Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Urol Pract ; 11(5): 884-891, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38913619

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Prolonged indwelling catheter use is a known risk factor for catheter-associated UTIs (CAUTIs). We sought to reduce catheter use by creating and implementing a trial of void (TOV) algorithm to standardize indwelling Foley catheter removal in surgical patients. METHODS: We partnered with the Departments of General Surgery and Nursing to develop an evidence-based TOV algorithm for a step-down unit at a large urban teaching hospital. Our cohort included patients treated with intra-abdominal, thoracic, vascular, urologic, and gynecologic surgeries. The primary outcome was mean cumulative indwelling urethral catheter patient-days. For example, if 2 patients had catheters for 3 and 7 days, respectively, then cumulative catheter days would be 10. We analyzed changes in catheter use 90 days before and after algorithm implementation. RESULTS: The mean number of hospitalized patient-days before and after algorithm introduction did not differ (32.2 vs 32.0, P = .60). After implementation, mean cumulative catheter patient-days decreased (14.8 vs 9.9, P < .01), as did mean daily number of patients with catheters on the unit (3.7 vs 3.1, P = .02). There was 1 CAUTI before and after algorithm implementation, the latter deemed associated with algorithm nonadherence. Catheter use in a surgical floor control group where the algorithm was not implemented did not differ for any outcome over the same time period (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: A multidisciplinary approach to standardize catheter care with a TOV algorithm is feasible and effective in reducing catheter use. Further research is needed to determine its impact on CAUTI rate.


Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Catéteres de Permanencia , Cateterismo Urinario , Catéteres Urinarios , Humanos , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Urinario/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Urinario/instrumentación , Catéteres Urinarios/efectos adversos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Infecciones Urinarias/prevención & control , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Anciano , Remoción de Dispositivos
2.
Crit Care Explor ; 4(11): e0802, 2022 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36419635

RESUMEN

To assess the impact of a mechanical ventilation quality improvement program on patients who were excluded from the intervention. DESIGN: Before-during-and-after implementation interrupted time series analysis to assess the effect of the intervention between coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery patients (included) and left-sided valve surgery patients (excluded). SETTING: Academic medical center. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing CABG and left-sided valve procedures were analyzed. INTERVENTIONS: A postoperative mechanical ventilation quality improvement program was developed for patients undergoing CABG. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients undergoing CABG had a median mechanical ventilation time of 11 hours during P0 ("before" phase) and 6.22 hours during P2 ("after" phase; p < 0.001). A spillover effect was observed because mechanical ventilation times also decreased from 10 hours during P0 to 6 hours during P2 among valve patients who were excluded from the protocol (p < 0.001). The interrupted time series analysis demonstrated a significant level of change for ventilation time from P0 to P2 for both CABG (p < 0.0001) and valve patients (p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in the slope of change between the CABG and valve patient populations across time cohorts (P0 vs P1 [p = 0.8809]; P1 vs P2 [p = 0.3834]; P0 vs P2 [p = 0.7672]), which suggests that the rate of change in mechanical ventilation times was similar between included and excluded patients. CONCLUSIONS: Decreased mechanical ventilation times for patients who were not included in a protocol suggests a spillover effect of quality improvement and demonstrates that quality improvement can have benefits beyond a target population.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA