Comparison of the performance of estimated fetal weight charts for the detection of small- and large-for-gestational age newborns with adverse outcomes: a French population-based study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of estimated fetal weight (EFW) charts at the third trimester ultrasound for detecting small- and large-for-gestational age (SGA/LGA) newborns with adverse outcomes. DESIGN: Nationally representative observational study. SETTING: French maternity units in 2016. POPULATION: 9940 singleton live births with an ultrasound between 30 and 35 weeks of gestation. METHODS: We compared three prescriptive charts (INTERGROWTH-21st, World Health Organization (WHO), Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [NICHD]), four descriptive charts (Hadlock, Fetal Medicine Foundation, two French charts) and a French customised growth model (Epopé). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: SGA and LGA (birthweights <10th and >90th percentiles) associated with adverse outcomes (low Apgar score, delivery-room resuscitation, neonatal unit admission). RESULTS: 2.1% and 1.1% of infants had SGA and LGA and adverse outcomes, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for detecting these infants with an EFW <10th and >90th percentile varied from 29-65% and 84-96% for descriptive charts versus 27-60% and 83-96% for prescriptive charts. WHO and French charts were closest to the EFW distribution, yielding a balance between sensitivity and specificity for SGA and LGA births. INTERGROWTH-21st and Epopé had low sensitivity for SGA with high sensitivity for LGA. Areas under the receiving operator characteristics curve ranged from 0.62 to 0.74, showing low to moderate predictive ability, and diagnostic odds ratios varied from 7 to 16. CONCLUSION: Marked differences in the performance of descriptive as well as prescriptive EFW charts highlight the importance of evaluating them for their ability to detect high-risk fetuses. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Choice of growth chart strongly affected identification of high-risk fetuses at the third trimester ultrasound.

Factors influencing complications after 3-columns spinal osteotomies for fixed sagittal imbalance from multiple etiologies: a multicentric cohort study about 286 cases in 273 patients.

PURPOSE: Spinal osteotomies performed to treat fixed spinal deformities are technically demanding and associated with a high complications rate. The main purpose of this study was to analyze complications and their risk factors in spinal osteotomies performed for fixed sagittal imbalance from multiple etiologies. METHODS: The study consisted of a blinded retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from a large multicenter cohort of patients who underwent 3-columns (3C) spinal osteotomy, between January 2010 and January 2017. Clinical and radiological data were compared pre- and post-operatively. Complications and their risk factors were analyzed. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-six 3C osteotomies were performed in 273 patients. At 1 year follow-up, both clinical (VAS pain, ODI and SRS-22 scores) and radiological (SVA, SSA, loss of lordosis and pelvic version) parameters were significantly improved (p < 0.001). A total of 164 patients (59.2%) experienced at least 1 complication (277 complications). Complications-free survival rates were only 30% at 5 years. Most of those were mechanical (35.2%), followed by general (17.6%), surgical site infection (17.2%) and neurological (10.9%). Pre-operative neurological status [RR = 2.3 (1.32-4.00)], operative time (+ 19% of risk each additional hour) and combined surgery [RR = 1.76 (1.08-2.04)] were assessed as risk factors for overall complication (p < 0.05). The use of patient-specific rods appeared to be significantly associated with less overall complications [RR = 0.5 (0.29-0.89)] (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Spinal 3C osteotomies were efficient to improve both clinical and radiological parameters despite high rates of complication. Efforts should be made to reduce operative time which appears to be the strongest predictive risk factor for complication.

Using Robson's Ten-Group Classification System for comparing caesarean section rates in Europe: an analysis of routine data from the Euro-Peristat study.

OBJECTIVE: Robson's Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) creates clinically relevant sub-groups for monitoring caesarean birth rates. This study assesses whether this classification can be derived from routine data in Europe and uses it to analyse national caesarean rates. DESIGN: Observational study using routine data. SETTING: Twenty-seven EU member states plus Iceland, Norway, Switzerland and the UK. POPULATION: All births at ≥22 weeks of gestational age in 2015. METHODS: National statistical offices and medical birth registers derived numbers of caesarean births in TGCS groups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Overall caesarean rate, prevalence and caesarean rates in each of the TGCS groups. RESULTS: Of 31 countries, 18 were able to provide data on the TGCS groups, with UK data available only from Northern Ireland. Caesarean birth rates ranged from 16.1 to 56.9%. Countries providing TGCS data had lower caesarean rates than countries without data (25.8% versus 32.9%, P = 0.04). Countries with higher caesarean rates tended to have higher rates in all TGCS groups. Substantial heterogeneity was observed, however, especially for groups 5 (previous caesarean section), 6, 7 (nulliparous/multiparous breech) and 10 (singleton cephalic preterm). The differences in percentages of abnormal lies, group 9, illustrate potential misclassification arising from unstandardised definitions. CONCLUSIONS: Although further validation of data quality is needed, using TGCS in Europe provides valuable comparator and baseline data for benchmarking and surveillance. Higher caesarean rates in countries unable to construct the TGCS suggest that effective routine information systems may be an indicator of a country's investment in implementing evidence-based caesarean policies. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Many European countries can provide Robson's Ten-Group Classification to improve caesarean rate comparisons.

C1-C2 Injury: Factors influencing mortality, outcome, and fracture healing.

BACKGROUND: C1-C2 injury represents 25-40% of cervical injuries and predominantly occurs in the geriatric population. METHODS: A prospective multicentre study was conducted under the aegis of the french spine surgery society (SFCR) investigating the impact of age, comorbidities, lesion type, and treatment option on mortality, complications, and fusion rates. RESULTS: A total of 417 patients were recruited from 11 participating centres. The mean ± SD age was 66.6 ± 22 years, and there were 228 men (55%); 5.4% presented a neurological deficit at initial presentation. The most frequent traumatic lesion was C2 fracture (n = 308). Overall mortality was 8.4%; it was 2.3% among those aged ≤ 60 years, 5.0% 61-80 years, and 16.0% > 80 years (p < 0.001). Regarding complications, 17.8% of patients ≤ 70 years of age presented with ≥ 1 complication versus 32.3% > 70 years (p = 0.0009). The type of fracture did not condition the onset of complications and/or mortality (p > 0.05). The presence of a comorbidity was associated with a risk factor for both death (p = 0.0001) and general complication (p = 0.008). Age and comorbidities were found to be independently associated with death (p < 0.005). The frequency of pseudoarthrosis ranged from 0 to 12.5% up to 70 years of age and then constantly and progressively increased to reach 58.6% after 90 years of age. CONCLUSIONS: C1-C2 injury represents a serious concern, possibly life-threatening, especially in the elderly. We found a major impact of age and comorbidities on mortality, complications, and pseudarthrosis; injury pattern or treatment option seem to have a minimal effect.

Outcomes of surgical treatments of spinal metastases: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Owing to recent advances in cancer therapy, updated data are required for clinicians counselling patients on treatment of spinal metastases. OBJECTIVE: To analyse the outcomes of surgical treatments of spinal metastases. METHODS: Prospective and multicentric study that included consecutively patients operated on for spinal metastases between January 2016 and January 2017. Overall survival was calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazard model was used to calculate hazard ratio (HR) analysing mortality risk according to preoperative Karnofsky performance status (KPS), mobility level and neurological status. RESULTS: A total of 252 patients were included (145 males, 107 females) aged a mean 63.3 years. Median survival was 450 days. Primary cancer sites were lung (21%) and breast (19%). Multiple spinal metastases involved 122 patients (48%). Concomitant skeletal and visceral metastases were noted in 90 patients (36%). Main procedure was laminectomy and posterior fixation (57%). Overall, pain and mobility level were improved postoperatively. Most patients had normal preoperative motor function (50%) and remained so postoperatively. Patients "bedbound" on admission were the less likely to recover. In-hospital death rate was 2.4% (three disease progression, one septic shock, one pneumonia, one pulmonary embolism). Complication rate was 33%, deep wound infection was the most frequent aetiology. Higher mortality was observed in patients with poorest preoperative KPS (KPS 0-40%, HR = 3.1, p < 0.001) and mobility level ("bedbound", HR = 2.16, p < 0.001). Survival seemed also to be linked to preoperative neurological function. CONCLUSION: Surgical treatments helped maintain reasonable condition for patients with spinal metastases. Intervention should be offered before patients' condition worsen to ensure better outcomes.

Correction to: Outcomes of surgical treatments of spinal metastases: a prospective study.

The correct name of F. Saihlan should be F. Sailhan.

Association between inadequate antenatal care utilisation and severe perinatal and maternal morbidity: an analysis in the PreCARE cohort.

OBJECTIVE: Because the effectiveness of antenatal care in reducing pregnancy complications is still discussed despite widespread recommendations of its use, we sought to assess the association between utilisation of recommended antenatal care and severe maternal (SMM) and perinatal morbidity (SPM). DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Four maternity units around Paris in 2010-2012. SAMPLE: 9117 women with singleton pregnancies. METHODS: Logistic regression models adjusted for maternal social, demographic and medical characteristics. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Antenatal care utilisation was assessed by: (1) initiation of care after 14 weeks, (2) < 50% of recommended visits made, according to gestational age, (3) absence of the first, second or third trimester ultrasounds, (4) two modified Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilisation indexes, combining these components. The two main outcomes were composite variables of SMM and SPM. RESULTS: According to the modified Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilisation index, 34.6% of women had inadequate antenatal care utilisation; the incidence of severe maternal morbidity (SMM) was 2.9% and severe perinatal morbidity (SPM) 5.5%. A percentage of recommended visits below 50% (2.6% of women) was associated with SMM [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.40 (1.38-4.17)] and SPM [aOR 2.27 (1.43-3.59)]. Late initiation of care (17.0% of women) was not associated with SMM or SPM. Failure to undergo the recommended ultrasounds (16, 17 and 22% of women) was associated with SPM. Inadequate antenatal care utilisation according to the index was associated with SPM [aOR 1.37 (1.05-1.80)]. CONCLUSION: Inadequate antenatal care utilisation is associated with SMM and SPM, to degrees that vary with the component of care and the outcome considered. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Inadequate antenatal care utilisation is associated with severe maternal and perinatal morbidity.

How do late terminations of pregnancy affect comparisons of stillbirth rates in Europe? Analyses of aggregated routine data from the Euro-Peristat Project.

OBJECTIVE: To describe how terminations of pregnancy at gestational ages at or above the limit for stillbirth registration are recorded in routine statistics and to assess their impact on comparability of stillbirth rates in Europe. DESIGN: Analysis of aggregated data from the Euro-Peristat project. SETTING: Twenty-nine European countries. POPULATION: Births and late terminations in 2010. METHODS: Assessment of terminations as a proportion of stillbirths and derivation of stillbirth rates including and excluding terminations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Stillbirth rates overall and excluding terminations. RESULTS: In 23 countries, it is possible to assess the contribution of terminations to stillbirth rates either because terminations are rare occurrences or because they can be distinguished from spontaneous stillbirths. Where terminations were reported, they accounted for less than 1.5% of stillbirths at 22+ weeks in Denmark, between 13 and 22% in Germany, Italy, Hungary, Finland and Switzerland, and 39% in France. Proportions were much lower at 24+ weeks, with the exception of Switzerland (7.4%) and France (39.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Terminations represent a substantial proportion of stillbirths at 22+ weeks of gestation in some countries. Countries where terminations occur at 22+ weeks should publish rates with and without terminations in order to improve international comparisons and the policy relevance of stillbirth statistics. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: For valid comparisons of stillbirth rates, data about late terminations of pregnancy are needed.

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation (UNILIF): morbidity, clinical and radiological 2-year outcomes of a 66-patient prospective series.

PURPOSE: To assess clinical and radiological outcomes at 2-year follow-up of one-level minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation (UNILIF) in the treatment of stable lumbar degenerative diseases. METHODS: From January 1, 2012 to January 31, 2013, we prospectively collected clinical and radiological data on patients with stable degenerative lumbar disease managed by UNILIF in a single institution. Preoperatively and at 2 years, we recorded ODI, SF-12, Quebec and VAS. Interbody fusion was analyzed on radiography and on a CT scan, and sagittal balance was tested on full spine radiography. RESULTS: Mean operation time was 74.5 min ± 16.8, mean blood loss was 130.8 ml ± 210.9. At 2 years, ODI, SF-12, Quebec and VAS were significantly improved (p > 0.005).The fusion rate was 96.8% on radiographic analysis and was 87.9% on CT scan analysis. CONCLUSIONS: One-level UNILIF constitutes an effective alternative for management of stable lumbar degenerative diseases. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Posterior elements disruption with hybrid constructs in AIS patients: is there an impact on proximal junctional kyphosis?

PURPOSE: Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) is a frequent proximal adjacent segment disease following spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and its rate has been estimated to 28% in the literature. The etiology is multifactorial, and risk factors associated with PJK are controversial. The aim of this study was to demonstrate that the disruption of muscular and bony tissue above the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) during surgery does not increase the rate of PJK in patients undergoing posterior fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. MATERIAL AND METHOD: 50 patients with AIS operated between June 2014 and January 2016 were included. Every patient underwent a long posterior spine arthrodesis with a hybrid construct (proximal lamino-laminar claw, thoracic sublaminar bands and lumbar screws). The dissection of posterior elements above the UIV was necessary for the placement of proximal anchors. Radiographic analysis including proximal junctional angle, spino-pelvic parameters (cervical lordosis, thoracic kyphosis TK, lumbar lordosis, pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope) and sagittal vertical axis were collected preoperatively and postoperatively at the last control. The numbers of fused levels, locations of upper instrumented vertebra, locations of lower instrumented vertebra, length of fusion segments were also recorded. Multiple odd ratios and other statistical analysis were performed to evaluate the relation between PJK and the potential risk factors. RESULTS: There were 43 females and 7 males with a mean age of 14.8 years at surgery. PJK occurred in 5 out of 50 cases with an incidence of 10%. The mean follow-up was 18 months. There was no significant difference in gender (OR 1.36, p = 0.8), decrease of TK (OR 1.63, p = 0 0.69), location of UIV (OR 2.25, p = 0.4), LIV (OR 2, p = 0.55), and SVA change (OR 1.63, p = 0.46). CONCLUSIONS: The disruption of ligamentous and bony tissue proximal to the UIV during the surgery does not increase the rate of PJK. Level of evidence IV.

Why women with previous caesarean and eligible for a trial of labour have an elective repeat caesarean delivery? A national study in France.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the characteristics of women and maternity units associated with elective repeat caesarean delivery (ERCD) in women eligible for trial of labour after caesarean (TOLAC). DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: France. POPULATION AND SAMPLE: Using data from the 2010 French National Perinatal Survey, a representative sample of births in France (n = 14 681 women), we studied two groups of women with prior caesarean section: (i) women eligible for TOLAC according to guidelines (n = 1179) and (ii) a subgroup of these women without any medical characteristics that might indicate ERCD (n = 575). METHODS: Associations were analysed by multilevel logistic regression. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adjusted odds ratios. RESULTS: Among the 1584 women with a previous caesarean, 1179 (74.4%) were eligible for TOLAC according to guidelines (group 1); 490 (41.6%) had ERCD. Risk of ERCD increased with increasing maternal age and body mass index, pre-existing condition and suspected macrosomia and decreased with previous vaginal deliveries. Among the unit characteristics, private status (aOR = 2.3, 95% CI 1.3-4.1) and low level of care (aOR = 2.5, 95% CI 1.4-4.5]) were independently associated with a higher risk of ERCD after adjustment on patient/pregnancy characteristics. The variability of ERCD rate between hospitals was mainly (78%) explained by the status and level of care, and not (0%) by patient/pregnancy characteristics. Associations with unit characteristics were similar for group 2. CONCLUSION: For women eligible for TOLAC, the rate of ERCD is high and not in agreement with guidelines. Some characteristics of women are associated with ERCD, but the main determinants are at the unit level, which suggests that non-medical reasons are involved in the decision process. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Elective repeat caesarean in women eligible for trial of labour mainly depends on maternity unit characteristics.

Elective induction of labour and maternal request: a national population-based study.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the rate of elective inductions in France and the proportion of them that were maternally requested, and to study the factors associated with elective inductions that were or were not requested by women. DESIGN: Cross-sectional population-based study. SETTING: All maternity units in France. POPULATION: About 14 681 women from the 2010 French National Perinatal Survey of a representative sample of births. METHODS: Inductions were classified as elective based on their indications and maternal and fetal characteristics, collected from medical records. Elective inductions requested by women were identified from the mother's postpartum interviews. Polytomous logistic regression analysis was used to study the determinants of inductions that were or were not maternally requested. Women with spontaneous labour served as the comparison group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Rate of elective inductions. RESULTS: The induction rate was 22.6, 13.9% elective. Among elective inductions, 47.3% were requested by women. The characteristics of mothers, pregnancies, and maternity units were similar in both groups of elective inductions. The main associated factors were parity 2 or more [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 4.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.1-7.2 for maternally requested inductions and aOR of 1.8 (95% CI1.2-2.7) for unrequested inductions, compared with parity 0] and private hospital status [aOR 4.5 95% (CI 3.3-6.0) for maternally requested inductions and aOR 3.7 (95% CI 2.8-4.9) for inductions not requested by the mother]. We found no association between maternal social characteristics and type of elective induction. CONCLUSION: Parity and organisational factors appear to influence the decision about elective inductions. It would be interesting to determine how obstetricians and women make this decision and for what reasons. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: About 13.9% of inductions of labour were elective in France, 47.3% of these requested by women.

Wide differences in mode of delivery within Europe: risk-stratified analyses of aggregated routine data from the Euro-Peristat study.

OBJECTIVE: To use data from routine sources to compare rates of obstetric intervention in Europe both overall and for subgroups at higher risk of intervention. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of aggregated routine data. SETTING: Thirty-one European countries or regions contributing data on mode of delivery to the Euro-Peristat project. POPULATION: Births in participating countries in 2010. METHODS: Countries provided aggregated data about overall rates of obstetric intervention and about caesarean section rates for specified subgroups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mode of delivery. RESULTS: Rates of caesarean section ranged from 14.8% to 52.2% of all births and rates of instrumental vaginal delivery ranged from 0.5% to 16.4%. Overall, there was no association between rates of instrumental vaginal delivery and rates of caesarean section, but similarities were observed between some countries that are geographically close and may share common traditions of practice. Associations were observed between caesarean section rates for women with breech and vertex births and with singleton and multiple births but patterns of association for women who had and had not had previous caesarean sections were more complex. CONCLUSIONS: The persisting wide variations in caesarean section and instrumental vaginal delivery rates point to a lack of consensus about practice and raise questions for further investigation. Further research is needed to explore the impact of differences in clinical guidelines, healthcare systems and their financing and parents' and professionals' attitudes to care at delivery.

A global reference for caesarean section rates (C-Model): a multicountry cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: To generate a global reference for caesarean section (CS) rates at health facilities. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Health facilities from 43 countries. POPULATION/SAMPLE: Thirty eight thousand three hundred and twenty-four women giving birth from 22 countries for model building and 10,045,875 women giving birth from 43 countries for model testing. METHODS: We hypothesised that mathematical models could determine the relationship between clinical-obstetric characteristics and CS. These models generated probabilities of CS that could be compared with the observed CS rates. We devised a three-step approach to generate the global benchmark of CS rates at health facilities: creation of a multi-country reference population, building mathematical models, and testing these models. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Area under the ROC curves, diagnostic odds ratio, expected CS rate, observed CS rate. RESULTS: According to the different versions of the model, areas under the ROC curves suggested a good discriminatory capacity of C-Model, with summary estimates ranging from 0.832 to 0.844. The C-Model was able to generate expected CS rates adjusted for the case-mix of the obstetric population. We have also prepared an e-calculator to facilitate use of C-Model (www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/maternal_perinatal_health/c-model/en/). CONCLUSIONS: This article describes the development of a global reference for CS rates. Based on maternal characteristics, this tool was able to generate an individualised expected CS rate for health facilities or groups of health facilities. With C-Model, obstetric teams, health system managers, health facilities, health insurance companies, and governments can produce a customised reference CS rate for assessing use (and overuse) of CS. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: The C-Model provides a customized benchmark for caesarean section rates in health facilities and systems.

Linking databases on perinatal health: a review of the literature and current practices in Europe.

BACKGROUND: International comparisons of perinatal health indicators are complicated by the heterogeneity of data sources on pregnancy, maternal and neonatal outcomes. Record linkage can extend the range of data items available and thus can improve the validity and quality of routine data. We sought to assess the extent to which data are linked routinely for perinatal health research and reporting. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the literature by searching PubMed for perinatal health studies from 2001 to 2011 based on linkage of routine data (data collected continuously at various time intervals). We also surveyed European health monitoring professionals about use of linkage for national perinatal health surveillance. RESULTS: 516 studies fit our inclusion criteria. Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden, the US and the UK contributed 76% of the publications; a further 29 countries contributed at least one publication. Most studies linked vital statistics, hospital records, medical birth registries and cohort data. Other sources were specific registers for: cancer (70), congenital anomalies (56), ART (19), census (19), health professionals (37), insurance (22) prescription (31), and level of education (18). Eighteen of 29 countries (62%) reported linking data for routine perinatal health monitoring. CONCLUSION: Research using linkage is concentrated in a few countries and is not widely practiced in Europe. Broader adoption of data linkage could yield substantial gains for perinatal health research and surveillance.

Interest of T1 parameters for sagittal alignment evaluation of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients.

PURPOSE: In the last few years several reports stressed the importance of sagittal alignment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients. It was recently reported that T1 slope, defined as the angle between the superior endplate of T1 and the horizontal, correlates strongly with overall sagittal parameters. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of T1 parameters (T1-slope and T1-tilt) on sagittal alignment of AIS hypokyphotic patients preoperatively and postoperatively. METHODS: Twenty-nine AIS patients with <20° preoperative hypokyphosis were included in a retrospective study. Surgery systematically comprised hybrid construct with screws below T11, sublaminar bands at thoracic level and a lamino-laminar claw on the upper instrumented vertebra. Preoperative, postoperative and 2-year follow-up radiological assessment included Cobb angle, T1 slope, T1 sagittal tilt, regional sagittal parameters and pelvic parameters. RESULTS: In the series as a whole, coronal Cobb angle was significantly reduced postoperatively (58° vs. 17°; p < 0.001), thoracic kyphosis significantly improved (12.4° vs. 25.6°; p < 0.001) and cervical lordosis significantly restored (6.2° kyphosis vs. 4.1° lordosis; p < 0.001). There was a significant modification in T1-slope (10.2° vs. 18.2°; p < 0.001). Preoperatively, T1 slope was significantly correlated with T1 tilt (r = 0.427; p = 0.029). Postoperatively, T1 slope was significantly correlated with T1 tilt (r = 0.549; p = 0.002), thoracic kyphosis (r = 0.535, p = 0.005) and cervical lordosis (r = -0.444, p = 0.03). Restoration of cervical lordosis was significantly correlated to changes of T1-slope (r = -0.393, p = 0.032), which was significantly correlated to postoperative thoracic kyphosis. CONCLUSION: According to these results, T1 seems to be of major interest in postoperative modifications of sagittal alignment. T1 slope and sagittal tilt are good indicators of postoperative changes for regional (cervical lordosis and thoracic kyphosis) and global parameters. We therefore consider these parameters as essential in the assessment of AIS patients. Further studies and correlation with clinical scores will, however, be necessary in order to confirm the present findings.

Poor effectiveness of antenatal detection of fetal growth restriction and consequences for obstetric management and neonatal outcomes: a French national study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the proportion of small for gestational age (SGA) and normal birthweight infants suspected of fetal growth restriction (FGR) during pregnancy, and to investigate obstetric and neonatal outcomes by suspicion of FGR and SGA status at birth. DESIGN: Population-based study. SETTING: All French maternity units in 2010. POPULATION: Representative sample of singleton births (n = 14,100). METHODS: We compared SGA infants with a birthweight of less than the 10th percentile suspected of FGR, defined as mention of FGR in medical charts (true positives), non-SGA infants suspected of FGR (false positives), SGA infants without suspicion of FGR (false negatives) and non-SGA infants without suspicion of FGR (true negatives). Multivariable analyses were adjusted for maternal and neonatal characteristics hypothesised to affect closer surveillance for FGR and our outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Obstetric management (caesarean, provider-initiated preterm and early term delivery) and neonatal outcomes (late fetal death, preterm birth, Apgar score, resuscitation at birth). RESULTS: 21.7% of SGA infants (n = 265) and 2.1% of non-SGA infants (n = 271) were suspected of FGR during pregnancy. Compared with true negatives, provider-initiated preterm deliveries were higher for true and false positives (adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 6.1 [95% CI, 3.8-9.8] and 4.6 [95% CI, 3.2-6.7]), but not for false negatives (aRR, 1.1 [95% CI, 0.6-1.9]). Neonatal outcomes were not better for SGA infants if FGR was suspected. CONCLUSION: Antenatal suspicion of FGR among SGA infants was low and one-half of infants suspected of FGR were not SGA. The increased risk of provider-initiated delivery observed in non-SGA infants suspected of FGR raises concerns about the iatrogenic consequences of screening.