Respiratory syncytial virus acute respiratory infections in ≥ 65-year-old adults in long-term care facilities in the Czech Republic.

OBJECTIVES: Due to immunosenescence and presence of comorbidities, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) disease burden is a major health concern in older adults, which is expected to increase with the life expectancy rise. Data on RSV burden are scarce in older adults residing in long-term care facilities, a vulnerable population living in crowded settings. Therefore, two independent prospective studies were conducted during the 2003-2004 and 2004-2005 RSV seasons to assess RSV acute respiratory illnesses (ARIs) and lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) in ≥ 65-year-old adults residing in long-term care facilities in the Czech Republic. METHODS: RSV ARI episodes were confirmed by polymerase chain reaction in nasal swabs collected within 3 days of symptoms onset. The mortality and morbidity of RSV-confirmed ARIs, as well as the risk factors associated with RSV-confirmed ARIs were evaluated. RESULTS: Among 1,251 participants in the 2003-2004 season (ARI surveillance between October and March), there were no RSV-positive cases in 255 ARI and 105 LRTI episodes. Among 1,280 participants in the 2004-2005 season (ARI surveillance between October and April), there were 39 and 26 RSV-positive cases in 335 ARI and 217 LRTI episodes, respectively, and RSV-positive ARI and LRTI episode incidence rates were 45.82 and 30.40 per 1,000 person-years. Among 290 RSV-negative and 39 RSV-positive ARI cases in the 2004-2005 season, 15 and 4 hospitalizations, 188 and 26 LRTIs, and 11 and 3 deaths were reported. Risk factors associated with RSV-positive ARI were female gender (odds ratio: 4.98), chronic heart failure class II (odds ratio: 2.31) and diabetes requiring insulin treatment (odds ratio: 9.82). CONCLUSIONS: These studies showed that RSV was an important cause of ARI in older adults living in long-term care facilities in the 2004-2005 season, with fluctuating yearly incidences.

A comprehensive interdisciplinary view at the Return to Sport after COVID-19 infection.

The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the whole world. It applies to all age and social groups. It is no different with athletes. So far, we cannot say for sure what the long-term consequences of SARS-CoV-2 infection are. Recent evidence, however, suggests that we should be very careful when returning to sports. After self-isolation, the athlete should undergo a Preparticipation Physical Examination and then pay attention to the gradual dosing of the load to prevent complications. Lifestyle changes and care for the mental health of athletes are also necessary during the illness. In this work, we present a comprehensive methodology for returning to sports after COVID-19 for medical and coaching teams caring for athletes divided according to the course of the disease. In scientific literature, similar algorithms are called "Return to Play" or "Return to Sport". Creating an exact algorithm can make the Return to Play process more efficient and safer. However, increased attention still needs to be paid to certain organ systems and specific symptoms that could indicate long-term consequences to the new type of coronavirus.

Safety and Immunogenicity of 3 Formulations of an Investigational Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccine in Nonpregnant Women: Results From 2 Phase 2 Trials.

Background: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) causes bronchiolitis and pneumonia in neonates and infants. RSV vaccination during pregnancy could boost preexisting neutralizing antibody titers, providing passive protection to newborns. Methods: Two observer-blinded, controlled studies (RSV F-020 [clinical trials registration NCT02360475] and RSV F-024 [NCT02753413]) evaluated immunogenicity and safety of an investigational RSV vaccine in healthy, nonpregnant 18-45-year-old women. Both studies used a licensed adult formulation of combined tetanus toxoid-diphtheria toxoid-acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine as a control. RSV F-020 evaluated immunogenicity and safety: participants were randomized (1:1:1:1) to receive 1 dose of RSV-prefusion F protein (PreF) vaccine containing 30 µg or 60 µg of nonadjuvanted RSV-PreF, 60 µg of aluminum-adjuvanted RSV-PreF, or Tdap. RSV F-024 evaluated safety: participants were randomized 1:1 to receive 1 dose of 60 µg of nonadjuvanted RSV-PreF or Tdap. Results: Both studies showed similar reactogenicity profiles for RSV-PreF and Tdap. No serious adverse events were considered vaccine related. In RSV F-020, geometric mean ratios of RSV-A neutralizing antibody levels at day 30 versus prevaccination were 3.1-3.9 in RSV-PreF recipients and 0.9 in controls. Palivizumab-competing antibody concentrations increased >14-fold in RSV-PreF recipients on day 30. RSV antibody titers waned after day 30 but remained well above baseline through day 90. Conclusions: All formulations of RSV-PreF boosted preexisting immune responses in 18-45-year old women with comparable immunogenicity. The RSV-PreF safety profile was similar to that of Tdap vaccine.

Inosine pranobex is safe and effective for the treatment of subjects with confirmed acute respiratory viral infections: analysis and subgroup analysis from a Phase 4, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind study.

BACKGROUND: Inosine pranobex (Isoprinosine®) is an immunomodulatory drug approved in several countries for the treatment of viral infections. This study compared the efficacy and safety of inosine pranobex versus placebo in subjects with clinically diagnosed influenza-like illness, including subjects with laboratory-confirmed acute respiratory viral infections. Subgroup analyses evaluated the efficacy of inosine pranobex compared to placebo in otherwise healthy (without related ongoing disease) subjects that were less than 50 years of age and healthy subjects that were at least 50 years of age. The effect of body mass index (BMI) was evaluated in subjects less than 50 years of age. METHODS: A total of 463 subjects were randomly assigned to receive inosine pranobex (n = 231) or placebo (n = 232) in this Phase 4, randomised, double-blind, multicentre study. The primary efficacy endpoint was time to resolution of all influenza-like symptoms present at baseline to none. Safety was evaluated through analysis of adverse events, vital signs, and physical examinations. RESULTS: The difference in time to resolution of all influenza-like symptoms between treatment groups was not statistically significant but showed a faster improvement in subjects in the inosine pranobex group versus those in the placebo group - Hazard Ratio = 1.175; (95 % CI: 0.806-1.714). P-value = 0.324. In the subgroup analysis for subjects less than 50 years of age, statistically significant differences in time to resolution of influenza-like symptoms that favoured the inosine pranobex group over the placebo group were observed in those without related ongoing disease and those who were non-obese (BMI <30 kg/m2). The differences between the inosine pranobex and placebo groups in subjects at least 50 years of age without related ongoing disease and in subjects less than 50 years of age who were obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) were not statistically significant. Inosine pranobex was generally well tolerated, and no deaths were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The study results indicate the safety of inosine pranobex for the treatment of subjects with confirmed acute respiratory viral infections and confirm the efficacy of inosine pranobex versus placebo in healthy non-obese subjects less than 50 years of age with clinically diagnosed influenza-like illnesses. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EWO-ISO-2014/1, EudraCT 2014-001863-11 ; Date of registration: 29 APR 2014; Detail information web link: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2014-001863-11/results.

Respiratory syncytial virus and other respiratory viral infections in older adults with moderate to severe influenza-like illness.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have prospectively assessed viral etiologies of acute respiratory infections in community-based elderly individuals. We assessed viral respiratory pathogens in individuals ≥65 years with influenza-like illness (ILI). METHODS: Multiplex reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction identified viral pathogens in nasal/throat swabs from 556 episodes of moderate-to-severe ILI, defined as ILI with pneumonia, hospitalization, or maximum daily influenza symptom severity score (ISS) >2. Cases were selected from a randomized trial of an adjuvanted vs nonadjuvanted influenza vaccine conducted in elderly adults from 15 countries. RESULTS: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) was detected in 7.4% (41/556) moderate-to-severe ILI episodes in elderly adults. Most (39/41) were single infections. There was a significant association between country and RSV detection (P = .004). RSV prevalence was 7.1% (2/28) in ILI with pneumonia, 12.5% (8/64) in ILI with hospitalization, and 6.7% (32/480) in ILI with maximum ISS > 2. Any virus was detected in 320/556 (57.6%) ILI episodes: influenza A (104/556, 18.7%), rhinovirus/enterovirus (82/556, 14.7%), coronavirus and human metapneumovirus (each 32/556, 5.6%). CONCLUSIONS: This first global study providing data on RSV disease in ≥65 year-olds confirms that RSV is an important respiratory pathogen in the elderly. Preventative measures such as vaccination could decrease severe respiratory illnesses and complications in the elderly.

Immunogenicity and safety of quadrivalent versus trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine: a randomized, controlled trial in adults.

BACKGROUND: Two phylogenetic lineages of influenza B virus coexist and circulate in the human population (B/Yamagata and B/Victoria) but only one B-strain is included in each seasonal vaccine. Mismatch regularly occurs between the recommended and circulating B-strain. Inclusion of both lineages in vaccines may offer better protection against influenza. METHODS: This study (NCT00714285) assessed the immunogenicity and safety of two candidate quadrivalent influenza vaccines (QIV) containing two A- and two B-strains (one from each lineage) in adults (18-60 years). Subjects were randomized and stratified by age to receive either QIV (non-adjuvanted or low-dose adjuvanted [LD QIV-AS]) or trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV, non-adjuvanted or low-dose adjuvanted [LD TIV-AS]), N = 105 in all treatment groups. The study evaluated the statistical non-inferiority of the immunological response elicited by QIV and LD QIV-AS versus TIV and LD TIV-AS and the statistical superiority of the response elicited by the quadrivalent vaccines against the B-strain (B/Jiangsu) not included in the TIV. RESULTS: Pre-defined non-inferiority and superiority criteria were reached for both QIVs compared to the TIVs. On Day 21 in all vaccine groups SCRs were ≥54.8%, SPRs ≥88.5% and SCFs ≥5.4 for the A strains and B strain included in all vaccines (B/Malaysia). This fulfilled the European (CHMP) and the US (CBER) licensing criteria for the assessment of influenza vaccines in adults (CHMP criteria: SCR > 40%, SPR > 70%, SCF > 2; CBER criteria: LL of 95% CI for SPR ≥ 70% or SCR ≥ 40%). Only the QIVs met the CHMP and CBER criteria for the B/Jiangsu strain. In the QIV and LD-QIV-AS groups, the SCFs were 9.1 and 8.1, respectively and the SPRs were 98.1% and 95.2%, whereas for the TIV and LD-TIV-AS groups, the SCFs were 2.3 and 2.5, respectively, and the SPRs were 75.0% and 63.8%, with the LLs of the 95% CI <70% for SPR and <40% for SCR. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of a fourth strain did not impact the immune response elicited by the three original strains contained in the TIV. A clear immunological benefit was seen with the QIV formulation for the second B-strain, indicating that quadrivalent vaccines could provide broader protection against influenza. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00714285.

Sustained antibody persistence for at least 15 years after a booster vaccination against tick-borne encephalitis following different primary vaccination schedules: Third 5-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Vaccination is the best mode of protection against tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) and its sequelae. The duration of protection and the optimal interval of repeat booster doses are still debated. The current study evaluated the persistence of the antibody response 11-15 years after a first booster vaccination following different primary vaccination schedules with a TBE vaccine (Encepur Adults, manufactured by Bavarian Nordic, previously by GSK). METHODS: This phase IV, open-label, mono-centric extension study enrolled adults who had received (at ≥ 12 years of age) primary vaccination with one of three randomly assigned TBE vaccine schedules (rapid [group R], conventional [group C], or accelerated conventional schedule [group A]) followed by a booster dose 3 years later. The antibody response was measured annually from 11 to 15 years post-booster using a TBE virus neutralization test (NT). An NT titer of ≥ 10 was considered as a clinically meaningful threshold and surrogate for protection. RESULTS: In total, 194 participants were enrolled and included in the per-protocol set; 188 completed the study. The percentage of participants with an NT titer ≥ 10 was 100% in group R and 99.0% in group A at all visits and ranged from 100% (year 11) to 95.8% (year 15) in group C. NT geometric mean titers were similar in the three study groups (181-267 in group R, 142-227 in group C, 141-209 in group A). NT geometric mean titers also remained high among participants ≥ 50 years old (98-206) and ≥ 60 years old (91-191) across study groups and time points. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed neutralizing antibody persistence for at least 15 years after a first booster dose of the Encepur Adults TBE vaccine in all age groups evaluated, regardless of which primary vaccination schedule was given to adolescents or adults. Trialregistry: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03294135.

Inosine Pranobex Deserves Attention as a Potential Immunomodulator to Achieve Early Alteration of the COVID-19 Disease Course.

Since its licensing in 1971, the synthetic compound inosine pranobex has been effectively combating viral infections, including herpes zoster, varicella, measles, and infections caused by the herpes simplex virus, human papillomavirus, Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, and respiratory viruses. With the emergence of SARS-CoV-2, new and existing drugs have been intensively evaluated for their potential as COVID-19 medication. Due to its potent immunomodulatory properties, inosine pranobex, an orally administered drug with pleiotropic effects, can, during early treatment, alter the course of the disease. We describe the action of inosine pranobex in the body and give an overview of existing evidence collected to support further efforts to study this drug in a rigorous clinical trial setup.

Immunogenicity and Safety of Investigational MenABCWY Vaccine and of 4CMenB and MenACWY Vaccines Administered Concomitantly or Alone: a Phase 2 Randomized Study of Adolescents and Young Adults.

This phase 2, randomized, open-label study assessed the immunogenicity and safety of an investigational meningococcal ABCWY vaccine (MenABCWY) that contains components of licensed vaccines against meningococcal serogroup B (4CMenB) and serogroups ACWY (MenACWY). A total of 500 healthy 10- to 25-year-old participants were randomly assigned to one of five study groups in a 1:1:1:1:1 ratio. Four groups received two doses 2 months apart of MenABCWY and 4CMenB plus MenACWY administered concomitantly in the same arm (4CMenB+ACWY/S group) or different arms (4CMenB+ACWY/D group) or 4CMenB administered alone. A fifth group received a single MenACWY dose. Immunogenicity was determined by serum bactericidal assay using human complement (hSBA). The study was powered to assess immunological interference against pooled serogroup B test strains. One month after the second vaccine dose, hSBA geometric mean titers (GMTs) (with 80% confidence intervals [CI]) against pooled serogroup B strains were 31.84 (80% CI, 28.18 to 35.98), 38.48 (80% CI, 34.23 to 43.26), 40.08 (80% CI, 35.44 to 45.33), and 42.38 (80% CI, 37.31 to 48.13) in the MenABCWY, 4CMenB+ACWY/S, 4CMenB+ACWY/D, and 4CMenB groups, respectively. Immune responses (GMTs and 80% CIs) were lower for PorA and NHBA serogroup B test strains in the MenABCWY group compared to the 4CMenB+ACWY/D group and 4CMenB group. Evaluation of solicited and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) identified no safety concerns for the MenABCWY vaccine. One serious AE (syncope in the 4CMenB group) was considered related to vaccination. In conclusion, there is no evidence of substantial immunological interference between 4CMenB and MenACWY vaccine components against serogroup B. The safety and tolerability profile of the investigational MenABCWY vaccine was acceptable. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT03587207.) IMPORTANCE The bacterial species Neisseria meningitidis is a major cause of meningitis, with six meningococcal groups (serogroups) causing most cases. A licensed vaccine, MenACWY (Menveo), targets four of these meningococcal serogroups, and another vaccine, 4CMenB (Bexsero), targets serogroup B. A combined vaccine (MenABCWY) that targets all five serogroups is under development to simplify the vaccination schedule. In a previous study, the immune response to serogroup B was found to be overall higher in individuals who received 4CMenB than in those who received an investigational MenABCWY vaccine. We investigated this further by giving healthy adolescents and young adults the MenABCWY vaccine, 4CMenB plus MenACWY vaccine in the same or different arms, 4CMenB vaccine alone, or MenACWY vaccine alone. Immunogenicity results for serogroup B across study groups suggest no major interference between the MenB and MenACWY vaccine components. This supports further development of the combined MenABCWY vaccine.

Correction: Beran et al. Inosine Pranobex Significantly Decreased the Case-Fatality Rate among PCR Positive Elderly with SARS-CoV-2 at Three Nursing Homes in the Czech Republic. Pathogens 2020, 9, 1055.

There was an error in the original article [...].

Prevention of influenza during mismatched seasons in older adults with an MF59-adjuvanted quadrivalent influenza vaccine: a randomised, controlled, multicentre, phase 3 efficacy study.

BACKGROUND: The absolute degree of protection from influenza vaccines in older adults has not been studied since 2001. This study aimed to show the clinical efficacy of an MF59-adjuvanted quadrivalent influenza vaccine (aQIV) in adults 65 years or older compared with adults not vaccinated to prevent influenza. METHODS: We did a randomised, stratified, observer-blind, controlled, multicentre, phase 3 study at 89 sites in 12 countries in 2016-17 northern hemisphere and 2017 southern hemisphere influenza seasons. We enrolled community-dwelling male and female adults aged 65 years and older who were healthy or had comorbidities that increased their risk of influenza complications. We stratified eligible participants by age (cohorts 65-74 years and ≥75 years) and risk of influenza complications (high and low) and randomly assigned them (1:1) via an interactive response technology to receive either aQIV or a non-influenza comparator vaccine. We masked participants and outcome assessors to the administered vaccine. Personnel administering the vaccines did not participate in endpoint assessment. The primary outcome was absolute vaccine efficacy assessed by RT-PCR-confirmed influenza due to any influenza strain in the overall study population (full analysis set) from day 21 to 180 or the end of the influenza season. Vaccine efficacy was calculated on the basis of a Cox proportional hazard regression model for time to first occurrence of RT-PCR-confirmed influenza due to any strain of influenza. Safety outcomes were assessed in the overall study population. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02587221. FINDINGS: Northern hemisphere enrolment occurred between Sept 30, 2016, and Feb 28, 2017, and southern hemisphere enrolment between May 26, 2017, and 30 June 30, 2017. aQIV was administered to 3381 participants, who subsequently had 122 (3·6%) RT-PCR-confirmed influenza cases, and the comparator was administered to 3380 participants, who subsequently had 151 (4·5%) influenza cases. The majority, 214 (78·4%) of 273, were caused by influenza A H3N2. Most antigenically characterised isolates were mismatched to the vaccine strain (118 [85%] of 139). Vaccine efficacy was 19·8% (multiplicity-adjusted 95% CI -5·3 to 38·9) against all influenza and 49·9% (-24·0 to 79·8) against antigenically matched strains, when the protocol definition of influenza-like illness was used. The most common local solicited adverse event was injection site pain, reported by 102 (16·3%) of 624 participants in the aQIV group and 71 (11·2%) of 632 of participants in the comparator group. Deaths were evenly distributed; none were considered related to study vaccines. The safety profile for aQIV was similar to previously reported trials. INTERPRETATION: The prespecified criterion for showing the efficacy of aQIV in older adults was not met during the influenza seasons with high amounts of vaccine strain mismatch. Vaccine efficacy was higher against influenza cases associated with higher fever, which represent more clinically significant disease. FUNDING: Seqirus UK.

Safety and immunogenicity of an investigational adjuvanted hepatitis B vaccine (HB-AS02V) in healthy adults.

HB-AS02 is an investigational adjuvanted hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccine for potential use in patients with renal insufficiency and other immunocompromized individuals. In this Phase III lot-to-lot consistency study, 450 healthy adult volunteers who had not previously been vaccinated against HBV were randomized to one of three production lots of HB-AS02 at 0 and 1 month and followed until one month after the last vaccine dose. Lot-to-lot consistency was established. High seroprotection rates were already achieved after the first vaccine dose (75.9%). All subjects were seroprotected (anti-HBs antibody concentrations ≥10 mIU/ml) after two doses, with all but one subject achieving anti-HBs antibody concentrations ≥100 mIU/ml (99.7%). Geometric mean anti-HBs antibody concentration was 4594.5 mIU/ml. Local and general symptoms were reported after 80.7% and 45.5% of doses, respectively. However, these were mainly of mild or moderate severity and no subject withdrew from the study due to adverse events.

Glycemic control improvement through treatment of depression using antidepressant drugs in patients with diabetes mellitus type 1.

OBJECTIVE: Depression is a common disorder among diabetic patients and affects negatively the treatment of their basic disease. The aim of the study was to assess, whether antidepressant medication could positively influence glycemic control of diabetes type 1 in depressive or anxious patients. METHODS: A six-month, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study was performed to investigate the reaction of type 1diabetic patients (n=21) to treatment of depression and anxiety symptoms using antidepressant drug sertraline. The patients were given sertraline (100 mg/day) or placebo. The evolution of mental change was assessed using Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) along with development of somatic parameters commonly assessed in diabetic patients, especially glycosylated hemoglobin, insulin dose and body weight. The level of active substance in serum of the patients was also measured. RESULTS: Mental state improved at the level of statistical significance of p<0.001 in both patients using antidepressant and placebo. From somatic parameters, body weight and systolic blood pressure increased statistically significantly also in both groups of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The mental state of most patients who successfully completed the study improved regardless of the fact if they were using antidepressant or placebo. No statistically significant connections between the mental and somatic changes were found. This finding points out to the placebo effect of the medication, to the importance of a contact with patients, but also to the need to concentrate on their mental state.

Efficacy of inactivated split-virus influenza vaccine against culture-confirmed influenza in healthy adults: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: A new trivalent inactivated split-virus influenza vaccine (TIV) was recently introduced in the United States. We assessed the efficacy of TIV against culture-confirmed influenza A and/or B. METHODS: In this double-blind trial conducted from September 2006 to May 2007 in the Czech Republic and Finland, participants aged 18-64 years were randomized to receive 1 dose of TIV (n = 5103) or placebo (n = 2549). Influenza-like illnesses (ILI) (defined as at least 1 systemic symptom [fever {oral temperature, > or = 37.8 degrees C} and/or myalgia] and at least 1 respiratory symptom [cough and/or sore throat]) were identified by both active (biweekly phone contact) and passive surveillance. Nasal and throat swab specimens were collected for viral culture. RESULTS: The attack rate for culture-confirmed ILI was 3.2% in the placebo group, with most strains identified as influenza A (all except 1 were H3N2) matching the vaccine strain. There were 6 cases of influenza B, all of which were of a different lineage (Yamagata) than the vaccine strain. Vaccine efficacy against culture-confirmed influenza A and/or B due to strains antigenically matched to the vaccine was 66.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 51.9%-77.4%; P < .001) and to any strain was 61.6% (95% CI, 46.0%-72.8%; P < .001). CONCLUSION: TIV is efficacious against culture-confirmed influenza in healthy adults. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00363870.

Predicted long-term antibody persistence for a tick-borne encephalitis vaccine: results from a modeling study beyond 10 years after a booster dose following different primary vaccination schedules.

In tick-borne encephalitis (TBE)-endemic regions, long-term vaccination programs are efficient in preventing the disease. A booster dose of a polygeline-free inactivated TBE vaccine (Encepur Adults, GSK), administered approximately 3 years post-primary vaccination according to 1 of 3 licensed vaccination schedules in adults and adolescents, resulted in antibody persistence for 10 years post-boosting. We used different power-law models (PLMs) to predict long-term persistence of anti-TBE virus neutralization test (NT) antibody titers over a period of 20 years post-booster dose, based on individual antibody NT titers measured for 10 years post-booster vaccination. The PLMs were fitted on pooled data for all vaccine schedules. A mean NT titer of 261 (95% prediction interval: 22-3096), considerably above the accepted threshold of protection (NT titers ≥10), was predicted 20 years post-booster vaccination with TBE vaccine. Our modeled data suggest that the intervals of booster doses could be increased without compromising protection against TBE.

Inosine Pranobex Significantly Decreased the Case-Fatality Rate among PCR Positive Elderly with SARS-CoV-2 at Three Nursing Homes in the Czech Republic.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the elderly population has been disproportionately affected, especially those in nursing homes (NH). Inosine pranobex (IP) has been previously demonstrated to be effective in treating acute viral respiratory infections. In three NH experiencing the SARS-CoV-2 virus epidemic, we started treatment with IP as soon as clients tested PCR+. In Litovel, CZ, the difference in case-fatality rate (CFR) for the PCR+ group using vs. not using IP was statistically significant, and the odds ratio (OR) was 7.2. When comparing all those taking IP in the three NH vs. the non-drug PCR+ group in Litovel, the odds ratio was lower for all three NH, but still significant at 2.9. The CFR in all three tested NHs, age range 75-84, compared to the CFR in all NHs in the Czech Republic, was significantly reduced (7.5% vs. 18%) (OR: 2.8); there was also a significant difference across all age groups (OR: 1.7). In our study with 301 residents, the CFR was significantly reduced (OR: 2.8) to 11.9% (17/142) in comparison to a study in Ireland with 27.6% (211/764). We think the effect of IP was significant in this reduction; nevertheless, these are preliminary results that need larger-scale trials on COVID-19 patients.

Safety and immunogenicity of fully liquid and lyophilized formulations of an investigational trivalent group B streptococcus vaccine in healthy non-pregnant women: Results from a randomized comparative phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of liquid and lyophilized formulations of an investigational trivalent group B streptococcus (GBS) vaccine in non-pregnant women and assessed the formulations' equivalence in terms of serotype-specific immune response. METHODS: This phase II, randomized, comparative, observer-blind trial enrolled healthy non-pregnant women 18-40 years of age. Women received a single dose of fully liquid (n = 529) or lyophilized (n = 521) trivalent GBS vaccine on day 1. Safety assessments were performed up to day 181 (study termination). Serotype Ia/Ib/III-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies were measured in sera from women on day 1 (pre-vaccination) and day 31. Equivalence between the two formulations was demonstrated if the two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for the ratio (liquid/lyophilized) of the geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) on day 31 was contained in a (0.5, 2.0) interval for each serotype. RESULTS: Solicited and unsolicited adverse events were reported at similar rates for both formulations. Serious adverse events were reported for six (1.1%) liquid GBS and nine (1.7%) lyophilized GBS vaccinated women, none of which were considered related to vaccination or fatal. On day 31, serotype-specific IgG concentrations were 8-16-fold higher than on day 1 in both groups. Equivalence of the liquid to the lyophilized formulation 30 days post-vaccination was demonstrated as the 95% CIs of the GMC ratios were within the pre-specified interval for the three serotypes: GMC ratios were 1.02 (95% CI: 0.79, 1.32) for serotype Ia, 0.93 (0.71, 1.21) for serotype Ib and 0.99 (0.76, 1.30) for serotype III. CONCLUSIONS: Both formulations of the investigational trivalent GBS vaccine had favorable safety profiles and induced similar GBS serotype-specific antibody concentrations. This study demonstrated that the fully liquid formulation was equivalent to the lyophilized formulation in healthy non-pregnant women in terms of immunogenicity for all three serotypes. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT02270944.

Intradermal influenza vaccination of healthy adults using a new microinjection system: a 3-year randomised controlled safety and immunogenicity trial.

BACKGROUND: Intradermal vaccination provides direct and potentially more efficient access to the immune system via specialised dendritic cells and draining lymphatic vessels. We investigated the immunogenicity and safety during 3 successive years of different dosages of a trivalent, inactivated, split-virion vaccine against seasonal influenza given intradermally using a microinjection system compared with an intramuscular control vaccine. METHODS: In a randomised, partially blinded, controlled study, healthy volunteers (1150 aged 18 to 57 years at enrollment) received three annual vaccinations of intradermal or intramuscular vaccine. In Year 1, subjects were randomised to one of three groups: 3 microg or 6 microg haemagglutinin/strain/dose of inactivated influenza vaccine intradermally, or a licensed inactivated influenza vaccine intramuscularly containing 15 microg/strain/dose. In Year 2 subjects were randomised again to one of two groups: 9 microg/strain/dose intradermally or 15 microg intramuscularly. In Year 3 subjects were randomised a third time to one of two groups: 9 microg intradermally or 15 microg intramuscularly. Randomisation lists in Year 1 were stratified for site. Randomisation lists in Years 2 and 3 were stratified for site and by vaccine received in previous years to ensure the inclusion of a comparable number of subjects in a vaccine group at each centre each year. Immunogenicity was assessed 21 days after each vaccination. Safety was assessed throughout the study. RESULTS: In Years 2 and 3, 9 microg intradermal was comparably immunogenic to 15 microg intramuscular for all strains, and both vaccines met European requirements for annual licensing of influenza vaccines. The 3 microg and 6 microg intradermal formulations were less immunogenic than intramuscular 15 microg. Safety of the intradermal and intramuscular vaccinations was comparable in each year of the study. Injection site erythema and swelling was more common with the intradermal route. CONCLUSION: An influenza vaccine with 9 microg of haemagglutinin/strain given using an intradermal microinjection system showed comparable immunogenic and safety profiles to a licensed intramuscular vaccine, and presents a promising alternative to intramuscular vaccination for influenza for adults younger than 60 years. TRIAL REGISTRATION: (Clinicaltrials.gov) NCT00703651.

Challenge of conducting a placebo-controlled randomized efficacy study for influenza vaccine in a season with low attack rate and a mismatched vaccine B strain: a concrete example.

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to determine the efficacy of a trivalent inactivated split virus influenza vaccine (TIV) against culture-confirmed influenza A and/or B in adults 18 to 64 years of age during the 2005/2006 season in the Czech Republic. METHODS: 6203 subjects were randomized to receive TIV (N = 4137) or placebo (N = 2066). The sample size was based on an assumed attack rate of 4% which provided 90% power to reject the hypothesis that vaccine efficacy (VE) was > or = 45%. Cases of influenza like illness (defined as fever (oral temperature > or =37.8 degrees C) plus cough and/or sore throat) were identified both by active (biweekly phone contact) and passive (self reporting) surveillance and nasal and throat swabs were collected from subjects for viral culture. RESULTS: TIV was well tolerated and induced a good immune response. The 2005/2006 influenza season was exceptionally mild in the study area, as it was throughout Europe, and only 46 culture-confirmed cases were found in the study cohort (10 influenza A and 36 influenza B). Furthermore among the B isolates, 35 were identified as B/Hong Kong 330/2001-like (B/Victoria/2/87 lineage) which is antigenically unrelated to the vaccine B strain (B/Yamagata/16/88 lineage). The attack rate in the vaccine group (0.7%) was not statistically significantly different from the attack rate in the placebo group (0.9%). CONCLUSION: Due to the atypical nature of the influenza season during this study we were unable to assess TIV efficacy. This experience illustrates the challenge of conducting a prospective influenza vaccine efficacy trial during a single season when influenza attack rates and drift in circulating strains or B virus lineage match can be difficult to estimate in advance. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial registery: NCT00197223.