Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 408(1): 344, 2023 Aug 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37642752

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Parastomal incisional hernia (PH) is a frequent complication following the creation of an ileal conduit (IC), and it can be a significant detriment to quality of life. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of PH repair following IC for urinary diversion. METHOD: A multicenter retrospective study was conducted of 6 academic hospitals in France. The study's population included patients who underwent surgical treatment for parastomal hernia following IC creation from 2013 to 2021. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients were included in the study. Median follow up was 15.3 months. Eighteen patients presented with a recurrence (35%), with a median time to recurrence of 11.1 months. The vast majority of PH repair was performed through an open approach (88%). With regard to technique, Keyhole was the most reported technique (46%) followed by Sugarbaker (22%) and suture only (20%). The Keyhole technique was associated with a higher risk of recurrence compared to the Sugarbaker technique (52% vs 10%, p = 0.046). Overall, there was a 7.8% rate of major complications without a statistical difference between PH repair techniques for major complications. CONCLUSION: Surgical treatment of parastomal hernia following IC was associated with a high risk of recurrence. Novel surgical approaches to PH repair should be considered.


Asunto(s)
Hernia Incisional , Derivación Urinaria , Humanos , Cistectomía/efectos adversos , Hernia Incisional/etiología , Hernia Incisional/cirugía , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos , Derivación Urinaria/efectos adversos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA