Effect of High-Intensity Interval Training, Moderate Continuous Training, or Guideline-Based Physical Activity Advice on Peak Oxygen Consumption in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Endurance exercise is effective in improving peak oxygen consumption (peak V̇o2) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, it remains unknown whether differing modes of exercise have different effects. Objective: To determine whether high-intensity interval training, moderate continuous training, and guideline-based advice on physical activity have different effects on change in peak V̇o2 in patients with HFpEF. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized clinical trial at 5 sites (Berlin, Leipzig, and Munich, Germany; Antwerp, Belgium; and Trondheim, Norway) from July 2014 to September 2018. From 532 screened patients, 180 sedentary patients with chronic, stable HFpEF were enrolled. Outcomes were analyzed by core laboratories blinded to treatment groups; however, the patients and staff conducting the evaluations were not blinded. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1; n = 60 per group) to high-intensity interval training (3 × 38 minutes/week), moderate continuous training (5 × 40 minutes/week), or guideline control (1-time advice on physical activity according to guidelines) for 12 months (3 months in clinic followed by 9 months telemedically supervised home-based exercise). Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary end point was change in peak V̇o2 after 3 months, with the minimal clinically important difference set at 2.5 mL/kg/min. Secondary end points included changes in metrics of cardiorespiratory fitness, diastolic function, and natriuretic peptides after 3 and 12 months. Results: Among 180 patients who were randomized (mean age, 70 years; 120 women [67%]), 166 (92%) and 154 (86%) completed evaluation at 3 and 12 months, respectively. Change in peak V̇o2 over 3 months for high-intensity interval training vs guideline control was 1.1 vs -0.6 mL/kg/min (difference, 1.5 [95% CI, 0.4 to 2.7]); for moderate continuous training vs guideline control, 1.6 vs -0.6 mL/kg/min (difference, 2.0 [95% CI, 0.9 to 3.1]); and for high-intensity interval training vs moderate continuous training, 1.1 vs 1.6 mL/kg/min (difference, -0.4 [95% CI, -1.4 to 0.6]). No comparisons were statistically significant after 12 months. There were no significant changes in diastolic function or natriuretic peptides. Acute coronary syndrome was recorded in 4 high-intensity interval training patients (7%), 3 moderate continuous training patients (5%), and 5 guideline control patients (8%). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with HFpEF, there was no statistically significant difference in change in peak V̇o2 at 3 months between those assigned to high-intensity interval vs moderate continuous training, and neither group met the prespecified minimal clinically important difference compared with the guideline control. These findings do not support either high-intensity interval training or moderate continuous training compared with guideline-based physical activity for patients with HFpEF. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02078947.

Outcome assessment using estimation of left ventricular filling pressure in asymptomatic patients at risk for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

AIMS: High prevalence and lack of pharmacological treatment are making heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) a growing public health problem. No algorithm for the screening of asymptomatic patients with risk for HFpEF exists to date. We assessed whether HFA/ESC 2007 diagnostic criteria for HFpEF are helpful to investigate the cardiovascular outcome in asymptomatic patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed an analysis of the Diagnostic Trial on Prevalence and Clinical Course of Diastolic Dysfunction and Heart Failure (DIAST-CHF) that recruited patients with cardiovascular risk factors. All patients underwent a comprehensive diagnostic workup at baseline. Asymptomatic patients with preserved LVEF (>50%) were selected and classified according to HFA/ESC surrogate criteria for left ventricular elevated filling pressure (mean E/e' >15 or E/e' >8 and presence of either NT-proBNP > 220 ng/l, BNP > 200 ng/l or atrial fibrillation) into elevated filling pressure (FPe) or controls. Cardiovascular hospitalizations and all-cause death were assessed for both groups over a 10-year-follow-up.851 asymptomatic patients (age 65.5 ± 7.6 years, 44% female) were included in the analysis. FPe-patients were significantly older (p < 0.001), more often female (p = 0.003) and more often had a history of coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation and renal dysfunction (p < 0.001, respectively) compared to controls. Incidence of death was significantly higher in the FPe group after a 10-year follow-up (p < 0.001), whereas cardiovascular hospitalization did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION: Asymptomatic patients that fulfill HFA/ESC diagnostic criteria for HFpEF are at higher risk of symptomatic HFpEF and have a worse 10-year-outcome than those who do not fulfill criteria.

Diastolic stress test echocardiography in patients with suspected heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a pilot study.

AIMS: The purpose of this pilot study was to assess the potential usefulness of diastolic stress test (DST) echocardiography in patients with suspected heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with suspected HFpEF (left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 50%, exertional dyspnoea, septal E/e' at rest 9-14, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) at rest < 220 pg/mL; n = 13) and a control group constituted from asymptomatic patients with arterial hypertension (n = 19) and healthy subjects (n = 18) were included. All patients were analysed by two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography at rest and during exercise (DST) and underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing and NT-proBNP analysis during exercise. HFpEF during exercise was defined as exertional dyspnoea and peak VO2  ≤ 20.0 mL/min/kg. In patients with suspected HFpEF at rest, 84.6% of these patients developed HFpEF during exercise, whereas in the group of asymptomatic patients with hypertension and healthy subjects, the rate of developed HFpEF during exercise was 0%. Regarding the diagnostic performance of DST to detect HFpEF during exercise, an E/e' ratio >15 during exercise was the most accurate parameter to detect HFpEF (accuracy 86%), albeit a low sensitivity (45.5%). Nonetheless, combining E/e' with tricuspid regurgitation (TR) velocity > 2.8 m/s during exercise provided a significant increase in the sensitivity to detect patients with HFpEF during exercise (sensitivity 72.7%, specificity 79.5%, and accuracy 78%). Consistent with these findings, an increase of E/e' was significantly linked to worse peak VO2 , and the combination of an increase of both E/e' and TR velocity was associated with elevated NT-proBNP values during exercise. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this pilot study suggest that DST using E/e' ratio and TR velocity could be of potential usefulness to diagnose HFpEF during exercise in patients with suspected HFpEF at rest.

Exercise training in patients with a left ventricular assist device (Ex-VAD): rationale and design of a multicentre, prospective, assessor-blinded, randomized, controlled trial.

AIMS: Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy is a promising option for patients with advanced heart failure (HF), refractory to guideline-mandated medical treatment either as a bridge to heart transplantation or as lifelong therapy. Functional capacity improves after LVAD implantation but remains reduced in patients with long-term LVAD therapy. Exercise training (ET) improves functional capacity and quality of life (QoL) in HF and may provide incremental benefits in patients supported with LVAD therapy. METHODS: The primary objective of Ex-VAD is to investigate whether a 12-week supervised ET can improve peak oxygen uptake (peakVO2 ) measured by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) on an ergometer. The study is powered to demonstrate a group difference of 3 mL/min/kg in peakVO2 at week 12, with a power of 0.9 and a standard deviation of 5 mL/min/kg. After baseline assessments to determine whether ET is safe, 66 patients at six trial sites with advanced HF and LVAD therapy will be randomized 2:1 to supervised ET or to the control arm of usual care alone. Patients randomized to ET will perform supervised aerobic endurance and resistance ET (three times/week) for 12 weeks. At baseline and during follow-up, anthropometry, CPET, echocardiography (at rest and exercise), and QoL evaluation will be performed. Blood samples will be collected to examine cardiac-specific relevant biomarkers. Overall physical activity, training sessions, and adherence will be monitored and documented throughout the study using accelerometers and patient diaries. CONCLUSIONS: The Ex-VAD trial will assess the effects of a supervised ET programme on peakVO2 and QoL in patients with LVAD. As LVAD therapy moves from crisis support to ambulatory functional enhancement, this trial will provide a rationale to improve functional capacity and, in perspective, cardiovascular outcomes in LVAD-supported patients with advanced HF.

Investigating a biomarker-driven approach to target collagen turnover in diabetic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction patients. Effect of torasemide versus furosemide on serum C-terminal propeptide of procollagen type I (DROP-PIP trial).

AIM: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is associated with myocardial remodelling including severe pro-fibrotic changes contributing to an increase in left ventricular stiffness and diastolic dysfunction. Serum C-terminal propeptide of procollagen type I (PIP) strongly correlates with the turnover of extracellular cardiac matrix proteins and fibrosis. Torasemide, but not furosemide, was described to reduce collagen type I synthesis in clinically unstable patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. We evaluated whether its effect translated to HFpEF patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and abnormal basal PIP levels. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a relatively small, single-centre, randomised, double-blind, two-arm parallel-group, active controlled clinical trial in 35 HFpEF patients with T2DM to determine the effects of a 9-month treatment with torasemide vs. furosemide on changes of serum PIP levels. Patients with increased PIP levels (≥110 ng/mL), or evidence of structural changes with a left atrial volume index (LAVI) >29 mL/m2 and abnormal PIP levels (≥70 ng/mL), were eligible to participate. Fifteen patients were female (42%), mean age was 69 years, body mass index was 34.7 kg/m2 , 83% were in New York Heart Association class II/III. Echocardiographic characteristics showed a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of >60%, a left ventricular mass index >120 g/m2 , an E/e' ratio of 14, and a LAVI of 40 mL/m2 with a NT-proBNP of 174 ng/L and a 6-minute walk distance of 421 m. Mean per cent change in PIP was 2.63 ± 5.68% (±SEM) in torasemide vs. 2.74 ± 6.49% in furosemide (P = 0.9898) treated patients. Torasemide was not superior to furosemide in improving functional capacity, diastolic function, quality of life, or neuroendocrine activation. CONCLUSION: In this hypothesis-generating, mechanistic trial in stable HFpEF patients with T2DM, neither long-term administration of torasemide nor furosemide was associated with a significant effect on myocardial fibrosis, as assessed by serum PIP. Further studies are urgently needed in this field. More specific diuretic and anti-fibrotic treatment strategies in T2DM and/or HFpEF are warranted.

Amount or intensity? Potential targets of exercise interventions in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

AIMS: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains a common condition with no pharmacological treatment. Physical activity (PA) improves symptoms and quality of life (QoL), but no clear recommendations exist on PA in HFpEF patients. We investigated the association of PA (amount/intensity) on clinical phenotype in HFpEF. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Aldosterone in Diastolic Heart Failure trial investigated spironolactone vs. placebo in stable HFpEF patients. At baseline, all patients underwent detailed phenotypization including echocardiography, cardiopulmonary exercise testing, 6 minute walking test (6MWT), and QoL assessment (36-item Short-Form questionnaire). PA was assessed by a self-report questionnaire, classified in metabolic equivalents of task (MET) and analysed with regard to exercise capacity, diastolic function, and QoL. Four hundred twenty-two patients (52% women, age 67 ± 8 years, New York Heart Association II and III) were classified by weekly MET hours into a low (<70), middle (70-140), or high (>140) level of PA. Total PA correlated positively with 6MWT distance (r = 0.17; P = 0.002) and physical function of QoL (r = 0.10; P = 0.05), but not with peak oxygen uptake (peakVO2 ). In contrast, both 6MWT distance and peakVO2 were significantly higher in patients who performed high-intensity PA for >8 h/week (P < 0.001, P = 0.02, respectively). Time of high-intensity PA was related to higher 6MWT distance (r = 0.21, P < 0.001), peakVO2 , and better physical function of QoL (both r = 0.13, P = 0.01), whereas low-intensity PA did not show significant associations. Interestingly, PA was not related to any measure of diastolic function. CONCLUSIONS: A higher amount of PA is related to higher submaximal exercise capacity and physical function of QoL. Regarding maximal exercise capacity, only high-intensity PA showed significant association in HFpEF patients.

Arterial stiffness and elevated left ventricular filling pressure in patients at risk for the development or a previous diagnosis of HF-A subgroup analysis from the DIAST-CHF study.

Left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP) is a marker for diastolic dysfunction and heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (pEF). The interaction between arterial stiffness (AS) and elevated LVFP has not been sufficiently investigated. In 257 patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (mean age: 66 years, 53% female, mean left ventricular ejection fraction: 61%) and at least one cardiovascular risk factor (eg, hypertension and diabetes) for the development of HF or a previous diagnosis of HF, LVFP was estimated in accordance with the recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography (elevated when E/e' ≥ 13, left atrial volume index ≥ 34 mL/m2). LVFP was correlated with radial pulse wave analysis (augmentation index normalized by 75 b/min [AIx@75]) and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV). Thirty-eight percent of patients demonstrated an elevated LVFP. These patients were significantly older (68.3 ± 7.4 vs. 63.5 ± 7.6 years, P < .001), demonstrated a higher body mass index (29.8 ± 4.6 vs. 28.0 ± 5.0; P < .01), presented more often with hypertension (89.7% vs. 73.1%, P < .01), hypercholesterolemia (32.0% vs. 21.3%, P < .05), dyspnea on exertion (28.4% vs. 16.6%, P < .05), and peripheral edema (25.3% vs. 10.2%, P < .01). cfPWV and AIx@75 and were significantly elevated in patients with elevated LVFP (12.2 ± 2.7 m/s vs. 10.5 ± 2.6 m/s, P < .001, an 29.2 ± 6.7% vs. 27.4 ± 6.7%, P < .05 respectively). cfPWV and AIx@75 were correlated with echocardiographic parameters, that is, posterior wall thickness (r = 0.292, P < .001; r = 0.167, P < .01), left ventricular mass index (r = 0.255, P < .001; r = -0.192, P < .01), e' (r = -0.508, P < .001; r = -0.159, P < .05), and E/e' (r = 0.380, P < .001; r = 0.200, P < .01). cfPWV correlated with left atrial volume index (r = 0.189, P < .05) and increasing E/A ratio (r = -0.334, P < .001). Multivariate linear regression analysis demonstrated age and PWV as most important and independent predictors of LVFP elevation in the cohort. Increased AS measured by cfPWV was associated with an elevated LVFP in patients with preserved systolic function. Whether targeting AS as a major component of diastolic dysfunction and HF with preserved ejection fraction needs to be further investigated.

Exercise training in Diastolic Heart Failure (Ex-DHF): rationale and design of a multicentre, prospective, randomized, controlled, parallel group trial.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a common disease with high incidence and increasing prevalence. Patients suffer from functional limitation, poor health-related quality of life, and reduced prognosis. A pilot study in a smaller group of HFpEF patients showed that structured, supervised exercise training (ET) improves maximal exercise capacity, diastolic function, and physical quality of life. However, the long-term effects of ET on patient-related outcomes remain unclear in HFpEF. The primary objective of the Exercise training in Diastolic Heart Failure (Ex-DHF) trial is to investigate whether a 12 month supervised ET can improve a clinically meaningful composite outcome score in HFpEF patients. Components of the outcome score are all-cause mortality, hospitalizations, NYHA functional class, global self-rated health, maximal exercise capacity, and diastolic function. After undergoing baseline assessments to determine whether ET can be performed safely, 320 patients at 11 trial sites with stable HFpEF are randomized 1:1 to supervised ET in addition to usual care or to usual care alone. Patients randomized to ET perform supervised endurance/resistance ET (3 times/week at a certified training centre) for 12 months. At baseline and during follow-up, anthropometry, echocardiography, cardiopulmonary exercise testing, and health-related quality of life evaluation are performed. Blood samples are collected to examine various biomarkers. Overall physical activity, training sessions, and adherence are monitored and documented throughout the study using patient diaries, heart rate monitors, and accelerometers. The Ex-DHF trial is the first multicentre trial to assess the long-term effects of a supervised ET programme on different outcome measures in patients with HFpEF.