positive celiac serology and small intestinal biopsy. SSDC1 levels at the time of biopsy were correlated with Marsh grading. Controls were defined by AP, negative celiac serology, normal upper endoscopy, and small intestinal biopsies. RESULTS: SSDC1 levels were significantly higher in CD patients compared to AP controls (116.2 ± 161 vs. 41.3 ± 17.5 ng/ml, respectively, p < 0.01). SSDC1 levels were significantly higher in patients with Marsh 3c lesion compared to AP controls (170.6 ± 201 vs. 41.3 ± 17.5 ng/ml, respectively, p < 0.05). SSDC1 concentrations displayed a significant correlation with mucosal damage defined by Marsh (r = 0.39, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This is the first study demonstrating elevated levels of serum SSDC1 in children with CD. Our results suggest that SSDC1 is a potentially novel marker of intestinal mucosal damage in patients with CD. Its applicability as a surrogate biomarker in CD remains to be determined.

Diffusion-weighted imaging in quiescent Crohn's disease: correlation with inflammatory biomarkers and video capsule endoscopy.

AIM: To investigate the role of restricted diffusion in quiescent Crohn's disease (CD) patients and its association with inflammatory biomarkers and endoscopic disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-two quiescent CD patients prospectively underwent magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) and video capsule endoscopy (VCE) and were tested for the inflammatory biomarkers, faecal calprotectin (FCP) and C-reactive protein (CRP). Restricted diffusion in the distal ileum was qualitatively (absence/presence) and quantitatively (apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC]) assessed by two readers. The VCE-based Lewis score was calculated for the distal ileum. Restricted diffusion sensitivity and specificity for VCE ulcerations were assessed for patients with elevated (>100 µg/g) or normal (<100 µg/g) FCP. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to assess the ability of ADC to identify patients with concurrent VCE ulceration and elevated FCP. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of restricted diffusion for patients with VCE ulceration were higher in patients with elevated FCP (reader 1: 71.4%, 80%, reader 2: 76.2%, 100%, respectively) compared to patients with normal FCP (reader 1: 46.2%, 61.5%; reader 2: 15.4%, 76.9%, respectively). The ADC had a high diagnostic accuracy for identifying patients that had concurrent VCE ulceration and elevated FCP (reader 1: AUC=0.819, reader 2: AUC=0.832). CONCLUSION: In quiescent CD patients, the presence of restricted diffusion is suggestive of an active inflammation, associated with elevated FCP. Thus, DWI may serve as a clinical tool in the follow-up of these patients, implying subclinical inflammatory flares.

The impact of pseudomembrane formation on the outcome of Clostridium difficile-associated disease.

PURPOSE: Although pseudomembranes are the hallmark manifestation of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD), there are scant data specifically addressing their impact on the clinical outcome. We investigated whether the formation of pseudomembranes predicts a worse CDAD outcome. METHODS: CDAD patients hospitalized during 2010 underwent sigmoidoscopy and were followed prospectively. In addition, all hospitalized CDAD patients in the period 01/2000-12/2009 who underwent lower endoscopy were retrospectively identified and their charts reviewed. Patients with detectable pseudomembranes on endoscopy were compared to those in whom pseudomembranes were absent. Thirty-day mortality and a composite outcome comprised of mortality within 30 days of diagnosis, admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), colectomy, peritonitis, hemodynamic instability, or respiratory insufficiency were addressed. Additional clinical outcomes used for comparison between the two groups were 60-day mortality, duration of hospitalization, and the failure of metronidazole and vancomycin. RESULTS: A total of 117 CDAD patients (mean age 62.9 ± 19 years) who underwent lower endoscopy were included; 46 with pseudomembranes and 71 without. Seven out of the 46 patients with pseudomembranes died within 30 days compared to 9/71 in the non-pseudomembrane group [odds ratio (OR) 1.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.4-3.6, P = 0.8]. Similarly, there was no correlation between the occurrence of pseudomembranes and the rate of the composite adverse outcome (P = 0.6). In contrast, acute renal insufficiency (OR 15, 95% CI 3.2-72, P < 0.001) and hypoalbuminemia (OR 5.7, 95% CI 1.8-18, P = 0.002) were both independently predictive of a severe clinical outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the presence of pseudomembranes is not associated with an adverse outcome in CDAD patients.

Early preservation of effector functions followed by eventual T cell memory depletion: a model for the delayed onset of the effect of thiopurines.

OBJECTIVE: The onset of the effect of thiopurines is delayed for several months. The aim of this study was to investigate immune mechanisms for this delay. METHODS: The effects of thiopurines on human peripheral blood T cells and on lamina propria lymphocytes were investigated for apoptosis induction by Annexin V/propidium iodide (PI) and for cytokine secretion by intracellular staining and ELISA assays. To investigate the mechanism of the effect of thiopurines in vivo, Balb/C mice were co-immunised with HEL/OVA (hen egg lysozyme/ovalbumin) antigens, and then repeatedly challenged by HEL only, while being treated by mercaptopurine or vehicle alone for either 4 or 20 weeks. The memory response of CD4+ splenocytes towards HEL/OVA was then determined by CFSE (carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester) dilution. RESULTS: Thiopurines arrested the proliferation of stimulated T cells but did not enhance the apoptosis of either resting T cells or activated T cells until day 5 poststimulation. Despite the proliferation arrest, stimulated T cells successfully differentiated into effector cells, as evidenced by their capacity for proinflammatory cytokine secretion, potent adhesion and cytotoxicity. Prolonged mercaptopurine treatment of mice for 20 weeks selectively reduced the CD4+ memory response to a repeatedly encountered HEL antigen, but did not affect the T cell memory pool to the previously presented OVA antigen. A shorter, 4 weeks, treatment with mercaptopurine did not inhibit the memory response to either antigen. CONCLUSIONS: T cells arrested from cycling by thiopurines can still differentiate into potent effector cells capable of propagating the inflammatory process. Thiopurine treatment results in depletion of antigen-specific memory T cells, but this effect is dependent upon repeated encounters with the antigen over a prolonged time course.

The anti-inflammatory target A(3) adenosine receptor is over-expressed in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis and Crohn's disease.

The Gi protein associated A(3) adenosine receptor (A(3)AR) was recently defined as a novel anti-inflammatory target. The aim of this study was to look at A(3)AR expression levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of patients with autoimmune inflammatory diseases and to explore transcription factors involved receptor expression. Over-expression of A(3)AR was found in PBMCs derived from patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriasis and Crohn's disease compared with PBMCs from healthy subjects. Bioinformatics analysis demonstrated the presence of DNA binding sites for nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-kappaB) and cyclic AMP-responsive element binding protein (CREB) in the A(3)AR gene promoter. Up-regulation of NF-kappaB and CREB was found in the PBMCs from patients with RA, psoriasis and Crohn's disease. The PI3K-PKB/Akt signaling pathway, known to regulate both the NF-kappaB and CREB, was also up-regulated in the patients' PBMCs. Taken together, NF-kappaB and CREB are involved with the over-expression of A(3)AR in patients with autoimmune inflammatory diseases. The receptor may be considered as a specific target to combat inflammation.

Inflammatory Bowel Disease [IBD] and Physical Activity: A Study on the Impact of Diagnosis on the Level of Exercise Amongst Patients With IBD.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] can impair patients' functional capacity with significant negative effects on their quality of life. Our aim was to determine the impact of IBD diagnosis on fitness levels and to assess the levels of engagement in physical activity and fatigue in IBD patient before and after diagnosis. METHODS: A prospective multi-centre cross-sectional study was performed. Patients diagnosed with IBD in the previous 18 months were recruited. Inclusion criteria included clinical remission and/or no treatment changes within the previous 6 months. Physical exercise levels were assessed by the Godin score and fatigue levels was assessed by the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy [FACIT] score. RESULTS: In total, 158 patients (100 Crohn's disease [CD]) were recruited. Mean age was 35.1 years (95% confidence interval [CI] ± 2.0). Gender distribution was approximately equal [51.3% male]. The Mean Harvey Bradshaw and Simple Clinical Colitis Activity indices were 2.25 [95% CI ± 0.40] and 1.64 [95% CI ± 0.49], respectively. The mean Godin score difference before and after IBD diagnosis was 6.94 [p = 0.002]. Patients with ulcerative colitis [UC] [41.8%] were more likely than patients with CD [23.0%] to reduce their exercise levels [p = 0.04]. FACIT scores were lower in patients who had experienced relapses [p = 0.012] and had severe disease [p = 0.011]. Approximately one-third of patients reduced their activity level following IBD diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Patients were significantly less physically active after a diagnosis of IBD and this was more apparent in UC. Identification of the risk factors associated with loss of fitness levels would help to address the reduced patient quality of life.

Lidocaine down-regulates nuclear factor-kappaB signalling and inhibits cytokine production and T cell proliferation.

Lidocaine is a commonly used local anaesthetic agent which has also been found to possess anti-inflammatory activity in several disorders. However, the mechanism of this effect has been little explored. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of lidocaine on stimulated human T cells. The effect of lidocaine on Jurkat T cells was examined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to determine secretion of interleukin (IL)-2, and by the [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide] viability assay. Tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha and IL-2 mRNA expression was determined by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. In addition, the effect of lidocaine on the proliferation of freshly isolated peripheral blood (PB) CD3(+) T cells was examined by carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester dilution. Apoptosis induction and cytokine production and secretion were determined by annexin V/PI assay, intracellular immunostaining and ELISA respectively. The results showed that lidocaine exerts a dose-dependent inhibition of IL-2 and TNF-alpha secretion by Jurkat T cells at the protein and mRNA levels. Moreover, lidocaine reduced nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-kappaB) signalling in clinically relevant concentrations. Similarly, proliferation of anti-CD3 stimulated PB T cells was abrogated significantly by lidocaine, and the percentage of interferon-gamma- and TNF-alpha-producing T cells was diminished after culture with this agent. In both experimental systems, lidocaine's effect was not mediated by cytotoxic mechanism, as no significant apoptosis or necrosis was demonstrated following co-culture of T cells with this drug. In conclusion, lidocaine's anti-inflammatory effect may be mediated by a drug-induced abrogation of T cell proliferation and cytokine secretion independent of cell death. These effects are mediated at least partly by inhibition of NF-kappaB signalling.

Safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of vedolizumab in patients with simultaneous exposure to an anti-tumour necrosis factor.

BACKGROUND: Data on combination-biologic treatment in (IBD) are still scant. AIM: To explore outcomes of patients co-exposed to anti-TNF and vedolizumab. METHODS: Patients starting vedolizumab having measurable anti-TNF levels after recently stopping adalimumab/infliximab ('VDZ-aTNF' group), were compared with control vedolizumab patients in a retrospective 1:2 matched case-control study. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients were included (25 VDZ-aTNF, 50 VDZ). Adverse events were experienced by 9/25 VDZ-aTNF compared to 13/50 VDZ patients (P = 0.4, follow-up 14 weeks in all). Week 14 clinical remission was attained in 10/25 (40%) of VDZ-aTNF patients versus 23/50 (46%) of VDZ patients (OR = 0.8, 95% CI 0.3-2.1, P = 0.6) and clinical response in 19/25 (76%) versus 39/50 (78%) respectively (OR = 0.9, 95% CI 0.3-2.7, P = 0.8). Corticosteroid-free remission and corticosteroid-free response were experienced by 30% and 54%, respectively, of the entire cohort, and were similar between the two groups. Vedolizumab drug concentrations at week 2, 6 and 14 were similar among VDZ-aTNF and VDZ patients (P > 0.5). Multi-variable analysis showed independent association of some vedolizumab drug-levels time-points with baseline albumin and weight, but not with anti-TNF co-exposure. In a prospective study of a separate cohort of patients starting infliximab (n = 12), the percentage of α4ß7+ memory T cells, slightly but nonsignificantly increased throughout weeks 0, 2 to 14 (26 ± 2.3%, 27.8 ± 2.9%, 29.5 ± 2.6% respectively, P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Vedolizumab/anti-TNF co-exposure did not generate new safety signals during 14-weeks induction, nor did it reduce efficacy or alter vedolizumab pharmacokinetics. These observations may aid the design of future co-biologics trials and also suggest that a deliberate waiting-interval between anti-TNF cessation and subsequent vedolizumab initiation may not be warranted.

Early drug and anti-infliximab antibody levels for prediction of primary nonresponse to infliximab therapy.

BACKGROUND: Primary nonresponse, defined as lack of clinical benefit during the induction phase, occurs in up to 30% of IBD patients treated with infliximab. The mechanisms underlying primary nonresponse have not yet been clearly defined. AIM: To evaluate the association of early (week 2 and week 6) induction infliximab and anti-infliximab antibody levels with primary nonresponse. METHODS: A retrospective observational case-control study of inflammatory bowel disease patients treated with infliximab and followed at Sheba Medical Center between 2009 and 2016 was performed. Pre-infusion infliximab and antibodies to infliximab (ATI) levels were measured by our previously described drug-tolerant ELISA assay. RESULTS: Thirty-five primary nonresponders have been identified and matched with 105 primary responders (1:3 ratios). Both week 2 and week 6 infliximab levels were significantly lower among primary nonresponders compared to responders (week 2, 6: median level 7.2, 2.2 µg/mL vs 13.5, 9.5 µg/mL, P = .0019, P < .0001 respectively). Antibodies to infliximab appeared more frequently (either week 2 or 6, 68% vs 28% prevalence, P = .0004) and at higher levels in nonresponders compared to responders (week 2, 6: median ATI 7.3, 10.8 µg/mL-eq vs 3.8, 4.4 µg/mL-eq, P = .005, P = .008 respectively). Moreover, week 2 infliximab levels <6.8 µg/mL (AUC = 0.68, P = .002, sensitivity 50%, specificity 86%) and antibodies to infliximab levels >4.3 µg/mL-eq (AUC = 0.78, P = .0004, sensitivity 77%, specificity 71%) were predictive of primary nonresponse. Among the other clinical and demographic variables, higher baseline ulcerative colitis clinical score, infliximab monotherapy, prior adalimumab therapy and previous Crohn's disease-related surgeries were also associated with an increased risk of primary nonresponse. CONCLUSIONS: Infliximab levels below 6.8 µg/mL and antibodies to infliximab levels above 4.3 µg/mL-eq before the second infusion are associated with primary nonresponse, especially among Crohn's disease patients.

Antigenic response to CT-P13 and infliximab originator in inflammatory bowel disease patients shows similar epitope recognition.

AIM: To test the cross-immunogenicity of anti-CT-P13 IBD patients' sera to CT-P13/infliximab originator and the comparative antigenicity evoked by CT-P13/infliximab originator sera. METHODS: Sera of patients with IBD with measurable anti-CT-P13 antibodies were tested for their cross-reactivity to 5 batches of infliximab originator and CT-P13. Anti-drug antibody positive sera from treated patients were used to compare antigenic epitopes. RESULTS: All 42 anti-CT-P13 and 37 anti-infliximab originator IBD sera were cross-reactive with infliximab originator and CT-P13 respectively. Concentration of anti-drug antibodies against infliximab originator or CT-P13 were strongly correlated both for IgG1 and IgG4 (P < 0.001). Anti-CT-P13 sera of patients with IBD (n = 32) exerted similar functional inhibition on CT-P13 or infliximab originator TNF binding capacity and showed reduced binding to CT-P13 in the presence of five different batches of CT-P13 and infliximab originator. Anti-CT-P13 and anti-infliximab originator IBD sera selectively enriched phage-peptides from the VH (CDR1 and CDR3) and VL domains (CDR2 and CDR3) of infliximab. Sera reactivity detected major infliximab epitopes in these regions of infliximab in 60%-79% of patients, and no significant differences were identified between CT-P13 and infliximab originator immunogenic sera. Minor epitopes were localised in framework regions of infliximab with reduced antibody reactivity shown, in 30%-50% of patients. Monoclonal antibodies derived from naïve individuals and ADA-positive IBD patients treated with CT-P13 provided comparable epitope specificity to five different batches of CT-P13 and infliximab originator. CONCLUSIONS: These results strongly support a similar antigenic profile for infliximab originator and CT-P13, and point toward a safe switching between the two drugs in anti-drug antibody negative patients.

Re-phrasing the question: A simple tool for evaluation of adherence to therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: Non-adherence to medication in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a challenging problem which is often overlooked or under-estimated by the physician or denied by the patient. We aimed to examine if re-phrasing the wording of the question used by the physician could help in revealing more patients who are non-adherent, and for whom appropriate counseling may be instituted. METHODS: A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study of IBD patients treated in a tertiary center was conducted. Patients received a questionnaire detailing their treatments and disease course, as well as their perceptions about disease. Two forms of questions about adherence were deliberately placed in two separate parts of the questionnaire: One was 'are you taking your medications regularly as prescribed?' (Standard question), and the second, more emphatic question, was 'how often does it happen that you miss a drug dosing?' (Re-phrased question). The rate of non-adherence disclosed by each of these questions was compared. Sensitivity, specificity and predicative values were computed for each question against the conventional definition of non-adherence as taking of less than 80% of prescribed medication doses disclosed by any of the methods. Predictors of non-compliance and of denying non-compliance were also explored. RESULTS: Overall, 165 patients were included (49% female, mean age 33.7 ± 12.7 SD, median age 30 years, 29.6% with ulcerative colitis, 62.4% with Crohn's disease). Upon questioning, 50 (30.3%) of the patients admitted to non-adherence in the last month when asked by the emphatic re-phrased question format, compared with only 10 patients (6%) reporting non-adherence when asked directly by the standard question (OR 7.4, 95%CI 3.6-15.2, p < 0.001). Thus, a 'Do you take your medicine regularly' question format disclosed only 20% of genuinely non-compliant patients and had 16% sensitivity and 98.2% specificity for revealing non-adherence (PPV 80%, NPV 72.9%) compared with the reference re-phrased question. The leading cause for non-adherence was skepticism about drug efficacy or safety (20.5%), followed by vacation or weekend (15%), problems with prescription or pharmacy (13.5%) and forgetfulness (10%). No single demographic or clinical factor correlated with non-adherence. The only factor which correlated with higher probability for non-adherence was biological and combination treatment. CONCLUSION: Non-compliance with treatment is much more common than patients admit. Asking patients how often does it happen that they miss a drug dosing is a simple, practical tool which performs significantly better in disclosing non-adherence compared with asking patients if they take their medication as they should.

Addition of an immunomodulator can reverse antibody formation and loss of response in patients treated with adalimumab.

BACKGROUND: Anti-adalimumab antibodies (AAA) are associated with loss of clinical response (LOR). Addition of an immunomodulator has been shown to reverse immunogenicity and regain response with infliximab monotherapy. Similar data on adalimumab are lacking. AIM: To study the impact of immunomodulator addition on the emergence of AAA and LOR among adalimumab therapy patients. METHODS: The databases of three tertiary medical centres were reviewed to identify patients who developed AAA during adalimumab monotherapy with resultant LOR, and received an immunomodulator as a salvage combination therapy. All sera were prospectively analysed using previously described ELISA assays. Clinical response was determined using appropriate clinical scores. Elimination of AAA, designated as 'sero-reversal', elevation of drug levels and regained clinical response were the sought outcomes. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients (21 Crohn's disease, and 2 ulcerative colitis) developed AAA with subsequent LOR and were thereafter prescribed an immunomodulator as salvage therapy (thiopurine n = 14, methotrexate n = 9). Eleven patients (48%) underwent sero-reversal with gradual elimination of AAA, increase in drug trough levels and restoration of clinical response (median time to sero-reversal 5 months). In 12 patients (52%), immunogenicity and loss of response could not be reversed. There was no difference between responders and nonresponders in the type of immunomodulators used or baseline clinical characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: In almost half of inflammatory bowel disease patients developing anti-adalimumab antibodies and loss of response, established immunogenicity of adalimumab can be gradually reversed by the addition of immunomodulator therapy with restoration of a clinico-biological response. However, these observations need to be confirmed with larger studies.

Induction infliximab levels among patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis compared with patients with moderately severe ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND: Infliximab is effective as salvage therapy for patients with steroid refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis (UC). Although current data suggest that the pharmacokinetics of infliximab are influenced by inflammatory burden in patients with acute severe UC, data comparing infliximab trough levels in patients with acute severe UC vs. moderately severe UC are scarce. AIM: To compare infliximab trough and anti-infliximab antibody levels at a standard fixed time-point during induction between patients with acute severe and moderately severe UC. METHODS: A multi-centre retrospective study comparing infliximab drug and antibody levels 14 days after the first infusion in hospitalised acute severe UC versus out-patients with moderately severe UC was performed. RESULTS: Sixteen acute severe UC patients, hospitalised between 2010-2015 and refractory to intravenous corticosteroids, were treated with infliximab 5 mg/kg salvage therapy. They were compared to 16 moderately severe UC out-patient controls. Mean infliximab trough levels at day 14 were significantly lower in patients with acute severe UC compared to moderately severe UC (7.15 ± 5.3 vs. 14.4 ± 11.2 µg/mL, P = 0.007). Seven patients (three acute severe and four moderate severe UC) were primary nonresponders to infliximab induction therapy. Infliximab level at day 14 did not differ between responders and nonresponders (9.8 ± 9 vs. 12.1 ± 10.6 µg/mL, respectively, P = N.S.). However, week 2 median antibody-to-infliximab levels were numerically higher among primary nonresponders (3.4 ± 5.7 vs. 1.2 ± 4 µg/mL-eq, respectively, P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Infliximab trough levels at day 14 were lower in patients with acute severe UC compared to moderately severe UC, possibly due to a higher inflammatory burden and/or increased drug clearance. However, drug levels at day 14 were not lower among nonresponders compared with responders. Controlled trials are warranted to examine whether an a-priori-intensified infliximab induction protocol will lead to an improved outcome in acute severe UC.

Undetectable anti-TNF drug levels in patients with long-term remission predict successful drug withdrawal.

BACKGROUND: Low drug levels are associated with emerging loss of response to anti-TNF. However, this may not be the case in patients with long-term remission. AIM: To investigate the outcome of anti-TNF discontinuation in patients with long-term remission and incidental undetectable drug levels. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study examining the duration of relapse-free survival in IBD patients in remission who discontinued infliximab or adalimumab having undetectable drug levels. RESULTS: Forty eight patients who discontinued anti-TNF while in remission and had available drug levels were identified in two centres in France and Israel (infliximab-treated 35, adalimumab-13, Crohn's disease 30, ulcerative colitis 18, mean treatment duration of 22.7 ± 12.4 months). Endoscopy/MRE before stopping showed absence of active inflammation in 40/42 (95%) of evaluated patients, while inflammatory biomarkers (CRP and/or Calprotectin) were completely normal in only 31/48 (65%) of patients. During 12 months median follow-up, relapse occurred in 16/20 (80%) of patients who stopped anti-TNF while having measurable drug levels compared with 9/28 (32%) of patients who had undetectable drug levels (OR: 8.4, 95% CI: 2.2-32, P = 0.002). Relapse-free survival after anti-TNF cessation was significantly longer in patients with absent drug compared to those with detectable drug (P < 0.001, log rank test). On multivariate analysis, a patient's decision to stop therapy was weakly associated and abnormal inflammatory biomarkers and detectable drug levels were both strongly and independently associated with a higher risk of relapse after drug discontinuation. CONCLUSION: Incidental finding of undetectable anti-TNF drug levels in patients with stable long-term deep remission may identify a subset of patients whose clinical remission is no longer dependent on anti-TNF treatment.

Localized pericardial inflammation in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Regional or localized pericarditis has been infrequently reported. We report a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), who presented with retrosternal pleuritic-type chest pain without audible friction rub, electrocardiographic changes or detectable pericardial effusion on echocardiography. Computed tomography, however, revealed a circumscribed area of pericardial inflammation, suggesting a diagnosis of localized lupus-associated pericarditis. This case demonstrates that localized pericarditis may occur in SLE and that chest CT may be required as part of the work-up in the diagnosis of lupus pericarditis.

Adalimumab drug and antibody levels as predictors of clinical and laboratory response in patients with Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: Adalimumab is an effective treatment for Crohn's disease (CD). Anti-adalimumab antibodies (AAA) and low trough serum drug concentrations have been implicated as pre-disposing factors for treatment failure. AIMS: To assess adalimumab and AAA serum levels, and to examine their association and discriminatory ability with clinical response and serum C-reactive protein (CRP). METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study using trough sera from adalimumab-treated CD patients. Demographical data, Montreal classification, treatment regimen and clinical status were recorded. Serum adalimumab, AAA and CRP were measured. Receiver operating characteristic analysis and a multivariate regression model were performed to find drug and antibody thresholds for predicting disease activity at time of serum sampling. RESULTS: One hundred and eighteen trough serum samples were included from 71 patients. High adalimumab trough serum concentration was associated with disease remission (Area Under Curve 0.748, P < 0.001). A cut-off drug level of 5.85 µg/mL yielded optimal sensitivity, specificity and positive likelihood ratio for remission prediction (68%, 70.6% and 2.3, respectively). AAA were inversely related with adalimumab drug levels (Spearman's r = -0.411, P < 0.001) and when subdivided into categorical values, positively related with disease activity (P < 0.001). High drug levels and stricturing vs. penetrating or inflammatory phenotype, but not AAA levels, independently predicted disease remission in a multivariate logistic regression model. CONCLUSIONS: Adalimumab drug levels were inversely related to disease activity. High levels of anti-adalimumab antibodies were positively associated with disease activity, but this association was mediated mostly by adalimumab drug levels.