S-ICD lead dislodgement in a young isometric athlete: A rare complication.

The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) is an alternative to transvenous ICD in patients who do not need cardiac pacing. We report the case of a young isometric athlete who received S-ICD for primary prevention of sudden death. Lead dislodgement and myopotential noise oversensing during isometric training led to inappropriate shock, and a surgical revision was performed. During the procedure, strong fibrous adhesions were found, requiring polytetrafluoroethylene dilator sheaths. The S-ICD was finally reimplanted. Despite continued isometric training, no more myopotential oversensing occurred after 1-year follow-up. The present case highlights the possible higher risks of lead complication in an isometric athlete and the uncommon effort in removing an old-generation subcutaneous defibrillator lead.

Endocardial ablation of epicardial ganglionated plexi: history, open questions and future prospects of cardioneuroablation.

Neurocardiogenic syncope is the most common cause of transient loss of consciousness and considerably reduces quality of life. Pharmacological and pacing therapy may not be fully efficacious and complications related to implanted hardware must be considered. In this context, cardioneuroablation (CNA) has been proposed to attenuate the vagal reflex with elimination of cardioinhibition. It has been shown that CNA is able to eliminate recurrences of syncope in over 90% of cases and no major complications are reported in the current literature. Despite these encouraging findings, CNA is only mentioned in current guidelines as a possible alternative treatment and has no real indication class. The diversity of mapping techniques, the absence of direct denervation control, the lack of a precise endpoint, the possible placebo effect, the short follow-up, and the question of the learning curve represent the major limitations of this promising procedure. The aim of this review was to look over the existing literature, analysing the novelties, the limitations, the unresolved issues and the outcome of CNA.

Evaluation of Pulmonary Vein Fibrosis Following Cryoballoon Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: A Semi-Automatic MRI Analysis.

Current guidelines recommend the use of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the management of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the widespread use of cardiac MRI in clinical practice is difficult to achieve. The aim of the present study is to assess whether cardiac MRI can be adopted to identify ablation-induced fibrosis, and its relationship with AF recurrences. Fifty patients undergoing AF cryoballoon ablation were prospectively enrolled. Cardiac MRI was performed before and 30 days after the index ablation. Commercially available software and a specifically designed image processing workflow were used to quantify left atrium (LA) fibroses. Thirty-six patients were finally included in the analysis; twenty-eight were analyzed with the dedicated workflow. Acute electrical isolation was achieved in 98% of the treated pulmonary veins (PVs). After a median follow-up of 16 months, AF recurrences occurred in 12 patients (33%). In both analyses, no differences were found between the subgroups of patients with and without recurrence in the variation of either LA fibrosis or fibrosis at the ostium of the PV, before and after ablation. The ability to predict arrhythmic recurrences evaluated via the ROC curve of the variations in both LA fibrosis (AUC 0.566) and PV fibrosis (AUC 0.600) was low. Cardiac MRI holds the potential to provide clinically significant information on LA disease and AF progression; however, LA fibrosis cannot be easily identified, either by currently available commercial programs or custom tools.

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy With or Without Defibrillation: A Long-Standing Debate.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) was shown to improve cardiac function, reduce heart failure hospitalizations, improve quality of life and prolong survival in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction and intraventricular conduction disturbances, mainly left bundle branch block, on optimal medical therapy with ACE-inhibitors, ß-blockers and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists up-titrated to maximum tolerated evidence-based doses. CRT can be achieved by means of pacemaker systems (CRT-P) or devices with defibrillation capabilities (CRT-D). CRT-Ds offer an undoubted advantage in the prevention of arrhythmic death, but such an advantage may be of lesser degree in nonischemic heart failure etiologies. Moreover, the higher CRT-D hardware complexity compared to CRT-P may predispose to device/lead malfunctions and the higher current drainage may cause a shorter battery duration with consequent premature replacements and the well-known incremental complications. In a period of financial constraints, also device costs should be carefully evaluated, with recent reports suggesting that CRT-Ps may be favored over CRT-Ds in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy and no prior history of cardiac arrhythmias from a cost-effectiveness point of view. The choice between a CRT-P or a CRT-D device should be patient-tailored whenever straightforward defibrillator indications are not present. The Goldenberg score may facilitate this decision-making process in ambiguous settings. Age, comorbidities, kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, advanced functional class, inappropriate therapy risk, implantable device infections, and malfunctions are factors potentially reducing the expected benefit from defibrillating capabilities. In the future, prospective randomized controlled trials are warranted to directly compare the efficacy and safety of CRT-Ps and CRT-Ds.

Catheter ablation for treatment of bradycardia-tachycardia syndrome: is it time to consider it the therapy of choice? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation catheter ablation (AFCA) should be considered as a strategy to avoid pacemaker (PM) implantation for patients with bradycardia-tachycardia syndrome (BTS), but lack of evidence is remarkable. METHODS: Our aim was to conduct a random-effects model meta-analysis on safety and efficacy data from controlled trials and observational studies. We compared atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence, AF progression, procedural complication, additional procedure, cardiovascular death, cardiovascular hospitalization, heart failure and stroke in patients undergoing AFCA vs. PM implantation. RESULTS: PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Database and Google Scholar were screened, and four retrospective studies were selected. A total of 776 patients (371 in the AFCA group, 405 in the PM group) were included. After a median follow-up of 67.5 months, lower AF recurrence [odds ratio (OR) 0.06, confidence interval (CI) 0.02-0.18, I2 = 82.42%, P < 0.001], AF progression (OR 0.12, CI 0.06-0.26, I2 = 0%, P < 0.001), heart failure (OR 0.12, CI 0.04-0.34, I2 = 0%, P < 0.001), and stroke (OR 0.30, CI 0.15-0.61, I2 = 0%, P = 0.001) were observed in the AFCA group. No differences were observed in cardiovascular death and hospitalization (OR 0.48, CI 0.10-2.28, I2 = 0%, P = 0.358 and OR 0.43, CI 0.14-1.29, I2 = 87.52%, P = 0.134, respectively). Higher need for additional procedures in the AFCA group was highlighted (OR 3.65, CI 1.51-8.84, I2 = 53.75%, P < 0.001). PM implantation was avoided in 91% of BTS patients undergoing AFCA. CONCLUSIONS: AFCA in BTS patients seems to be more effective than PM implantation in reducing AF recurrence and PM implantation may be waived in most BTS patients treated by AFCA. Need for additional procedures in AFCA patients is balanced by long-term benefit in clinical end points.

Prognostic role of left atrial enlargement in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators for primary prevention.

PURPOSE: Left atrial volume index (LAVI) is a predictor of heart failure and adverse events, irrespective of left ventricular systolic function. The role of LAVI in the prediction of appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapies is currently unclear and was the focus of this study. METHODS: Consecutive heart failure patients with ischaemic (ICM) or idiopathic (DCM) aetiology receiving ICD for primary prevention were included. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of appropriate ICD therapies (ATs): shocks or antitachycardia pacing (ATP). Inappropriate ICD shocks were also assessed as secondary endpoint. RESULTS: Among 198 included patients, severe left atrial dilatation (SLAE = LAVI ≥ 60 ml/m2) was present in 54 (27%). SLAE patients had a higher prevalence of NYHA class ≥ III, severe mitral regurgitation and atrial fibrillation history. During a median follow-up of 45 months (IQR 25-68), ATs occurred more frequently in SLAE group (33% vs. 15%, p = .007) as well as appropriate shocks (24% vs. 10%, p = .014). At multivariate analysis SLAE was an independent predictor of ATs (OR 3.19, 95% CI 1.38-7.38, p = .007). Inappropriate shocks were associated with AF during implantation (p = .03), but not with SLAE (p = .009). CONCLUSION: In DCM or ICM patients candidate to receive an ICD for primary prevention, a severely enlarged left atrium is a predictive factor for ATs (shocks or ATP). The risk of inappropriate shocks was increased in patients with atrial fibrillation, rather than SLAE.

Safety of lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for the functioning of cardiac implantable electronic devices.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The prevalence of patients with a cardiac implantable device (CIED) developing cancer and requiring a course of radiotherapy (RT) is increasing remarkably. Previously published reports agree that standard and conventionally fractionated RT is usually safe for CIEDs, but no "in-vivo" reports are available on the potential effects of thoracic stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) regimens to CIEDs functioning. The purpose of our study is therefore to evaluate the effects of SABR on CIEDs (pacemakers [PM] or implantable cardiac defibrillators [ICD]) in a cohort of patients affected by primary or metastatic lung lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively collected all CIED-bearing patients undergoing SABR between 2007 and 2019 at our Institution. All CIEDs were interrogated before and after the SABR course to check for any malfunction. Prescription dose, beam energy and maximum dose (Dmax) to CIEDs were retrieved for each patient. Electrical records of the CIEDs were reviewed by the medical records. RESULTS: Thirty-four consecutive patients (24 with a PM and 10 with an ICD), who underwent 38 separate SABR courses, were included in the study. Eight patients (24%) were PM-dependent. Prescription dose of SABR ranged 26-60 Gy in 1-8 fractions, with a photon energy ranging 6-to-10 MV (76.3% and 23.7%, respectively) and a median Dmax to CIEDs of 0.17 Gy (range 0.04-1.97 Gy). Electrical parameters were stable in post-treatment device programming visits and no transient or persistent alteration of the CIED function was recorded in any patient. No inappropriate interventions were recorded in the 10 ICD-bearing patients during the treatment fractions. CONCLUSIONS: Thoracic SABR proved to be safe for CIEDs when the dose is kept <2 Gy and the beam energy is ≤10 MV, irrespective of the pacing-dependency and of the CIED type.

Ratchet mechanism selectively causing idiopathic macrodislodgement of an active-fixation coronary sinus lead: a case report.

BACKGROUND: 'Idiopathic' lead macrodislodgement may be due to Twiddler's syndrome depending on active twisting of pulse generator within subcutaneous pocket. All leads are involved, at any time from implantation, and frequently damaged. In the past few years, a reel syndrome was also observed: retraction of pacemaker leads into pocket without patient manipulation, owing to lead circling the generator. In other cases, a 'ratchet' mechanism has been postulated. Reel and ratchet mechanisms require loose anchoring, occur generally briefly after implantation, with non-damaged leads. We report the first case of an active-fixation coronary sinus lead selective macrodislodgement involving such ratchet mechanism. CASE SUMMARY: A 65-year-old man underwent biventricular defibrillator device implantation, with active-fixation coronary sinus lead. Eight months later, he complained of muscle contractions over device pocket. At fluoroscopy, coronary sinus lead was found near to pocket, outside of thoracic inlet. Atrial and ventricular leads were in normal position. After opening pocket, a short tract of coronary sinus lead appeared anteriorly dislocated to generator, while greater length of lead body twisted a reel behind. The distal part of lead was found outside venous entry at careful dissection. Atrial and ventricular leads were firmly anchored. DISCUSSION: Our case is a selective 'Idiopathic' lead macrodislodgement, possibly due to a ratchet mechanism between the lead and the suture sleeve, induced by normal arm motion; such mechanism incredibly, and for first time in literature involves a coronary sinus active-fixation lead. CONCLUSION: Careful attention should always be paid to secure anchoring even of active-fixation coronary sinus leads.

A single cystatin C determination before coronary angiography can predict short and long-term adverse events.

BACKGROUND: Cystatin C (CyC) role in the detection of contrast induced acute kidney injury (CIAKI) is controversial. This study assessed whether a single CyC determination before coronary angiography (CA)could predict CIAKI and long-term adverse events. METHODS: CyC was assessed before CA in 713 consecutive patients. CIAKI was the primary endpoint, defined as ≥0.3 mg/dl creatinine (sCR) increase at 48 h or ≥50% in 7-days. All-cause death, cardiovascular (CV)death and MACE (acute coronary syndrome, acute pulmonary edema,CV death) were secondary endpoints. Re-hospitalization, in-hospital death and worsening renal function were tertiary endpoints. RESULTS: CIAKI occurred in 47 (6.7%) patients. ROC analysis showed a good accuracy of CyC in the prediction of CIAKI (AUC 0.82,p < 0.01), compared with baseline sCR and sCR-eGFR (AUC 0.70 and 0.75 respectively, both p < 0.01). CyC was associated with 10-year CV-death, all-cause death and MACEs (AUC 0.76,0.74 and 0.64 respectively,all p < 0.01). A CyC cut-off value of 1.4 mg/L was not only accurate in predicting or ruling-out CIAKI following CA (97% negative predictive value, 84% specificity), but also useful as a prognostic marker for 10-year adverse events (50% vs.16% all cause mortality, 29% vs.3% CV death, 39% vs.13% MACE,all p < 0.01), re-hospitalizations (54% vs.35%,p < 0.01) and worsening renal function (34% vs.19%,p < 0.01). The strongest and independent risk factor for 10-year CV death was baseline CyC>1.4 mg/L (HR 17.3, 95% CI 1.94-155.1). CONCLUSIONS: A baseline determination of CyC before CA can accurately rule out CIAKI and predict adverse events in the long term. CIAKI can be ruled out before CA in 97% patients with a CyC value < 1.4 mg/L.

Same-day CIED implantation and discharge: Is it possible? The E-MOTION trial (Early MObilization after pacemaker implantaTION).

BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing number of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) procedures worldwide, no guideline assessed postoperative mobilization protocols. Lacking evidences in literature, many centers require 24-hour immobilization and bed rest to minimize the risk of pacing lead (PL) dislodgement. Prolonged immobilization may futilely delay discharge, induce pain and reduced joint mobility especially in elderly patients. We examined whether early mobilization at 3-h after CIED surgery would result in higher complication rates, compared with standard 24-hour immobilization. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing CIED implantation were randomized to early (3-h) mobilization protocol with an arm sling support (E-motion group, EMG) vs. standard (24-h) immobilization (control group, CG). The primary end-point was 24-month PL dislodgement. Secondary safety end-point was any major intra-procedural complication (cardiac perforation, pericardial tamponade, valve damage, haemothorax, pneumothorax, myocardial infarction, peripheral embolus, TIA/stroke or death). RESULTS: Among 200 enrolled patients, 86% underwent pacemaker implantation (28% single-chamber, 72% dual-chamber device), 14% underwent ICD implantation (75% single-chamber, 25% dual-chamber device). PL fixation was mostly passive (97% atrial PL, 88% ventricular PL), without differences between EMG and CG (p = 0.99). No differences were observed in the incidence of 24-month PL dislodgement (3% in the EMG vs. 4% in the CG, p = 0.99). No major intra-procedural complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Early mobilization at 3-h following CIED surgery is safe and feasible compared with standard immobilization and is not associated with an increased risk of intra-procedural complications or 24-month lead dislodgment. So, same-day implantation and discharge might be possible.

Supraventricular Arrhythmias in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

The onset of supraventricular arrhythmias (SVA) may be associated with clinical worsening in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). However, limited data have been reported, especially at long-term follow-up. Aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of SVA in our patients with PAH, the risk factors correlated to their onset and the prognostic impact. All consecutive patients with PAH without history of SVA were enrolled. Incidence of new SVA was investigated and also the risk factors for SVA. Primary end point of the study was the impact of SVA on a composite of all-cause mortality and re-hospitalization, whereas mortality was the secondary end point. Seventy-seven patients were enrolled. No significant differences in the clinical or instrumental baseline characteristics between the 2 study groups were reported. During a median follow-up of 35 months (interquartile range 21.5 to 53.5), 17 (22%) patients experienced SVA. Development of SVA was associated with worsening of prognostic parameters at the follow-up: increasing of World Health Organization (WHO) functional class (p = 0.005) and N-terminal-pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) (p = 0.018) and reduction of 6-minute walking distance (p = 0.048), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) (p = 0.041), and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (p = 0.025). The primary end point occurred in 13 patients (76%) in the SVA group and in 22 patients (37%) in the group without SVA (p = 0.004), whereas 9 patients (53%) among those with SVA died during the follow-up compared with 8 (13%) among those without (p = 0.001). At multivariate analysis, development of SVA was independently associated with an increased risk to meet the both primary (hazard ratio 2.13; 95% confidence interval 1.07 to 4.34; p = 0.031) and secondary (hazard ratio 4.1; 95% confidence interval 1.6 to 10.6; p = 0.004) end points. In conclusion, during the 3-year follow-up period, 1/3 of patients with PAH developed SVA, which was related to worsening of hemodynamic and functional parameter and independently predicted adverse prognosis.