Mechanisms of surface-tension-induced epithelial cell damage in a model of pulmonary airway reopening.

Airway collapse and reopening due to mechanical ventilation exerts mechanical stress on airway walls and injures surfactant-compromised lungs. The reopening of a collapsed airway was modeled experimentally and computationally by the progression of a semi-infinite bubble in a narrow fluid-occluded channel. The extent of injury caused by bubble progression to pulmonary epithelial cells lining the channel was evaluated. Counterintuitively, cell damage increased with decreasing opening velocity. The presence of pulmonary surfactant, Infasurf, completely abated the injury. These results support the hypotheses that mechanical stresses associated with airway reopening injure pulmonary epithelial cells and that pulmonary surfactant protects the epithelium from this injury. Computational simulations identified the magnitudes of components of the stress cycle associated with airway reopening (shear stress, pressure, shear stress gradient, or pressure gradient) that may be injurious to the epithelial cells. By comparing these magnitudes to the observed damage, we conclude that the steep pressure gradient near the bubble front was the most likely cause of the observed cellular damage.

Pressure gradient, not exposure duration, determines the extent of epithelial cell damage in a model of pulmonary airway reopening.

The reduction of tidal volume during mechanical ventilation has been shown to reduce mortality of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome, but epithelial cell injury can still result from mechanical stresses imposed by the opening of occluded airways. To study these stresses, a fluid-filled parallel-plate flow chamber lined with epithelial cells was used as an idealized model of an occluded airway. Airway reopening was modeled by the progression of a semi-infinite bubble of air through the length of the channel, which cleared the fluid. In our laboratory's prior study, the magnitude of the pressure gradient near the bubble tip was directly correlated to the epithelial cell layer damage (Bilek AM, Dee KC, and Gaver DP III. J Appl Physiol 94: 770-783, 2003). However, in that study, it was not possible to discriminate the stress magnitude from the stimulus duration because the bubble propagation velocity varied between experiments. In the present study, the stress magnitude is modified by varying the viscosity of the occlusion fluid while fixing the reopening velocity across experiments. This approach causes the stimulus duration to be inversely related to the magnitude of the pressure gradient. Nevertheless, cell damage remains directly correlated with the pressure gradient, not the duration of stress exposure. The present study thus provides additional evidence that the magnitude of the pressure gradient induces cellular damage in this model of airway reopening. We explore the mechanism for acute damage and also demonstrate that repeated reopening and closure is shown to damage the epithelial cell layer, even under conditions that would not lead to extensive damage from a single reopening event.

Considerations for tissue-engineered and regenerative medicine product development prior to clinical trials in the United States.

Tissue-engineered and regenerative medicine products are promising innovative therapies that can address unmet clinical needs. These products are often combinations of cells, scaffolds, and other factors and are complex in both structure and function. Their complexity introduces challenges for product developers to establish novel manufacturing and characterization techniques to ensure that these products are safe and effective prior to clinical trials in humans. Although there are only a few commercial products that are currently in the market, many more tissue-engineered and regenerative medicine products are under development. Therefore, it is the purpose of this article to help product developers in the early stages of product development by providing insight into the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) process and by highlighting some of the key scientific considerations that may be applicable to their products. We provide resources that are publically available from the FDA and others that are of potential interest. As the provided information is general in content, product developers should contact the FDA for feedback regarding their specific products. Also described are ways through which product developers can informally and formally interact with the FDA early in the development process to help in the efficient progression of products toward clinical trials.