RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Vision screening and regular eye care can help detect and treat potentially irreversible vision impairment. This study aims to investigate the associations between sociodemographic and health characteristics and the receipt of eye care among children aged 17 years and younger in the United States. DESIGN: This cross-sectional study used data from the National Survey of Children's Health (NSCH), a nationally representative and population-based survey of randomly sampled households. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were children aged 0 to 17 years, residing in all 50 states and the District of Columbia, whose caregivers or parents answered an address-based survey by mail or online. METHODS: Weighted prevalence calculations were applied to analyze the data, and logistic regression was performed to explore associations between reported eye care and demographic, health, and parent-related variables. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Caregiver-reported vision screenings, referral to an eye doctor after vision screening, eye doctor visits, and prescription of corrective lenses. RESULTS: Caregivers reported that 53.2% of children had a vision screening at least once (if child ≤ 5 years) or within the past 2 years (if child > 5 years). Of those screened, 26.9% were referred to an eye doctor. Overall, 38.6% of all children had a previous eye doctor visit, and among them, 55.4% were prescribed corrective lenses during the visit. Factors associated with decreased odds of vision screening included younger age, lack of health care visits, no insurance coverage, parent education high school or less, and lower household income. Non-White ethnicities, households with a non-English primary language, and lower incomes were more likely to be referred to an eye doctor after vision screening. Lower rates of eye doctor visits were associated with younger age, lack of insurance coverage, and primary household languages other than English. CONCLUSIONS: Children from disadvantaged backgrounds are less likely to receive vision screening and eye care. Targeted strategies are needed to increase vision screening and access to eye care services in these vulnerable groups. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
RESUMEN
SIGNIFICANCE: This study brings awareness of racial/ethnic difference of refractive error characteristics in clinics. PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess longitudinal change in refractive errors over a 36-month period in Hispanic and Black children. METHODS: Children (2.4 to 15 years old) were studied. Cycloplegic refraction was measured annually. Spherical equivalent was calculated. Astigmatism was evaluated by magnitude of cylinder and power vector (J0 and J45). Absolute value of interocular spherical equivalent difference was used to calculate anisometropia. Mixed-linear model was used to analyze longitudinal annual change in spherical equivalent, cylinder, J0, and J45 over 36 months. RESULTS: A total of 485 participants (310 Black, 175 Hispanic) met the criteria. At the baseline examination, prevalence of myopia, emmetropia, and hyperopia was 39% (n = 187), 31% (n = 150), and 30% (n = 148), respectively. Spherical equivalent of Black children was not significantly different from that in Hispanic children (0.10 ± 2.92 vs. -0.37 ± 2.05 D, p=0.06); however, the Hispanic children had a significantly higher cylinder compared with Black children (Hispanic: 1.46 ± 1.57 D vs. Black: 0.92 ± 1.07 D; p<0.001). Both J0 (p<0.001) and J45 (p=0.01) were significantly different between two groups; the Hispanic children had more with-the-rule astigmatism and oblique astigmatism than the Black children. Prevalence of anisometropia (≥1 D) was higher in Black children (14%) compared with Hispanic children (5%, p=0.006). Over 36 months, spherical equivalent significantly decreased an average of 0.69 D (0.23 D/y, p<0.001) for both groups; neither astigmatism nor anisometropia changed significantly (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Astigmatism in the Hispanic children was significantly higher than in Black children. However, the Black children had a higher prevalence and degree of anisometropia than the Hispanic children.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Determine the pediatric prevalence of keratoconus (KC) using Scheimpflug corneal tomography. METHODS: A prospective observational study was done on subjects aged 3 to 18 years at the Princeton Vision Clinic, Chicago, IL. Scheimpflug tomography (Pentacam HR, OCULUS Optikgerate GmbH) scans (Belin/Ambrósio Enhanced Ectasia BAD3) yielded BAD Final D (Final D) and Back Elevation at the Thinnest Point (BETP) measurements. Criteria differentiating non-KC from KC suspects & KC were, Non-KC -Final D <2.00 in both eyes; KC suspect -Final D ≥2.00 and <3.00 in combination with BETP ≥18 µm for myopia and ≥28 µm for hyperopia/mixed astigmatism in at least one eye; and KC -Final D of ≥3.00 with BETP ≥18 µm for myopia or ≥28 µm for hyperopia/mixed astigmatism in at least one eye. Two thousand two hundred and six subjects were recorded, removing duplicate and poor-quality scans leaving 2007 subjects. RESULTS: Of 2007 subjects, six were classified as KC -prevalence of 1:334, three subjects were KC suspects -prevalence of 1:669, and total prevalence of KC suspects and KC was 1:223. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of KC in children is higher than previously reported, emphasizing the importance of sensitive screening for KC at its earliest manifestation as standard in pediatric comprehensive eye examinations.
Asunto(s)
Astigmatismo , Hiperopía , Queratocono , Miopía , Niño , Humanos , Chicago/epidemiología , Córnea/diagnóstico por imagen , Paquimetría Corneal , Topografía de la Córnea/métodos , Queratocono/diagnóstico , Queratocono/epidemiología , Miopía/diagnóstico , Miopía/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Curva ROC , Tomografía , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To survey paediatric eye care providers to identify current patterns of prescribing for hyperopia. METHODS: Paediatric eye care providers were invited, via email, to participate in a survey to evaluate current age-based refractive error prescribing practices. Questions were designed to determine which factors may influence the survey participant's prescribing pattern (e.g., patient's age, magnitude of hyperopia, patient's symptoms, heterophoria and stereopsis) and if the providers were to prescribe, how much hyperopic correction would they prescribe (e.g., full or partial prescription). The response distributions by profession (optometry and ophthalmology) were compared using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov cumulative distribution function test. RESULTS: Responses were submitted by 738 participants regarding how they prescribe for their hyperopic patients. Most providers within each profession considered similar clinical factors when prescribing. The percentages of optometrists and ophthalmologists who reported considering the factor often differed significantly. Factors considered similarly by both optometrists and ophthalmologists were the presence of symptoms (98.0%, p = 0.14), presence of astigmatism and/or anisometropia (97.5%, p = 0.06) and the possibility of teasing (8.3%, p = 0.49). A wide range of prescribing was observed within each profession, with some providers reporting that they would prescribe for low levels of hyperopia while others reported that they would never prescribe. When prescribing for bilateral hyperopia in children with age-normal visual acuity and no manifest deviation or symptoms, the threshold for prescribing decreased with age for both professions, with ophthalmologists typically prescribing 1.5-2 D less than optometrists. The threshold for prescribing also decreased for both optometrists and ophthalmologists when children had associated clinical factors (e.g., esophoria or reduced near visual function). Optometrists and ophthalmologists most commonly prescribed based on cycloplegic refraction, although optometrists most commonly prescribed based on both the manifest and cycloplegic refraction for children ≥7 years. CONCLUSION: Prescribing patterns for paediatric hyperopia vary significantly among eye care providers.
Asunto(s)
Astigmatismo , Hiperopía , Optometría , Errores de Refracción , Niño , Humanos , Hiperopía/tratamiento farmacológico , MidriáticosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate differences between autorefraction measurements with and without cycloplegia among school-aged individuals and to explore factors associated with significant differences. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, retrospective study. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals between 3 and 22 years of age evaluated at the Illinois College of Optometry from September 2016 through June 2019 who underwent same-day noncycloplegic and cycloplegic autorefraction of the right eye. METHODS: Demographic information including age, sex, and race or ethnicity were collected during the eye examination. Autorefraction was performed before and after cycloplegia. Myopia, defined as at least -0.50 diopter (D) spherical equivalent (SE), hyperopia, defined as at least +0.50 D SE, and astigmatism of at least 1.00 D cylinder were determined using noncycloplegic and cycloplegic autorefractions. Factors associated with at least 1.00 D more myopic SE or at least 0.75 D cylindrical difference by noncycloplegic autorefraction were assessed using logistic regression models. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Differences between noncycloplegic and cycloplegic autorefraction measurements. RESULTS: The mean age was 10.8 ± 4.0 years for the 11 119 individuals; 52.4% of participants were female. Noncycloplegic SE measured 0.65 ± 1.04 D more myopic than cycloplegic SE. After adjusting for demographic factors and refractive error, individuals with at least 1.00 D of more myopic SE refraction by noncycloplegic autorefraction (25.9%) were more likely to be younger than 5 years (odds ratio [OR], 1.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18-1.79) and 5 to younger than 10 years (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.18-1.48) than those 10 to younger than 15 years. This difference of at least 1.00 D of more myopic SE was more likely to be observed in Hispanic people (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.10-1.36) and those with hyperopia (OR range, 4.20-13.31). Individuals with 0.75 D or more of cylindrical difference (5.1%) between refractions were more likely to be younger than 5 years, to be male, and to have mild-moderate-high myopia or moderate-high hyperopia. CONCLUSIONS: Three quarters of school-aged individuals had < 1 D of myopic SE difference using noncycloplegic compared with cycloplegic autorefraction. Understanding measurement differences obtained for refractive error and associated factors may provide useful information for future studies or programs involving refraction in school-aged children.
Asunto(s)
Hiperopía , Miopía , Presbiopía , Trastornos de la Pupila , Errores de Refracción , Adolescente , Chicago/epidemiología , Niño , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Hiperopía/diagnóstico , Masculino , Midriáticos , Miopía/diagnóstico , Refracción Ocular , Errores de Refracción/diagnóstico , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Objective: Optometrists are increasingly adopting teleoptometry as an approach to delivering eye care. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has created further opportunities for optometrists to utilize innovation in telehealth to deliver eye care to individuals who experience access barriers. A systematic literature review is presented detailing the evidence to support the use of teleoptometry. Methods: Databases of MEDLINE, Global Health, and Web of Science were searched, and articles were included if they reported any involvement of optometrists in the delivery of telehealth. Findings were reported according to the mode of telehealth used to deliver eye care, telehealth collaboration type, and the format and geographical areas where eye care via telehealth is being delivered. Results: Twenty-seven relevant studies were identified. Only 11 studies included the role of optometrists as a member of the telehealth team where the scope of practice extended beyond creating and receiving referrals, collecting clinical data at in-person services, and continuing in-person care following consultation with an ophthalmologist. Both synchronous and asynchronous telehealth services were commonly utilized. Optometrists were most commonly involved in ophthalmology-led telehealth collaborations (n = 19). Eight studies reported optometrists independently delivering primary eye care via telehealth, and commonly included videoconferencing. Conclusion: The application of teleoptometry to deliver eye care is rapidly emerging, and appears to be a viable adjunct to the delivery of in-person optometry services. The review highlighted the scarcity of evidence surrounding the clinical benefits, safety, and outcomes of teleoptometry. Further research is required in this area.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Oftalmología , Optometría , Telemedicina , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , PandemiasRESUMEN
SIGNIFICANCE: This study confirmed the application of the Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey (CISS) in distinguishing children with oculomotor dysfunction (OMD) from those with normal binocular vision (NBV) but not in distinguishing children with accommodative insufficiency (AI). PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the application of the CISS for quantifying symptoms in children aged 9 to 18 years with AI or OMD. METHODS: All participants (aged 9 to 18 years) underwent comprehensive binocular vision tests including visual acuity, cover test, near point of convergence, fusional vergence, accommodative amplitude, and the Developmental Eye Movement test to ascertain the presence of any vision conditions. According to the examination outcomes, participants were divided into four groups: NBV group, AI group, OMD group, and a group with both AI and OMD (AI-OMD). The CISS was individually administered to each participant. An ANOVA and a receiver operating characteristic curve were performed to evaluate the ability of the CISS to quantify symptoms in AI and OMD. RESULTS: A total of 82 participants were qualified for this study, with 18 in the NBV group, 21 in AI, 16 in OMD, and 27 in AI-OMD group. The mean CISS score was significantly different among the four groups (F = 4.19, P = .008). Post hoc tests showed significantly higher CISS scores in the OMD group than the NBV (P = .01) and the AI (P = .03) groups, but no differences were detected among other groups. Receiver operating characteristics curve showed a significant effect of the CISS score on predicting an OMD (area under curve = 0.78, P = .006). Using a CISS score of ≥15, good discrimination of OMD was obtained. CONCLUSIONS: Children with OMD (Developmental Eye Movement type II or IV) had higher CISS scores than ones with NBV. Using the CISS, children with AI did not report worse symptoms than children with NBV.
Asunto(s)
Acomodación Ocular , Trastornos de la Motilidad Ocular , Niño , Convergencia Ocular , Humanos , Trastornos de la Motilidad Ocular/diagnóstico , Trastornos de la Motilidad Ocular/epidemiología , Visión Binocular , Agudeza VisualRESUMEN
SIGNIFICANCE: Methods and frequency of vision screenings for school-aged children vary widely by state, and there has been no recent comparative analysis of state requirements. This analysis underscores the need for developing evidence-based criteria for vision screening in school-aged children across the United States. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to conduct an updated comprehensive analysis of vision screening requirements for school-aged children in the United States. METHODS: State laws pertaining to school-aged vision screening were obtained for each state. Additional information was obtained from each state's Department of Health and Education, through their websites or departmental representatives. A descriptive analysis was performed for states with data available. RESULTS: Forty-one states require vision screening for school-aged children to be conducted directly in schools or in the community. Screening is more commonly required in elementary school (n = 41) than in middle (n = 30) or high school (n = 19). Distance acuity is the most commonly required test (n = 41), followed by color vision (n = 11) and near vision (n = 10). Six states require a vision screening annually or every 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Although most states require vision screening for some school-aged children, there is marked variation in screening methods and criteria, where the screening occurs, and grade levels that are screened. This lack of standardization and wide variation in state regulations point to a need for the development of evidence-based criteria for vision screening programs for school-aged children.
Asunto(s)
Planes Estatales de Salud/normas , Trastornos de la Visión/diagnóstico , Selección Visual/normas , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Atención a la Salud , Escolaridad , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Instituciones Académicas , Planes Estatales de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Estados Unidos , Selección Visual/legislación & jurisprudenciaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This article provides a rationale for developing an integrated data system for recording vision screening and eye care follow-up outcomes in preschool-aged children. The recommendations were developed by the National Expert Panel to the National Center for Children's Vision and Eye Health at Prevent Blindness and funded by the Maternal and Child Health Bureau of the Health Resources and Services Administration, US Department of Health and Human Services. Guidance is provided regarding specific elements to be included, as well as the characteristics and architecture of such a data system. Vision screening for preschool-aged children is endorsed by many organizations concerned with children's health issues. Currently, there is a lack of data on the proportion of children screened and no effective system to ensure that children who fail screenings access appropriate comprehensive eye examinations and follow-up care. RESULTS: The expansion of currently existing, or developing integrated health information systems, which would include child-level vision screening data, as well as referral records and follow-up diagnosis and treatment, is consistent with the proposed national approach to an integrated health information system (National Health Information Infrastructure). Development of an integrated vision data system will enhance eye health for young children at three different levels: (1) the child level, (2) the health care provider level, and (3) an epidemiological level. CONCLUSIONS: It is critical that the end users, the professionals who screen children and the professionals who provide eye care, be involved in the development and implementation of the proposed integrated data systems. As essential stakeholders invested in ensuring quality eye care for children, this community of professionals should find increasing need and opportunities at local, state, and national levels to contribute to cooperative guidance for data system development.
Asunto(s)
Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/normas , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/normas , Trastornos de la Visión/prevención & control , Selección Visual/normas , Niño , Preescolar , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Femenino , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Derivación y Consulta , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Purpose: To provide information on the demographics of optometrists and regulation of the optometry profession in countries who were members of the World Council of Optometry (WCO) during the period 2022-2023. Methods: A non-random, purposive sampling and a key informant strategy was employed to conduct a survey-based cross-sectional study on the professional landscape and distribution of optometrists; educational landscape; legislative aspects of the profession; and the scope of optometry practice in countries who were members of WCO during the period 2022-2023. Key informants were identified by WCO country members' leadership. Results: In the 39 countries surveyed, one optometrist serves 23,200 persons on average. Only 46.2% of the countries met the internationally suggested 1:10,000 optometrist-to-population ratio. The average male-to-female ratio was 45% males/55% females, with a division of average age as follows: under 45 years of age 46% as compared to above 45 years of age 54%. It was reported that optometry is not regulated in France, Portugal, India, Kenya and Cameron. Thirteen countries (33%) do not require a Bachelor's degree as a minimum to practice optometry. Use of diagnostic drugs is prohibited in 20% of the countries, with 25% of the countries limiting the use of therapeutic pharmaceutical agents. Conclusion: Many countries where optometry is recognized struggle to have an adequate number of optometrists; this hinders access to eye care. This is compounded by unregulated minimum levels of education for entry-level optometric practitioners. In addition, several countries limit or prohibit many optometric procedures that restrict the ability of optometrists to provide eye care and vision health services at the primary care level.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Keratoconus (KC) is a bilateral and often asymmetric disease which can progress to corneal thinning and protrusion. Keratoconus in children appears to be more aggressive than in adults. Research on pediatric keratoconus is limited, and treatments rely on research and experience in adult populations. The current study aimed to provide an analysis on the distribution of the corneal tomography measurements in an underserved, Black and LatinX, primarily low-income pediatric population. METHODS: This was a prospective study approved by the Illinois College of Optometry's IRB. A total of 2133 children, presented to a school-based vision clinic within the Chicago Public Schools, were included in the analysis and were classified into three age groups: 3-6 years, 7-12 years, and 13-18 years. Four specific tomography measurements were obtained from the Pentacam (BAD Final D, ART-Max, I-S Ratio, and Thinnest Point Asymmetry). RESULTS: The mean front corneal astigmatism of the study cohort was -1.39D ± 1.45. Tomography indices means were 0.95 ± 0.74 for BAD Final D, 457.34 ± 94.83 for ART-Max, 0.01 ± 0.68 for I-S ratio, and 9.60 ± 25.55 for Thinnest Point Asymmetry. A statistically significant difference was observed among age groups for BAD Final D (p < 0.001), ART-Max (p < 0.001) and Thinnest Point Asymmetry (p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: This study provided the first set of normative data for a pediatric population on the four tomography measurements, offering a reference for potential diagnosis of keratoconus for Black and LatinX children. Further study could include evaluation of additional races along with a comparison with the adult data, which will provide guidance on evaluating the current keratoconus diagnosis criteria to aid early diagnosis of keratoconus in the pediatric population.
Asunto(s)
Queratocono , Adulto , Niño , Humanos , Preescolar , Queratocono/diagnóstico por imagen , Queratocono/epidemiología , Topografía de la Córnea/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Córnea/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía/métodos , Paquimetría CornealRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Receptive and expressive vocabulary in adult and adolescent males with fragile X syndrome (FXS) have been shown as significantly lower than their chronological age; however, receptive vocabulary has been considered a strength relative to mental age. This has not been formally examined, however, and data are needed to compare receptive vocabulary with other language skills and with mental age in individuals with FXS. This is especially important as vocabulary measures are sometimes used as a proxy to estimate language ability. METHODS: This preliminary study examined receptive vocabulary, global language, and cognitive skills in 42 adults (33 males and 9 females) with FXS as a portion of the baseline evaluation prior to randomization in a clinical trial of ampakine CX516. The battery of standardized tests addressed receptive vocabulary with the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, Third Edition (PPVT-III), receptive and expressive language (termed henceforth as global language) via the Preschool Language Scale, Fourth Edition or the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals, Third Edition, and non-verbal cognition via the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, Fourth Edition (SB-IV). RESULTS: Results showed (1) significantly higher receptive vocabulary than global language, (2) significantly better receptive vocabulary than non-verbal cognition, (3) equivalent non-verbal cognition and global language, and (4) severity of autism symptomatology was not correlated to receptive vocabulary or global language once non-verbal cognition was removed as factor. The scores from the PPVT-III did not represent the global language skills in our sample of adults with FXS. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this investigation strongly suggest that the PPVT-III should not be used as a screening tool for language levels or cognitive function in clinical studies since the scores from the PPVT-III were not representative of global language or non-verbal cognitive skills in adults with intellectual disabilities. This finding is critical in order to understand how to evaluate, as well as to treat, language in individuals with FXS. Development of efficient and appropriate tools to measure language, cognition, and behavior in individuals with FXS is essential.
Asunto(s)
Comprensión/fisiología , Síndrome del Cromosoma X Frágil/fisiopatología , Pruebas del Lenguaje/normas , Lenguaje , Vocabulario , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Adulto JovenAsunto(s)
Personas con Discapacidad , Desarrollo Sostenible , Preescolar , Humanos , Salud Global , Naciones Unidas , Desarrollo Infantil , ObjetivosRESUMEN
A Phase II, 4-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Ampakine compound CX516 as a potential treatment for the underlying disorder in fragile X syndrome (FXS). After baseline screening, subjects with FXS (n = 49) underwent a 1-week placebo lead-in and then were randomized to study drug or placebo for a 4-week period. Cognitive and behavioral outcome measures were administered prior to treatment, at the end of treatment, and 2 weeks posttreatment. There were minimal side effects, no significant changes in safety parameters, and no serious adverse events. There was a 12.5% frequency of allergic rash in the CX516 group and 1 subject developed a substantial rash. There was also no significant improvement in memory, the primary outcome measure, or in secondary measures of language, attention/executive function, behavior, and overall functioning in CX516-treated subjects compared to placebo. This study did demonstrate that many outcome measures were reproducible in this test-retest setting for the FXS population, yet some were too difficult or variable. Adult subjects with FXS were able to complete an intensive clinical trial, and some valid outcome measures were identified for future FXS trial design. Problems with potency of CX516 in other studies have suggested dosing may have been inadequate for therapeutic effect and thus it remains unclear whether modulation of AMPA-mediated neurotransmission is a viable therapeutic strategy for the treatment of FXS.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de la Conducta Infantil/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos del Conocimiento/tratamiento farmacológico , Dioxoles/uso terapéutico , Síndrome del Cromosoma X Frágil/tratamiento farmacológico , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Receptores AMPA/efectos de los fármacos , Adolescente , Adulto , Trastorno Autístico/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Autístico/psicología , Trastornos de la Conducta Infantil/psicología , Trastornos del Conocimiento/psicología , Dioxoles/efectos adversos , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Método Doble Ciego , Erupciones por Medicamentos/etiología , Femenino , Síndrome del Cromosoma X Frágil/psicología , Humanos , Potenciación a Largo Plazo/efectos de los fármacos , Masculino , Plasticidad Neuronal/efectos de los fármacos , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Determinación de la Personalidad , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Transmisión Sináptica/efectos de los fármacos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Neitz Test of Color Vision (Neitz) and Color Vision Testing Made Easy(trade mark) (CVTME) were compared to determine which test was more effective in evaluating patients with intellectual disability (i.e., mental retardation) and developmental delay. METHODS: Two hundred eight Special Olympics floor hockey athletes were screened in San Diego, California, and 93 athletes were screened in Long Beach, California for a total of 301 athletes. Each athlete was administered the CVTME and the Neitz tests. RESULTS: The pass rate for the CVTME was 94.6% (n = 93) at Long Beach and 96.2% (n = 208) at San Diego. Every athlete was able to complete the CVTME. The pass rate for the Neitz was 38.7% at Long Beach and 56.7% at San Diego. Additionally, 10.8% of the Long Beach athletes and 12.5% of the San Diego athletes were unable to understand the Neitz. In addition, there was a low level of agreement between the results from the 2 tests with kappa = 0.081 for the San Diego data and 0.028 for the Long Beach data. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the CVTME continues to be the screening test of choice in evaluating color vision in individuals with intellectual disability. The Neitz had more failing scores on the first attempt and more total failing scores leading to over-referrals, making it an inappropriate screening test for individuals with intellectual disability and developmental delay.
Asunto(s)
Pruebas de Percepción de Colores/instrumentación , Percepción de Color/fisiología , Defectos de la Visión Cromática/diagnóstico , Discapacidad Intelectual/complicaciones , Selección Visual/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Defectos de la Visión Cromática/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Discapacidad Intelectual/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To define surveillance approaches and metrics to capture the burden of vision health disparities and to identify properties of a surveillance system to guide public health interventions. DESIGN: Expert panel. METHODS: Analysis of relevant literature and deliberations of expert panel. RESULTS: The panel identified that the purpose of vision surveillance was to link data to public health interventions. Panel members noted the importance of assessing vision through self-reported and performance-based measures. Defined populations should be included in a surveillance system to assess disparities in utilization of eye care and vision loss. The panel suggested that ophthalmic/vision measures should be sustained in national surveys and suggested that a vision surveillance system should be forged among federal agencies. CONCLUSIONS: Employing the 6 outlined strategies would improve vision surveillance and help reach the vision-related objectives of Healthy People 2020.