Are we supererestimating gait assessments of patients with idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus?

INTRODUCTION: Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a syndrome characterized by a triad composed of cognitive alteration, urinary incontinence, and gait impairment associated with ventricular enlargement and normal cerebrospinal fluid pressure. Gait impairment is among the earliest symptoms; however, the reliability of the evaluation is not well-established and no consensus has been reaching regarding variables that should be analyzed and which parameters should be considered to accurately assess post-intervention improvement. RESEARCH QUESTION: Are the degree of repeatability, standard error of measurement, and minimum detectable change considered to detect changes in gait variables in iNPH patients? METHODS: A total of 84 iNPH patients with a mean age of 77.1 (±6.4) years were analyzed. Gait deviation index (GDI), speed, cadence, cycle time, stride length, single support, and first and second double support were chosen as the variables to be analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed by an independent evaluator, with gait repeatability assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the standard error of measure (SEM). RESULTS: ICC values were 0.76-0.85 with excellent repeatability, while SEM demonstrated that the variables with best repeatability were the GDI (mean, 4.94; 95% confidence interval (CI), 4.63-5.43), representing a 7.65% mean relative error of the measurement (mean, 0.05 m; 95% CI, 0.05-0.06), and stride length (mean 0.05 m; 95% CI, 0.05-0.06), with a 7.69% mean relative error. SIGNIFICANCE: We concluded that GDI and stride length were the variables with the best repeatability and lower variability in the gait of iNPH patients.

An investigation of the value of tridimensional kinematic analysis in functional diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is based on clinical examination and imaging. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of 3D gait analysis as a tool in the differential diagnosis of LSS. Fourteen patients participated in the study that consisted of three phases: (1) capture six gait cycles after rest, (2) walk on a treadmill for a maximum of 20 min, (3) capture six gait cycles after effort. From these data, the kinematic variables were compared with the perception of pain and the cross sectional area of the spinal canal as measured by magnetic resonance. Most of correlations were weak and showed that the most significant results are reported by the Gait Deviation Index (GDI). The Gait Deviation Index demonstrated moderate negative correlation with the perception of pain after effort was made by both limbs. This means that there is a significant decrease in the overall function of the lower limbs according to the increase in pain symptoms. This situation may be reflected in decreased cadence and speed beyond the times of single support for the left limb, and the balance of the right limb, as part of a strategy to protect against pain and imbalance. We found no correlation between gait and pain in the cross-sectional area of the spinal canal. Therefore, we believe that there is no advantage for the patient to make a 3-D gait analysis because the analysis does not add relevant information to clinical diagnosis.

The impact of tibial torsion measurements on gait analysis kinematics.

OBJECTIVE: To measure and compare tibial torsion values as assessed by goniometry and three-dimensional kinematics. In addition, the impact of each one of these measurements on kinematic and kinetic results for normal gait was determined. METHODS: Twenty-three healthy and fully ambulatory patients were assessed, 11 women and 12 men, from 20 to 40 years old. Data were collected at a laboratory for the three-dimensional analysis of movement with 10 cameras and two force plates. Tibial torsion measurements were obtained using goniometry and three-dimensional kinematics based on the Plug-in Gait model. Afterwards, both procedures were compared, and the impact of each result was assessed on the kinematic and kinetic modeling of the knee and ankle. RESULTS: Pearson's linear correlation coefficient (r=0,504) showed a moderate correlation between the three-dimensional kinematics and goniometry, and between the changes in the measurements. Regarding the processed kinematic and kinetic results for every torsion position, no significant differences were noticed among any of the studied variables (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Although statistical correlation among tibial torsion angles by goniometry and three-dimensional kinematic were moderate, kinematic and kinetic analysis of the joints did not reveal any significant changes. Level of Evidence I, Diagnostic Studies - Investigating a Diagnostic Test.

The impact of tibial torsion measurements on gait analysis kinematics

Medir e comparar os valores de torção tibial avaliadospor goniometria e cinemática tridimensional. O impacto de cadamedida sobre os resultados cinemáticos e cinéticos para a marchanormal foi determinado. Métodos: Vinte e três pacientes saudáveise independentes para locomoção foram avaliados, 11 mulheres e12 homens, entre 20 a 40 anos de idade. Os dados foram coletadosno Laboratório de Análise do Movimento com 10 câmeras eduas plataformas de força. Medições da torção tibial foram obtidasutilizando a goniometria e a cinemática tridimensional oriunda domodelo de plug-in gait. Posteriormente, ambos os procedimentosforam comparados, e o impacto de cada resultado foi avaliado nacinemática e cinética do joelho e tornozelo. Resultados: o coeficientede correlação linear de Pearson (r = 0,504) mostrou umacorrelação moderada entre a cinemática tridimensional e goniometriae entre as mudanças nas medidas. Em relação aos resultadoscinemáticos e cinéticos processados para cada posiçãode torção, não foram observadas diferenças significativas entrenenhuma das variáveis estudadas (p ≥ 0,05). Conclusão: Apesarde correlação estatística entre os ângulos de torção da tíbia porgoniometria e cinemática tridimensional terem sido moderada, aanálise cinemática e cinética das articulações não revelou altera-ções significativas. Nível de Evidência I, Estudos Diagnósticos- Investigação de Um Exame Para Diagnóstico...

To measure and compare tibial torsion values as assessedby goniometry and three-dimensional kinematics. In addition,the impact of each one of these measurements on kinematic andkinetic results for normal gait was determined. Methods: Twenty--three healthy and fully ambulatory patients were assessed, 11women and 12 men, from 20 to 40 years old. Data were collectedat a laboratory for the three-dimensional analysis of movement with10 cameras and two force plates. Tibial torsion measurementswere obtained using goniometry and three-dimensional kinematicsbased on the Plug-in Gait model. Afterwards, both procedureswere compared, and the impact of each result was assessed onthe kinematic and kinetic modeling of the knee and ankle. Results:Pearson’s linear correlation coefficient (r=0,504) showed amoderate correlation between the three-dimensional kinematicsand goniometry, and between the changes in the measurements.Regarding the processed kinematic and kinetic results for everytorsion position, no significant differences were noticed amongany of the studied variables (p≥0.05). Conclusion: Although statisticalcorrelation among tibial torsion angles by goniometry andthree-dimensional kinematic were moderate, kinematic and kineticanalysis of the joints did not reveal any significant changes.Level of Evidence I, Diagnostic Studies - Investigating a Diagnostic Test...