Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
ASAIO J ; 70(2): 93-98, 2024 Feb 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37862687

RESUMEN

Advances in left ventricular assist device technologies have led to an improvement in pump hemocompatibility and outcomes. Because of concerns of thromboembolic complications in prior generations of left ventricular assist devices, bridging with parenteral anticoagulants was routinely. Management strategies of subtherapeutic INRs and their effects on the current generation of devices deserve review. We performed analysis of the MOMENTUM 3 trial including 6 centers in the mid-America region. Patients with subtherapeutic INRs (INR < 2) occurring after the index admission underwent chart review to determine the management strategies taken by clinicians. Strategies were divided into two groups, bridging or nonbridging. Of the 225 patients included in the analysis, 130 (58%) patients had a total of 235 subtherapeutic international normalized ratio (INR) events. Most (n = 179, 76.2%) of these INRs were not bridged (n = 100 warfarin dose adjustment, n = 79 no change in warfarin dose). Among those INRs (n = 56, 23.8%) treated with bridging, approximately half (n = 30, 53.6%) were treated with subcutaneous agents and other half (n = 26, 46.4%) were treated with intravenous agents. There was no difference in individual outcomes or composite endpoints of death, rehospitalization, CVA, or bleeding events between the groups.


Asunto(s)
Corazón Auxiliar , Tromboembolia , Humanos , Warfarina/uso terapéutico , Corazón Auxiliar/efectos adversos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Tromboembolia/etiología , Tromboembolia/prevención & control , Hemorragia/etiología , Relación Normalizada Internacional , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
Prog Cardiovasc Dis ; 60(2): 187-197, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28847619

RESUMEN

Despite the great progress made in the management of heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), its prevalence continues to rise owing to an aging population and an epidemic of hypertension, obesity and coronary artery disease. For decades, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and beta blockers have been the mainstay of HFrEF therapy. The recent addition of sacubitril/valsartan and ivabradine to the HF armamentarium has the potential to transform our therapeutic approach to HFrEF, while simultaneously raising some questions and uncertainties on their applicability. In this paper, we review the pathophysiology of HFrEF, discuss already established and novel evidenced-based pharmacologic therapies available for these patients. We also share some therapeutic strategies aimed to optimize HF therapy in specific undertreated patient populations including the elderly and patients with chronic kidney disease, while offering insight on how to tailor therapy in the "real-world."


Asunto(s)
Fármacos Cardiovasculares/uso terapéutico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/tratamiento farmacológico , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Brechas de la Práctica Profesional/normas , Volumen Sistólico/efectos de los fármacos , Función Ventricular Izquierda/efectos de los fármacos , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/efectos adversos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Humanos , Selección de Paciente , Recuperación de la Función , Sistema Renina-Angiotensina/efectos de los fármacos , Factores de Riesgo , Sistema Nervioso Simpático/efectos de los fármacos , Sistema Nervioso Simpático/fisiopatología , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA