Reduced incidence of cardiovascular events in hyper-Lp(a) patients on lipoprotein apheresis. The G.I.L.A. (Gruppo Interdisciplinare Aferesi Lipoproteica) pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Lipoprotein apheresis (LA) is the elective therapy for homozygous and other forms of Familial Hypercholesterolemia, Familial Combined Hypercholesterolemia, resistant/intolerant to lipid lowering drugs, and hyper-lipoproteinemia(a). Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has been classified as the most prevalent genetic risk factor for coronary artery disease and aortic valve stenosis. AIM: Our multicenter retrospective study has the aim to analyze the incidence of adverse cardiovascular events (ACVE) before and during the LA treatment, in subjects with elevated level of Lp(a) (>60 mg/dL) [hyper-Lp(a)] and chronic ischemic heart disease. METHODS: We collected data of 23 patients (mean age 63 ± 9 years, male 77%; from hospital of Pisa 11/23, Pistoia 7/23, Verona 2/23, Padova 2/23 and Ferrara 1/23), with hyper-Lp(a), pre-apheresis LDL-cholesterol <100 mg/dL, cardiovascular disease, on maximally tolerated lipid lowering therapy and LA treatment (median 7 years, interquartile range 3-9 years). The LA treatment was performed by heparin-induced LDL precipitation apheresis (16/23), dextran-sulphate (4/23), cascade filtration (2/23) and immunoadsorption (1/23). The time lapse between first cardiovascular event and beginning of apheresis was 6 years (interquartile range 1-12 years). RESULTS: The recorded ACVE, before and after the LA treatment inception, were 40 and 10 respectively (p < 0.05), notably, the AVCE rates/year were 0.43 and 0.11 respectively (p < 0.05) with a 74% reduction of event occurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm long-term efficacy and positive impact of LA on morbidity in patients with hyper-Lp(a) and chronic ischemic heart disease on maximally tolerated lipid lowering therapy.

Lipoprotein(a) concentration, genetic variants, apo(a) isoform size, and cellular cholesterol efflux in patients with elevated Lp(a) and coronary heart disease submitted or not to lipoprotein apheresis: An Italian case-control multicenter study on Lp(a).

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery disease (CAD) risk is greater with higher plasma lipoprotein(a)[Lp(a)] concentrations or smaller apoisoform size and putatively with increased cellular cholesterol loading capacity (CLC). The relationship between Lp(a) and CLC is not known. Information on Lp(a) polymorphisms in Italian patients is lacking. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine relationships between Lp(a) and CLC, the impact of lipoprotein apheresis (LA), and describe the genetic profile of Lp(a). METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, observational study in Italian patients with hyperLp(a) and premature CAD with (n = 18)/without (n = 16) LA in which blood samples were analyzed for Lp(a) parameter and CLC. Genetic profiling of LPA was conducted in patient receiving LA. RESULTS: Mean macrophage CLC of the pre-LA serum was significantly higher than that of normolipidemic controls (19.7 ± 0.9 µg/mg vs 16.01 ± 0.98 µg/mg of protein, respectively). After LA, serum macrophage CLC was markedly lower relative to preapheresis (16.1 ± 0.8 µg/mg protein; P = .003) and comparable with CLC of the normolipidemic serum. LA did not significantly affect average apo(a) isoform size distribution. No anthropometric or lipid parameters studied were related to serum CLC, but there was a relationship between CLC and the Lp(a) plasma concentration (P = .035). DNA analysis revealed a range of common genetic variants. Two rare, new variants were identified: LPA exon 21, c.3269C>G, p.Pro1090Arg, and rs41259144 p.Arg990Gln, c.2969G>A CONCLUSIONS: LA reduces serum Lp(a) and also reduces macrophage CLC. Novel genetic variants of the LPA gene were identified, and geographic variations were noted. The complexity of these polymorphisms means that genetic assessment is not a predictor of CAD risk in hyperLp(a).