Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int J Gynecol Pathol ; 35(6): 509-515, 2016 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26630226

RESUMEN

Uterine leiomyomas (ULs) are common benign tumors affecting women of different ethnicities. A large proportion of UL has mutations in MED12. Multiple and solitary ULs usually manifest with different severities, suggesting that their origin and growth pattern may be driven by different molecular mechanisms. Here, we compared the frequency and the spectrum of MED12 exon 2 mutations between multiple (n=82) and solitary (n=40) ULs from Russian patients. Overall, we detected MED12 exon 2 mutations in 51.6% (63/122) of ULs. The frequency of MED12 exon 2 mutations was almost two-fold higher in samples from the multiple UL patients than in those from the solitary UL patients - 61% (50/82) versus 32.5% (13/40). The increased MED12 exon 2 mutation frequency in the multiple ULs was not accompanied by significant alterations in the spectrum of mutation categories, which included missense mutations, deletions, splicing defects, and multiple (double/triple) mutations. Each mutation category had a unique mutation set, comprising both frequent and rarely encountered mutations, which did and did not overlap between the studied groups, respectively. We conclude that in contrast to the solitary ULs, the multiple ULs predominantly originate through MED12-associated mechanisms. The nature of these mechanisms seems to be similar in solitary and multiple ULs, as they contain similar mutations. In multiple UL patients, they are likely to be nonsporadic, indicating the existence of specific factors predisposing to multiple UL development. These data suggest that to clearly understand UL pathogenesis, solitary and multiple tumors should probably be analyzed as separate sets.


Asunto(s)
Leiomioma/genética , Leiomiomatosis/genética , Complejo Mediador/genética , Mutación , Neoplasias Uterinas/genética , Análisis Mutacional de ADN , Exones , Femenino , Humanos , Leiomioma/patología , Leiomiomatosis/patología , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa Inversa , Federación de Rusia , Neoplasias Uterinas/patología
2.
Fertil Steril ; 116(6): 1568-1577, 2021 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34465452

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of two different treatment regimens of dydrogesterone in the management of endometriosis-related chronic pelvic pain. DESIGN: Observational, prospective cohort study over six months. SETTING: Twenty gynecology clinics in the Russian Federation. PATIENT(S): Three hundred fifty women from 18 to 45 years of age with endometriosis and chronic pelvic pain with or without dysmenorrhea. INTERVENTION(S): Dydrogesterone 10 mg 2 or 3 times daily, either between the 5th and 25th days of the menstrual cycle (prolonged cyclical treatment regimen) or continuously (continuous treatment regimen). For all patients, the data cutoff was at six months of treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Intensity of chronic pelvic pain on the 11-point numerical rating scale (after 6 months). RESULT(S): A marked reduction in chronic pelvic pain was observed with both the prolonged cyclical and continuous treatment regimens (mean ± standard deviation change from baseline -3.3 ± 2.2 and -3.0 ± 2.2, respectively), with no significant difference between the two groups. With both regimens, patients experienced significant improvements in the intensity of chronic pelvic pain, number of days in which analgesics were required, severity of dysmenorrhea, sexual well-being, and health-related quality-of-life parameters. A favorable safety profile of dydrogesterone was confirmed, and no serious adverse drug reactions were reported during the study. CONCLUSION(S): Prolonged cyclical and continuous treatment regimens of dydrogesterone therapy both demonstrated a pronounced and similar reduction in the severity of chronic pelvic pain and dysmenorrhea and led to marked improvements in all study parameters related to quality of life and sexual well-being. REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03690765.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Didrogesterona/administración & dosificación , Endometriosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Pélvico/tratamiento farmacológico , Progestinas/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Adulto , Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico , Esquema de Medicación , Dismenorrea/diagnóstico , Dismenorrea/tratamiento farmacológico , Dismenorrea/epidemiología , Endometriosis/diagnóstico , Endometriosis/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor Pélvico/diagnóstico , Dolor Pélvico/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA