RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Approximately 50% of patients with congenital scoliosis will require surgical treatment to prevent further progression. Outcomes following congenital scoliosis are sparse in the literature. The purpose of this study was to identify independent risk factors associated with unplanned readmission and prolonged length of stay (LOS) in patients undergoing primary surgical treatment for congenital scoliosis. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Database-Pediatric was queried for database years 2016-2018 to identify patients with congenital scoliosis who underwent primary posterior fusion of the spine. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and operative variables, such as the number of levels fused and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classificaiton, were collected. Univariate and multivariate analyses of patient factors were performed to test for association with readmission within 30 days and prolonged LOS (>4 days). RESULTS: Eight hundred sixteen patients were identified. The average age was 11.3 ± 4.02 years, and the mean postoperative LOS was 4.64 ± 3.71 days. Forty-three patients (5.40%) were readmitted, and 73 patients (8.96%) had prolonged LOS. Independent risk factors associated with prolonged LOS included chronic lung disease (P < 0.001), presence of a tracheostomy (P < 0.001), structural central nervous system abnormality (P = 0.039), oxygen support (P < 0.001), and number of levels fused (P = 0.008). The factors independently associated with unplanned readmission were fusion to the pelvis (P = 0.004) and LOS >4 days (P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged LOS and readmission are widely being used as quality and performance metrics for hospitals. Congenital scoliosis, which often progresses rapidly resulting in significant deformity, frequently requires surgery at an earlier age than idiopathic and neuromuscular deformity. Nevertheless, 30-day outcomes for surgical intervention have not been thoroughly studied. The present study identifies risk factors for prolonged LOS and readmission, which can facilitate preoperative planning, patient/family counseling, and postoperative care. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Congenital scoliosis management poses certain challenges that may be mitigated by understanding the risk factors for adverse outcomes following primary fusion surgery.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Internet is an important source of information for patients, but its effectiveness relies on the readability of its content. Patient education materials (PEMs) should be written at or below a sixth-grade reading level as outlined by agencies such as the American Medical Association. This study assessed PEMs' readability for the novel anterior vertebral body tethering (AVBT), distraction-based methods, and posterior spinal fusion (PSF) in treating pediatric spinal deformity. METHODS: An online search identified PEMs using the terms "anterior vertebral body tethering," "growing rods scoliosis," and "posterior spinal fusion pediatric scoliosis." We selected the first 20 general medical websites (GMWs) and 10 academic health institution websites (AHIWs) discussing each treatment (90 websites total). Readability tests for each webpage were conducted using Readability Studio software. Reading grade levels (RGLs), which correspond to the US grade at which one is expected to comprehend the text, were calculated for sources and independent t tests compared with RGLs between treatment types. RESULTS: The mean RGL was 12.1 ± 2.0. No articles were below a sixth-grade reading level, with only 2.2% at the sixth-grade reading level. AVBT articles had a higher RGL than distraction-based methods (12.7 ± 1.6 vs 11.9 ± 1.9, P = 0.082) and PSF (12.7 ± 1.6 vs 11.6 ± 2.3, P = 0.032). Materials for distraction-based methods and PSF were comparable (11.9 ± 1.9 vs 11.6 ± 2.3, P = 0.566). Among GMWs, AVBT materials had a higher RGL than distraction-based methods (12.9 ± 1.4 vs 12.1 ± 1.8, P = 0.133) and PSF (12.9 ± 1.4 vs 11.4 ± 2.4, P = 0.016). CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Patients' health literacy is important for shared decision-making. Assessing the readability of scoliosis treatment PEMs guides physicians when sharing resources and discussing treatment with patients. CONCLUSION: Both GMWs and AHIWs exceed recommended RGLs, which may limit patient and parent understanding. Within GMWs, AVBT materials are written at a higher RGL than other treatments, which may hinder informed decision-making and patient outcomes. Efforts should be made to create online resources at the appropriate RGL. At the very least, patients and parents may be directed toward AHIWs; RGLs are more consistent.