Humoral profiling of pediatric patients with cancer reveals robust immunity following anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination superior to natural infection.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric patients with cancer infected with COVID-19 may be at higher risk of severe disease and may be unable to mount an adequate response to the virus due to compromised immunity secondary to their cancer therapy. PROCEDURE: This study presents immunologic analyses of 20 pediatric patients with cancer, on active chemotherapy or having previously received chemotherapy, and measures their immunoglobulin titers and activation of cellular immunity response to acute SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccination compared with healthy pediatric controls. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were enrolled, of which 10 were actively receiving chemotherapy, 10 had previously received chemotherapy, and 23 were healthy controls. Pediatric patients with cancer had similar immunoglobulin titers, antibody binding capacity, and effector function assay activity after vaccination against COVID-19 compared with healthy controls, though more variability in response was noted in the cohort actively receiving chemotherapy. Compared with acute infection, vaccination against COVID-19 produced superior immunoglobulin responses, particularly IgA1, IgG1, and IgG3, and elicited superior binding capacity and effector function in children with cancer and healthy controls. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric patients receiving chemotherapy and those who had previously received chemotherapy had adequate immune activation after both vaccination and acute infection compared to healthy pediatric controls, although there was a demonstrated variability in response for the patients on active chemotherapy. Vaccination against COVID-19 produced superior immune responses compared to acute SARS-CoV-2 infection in pediatric patients with cancer and healthy children, underscoring the importance of vaccination even in previously infected individuals.

Clinical Features and Risk Factors Associated With Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children With Cancer and COVID-19.

Importance: Little is known about the risk of post-COVID-19 multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) in the setting of childhood cancer. Objective: To evaluate factors associated with MIS-C and describe the clinical course of COVID-19 in the setting of MIS-C. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multisite observational cohort study of a registry representing more than 100 US pediatric oncology sites. All included patients were registered between April 1, 2020, and May 18, 2022. Sites submitted deidentified data surrounding sociodemographics, cancer diagnosis and treatment, and COVID-19 course (symptoms, maximum support required, outcome). Patients with MIS-C (n = 24) were compared with matched controls (n = 96). Children (<21 years) with cancer who developed COVID-19 while receiving cancer treatment or within 1 year of completing treatment were characterized based on their development of MIS-C. Exposures: (1) Clinical and sociodemographic characteristics of children with cancer and COVID-19; and (2) MIS-C. Main Outcomes and Measures: (1) Development of MIS-C among children with cancer and COVID-19; and (2) symptoms and disease severity associated with MIS-C. Results: Among 2035 children with cancer and COVID-19, 24 (1.2%) developed MIS-C. COVID-19 occurred at a median (IQR) age of 12.5 (5.5-17.1) years in those with MIS-C and 11 (6-16) years among matched controls (P = .86). The majority of children with MIS-C had a hematologic cancer (83.3% [n = 20]), were publicly insured (66.7% [n = 16]), and were Hispanic (54.2% [n = 13]). Half (n = 12) had 1 or more noncancer comorbidity. Those with comorbidities were more likely to develop MIS-C than those without (odds ratio [OR], 2.5 [95% CI, 1.1-5.7]). Among children with MIS-C, 100% (n = 24) were admitted to the hospital and 54.2% (n = 13) to the intensive care unit (ICU), while COVID-19 contributed to the death of 20.1% (n = 5); cancer therapy was changed in 62.5% (n = 15). Compared with matched controls, those with MIS-C had higher odds of symptoms classified as systemic (OR, 4.7 [95% CI, 1.4-15.8]) or gastrointestinal (OR, 5.0 [95% CI, 1.7-14.6]) along with higher odds of hospitalization (OR, 42.9 [95% CI, 7.1-258]), ICU admission (OR, 11.4 [95% CI, 3.6-36.4]), and changes to cancer therapy (OR, 24.9 [95% CI, 6.5-94.8]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study among children with cancer and COVID-19, those with MIS-C had a more severe clinical course than those without MIS-C. The risk of MIS-C and its severity are important to consider as clinicians monitor patients with COVID-19. These findings can inform their conversations with families regarding COVID-19 risks and the benefits of prevention strategies that are pharmacologic (vaccination) and nonpharmacologic (masking), as well as treatment (antivirals, monoclonal antibodies).

Pediatric PK/PD Phase I Trial of Pexidartinib in Relapsed and Refractory Leukemias and Solid Tumors Including Neurofibromatosis Type I-Related Plexiform Neurofibromas.

PURPOSE: Simultaneously targeting the tumor and tumor microenvironment may hold promise in treating children with refractory solid tumors. Pexidartinib, an oral inhibitor of tyrosine kinases including colony stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF-1R), KIT, and FLT3, is FDA approved in adults with tenosynovial giant cell tumor. A phase I trial was conducted in pediatric and young adult patients with refractory leukemias or solid tumors including neurofibromatosis type 1-related plexiform neurofibromas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A rolling six design with dose levels (DL) of 400 mg/m2, 600 mg/m2, and 800 mg/m2 once daily for 28-day cycles (C) was used. Response was assessed at regular intervals. Pharmacokinetics and population pharmacokinetics were analyzed during C1. RESULTS: Twelve patients (4 per DL, 9 evaluable) enrolled on the dose-escalation phase and 4 patients enrolled in the expansion cohort: median (lower, upper quartile) age 16 (14, 16.5) years. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Pharmacokinetics appeared linear over three DLs. Pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation determined a weight-based recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Two patients had stable disease and 1 patient with peritoneal mesothelioma (C49+) had a sustained partial response (67% RECIST reduction). Pharmacodynamic markers included a rise in plasma macrophage CSF (MCSF) levels and a decrease in absolute monocyte count. CONCLUSIONS: Pexidartinib in pediatric patients was well tolerated at all DL tested, achieved target inhibition, and resulted in a weight-based RPD2 dose.