Large artery stiffness is not related to plasma cholesterol in older subjects with hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have demonstrated a prognostic role of large artery stiffness in hypertensive subjects and increased stiffness in subjects with coronary artery disease. Although plasma cholesterol is an established risk factor for cardiovascular disease, its relationship with large artery properties in a hypertensive population is unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: Plasma cholesterol and large artery properties were measured at baseline in a subset of participants of a randomized controlled trial (ANBP2) evaluating hypertension treatment in older (65 to 84 years) subjects. Noninvasive measures of large artery behavior were central augmentation index (AI), systemic arterial compliance (SAC), and transverse expansion of the aortic arch (aortic distensibility). Arterial waveforms acceptable for analysis were obtained in approximately 80% of cases yielding valid measurements of AI in 868, SAC in 846, and aortic distensibility in 680 subjects. Mean total and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) concentrations were 5.5+/-1.0 and 1.4+/-0.5 mmol L(-1). Total and HDL cholesterol and AI were greater in females than males, whereas SAC and aortic distensibility were greater in males. In multiple regression analyses there were no significant associations between stiffness parameters and total or HDL cholesterol. Significant independent associations in such analyses were found for mean arterial blood pressure, gender, age, height, and heart rate, in keeping with previous findings. CONCLUSIONS: In the largest cohort of elderly hypertensive subjects studied to date, plasma cholesterol per se was not associated with large artery stiffness. Such independence from cholesterol increases the potential for artery stiffness measurements to additionally contribute to cardiovascular risk assessment in this population.

Large-artery stiffness contributes to the greater prevalence of systolic hypertension in elderly women.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether sex differences in large-artery stiffness contribute to the greater prevalence of systolic hypertension in elderly women than in elderly men. DESIGN: During a single visit arterial stiffness was assessed in the unmedicated state using four parameters. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred seventy-four women with a mean age+/-standard deviation of 72+/-5 and 296 men aged 71+/-5 participated. SETTING: Hypertensive patients were recruited from general practice as part of the second Australian National Blood Pressure Study in Melbourne, Australia. MEASUREMENTS: Large-artery stiffness was assessed using multiple methodologies, including aortic arch stiffness (beta-index) using M-mode ultrasound and arterial compliance and augmentation index using noninvasive carotid pressure and aortic flow measurements. RESULTS: Women had greater carotid and brachial pulse pressure (PP) than men (P<.001), despite higher mean arterial pressure in men. Mean arterial compliance was lower in women (0.20+/-0.12 vs 0.28+/-0.16 mL/mmHg, P<.001) even after correction for aortic area, and aortic arch stiffness was higher (30+/-36 vs 23+/-22; P<.01). Consistent with both a stiffer proximal circulation and a shorter distance to reflection sites, women had higher augmentation index (38+/-11% vs 29+/-12%, P<.001). In multivariate analysis, sex was an independent determinant of all arterial stiffness indices. CONCLUSION: Independently of known confounders, elderly hypertensive women have stiffer large arteries, greater central wave reflection, and higher PP than elderly men. Stiffer large arteries likely contribute to the greater prevalence of systolic hypertension in elderly women and may partly explain the acceleration in postmenopausal cerebrovascular and cardiac complications.

Smaller aortic dimensions do not fully account for the greater pulse pressure in elderly female hypertensives.

This study examined the importance of aortic dimensions in determining pulse pressure in elderly hypertensives participating in the 2nd Australian National Blood Pressure Study, including a substantial number not previously receiving blood pressure lowering medication. Aortic dimensions were determined by ultrasound at the transverse arch and at the insertion of the aortic valve. Unadjusted data showed negative (P<0.001) correlations between central (carotid) and (brachial) peripheral pulse pressure and both arch (-0.200, -0.181) and outflow tract (-0.238, -0.238) diameters. Correlations were similar in those previously treated with blood pressure lowering medication and in the treatment naïve. Central pulse pressure (84+/-26 versus 75+/-28 mm Hg, P<0.001) was higher and aortic dimensions (transverse arch 2.56+/-0.31 versus 2.88+/-0.35 mm, P<0.001) smaller in women than men. Women had greater aortic stiffness (beta index 29.4+/-36.1 versus 22.1+/-21.3, P<0.03). Other bivariate correlates of central pulse pressure were age, mean arterial pressure, height, heart rate, augmentation index, aortic stiffness (all P<0.001), and weight (P=0.027). In multivariate analyses gender remained a predictor of central pulse pressure (P<0.001) even with inclusion of aortic dimensions (P=0.013) height and weight. Other significant terms were age, heart rate, mean blood pressure, and aortic stiffness (all P<0.001). These findings demonstrate an independent inverse relation between aortic size and pulse pressure in older hypertensive subjects. Differences in aortic dimensions and stiffness between genders do not fully account for the observed blood pressure differences, suggesting that a contributory factor to gender differences in pulse pressure is an increased age-related mismatch in ventricular function and aortic stiffness in women compared with men.

Similar effects of treatment on central and brachial blood pressures in older hypertensive subjects in the Second Australian National Blood Pressure Trial.

The Second Australian National Blood Pressure Trial reported better prognosis for hypertensive subjects randomly assigned to an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I) compared with a diuretic-based regimen despite no difference in brachial blood pressure control. A possible explanation is that there was a difference in central aortic pressures despite similar brachial pressure reductions. We examined this hypothesis in a subset of the Second Australian National Blood Pressure Trial cohort evaluated both before and after 4 years of treatment. The average age of the 479 subjects was 71.6+/-4.7 years (mean+/-SD), and 56% were women. Brachial systolic and pulse pressures after treatment were 145+/-1 (mean+/-SEM), 143+/-1, 72+/-1, and 70+/-1 mm Hg for diuretic and ACE-I groups, respectively. The respective changes from pretreatment values were -17+/-2, -16+/-2, -9+/-1, and -7+/-1 mm Hg. None of the differences between diuretic and ACE-I groups were significant. Central arterial pressure waveforms were acquired from carotid tonometry and calibrated from brachial pressures. Central systolic and pulse pressures posttreatment were 144+/-2, 144+/-2, 71+/-2, and 72+/-2 mm Hg for diuretic and ACE-I groups, respectively. The respective changes from pretreatment values were -15+/-2, -17+/-2, -6+/-2, and -8+/-2 mm Hg. None of the differences between diuretic and ACE-I groups were significant. The similarity of central and brachial pressures in this cohort of older hypertensive subjects is most likely because of the influences of age and hypertension in increasing arterial stiffness. There is no evidence that the better prognosis for patients randomly assigned to ACE-I in Second Australian National Blood Pressure Trial resulted from a disproportionate lowering of central blood pressure.

Brachial blood pressure but not carotid arterial waveforms predict cardiovascular events in elderly female hypertensives.

Central arterial waveforms and related indices of large artery properties can be determined with relative ease. This would make them an attractive adjunct in the risk stratification for cardiovascular disease. Although they have been associated with some classical risk factors and the presence of coronary disease, their prospective value in predicting cardiovascular outcomes is unknown. The present study determined the relative predictive value for cardiovascular disease-free survival of large artery properties as compared with noninvasive brachial blood pressure alone in a population of elderly female hypertensive subjects. We measured systemic arterial compliance, central systolic pressure, and carotid augmentation index in a subset of female participants in the Second Australian National Blood Pressure Study (untreated blood pressure 169/88+/-12/8 mm Hg). There were a total of 53 defined events during a median of 4.1 years of follow-up in 484 women with complete measurements. Although baseline blood pressures at the brachial artery predicted cardiovascular disease-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 2.3; 95% CI, 1.3 to 4.1 for pulse pressure > or =81 versus <81 mm Hg; P=0.01), no such relation was found for carotid augmentation index (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.44 to 1.44; P value not significant) or systemic arterial compliance (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.72 to 2.16; P value not significant). Blood pressure, but not noninvasively measured central arterial waveforms, predict outcome in the older female hypertensive patient. Thus, blood pressure measurement alone is superior to measurement of arterial waveforms in predicting outcome in this group.