Respiratory-Triggered Flow-Independent Noncontrast Non-ECG-Gated MRV (REACT) Versus CE-MRV for Central Venous Evaluation in Children and Young Adults: A Six-Reader Study.

BACKGROUND. Contrast-enhanced MRI is commonly used to evaluate thoracic central venous patency in children and young adults. A flow-independent noncontrast non-ECG-gated 3D MRA-MR venography (MRV) technique described in 2019 as "relaxation-enhanced angiography without contrast and triggering (REACT)" may facilitate such evaluation. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to compare image quality, diagnostic confidence, and interreader agreement between respiratory-triggered REACT and 3D Dixon-based contrast-enhanced MRV (CE-MRV) for evaluating thoracic central venous patency in children and young adults. METHODS. This retrospective study included 42 consecutive children and young adults who underwent MRI of the neck and chest to evaluate central venous patency between August 2019 and January 2021 (median age, 5.2 years; IQR, 1.4-15.1 years; 22 female patients and 20 male patients). Examinations included respiratory-triggered REACT and navigator-gated CE-MRV sequences based on the institution's standard-of-care protocol. Six pediatric radiologists from four different institutions independently reviewed REACT and CE-MRV sequences; they assessed overall image quality (scale, 1-5; 5 = excellent), diagnostic confidence (scale, 1-5; 5 = extremely confident), and presence of clinically relevant artifact(s). Readers classified seven major central vessels as normal or abnormal (e.g., narrowing, thrombosis, or occlusion). Analysis used Wilcoxon signed rank and McNemar tests and Fleiss kappa coefficients. RESULTS. The distribution of overall image quality scores was higher (p = .02) for REACT than for CE-MRV for one reader (both sequences: median score, 5). Image quality scores were not significantly different between the sequences for the remaining five readers (all p > .05). Diagnostic confidence scores and frequency of clinically relevant artifact(s) were not significantly different between sequences for any reader (all p > .05). Interreader agreement for vessel classification as normal or abnormal was similar between sequences for all seven vessels (REACT: κ = 0.37-0.81; CE-MRV: κ = 0.34-0.81). Pooling readers and vessels, 65.4% of vessels were normal by both sequences; 18.7%, abnormal by both sequences; 9.8%, abnormal by REACT only; and 6.1%, abnormal by CE-MRV only. CONCLUSION. Respiratory-triggered REACT, in comparison with CE-MRV, showed no significant difference in image quality (aside from for one of six readers), diagnostic confidence, or frequency of artifact(s), with similar interreader agreement for vessel classification as normal or abnormal. CLINICAL IMPACT. High-resolution 3D MRV performed without IV contrast material can be used to assess central venous patency in children and young adults.

MRI safety screening of children with implants: updates and challenges.

MRI is the imaging modality of choice for assessing many pediatric medical conditions. Although there are several inherent potential safety risks associated with the electromagnetic fields exploited for MRI, they are effectively mitigated through strict adherence to established MRI safety practices, enabling the safe and effective use of MRI in clinical practice. The potential hazards of the MRI environment may be exacerbated by/in the presence of implanted medical devices. Awareness of the unique MRI safety and screening challenges associated with these implanted devices is critical to ensuring MRI safety for the affected patients. In this review article, we will discuss the basics of MRI physics as they relate to MRI safety in the presence of implanted medical devices, strategies for assessing children with known or suspected implanted medical devices, and the particular management of several well-established common, as well as recently developed, implanted devices encountered at our institution.