Duration of response after DEB-TACE compared to lipiodol-TACE in HCC-naïve patients: a propensity score matching analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively compare long-term outcomes of first-line drug-eluting particle (DEB)- transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and lipiodol-TACE, in patients with unresectable hepatocellular (HCC). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our database to identify adult patients with treatment-naïve unresectable HCC, who underwent TACE from 2006 to 2013. Patients were excluded in the absence of complete medical records relative to first TACE, 1-month follow-up, and/or sufficient follow-up data. Periprocedural complications, duration of hospitalization, 1-month tumor response by mRECIST, time to tumor progression (TTP) and target tumor progression (TTTP), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. RESULTS: Out of an initial series of 656 patients, 329 patients were excluded for unavailability of sufficient baseline and/or follow-up data. The remaining 327 patients underwent either lipiodol-TACE (n = 160) or DEB-TACE (n = 167). Patients treated with lipiodol-TACE had a significantly higher tumor burden. By propensity score, patients were matched according to baseline differences (BCLC stage, uninodular or multinodular HCC, and unilobar or bilobar HCC), resulting in 101 patients in each treatment group. Lipiodol-TACE was associated with a significantly higher incidence of adverse events (p = 0.03), and longer hospitalization (mean, 2.5 days vs 1.9 days; p = 0.03), while tumor response, TTP, and OS were comparable. In patients achieving 1-month complete response (CR) of target tumor, TTTP was significantly (p = 0.009) longer after DEB-TACE compared to lipiodol-TACE (median, 835 vs 353 days), resulting in a lower number of re-treatments during the entire follow-up (0.75 vs 1.6, p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Compared to lipiodol-TACE, DEB-TACE offers higher tolerability, reduced hospitalization, and more durable target tumor response after CR. KEY POINTS: • Compared to lipiodol-TACE, DEB-TACE is better tolerated and has reduced side effects, which translates into shorter hospitalization. • When complete radiological response according to the mRECIST is obtained 1 month after the procedure, DEB-TACE offers a more durable local tumor control compared to lipiodol-TACE. • In these patients, the longer duration of response after DEB-TACE translates into a lower number of re-interventions.

Comparison between radioiodine therapy and single-session radiofrequency ablation of autonomously functioning thyroid nodules: A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of Radioiodine (RI) and Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in the treatment of autonomously functioning thyroid nodules (AFTNs). End-points: nodule volume reduction (NVR) and thyroid function normalization. DESIGN, PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS: Twenty-two patients (2:20 M:F; 51.9 ± 13.9 years) affected by 25 AFTNs, treated by RFA were retrospectively compared with 25 patients (8:17 M:F; 57.2 ± 12.8 years) affected by a single AFTN treated by RI. Both group showed analogous characteristics as to age, gender, toxic/pretoxic phase and pretreatment nodule volume (calculated by the ellipsoid formula). Thyroid hormone levels and autoimmune thyroid profile were assessed before treatment. A fixed RI activity of 555 MBq (15 mCi) was administered. RFA was performed with an 18G, single-tipped electrode, by the "modified moving shot technique." Thyroid hormones were assessed and the nodule post-treatment volume calculated 12 months after treatment. RESULTS: No statistical difference was found between the post-treatment NVR by comparing RI and RFA (P = 0.69). The volume reduction rates were 68.4 ± 28.9% and 76.4 ± 16.9% after RI and RFA, respectively. As to the thyroid function, 5/25 patients developed clinical hypothyroidism after RI. After RFA, all the 22 patients silenced their AFTN and normalized the thyroid hormones. Subclinical hypothyroidism was recorded in two patients after both RI and RFA. Thus, the functional therapeutic success, defined as the restoration of euthyroidism, was achieved in 18/25 (72%) patients treated by RI and in 20/22 (90.9%) treated by RFA. CONCLUSIONS: No statistical difference in NVR was found between RI and RFA. All patients responded to RI but 5/25 were "over-treated" developing hypothyroidism. RFA was effective in all patients with no case of post-treatment clinical hypothyroidism. No radiation exposure and lower risk of post-treatment hypothyroidism might make RFA the favourite option especially for young patients.

Radiofrequency Ablation in the Treatment of Benign Thyroid Nodules: An Efficient and Safe Alternative to Surgery.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency (RF) ablation in the treatment of benign thyroid nodules (BTNs) by applying a modification of the moving-shot technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-one BTNs in 46 patients for whom surgery was contraindicated or who refused surgery were treated with RF ablation: 31 had lesion volumes < 20 cm3 (group A) and 20 had volumes ≥ 20 cm3 (group B). The solid component percentage of each lesion was assessed, and any present fluid component was aspirated. Symptomatic scores and cosmetic scores (CSs) were assessed. All RF ablations were performed under ultrasound (US) guidance with an 18-gauge electrode. Treatment response was evaluated by contrast-enhanced US at 6-month intervals for 18 months in group A. In group B, after the 6- and 12-month follow-up assessments, a second treatment was performed in selected cases, and the 6-month contrast-enhanced US follow-up was started again. Volume reduction rate (VRR) was evaluated at each follow-up examination. RESULTS: No permanent paralysis of the laryngeal nerve was observed; 2 patients experienced transient hoarseness. In all nodules treated with a single RF ablation session, the VRRs at 6, 12, and 18 months were 69.4%, 78.7%, and 84% in group A, respectively, and 66.6%, 79.4%, and 81.5% in group B, respectively. The VRRs of group B nodules treated with a second RF ablation procedure (n = 6) were 86.4% and 88.2% at 6 and 12 mo after the second treatment, respectively. All patients reported symptom relief and CS improvement. CONCLUSIONS: RF ablation is a reliable alternative to surgery in patients affected by BTNs and can be safely repeated in selected cases.