Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Transplantation ; 85(6): 801-12, 2008 Mar 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18360260

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The beneficial effects of glycemic control on both survival and function of transplanted kidneys in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) have been recognized. METHODS: Herein, we present the clinical outcome of a single-center pilot trial of islet after kidney (IAK) transplantation in seven patients with T1DM. The immunosuppression protocol for the kidney graft was converted to sirolimus+tacrolimus regimen 6 months before islet transplantation to exclude negative effects on kidney graft function. Primary endpoint was achievement of insulin independence after transplantation. Clinical outcome, metabolic control, severe hypoglycemia, kidney function, Quality of Life (QOL) psychometric measures, and adverse events were monitored. RESULTS: Seven patients showed graft function with improved metabolic control (A1c, fasting glycemia, and metabolic tests) after IAK (14,779+/-3,800 IEQ/kg). One-year insulin independence was 30% with persistent graft function in 86% (C-peptide-positive). A1c reduction was 1.95+/-0.31% from baseline (P<0.0001). No episodes of severe hypoglycemia were observed, even after resuming insulin. The direct consequence of these benefits was a significant improvement in diabetes QOL. Adverse events included procedure-related pleural effusion (n=2), cholecystitis (n=1), and additional immunosuppression-related, all resolved without sequelae. Kidney function (by estimated glomerular filtration rate) remained stable during follow-up in six of seven patients. CONCLUSIONS: Islet transplantation represents a feasible therapeutic option for patients with T1DM bearing a stable kidney allograft. Insulin independence at 1 year is lower than what reported in islet transplant alone. Nevertheless, clear benefits in terms of optimal metabolic control and absence of severe hypoglycemia are invariably present.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/cirugía , Nefropatías Diabéticas/cirugía , Trasplante de Islotes Pancreáticos/fisiología , Trasplante de Riñón/fisiología , Calidad de Vida , Adulto , Glucemia/metabolismo , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Islotes Pancreáticos/inmunología , Trasplante de Islotes Pancreáticos/psicología , Pruebas de Función Renal , Trasplante de Riñón/inmunología , Trasplante de Riñón/psicología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/clasificación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología
2.
Transplantation ; 86(9): 1161-7, 2008 Nov 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19005394

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Health related quality of life (HRQoL) is one of the most important outcomes to measure effectiveness of an intervention, especially for islet transplantation in which benefits should outweigh risks of long-term immunosuppression. This study aimed to evaluate long-term effects of islet transplantation and to outline possible influential factors. METHODS: Forty islet transplant recipients who completed 344 Health Status Questionnaires (HSQ 2.0) and 384 Diabetes Quality of Life Questionnaires (DQoL) between 2000 and 2007 were retrospectively reviewed. Assessments were analyzed in pretransplantation period, then every 3 months after the first infusion for 18 months and every 6 months thereafter. The mean follow-up posttransplantation was 40.8+/-21.9 months (9-72 months). RESULTS: Sustained improvement in DQoL-impact score was observed at all time-points posttransplantation. Similarly, worry and satisfaction scales were significantly better than pretransplant evaluation for most time-points. Four of eight HSQ 2.0 scales demonstrated a significant improvement at some time-points. Longitudinal analysis, after adjustments for potential confounding factors, showed significantly sustained improvement in impact scale up to 72 months. Longer diabetes duration, higher insulin dosage, and occurrence of adverse events had negative effects on HRQoL. Single islet infusion or islet after kidney transplant recipients showed the lowest values in HSQ 2.0. In contrast, subjects on exenatide therapy had significantly higher HSQ 2.0 scores. CONCLUSIONS: Islet transplantation is associated with long-term improvement in HRQoL. Exenatide usage had a positive effect whereas single islet infusion, islet after kidney transplantation, longer diabetes duration, higher insulin dosage, and adverse events had a negative impact on HRQoL scores.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/cirugía , Estado de Salud , Trasplante de Islotes Pancreáticos , Calidad de Vida , Adulto , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamiento farmacológico , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Exenatida , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Insulina/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Islotes Pancreáticos/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Islotes Pancreáticos/fisiología , Trasplante de Islotes Pancreáticos/psicología , Trasplante de Riñón , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Péptidos/uso terapéutico , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ponzoñas/uso terapéutico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA