RESUMEN
Iron deficiency is a highly prevalent condition, which contributes to unnecessary morbidity, mortality, and health inequity. A serum ferritin concentration of less than 30 µg/L has a high specificity and sensitivity for diagnosing iron deficiency in adults, but the laboratory reported lower limit of normal (LLN) is typically lower. These LLNs might not be rooted in rigorous scientific evidence and might be contributing to structural underdiagnosis of iron deficiency. A systematic review was done per systematic reviews and meta-analysis guidelines with the use of medical literature databases from inception of each database to Nov 30, 2021, to identify studies that determined ferritin reference intervals in healthy adults and grey literature search for the five most common ferritin assays (registration number CRD42022268844). The objectives were to systematically summarise the ferritin reference intervals and to do a methodological quality assessment of the included studies. 2306 studies were screened and 61 full texts were included. 37 studies were eligible for analysis of the ferritin LLN in the general population. The population the sample was comprised of was a total of 21 882 females and 23 650 males participants. The ferritin LLN was a median of 8 µg/L (IQR 5-15) and mean of 9 µg/L (SD 11) in females and a median of 25 µg/L (IQR 16-44) and mean of 25 µg/L (SD 29) in males. 30 (49%) of 61 studies did not explicitly screen for patients at risk of iron deficiency, and 32 (52%) did not refer to a reference interval establishment guideline (eg, guideline recommended by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute). The five most used commercial ferritin laboratory assays reported reference intervals with a median LLN of 11 (IQR 9-12) and mean of 9 µg/L (SD 4) for females and median of 22 (IQR 22-24) and mean of 23 µg/L (SD 4) for males. In the literature, serum ferritin reference intervals in healthy adults consistently report a LLN of less than 30 µg/L. Data driving these ferritin reference intervals are at high risk of bias, given no exclusion of individuals at risk for iron deficiency in the presumed normal population sample and no adherence to reference interval establishment standards. We suggest the use of evidence-based laboratory clinical decision limits to diagnose iron deficiency.
Asunto(s)
Ferritinas , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Anemia Ferropénica/diagnóstico , Anemia Ferropénica/sangre , Ferritinas/sangre , Valores de ReferenciaRESUMEN
Detecting dyslipidemia early is important because atherosclerosis originates in childhood and early treatment can improve outcomes. In 2022, the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) and Canadian Pediatric Cardiology Association (CPCA) published a clinical practice update to detect, evaluate, and manage pediatric dyslipidemia. However, guidance on its translation into clinical laboratories is lacking. The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists Working Group on Reference Interval Harmonization Lipid Team aims to assist guideline implementation and promote harmonized pediatric lipid reporting across Canada. The 2022 CCS/CPCA clinical practice update, 2011 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute integrated guidelines, and new data analysis (Canadian pediatric reference values from the Canadian Laboratory Initiative on Pediatric Reference Intervals [CALIPER] and retrospective patient data from large community laboratories) were incorporated to develop 5 key recommendations. These include recommendations to: (1) offer nonfasting and fasting lipid testing; (2) offer a lipid panel including total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), non-HDL-C, and triglycerides, with apolipoprotein B and lipoprotein(a) available as individually orderable tests; (3) flag total cholesterol, LDL-C, and non-HDL-C results ≥ 95th percentile, and HDL-C results < 10th percentile, as recommended by CCS/CPCA/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and validated by CALIPER, and flag apolipoprotein B and nonfasting triglyceride results ≥ 95th percentile on the basis of CALIPER, and do not flag Lp(a) results but mention the adult cutoff in the interpretive comments; (4) implement interpretive comments listed in the current report; and (5) implement the National Institutes of Health LDL-C equation. The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists Working Group on Reference Interval Harmonization Lipid Team will support clinical laboratories to implement these recommendations using knowledge translation strategies. Harmonizing pediatric lipid reporting across Canadian clinical laboratories will optimize clinical decision-making and improve cardiovascular risk management in youth.
Asunto(s)
Dislipidemias , Lípidos , Humanos , Canadá , Niño , Lípidos/sangre , Dislipidemias/diagnóstico , Dislipidemias/sangre , Sociedades Médicas , Valores de ReferenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: An analytical benchmark for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays is to achieve a coefficient of variation (CV) of ≤ 10.0 % at the 99th percentile upper reference limit (URL) used for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction. Few prospective multicenter studies have evaluated assay imprecision and none have determined precision at the female URL which is lower than the male URL for all cardiac troponin assays. METHODS: Human serum and plasma matrix samples were constructed to yield hs-cTn concentrations near the female URLs for the Abbott, Beckman, Roche, and Siemens hs-cTn assays. These materials were sent (on dry ice) to 35 Canadian hospital laboratories (n = 64 instruments evaluated) participating in a larger clinical trial, with instructions for storage, handling, and monthly testing over one year. The mean concentration, standard deviation, and CV for each instrument type and an overall pooled CV for each manufacturer were calculated. RESULTS: The CVs for all individual instruments and overall were ≤ 10.0 % for two manufacturers (Abbott CVpooled = 6.3 % and Beckman CVpooled = 7.0 %). One of four Siemens Atellica instruments yielded a CV > 10.0 % (CVpooled = 7.7 %), whereas 15 of 41 Roche instruments yielded CVs > 10.0 % at the female URL of 9 ng/L used worldwide (6 cobas e411, 1 cobas e601, 4 cobas e602, and 4 cobas e801) (CVpooled = 11.7 %). Four Roche instruments also yielded CVs > 10.0 % near the female URL of 14 ng/L used in the United States (CVpooled = 8.5 %). CONCLUSIONS: The number of instruments achieving a CV ≤ 10.0 % at the female 99th-percentile URL varies by manufacturer and by instrument. Monitoring assay precision at the female URL is necessary for some assays to ensure optimal use of this threshold in clinical practice.