Critical Dysphagia is Common in Parkinson Disease and Occurs Even in Early Stages: A Prospective Cohort Study.

To assess the prevalence of dysphagia and its typical findings in unselected "real-world" Parkinson patients using an objective gold-standard method. This was a prospective, controlled, cross-sectional study conducted in 119 consecutive Parkinson patients of all stages independent of subjective dysphagia. Patients and 32 controls were clinically and endoscopically examined by flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) to evaluate the deglutition with regard to three consistencies (water, biscuit, and bread). Typical findings of dysphagia like penetration and aspiration, residues, and leakage were assessed. Dysphagia was common in Parkinson patients and occurred in all, even early, disease stages. Only 5% (6/119) of patients showed a completely unremarkable deglutition. Aspiration was seen in 25% (30/119) of patients and always related to water. Residues occurred in 93% (111/119), most commonly for bread. Leakage was much less frequent and was found in only 3-18%, depending on consistency. In a significant fraction of patients, objective dysphagia was not subjectively perceived. A total of 16% of asymptomatic patients suffered from critical aspiration. Significant swallowing deficiencies already occurred in early disease. Aspiration was found in 4 of 20 (20%) patients with disease duration of less than 2 years. Seven of 57 patients (12%) with Hoehn and Yahr stage 2 suffered from severe aspiration. Given the high frequency of critical aspiration in Parkinson disease, these patients should be evaluated early for dysphagia to avoid complications and recommend an adequate therapy. FEES is a simple, cost efficient, minimally invasive method that is ideally suited for this purpose.

Swallowing speed is no adequate predictor of aspiration in Parkinson's disease.

BACKGROUND: There is still a lack of a clinical test to reliably identify patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) being at risk for aspiration. METHODS: In this prospective, controlled, cross-sectional study, we assessed if swallowing speed for water is a useful clinical test to predict aspiration proven by flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES). Due to this, we measured the swallowing speed for 90 mL water in 115 consecutive and unselected PD outpatients of all clinical stages and 32 healthy controls. KEY RESULTS: Average swallowing speed was lower in patients compared with controls (6.5 ± 3.9 mL/s vs 8.5 ± 3.2 mL/s; P < .01). The disease-independent widely used threshold of <10 mL/s showed insufficient sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 19% with high false-positive rates of 63% for patients and 69% for controls. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was carried out to define a suitable cutoff value for detection of aspiration of water (area under the curve 0.72, P < .001) in PD patients. The optimized cutoff value was 5.5 mL/s with a sensitivity of 69% and a specificity of 64%. CONCLUSION AND INFERENCES: Measuring swallowing speed is prone to methodological errors and not suitable as a screening instrument to predict aspiration in PD patients.

Predictive clinical factors for penetration and aspiration in Parkinson's disease.

BACKGROUND: Do the current swallow-specific subquestions of neurological diagnostic tools reflect the objective swallowing function in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients or are clinical factors superior to predict critical aspiration? METHODS: In a cross-sectional, observational study a total of 119 Parkinson outpatients were examined clinically and by flexible-endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES). Self-reported dysphagia by subquestions of the MDS-UPDRS and NMS questionnaire and history of subjective aspiration signs were collected. KEY RESULTS: Nearly, all PD patients showed deglutition abnormalities in FEES (113/119) while only 12%-27% of them reported swallowing problems in the swallow-specific subquestions of neurological standard diagnostic tools (MDS-UPDRS and NMS-Quest), and the answers were heterogeneous and poorly reproducible. With a sensitivity of up to a maximum of 50%, self-reported dysphagia is therefore no reliable tool for identifying dysphagia in PD. While most clinical parameters were linked to dysphagia to some extent, logistic regression analysis revealed high age (Odds Ratio (OR) 1.1 in years, 95% CI 1.03-1.18, P < 0.01), gender (OR 0.3 for females, 95% CI 0.08-0.97, P = 0.04), and affirmed subjective aspiration signs (OR 8.6, 95% CI 3.05-26.52, P < 0.001) as the most significant predictors for critical dysphagia. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Self-perception of swallowing is no reliable tool for identifying dysphagia and questionnaires are insufficient for detecting previous aspiration. Consequent and specific asking for previous subjective aspiration signs is the single most important measure for identifying PD patients at risk for critical aspiration.

Is the Munich dysphagia Test-Parkinson's disease (MDT-PD) a valid screening tool for patients at risk for aspiration?

BACKGROUND: Dysphagia is common in Parkinson's disease (PD) and leads to pneumonia, malnutrition, and reduced quality of life. For detecting dysphagia-exposed PD patients, the Munich dysphagia test-Parkinson's disease (MDT-PD) is a patient self-reported tool that has been developed specifically for PD patients. The MDT-PD is available in both German and English. This study aimed to ascertain whether the MDT-PD can detect aspiration in PD patients and, therefore, serve as a suitable screening tool. METHODS: In a controlled, cross-sectional, observational study, a total of 119 PD outpatients were examined clinically and were evaluated by the MDT-PD and the one swallowing question (NMS-3) from the nonmotor symptom questionnaire for Parkinson's disease (NMSQuest). The results of the MDT-PD and the NMS-3 were compared to the penetration-aspiration scale (PAS) rating defined by flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES). KEY RESULTS: Half of the patients with aspiration as determined using FEES were not detected by the MDT-PD and NMS-3 self-reported tools. The proportion of false positive patients was high with both tools. The sensitivity of the MDT-PD to detect patients who are at risk for aspiration is insufficient (0.37) and not superior to applying the dysphagia screening question from the NMSQuest (0.5). CONCLUSION: This study reveals that the MDT-PD is not suitable for detecting aspiration in PD patients and, therefore, cannot be considered as a screening tool for aspiration. However, at present, there is no alternative validated screening tool that can reliably detect aspiration in PD patients. A readjustment of the MDT-PD is urgently needed.

Pill swallowing in Parkinson's disease: A prospective study based on flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the prevalence, characteristics, and predictors of the difficulty of swallowing medication in Parkinson's disease (PD). METHODS: In this prospective controlled, cross-sectional cohort study, the ability to swallow four different placebos was assessed using flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) in 118 PD patients and 32 controls. The association between a patient's swallowing ability for each pill and water, patient characteristics and dopaminergic response was examined. The value of two swallowing screening questions was also evaluated. RESULTS: Substantially impaired ability to swallow pills was found in 28% (n = 33/118) of patients and 16% (n = 5/32) of controls (p = 0.18). Higher disease severity was associated with more problems with swallowing pills (p = 0.03), but PD patients with short disease duration (<2 years), low H&Y stage (1-2), and younger age (<70 years) were also affected (each at least in 20%). Capsules were the easiest to swallow while oval tablets were the most difficult (p < 0.01, r = 0.21). Most patients (73%, n = 24/33) presented with swallowing problems only for a single formulation. Aspiration of water was found in 48% of patients, suggesting a possible increased risk of aspiration when taking dissolved tablets. Standardized questionnaires showed insufficient sensitivity (52% both) but fairly good specificity (69-74%) for dysphagia of pills. Dysphagia for medication was not associated with a lack of dopaminergic response. CONCLUSIONS: Dysphagia of medication occurs preferentially in advanced disease stages. An assessment of pill swallowing using FEES is suggested at least in patients reporting swallowing problems. Capsules might be preferentially used when dysphagia is suspected.

Agenesis and dysgenesis of the corpus callosum: clinical, genetic and neuroimaging findings in a series of 41 patients.

Agenesis of the corpus callosum (ACC) is among the most frequent human brain malformations with an incidence of 0.5-70 in 10,000. It is a heterogeneous condition, for which several different genetic causes are known, for example, ACC as part of monogenic syndromes or complex chromosomal rearrangements. We systematically evaluated the data of 172 patients with documented corpus callosum abnormalities in the records, and 23 patients with chromosomal rearrangements known to be associated with corpus callosum changes. All available neuroimaging data, including CT and MRI, were re-evaluated following a standardized protocol. Whenever feasible chromosome and subtelomere analyses as well as molecular genetic testing were performed in patients with disorders of the corpus callosum in order to identify a genetic diagnosis. Our results showed that 41 patients with complete absence (agenesis of the corpus callosum-ACC) or partial absence (dysgenesis of the corpus callosum-DCC) were identified. Out of these 28 had ACC, 13 had DCC. In 11 of the 28 patients with ACC, the following diagnoses could be established: Mowat-Wilson syndrome (n = 2), Walker-Warburg syndrome (n = 1), oro-facial-digital syndrome type 1 (n = 1), and chromosomal rearrangements (n = 7), including a patient with an apparently balanced reciprocal translocation, which led to the disruption and a predicted loss of function in the FOXG1B gene. The cause of the ACC in 17 patients remained unclear. In 2 of the 13 patients with DCC, unbalanced chromosomal rearrangements could be detected (n = 2), while the cause of DCC in 11 patients remained unclear. In our series of cases a variety of genetic causes of disorders of the corpus callosum were identified with cytogenetic anomalies representing the most common underlying etiology.