Herbal Immune Booster-Induced Liver Injury in the COVID-19 Pandemic - A Case Series.

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in widespread use of complementary and alternative medicines. Tinospora cordifolia is a widely grown shrub which has been commonly used in India's traditional system of Ayurveda for its immune booster properties and has been extensively used as prophylaxis against COVID-19. Six patients (4 women, 2 men) with a median (IQR) age of 55 years (45-56) and with an history of Tinospora cordifolia consumption presented with symptoms of acute hepatitis during the study period of 4 months in the COVID-19 pandemic. The median (IQR) duration of Tinospora cordifolia consumption was 90 days (21-210). The median (IQR) peak bilirubin and AST were 17.5 mg/dl (12.2-24.9) and 1350 IU/ml (1099-1773), respectively. The patients had either a definite (n = 4) or probable (n = 2) revised autoimmune hepatitis score with an autoimmune pattern of drug-induced liver injury on biopsy. Four of these patients (all women) had underlying silent chronic liver disease of possible autoimmune etiology associated with other autoimmune diseases - hypothyroidism and type 2 diabetes mellitus. One of the three patients treated with steroids decompensated on steroid tapering. The other five patients had resolution of symptoms, liver profile, and autoimmune serological markers on drug withdrawal/continuing steroid treatment. The median (IQR) time to resolution from discontinuing the herb was 86.5 days (53-111). Tinospora cordifolia consumption seems to induce an autoimmune-like hepatitis or unmask an underlying autoimmune chronic liver disease, which may support its immune stimulant mechanism. However, the same mechanism can cause significant liver toxicity, and we recommend that caution be exercised in the use of this herb, especially in those predisposed to autoimmune disorders. Besides, in patients presenting with acute hepatitis, even in the presence of autoimmune markers, a detailed complementary and alternative medicine history needs to be elicited.

Non seminomatous mixed germ cell tumor of the testis with predominant component of somatic type malignancy (Rhabdomyosarcoma) - A rare occurrence.

Testicular germ cell tumors (GCT) are a diverse group of neoplasms, broadly divided into seminomatous and non seminomatous types, with varying histomorphology. Mixed germ cell tumors express more than one germ cell component. Somatic type malignancy occurring in testicular GCT is rare. Most often these components present as metastasis, particularly following chemotherapy, rather than primarily involving the testis. We describe a rare case of a young adult with no significant past history, who presented with testicular mass which on histology revealed a non-seminomatous mixed germ cell tumor with additional somatic type malignancy component of a rhabdomyosarcoma.

Can low grade PMP be divided into prognostically distinct subgroups based on histological features? A retrospective study and the importance of using the appropriate classification.

INTRODUCTION: The pathological classification of PMP of appendiceal origin has prognostic and treatment implications. Our goals were to • Classify low grade mucinous carcinoma peritonei (LGMCP) into prognostically distinct subgroups based on histological features. • Compare the reproducibility of the WHO and the PSOGI classifications for both PMP and the appendiceal primary tumor. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC or debulking surgery was done. All the tumors were re-classified according to the PSOGI classification. LGMCP was further classified into three histological subgroups and the impact on survival was evaluated. RESULTS: From Jun 2011 to June 2016, 101 patients underwent CRS with HIPEC (n = 89) or debulking surgery (n=12). The median PCI was 28 (3-39) and 74.1% patients had CC-0/1 resections. Of the 76.2% patients who had LGMCP, 4 patients (5.1%) were classified as group 1, 54 (70.1%) as group 2 and 19 patients (24.6%) as group 3. At a median follow up of 21 months, the disease free survival was not reached, 30 months and 14 months for groups 1, 2 and 3 respectively (p = 0.09). There was no difference in overall survival. Using the WHO classification, there was a discordance in the grade of the primary tumor and the peritoneal lesions in 19.8% and conflicting terminology was used in 62% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The subgroups of LGMCP described here are prognostically different though this needs further prospective evaluation in larger series. The PSOGI classification is more uniformly reproducible and should be preferred to the WHO classification.