RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Clinical trials that have assessed the effect of revascularization in patients with stable coronary disease have routinely excluded those with advanced chronic kidney disease. METHODS: We randomly assigned 777 patients with advanced kidney disease and moderate or severe ischemia on stress testing to be treated with an initial invasive strategy consisting of coronary angiography and revascularization (if appropriate) added to medical therapy or an initial conservative strategy consisting of medical therapy alone and angiography reserved for those in whom medical therapy had failed. The primary outcome was a composite of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction. A key secondary outcome was a composite of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for unstable angina, heart failure, or resuscitated cardiac arrest. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 2.2 years, a primary outcome event had occurred in 123 patients in the invasive-strategy group and in 129 patients in the conservative-strategy group (estimated 3-year event rate, 36.4% vs. 36.7%; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79 to 1.29; P = 0.95). Results for the key secondary outcome were similar (38.5% vs. 39.7%; hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.29). The invasive strategy was associated with a higher incidence of stroke than the conservative strategy (hazard ratio, 3.76; 95% CI, 1.52 to 9.32; P = 0.004) and with a higher incidence of death or initiation of dialysis (hazard ratio, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.04 to 2.11; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with stable coronary disease, advanced chronic kidney disease, and moderate or severe ischemia, we did not find evidence that an initial invasive strategy, as compared with an initial conservative strategy, reduced the risk of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and others; ISCHEMIA-CKD ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01985360.).
Asunto(s)
Angiografía Coronaria , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Isquemia Miocárdica/tratamiento farmacológico , Isquemia Miocárdica/cirugía , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Bloqueadores de los Canales de Calcio/uso terapéutico , Prueba de Esfuerzo , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/prevención & control , Isquemia Miocárdica/complicaciones , Isquemia Miocárdica/mortalidad , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Among patients with stable coronary disease and moderate or severe ischemia, whether clinical outcomes are better in those who receive an invasive intervention plus medical therapy than in those who receive medical therapy alone is uncertain. METHODS: We randomly assigned 5179 patients with moderate or severe ischemia to an initial invasive strategy (angiography and revascularization when feasible) and medical therapy or to an initial conservative strategy of medical therapy alone and angiography if medical therapy failed. The primary outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for unstable angina, heart failure, or resuscitated cardiac arrest. A key secondary outcome was death from cardiovascular causes or myocardial infarction. RESULTS: Over a median of 3.2 years, 318 primary outcome events occurred in the invasive-strategy group and 352 occurred in the conservative-strategy group. At 6 months, the cumulative event rate was 5.3% in the invasive-strategy group and 3.4% in the conservative-strategy group (difference, 1.9 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8 to 3.0); at 5 years, the cumulative event rate was 16.4% and 18.2%, respectively (difference, -1.8 percentage points; 95% CI, -4.7 to 1.0). Results were similar with respect to the key secondary outcome. The incidence of the primary outcome was sensitive to the definition of myocardial infarction; a secondary analysis yielded more procedural myocardial infarctions of uncertain clinical importance. There were 145 deaths in the invasive-strategy group and 144 deaths in the conservative-strategy group (hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.32). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with stable coronary disease and moderate or severe ischemia, we did not find evidence that an initial invasive strategy, as compared with an initial conservative strategy, reduced the risk of ischemic cardiovascular events or death from any cause over a median of 3.2 years. The trial findings were sensitive to the definition of myocardial infarction that was used. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and others; ISCHEMIA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01471522.).
Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Cardíaco , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Enfermedad Coronaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad Coronaria/cirugía , Revascularización Miocárdica/métodos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Anciano , Angina Inestable/epidemiología , Teorema de Bayes , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Angiografía Coronaria , Enfermedad Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Isquemia Miocárdica/terapia , Calidad de VidaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Women with chronic coronary disease are generally older than men and have more comorbidities but less atherosclerosis. We explored sex differences in revascularization, guideline-directed medical therapy, and outcomes among patients with chronic coronary disease with ischemia on stress testing, with and without invasive management. METHODS AND RESULTS: The ISCHEMIA (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches) trial randomized patients with moderate or severe ischemia to invasive management with angiography, revascularization, and guideline-directed medical therapy, or initial conservative management with guideline-directed medical therapy alone. We evaluated the primary outcome (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for unstable angina, heart failure, or resuscitated cardiac arrest) and other end points, by sex, in 1168 (22.6%) women and 4011 (77.4%) men. Invasive group catheterization rates were similar, with less revascularization among women (73.4% of invasive-assigned women revascularized versus 81.2% of invasive-assigned men; P<0.001). Women had less coronary artery disease: multivessel in 60.0% of invasive-assigned women and 74.8% of invasive-assigned men, and no ≥50% stenosis in 12.3% versus 4.5% (P<0.001). In the conservative group, 4-year catheterization rates were 26.3% of women versus 25.6% of men (P=0.72). Guideline-directed medical therapy use was lower among women with fewer risk factor goals attained. There were no sex differences in the primary outcome (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] for women versus men, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.77-1.13]; P=0.47) or the major secondary outcome of cardiovascular death/myocardial infarction (adjusted HR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.76-1.14]; P=0.49), with no significant sex-by-treatment-group interactions. CONCLUSIONS: Women had less extensive coronary artery disease and, therefore, lower revascularization rates in the invasive group. Despite lower risk factor goal attainment, women with chronic coronary disease experienced similar risk-adjusted outcomes to men in the ISCHEMIA trial. REGISTRATION: URL: http://wwwclinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01471522.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Infarto del Miocardio , Isquemia Miocárdica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Enfermedad Crónica , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/complicaciones , Objetivos , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Isquemia Miocárdica/terapia , Isquemia Miocárdica/complicaciones , Caracteres Sexuales , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Heart failure is one of the key causes of morbidity and mortality world-wide. The recent findings that regeneration is possible in the heart have made stem cell therapeutics the Holy Grail of modern cardiovascular medicine. The success of cardiac regenerative therapies hinges on the combination of an effective allogeneic "off the shelf" cell product with a practical delivery system. In 2007 Medistem discovered the Endometrial Regenerative Cell (ERC), a new mesenchymal-like stem cell. Medistem and subsequently independent groups have demonstrated that ERC are superior to bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (MSC), the most widely used stem cell source in development. ERC possess robust expansion capability (one donor can generate 20,000 patients doses), key growth factor production and high levels of angiogenic activity. ERC have been published in the peer reviewed literature to be significantly more effect at treating animal models of heart failure (Hida et al. Stem Cells 2008).Current methods of delivering stem cells into the heart suffer several limitations in addition to poor delivery efficiency. Surgical methods are highly invasive, and the classical catheter based techniques are limited by need for sophisticated cardiac mapping systems and risk of myocardial perforation. Medistem together with Dr. Amit Patel Director of Clinical Regenerative Medicine at University of Utah have developed a novel minimally invasive delivery method that has been demonstrated safe and effective for delivery of stem cells (Tuma et al. J Transl Med 2012). Medistem is evaluating the combination of ERC, together with our retrograde delivery procedure in a 60 heart failure patient, double blind, placebo controlled phase II trial. To date 17 patients have been dosed and preliminary analysis by the Data Safety Monitoring Board has allowed for trial continuation.The combined use of a novel "off the shelf" cell together with a minimally invasive 30 minute delivery method provides a potentially paradigm-shifting approach to cardiac regenerative therapy.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células , Endometrio/citología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Animales , Trasplante de Células/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Animales , Medicina RegenerativaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In ISCHEMIA-CKD, 777 patients with advanced chronic kidney disease and chronic coronary disease had similar all-cause mortality with either an initial invasive or conservative strategy (27.2% vs 27.8%, respectively). OBJECTIVES: This prespecified secondary analysis from ISCHEMIA-CKD (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches-Chronic Kidney Disease) was conducted to determine whether an initial invasive strategy compared with a conservative strategy decreased the incidence of cardiovascular (CV) vs non-CV causes of death. METHODS: Three-year cumulative incidences were calculated for the adjudicated cause of death. Overall and cause-specific death by treatment strategy were analyzed using Cox models adjusted for baseline covariates. The association between cause of death, risk factors, and treatment strategy were identified. RESULTS: A total of 192 of the 777 participants died during follow-up, including 94 (12.1%) of a CV cause, 59 (7.6%) of a non-CV cause, and 39 (5.0%) of an undetermined cause. The 3-year cumulative rates of CV death were similar between the invasive and conservative strategies (14.6% vs 12.6%, respectively; HR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.75-1.70). Non-CV death rates were also similar between the invasive and conservative arms (8.4% and 8.2%, respectively; HR: 1.25; 95% CI: 0.75-2.09). Sudden cardiac death (46.8% of CV deaths) and infection (54.2% of non-CV deaths) were the most common cause-specific deaths and did not vary by treatment strategy. CONCLUSIONS: In ISCHEMIA-CKD, CV death was more common than non-CV or undetermined death during the 3-year follow-up. The randomized treatment assignment did not affect the cause-specific incidences of death in participants with advanced CKD and moderate or severe myocardial ischemia. (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches-Chronic Kidney Disease [ISCHEMIA-CKD]; NCT01985360).
Asunto(s)
Isquemia Miocárdica , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Humanos , Causas de Muerte , Isquemia , Isquemia Miocárdica/diagnóstico , Isquemia Miocárdica/terapia , Isquemia Miocárdica/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/terapia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Anatomic complete revascularization (ACR) and functional complete revascularization (FCR) have been associated with reduced death and myocardial infarction (MI) in some prior studies. The impact of complete revascularization (CR) in patients undergoing an invasive (INV) compared with a conservative (CON) management strategy has not been reported. OBJECTIVES: Among patients with chronic coronary disease without prior coronary artery bypass grafting randomized to INV vs CON management in the ISCHEMIA (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches) trial, we examined the following: 1) the outcomes of ACR and FCR compared with incomplete revascularization; and 2) the potential impact of achieving CR in all INV patients compared with CON management. METHODS: ACR and FCR in the INV group were assessed at an independent core laboratory. Multivariable-adjusted outcomes of CR were examined in INV patients. Inverse probability weighted modeling was then performed to estimate the treatment effect had CR been achieved in all INV patients compared with CON management. RESULTS: ACR and FCR were achieved in 43.4% and 58.4% of 1,824 INV patients. ACR was associated with reduced 4-year rates of cardiovascular death or MI compared with incomplete revascularization. By inverse probability weighted modeling, ACR in all 2,296 INV patients compared with 2,498 CON patients was associated with a lower 4-year rate of cardiovascular death or MI (difference -3.5; 95% CI: -7.2% to 0.0%). In comparison, the event rate difference of cardiovascular death or MI for INV minus CON in the overall ISCHEMIA trial was -2.4%. Results were similar but less pronounced with FCR. CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes of an INV strategy may be improved if CR (especially ACR) is achieved. (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches [ISCHEMIA]; NCT01471522).
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Infarto del Miocardio , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Humanos , Infarto del Miocardio/cirugía , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Resultado del Tratamiento , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Revascularización Miocárdica/métodosRESUMEN
Background: Understanding of the risk factors for the development of adverse outcomes after aortic valve replacement is necessary to develop timely preventive measures and to improve the results of surgical treatment. Methods: We analyzed patients with aortic stenosis (n = 742) who underwent surgical treatment in the period 2014−2020. The average age was 63 (57;69) yearsmen 58%, women 42%. Results: The hospital mortality rate was 3% (22 patients). The following statistically significant threshold values (cut-off points) were obtained in the ROC analysis: aortic cross-clamp time > 93 min AUC (CI) 0.676 (0.640−0.710), p = 0.010; cardiopulmonary bypass time > 144 min AUC (CI) 0.809 (0.778−0.837), p < 0.0001, hemoglobin before op <120 g/L. AUC (CI) 0.762 (0.728−0.793), p < 0.0001, hematocrit before op <39% AUC (CI) 0.755 (0.721−0.786), p < 0.001, end-diastolic dimension index >2.39 AUC (CI) 0.647 (0.607−0.686), p = 0.014, end-systolic dimension index > 1.68 AUC (CI) 0.657 (0.617−0.695), p = 0.009. Statistically significant independent predictors of hospital mortality were identified: BMI > 30 kg/m2 (OR 2.84; CI 1.15−7.01), ischemic heart disease (OR 3.65; CI 1.01−13.2), diabetes (OR 3.88; CI 1.38−10.9), frequent ventricular ectopy before operation (OR 9.78; CI 1.91−50.2), mitral valve repair (OR 4.47; CI 1.76−11.3), tricuspid valve repair (OR 3.06; CI 1.09−8.58), 3 and more procedures (OR 4.44; CI 1.67−11.8). Conclusions: The hospital mortality rate was 3%. The main indicators associated with the risk of death were: diabetes, overweight (body mass index more than 30 kg/m2), frequent ventricular ectopy before surgery, hemoglobin level below 120 g/L, hematocrit level below 39%, longer cardiopulmonary bypass time and aortic cross-clamp time, additional mitral and tricuspid valve interventions.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is among the expected complications of cardiac surgery. Statins with pleiotropic anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects may be effective in the prevention of AKI. However, the results of studies on the efficacy and safety of statins are varied and require further study. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study to evaluate long-term preoperative intake of atorvastatin and rosuvastatin on the incidence of AKI, based on the "Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes" (KDIGO) criteria in the early postoperative period after coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). We performed propensity score matching to compare the findings in our study groups. The incidence of AKI was assessed on day 2 and day 4 after the surgery. RESULTS: The analysis included 958 patients after CABG. After 1:1 individual matching, based on propensity score, the incidence of AKI was comparable both on day 2 after the surgery (7.4%) between the atorvastatin group and rosuvastatin group (6.5%) (OR: 1.182; 95%Cl 0.411-3.397; p = 0.794), and on postoperative day 4 between the atorvastatin group (3.7%) and the rosuvastatin group (4.6%) (OR: 0.723, 95%Cl 0.187-2.792; p = 0.739). Additionally, there were no statistically significant differences in terms of incidence of AKI after 1:1 individual matching, based on propensity score, between the rosuvastatin group and the control group both on postoperative day 2 (OR: 0.692; 95%Cl 0.252-1.899; p = 0.611) and day 4 (OR: 1.245; 95%Cl 0.525-2.953; p = 0.619); as well as between the atorvastatin group and the control group both on postoperative day 2 (OR: 0.549; 95%Cl 0.208-1.453; p = 0.240) and day 4 (OR: 0.580; 95%Cl 0.135-2.501; p = 0.497). CONCLUSION: Long-term statin use before CABG did not increase the incidence of postoperative AKI. Further, we revealed no difference in the incidence of post-CABG AKI between the atorvastatin and rosuvastatin groups.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a common complication of cardiac surgery. It has been proven to be associated with an increase in the incidence of early complications and mortality, an increase in the rate of hospital stay duration, and economic costs of their treatment. One of the pharmaceutical drugs recommended by the American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) for preventing POAF is colchicine (class IIB). However, the results of research on the efficacy and safety of colchicine are ambiguous and, consequently, require further study. OBJECTIVE: Evaluating the efficacy of short-term colchicine administration in the prevention of POAF in patients after open-heart surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. The subjects were randomly assigned to two groups: treatment group (n = 50) with subjects receiving 1 mg of colchicine 24 h before the surgery, as well as on days 2, 3, 4, and 5 in the postoperative period; and the control group (n = 51), receiving placebo on the same schedule. The primary endpoint was the frequency of POAF in both groups within 7 days after surgery. RESULTS: The study included 101 patients (82 men, 19 women). Baseline clinical, laboratory, instrumental, and intraoperative data did not differ statistically significantly between the groups. POAF was detected in 9 patients (18%) of the treatment group and 15 subjects (29.4%) of the control group, which had no statistical significance (odds ratio, OR 0.527; 95% Cl 0.206-1.349; p = 0.178). No statistically significant differences were revealed for most secondary endpoints, as well as between the groups for all laboratory parameters. There were statistically significant differences between the groups solely in the frequency of diarrhea: 16 (32%) patients in the treatment group and 6 (11.8%) subjects in the control group (OR 3.529; 95% Cl 1.249-9.972; p = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: We did not detect any statistical differences between the groups in terms of primary endpoints, which could be due to the insufficient volume of the sample of the study. However, we detected some trends of statistical differences among the groups in terms of some parameters. CLINICALTRIALS: Unique identifier: NCT04224545.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Currently, left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are a successful surgical treatment for patients with end-stage heart failure on the waiting list or with contraindicated heart transplantation. In Russia, Sputnik 1 LVAD was also successfully introduced into clinical practice as a bridge-to-transplant and a destination therapy device. Development of Sputnik 2 LVAD was aimed at miniaturization to reduce invasiveness, optimize hemocompatibility, and improve versatility for patients of various sizes. METHODS: We compared hemolysis level in flow path of the Sputnik LVADs and investigated design aspects influencing other types of blood damage, using predictions of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and experimental assessment. The investigated operating point was a flow rate of 5 L/min and a pressure head of 100 mm Hg at an impeller rotational speed of 9100 min-1. RESULTS: Mean hemolysis indices predicted with CFD were 0.0090% in the Sputnik 1 and 0.0023% in the Sputnik 2. Averaged values of normalized index of hemolysis obtained experimentally for the Sputnik 1 and the Sputnik 2 were 0.011 ± 0.003 g/100 L and 0.004 ± 0.002 g/100 L, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Obtained results indicate obvious improvements in hemocompatibility and sufficiently satisfy the determined miniaturization aim for the Sputnik 2 LVAD development.
RESUMEN
The objective of this study was to study the use of the hydrogel biopolymer based on sodium alginate ("Colegel") with a drug substance-amiodarone-for the prevention of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) in cardiac surgery. The experimental part of the study was performed on 46 rabbits. Five groups were formed: in the first group, the dose of amiodarone in hydrogel was 1 mg; in the second group-3 mg; in the third group-6 mg; in the fourth group, hydrogel was used without amiodarone; in the fifth group, 60 mg amiodarone was administered intravenously. The animals from each group were removed from the experiment for the pathomorphological study of the heart after 3, 7 and 14 days. The studied endpoints were: the heart rate control; the development of the blockades of the conduction system of the heart; and the development of inflammation according to laboratory pathomorphological studies. The translational clinical part involved a randomized clinical trial which included 60 patients, with an average age of 62 ± 8.5 years. All patients were randomized into two groups: the study group (n = 30, with the application of amiodarone hydrogel) and the control group (n = 30, without the application of amiodarone hydrogel). The dose of amiodarone in the hydrogel material was 60 mg for all patients. The heart rhythm was monitored during 5 days. The primary endpoint was the development of POAF. Secondary endpoints were: the dynamics of heart rate; the duration of the QT and PQ intervals; the development of blockades of the cardiac conduction system; as well as the dynamics of AST and ALT. According to the results of the experimental part, it was found that the method of the local epicardial delivery of amiodarone by the hydrogel material was safe. Hydrogel with amiodarone is effective for reducing the heart rate in the animal experiment in comparison to the control group and the group with the intravenous administration of the drug. The optimal dose of amiodarone in hydrogel was 1 mg per 1 kg. According to the results of the clinical part, it was found that the method of the local epicardial delivery of amiodarone as a hydrogel material proved its safety. Hydrogel with amiodarone at a dose of 60 mg was effective in preventing POAF in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) operations in comparison to the control group (p < 0.001). The age and procedure of application of the amiodarone gel were significantly associated with POAF (p = 0.009 and p = 0.011, respectively). The use of hydrogel with amiodarone reduced the probability of developing POAF 18.9-fold. The method of the local epicardial delivery of amiodarone in the form of a hydrogel material is safe. The use of hydrogel with amiodarone after CABG reduced the probability of developing POAF.
RESUMEN
We studied the properties of low-frequency (LF) heart rate variability (HRV) and photoplethysmographic waveform variability (PPGV) and their interaction under conditions where the hemodynamic connection between them is obviously absent, as well as the LF regulation of PPGV in the absence of heart function. The parameters of HRV and finger PPGV were evaluated in 10 patients during cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass (on-pump cardiac surgery) with or without cardioplegia. The following spectral indices of PPGV and HRV were ertimated: the total spectral power (TP), the high-frequency (HF) and the LF ranges of TP in percents (HF% and LF%), and the LF/HF ratio. We assessed also the index S of synchronization between the LF oscillations in finger photoplethysmogram (PPG) and heart rate (HR) signals. The analysis of directional couplings was carried out using the methods of phase dynamics modeling. It is shown that the mechanisms leading to the occurrence of oscillations in the LF range of PPGV are independent of the mechanisms causing oscillations in the LF range of HRV. At the same time, the both above-mentioned LF oscillations retain their activity under conditions of artificial blood circulation and cardioplegia (the latter case applies only to LF oscillations in PPG). In artificial blood circulation, there was a coupling from the LF oscillations in PPG to those in HR, whereas the coupling in the opposite direction was absent. The coupling from the LF oscillations in PPG to those in HR has probably a neurogenic nature, whereas the opposite coupling has a hemodynamic nature (due to cardiac output).
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Paro Cardíaco Inducido/efectos adversos , Paro Cardíaco/fisiopatología , Frecuencia Cardíaca/fisiología , Fotopletismografía/métodos , Gasto Cardíaco/fisiología , Puente Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Dedos/fisiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
Importance: While many features of stable ischemic heart disease vary by sex, differences in ischemia, coronary anatomy, and symptoms by sex have not been investigated among patients with moderate or severe ischemia. The enrolled ISCHEMIA trial cohort that underwent coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) was required to have obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) for randomization. Objective: To describe sex differences in stress testing, CCTA findings, and symptoms in ISCHEMIA trial participants. Design, Setting, and Participants: This secondary analysis of the multicenter ISCHEMIA randomized clinical trial analyzed baseline characteristics of patients with stable ischemic heart disease. Individuals were enrolled from July 2012 to January 2018 based on local reading of moderate or severe ischemia on a stress test, after which blinded CCTA was performed in most. Core laboratories reviewed stress tests and CCTAs. Participants with no obstructive CAD or with left main CAD of 50% or greater were excluded. Those who met eligibility criteria including CCTA (if performed) were randomized to a routine invasive or a conservative management strategy (N = 5179). Angina was assessed using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire. Analysis began October 1, 2018. Interventions: CCTA and angina assessment. Main Outcomes and Measures: Sex differences in stress test, CCTA findings, and symptom severity. Results: Of 8518 patients enrolled, 6256 (77%) were men. Women were more likely to have no obstructive CAD (<50% stenosis in all vessels on CCTA) (353 of 1022 [34.4%] vs 378 of 3353 [11.3%]). Of individuals who were randomized, women had more angina at baseline than men (median [interquartile range] Seattle Angina Questionnaire Angina Frequency score: 80 [70-100] vs 90 [70-100]). Women had less severe ischemia on stress imaging (383 of 919 [41.7%] vs 1361 of 2972 [45.9%] with severe ischemia; 386 of 919 [42.0%] vs 1215 of 2972 [40.9%] with moderate ischemia; and 150 of 919 [16.4%] vs 394 of 2972 [13.3%] with mild or no ischemia). Ischemia was similar by sex on exercise tolerance testing. Women had less extensive CAD on CCTA (205 of 568 women [36%] vs 1142 of 2418 men [47%] with 3-vessel disease; 184 of 568 women [32%] vs 754 of 2418 men [31%] with 2-vessel disease; and 178 of 568 women [31%] vs 519 of 2418 men [22%] with 1-vessel disease). Female sex was independently associated with greater angina frequency (odds ratio, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.13-1.76). Conclusions and Relevance: Women in the ISCHEMIA trial had more frequent angina, independent of less extensive CAD, and less severe ischemia than men. These findings reflect inherent sex differences in the complex relationships between angina, atherosclerosis, and ischemia that may have implications for testing and treatment of patients with suspected stable ischemic heart disease. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01471522.
Asunto(s)
Angiografía Coronaria/métodos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Anciano , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/epidemiología , Prueba de Esfuerzo/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Isquemia Miocárdica/diagnóstico , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores Sexuales , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The purpose of the experiment was to study the safety of local epicardial use of the hydrogel with amiodarone, as well as the influence of its different dosages on the heart rate of mongrel rabbits. METHODS: The epicardial application of the hydrogel material with amiodarone was performed in 46 rabbits. Rabbits were divided into 5 groups: Group No. 1-dose of amiodarone in the hydrogel 1 mg, Group No. 2-dose 3 mg; Group No. 3-dose 6 mg; Group No. 4-hydrogel without amiodarone; Group No. 5-amiodarone intravenously, 60 mg. RESULTS: The application of hydrogel with amiodarone is not accompanied by a systemic inflammatory reaction. In group No. 2, there was a significant reduction in the heart rate (before surgery: 158±16, after: 130±11, (P<0,001), without any disturbances to the conduction system of the heart functioning. With an increase in amiodarone concentration (Group No. 3), significant atrial and atrioventricular (AV) conduction defects (up to 70%) were noted; when the dosage of amiodarone (Group No. 1) was reduced, there was no influence on the heart rate reduction. The hydrogel without amiodarone has no effect on the conductive system. CONCLUSIONS: The method of local epicardial delivery of amiodarone in the form of a hydrogel material is safe. The hydrogel with amiodarone is effective for the heart rate reduction (according to the experiment on animals), compared to the control group and the group with intravenous drug administration. The optimal dosage of amiodarone in the hydrogel is 3 mg.
RESUMEN
The need to simulate the operating conditions of the human body is a key factor in every study and engineering process of a bioengineering device developed for implantation. In the present paper, we describe in detail the interaction between the left ventricle (LV) and our Sputnik left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). This research aims to evaluate the influence of different rotary blood pumps (RBPs) on the LV depending on the degree of heart failure (HF), in order to investigate energetic characteristics of the LV-LVAD interaction and to estimate main parameters of left ventricular unloading. We investigate energetic characteristics of adult Sputnik 1 and Sputnik 2 LVADs connected to a hybrid adult mock circulation (HAMC) and also for the Sputnik pediatric rotary blood pump (PRBP) connected to a pediatric mock circulation (PMC). A major improvement of the LV unloading is observed during all simulations for each particular heart failure state when connected to the LVAD, with sequential pump speed increased within 5000-10000 rpm for adult LVADs and 6000-13000 rpm for PRBP with 200 rpm step. Additionally, it was found that depending on the degree of heart failure, LVADs influence the LV in different ways and a significant support level cannot be achieved without the aortic valve closure. Furthermore, this study expands the information on LV-LVAD interaction, which leads to the optimization of the RBP speed rate control in clinics for adult and pediatric patients suffering from heart failure. Finally, we show that the implementation of control algorithms using the modulation of the RBP speed in order to open the aortic valve and unload the LV more efficiently is necessary and will be content of further research.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Risk factor control is the cornerstone of managing stable ischemic heart disease but is often not achieved. Predictors of risk factor control in a randomized clinical trial have not been described. METHODS AND RESULTS: The ISCHEMIA trial (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches) randomized individuals with at least moderate inducible ischemia and obstructive coronary artery disease to an initial invasive or conservative strategy in addition to optimal medical therapy. The primary aim of this analysis was to determine predictors of meeting trial goals for LDL-C (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, goal <70 mg/dL) or systolic blood pressure (SBP, goal <140 mm Hg) at 1 year post-randomization. We included all randomized participants in the ISCHEMIA trial with baseline and 1-year LDL-C and SBP values by January 28, 2019. Among the 3984 ISCHEMIA participants (78% of 5179 randomized) with available data, 35% were at goal for LDL-C, and 65% were at goal for SBP at baseline. At 1 year, the percent at goal increased to 52% for LDL-C and 75% for SBP. Adjusted odds of 1-year LDL-C goal attainment were greater with older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.11 [95% CI, 1.03-1.20] per 10 years), lower baseline LDL-C (OR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.17-1.22] per 10 mg/dL), high-intensity statin use (OR, 1.30 [95% CI, 1.12-1.51]), nonwhite race (OR, 1.32 [95% CI, 1.07-1.63]), and North American enrollment compared with other regions (OR, 1.32 [95% CI, 1.06-1.66]). Women were less likely than men to achieve 1-year LDL-C goal (OR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.58-0.80]). Adjusted odds of 1-year SBP goal attainment were greater with lower baseline SBP (OR, 1.27 [95% CI, 1.22-1.33] per 10 mm Hg) and with North American enrollment (OR, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.04-1.76]). CONCLUSIONS: In ISCHEMIA, older age, male sex, high-intensity statin use, lower baseline LDL-C, and North American location predicted 1-year LDL-C goal attainment, whereas lower baseline SBP and North American location predicted 1-year SBP goal attainment. Future studies should examine the effects of sex disparities, international practice patterns, and provider behavior on risk factor control.
Asunto(s)
Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Presión Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , LDL-Colesterol/sangre , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Dislipidemias/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Antihipertensivos/efectos adversos , Biomarcadores/sangre , Protocolos Clínicos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/sangre , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/fisiopatología , Dislipidemias/sangre , Dislipidemias/mortalidad , Femenino , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Humanos , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/efectos adversos , Hipertensión/mortalidad , Hipertensión/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Most drug-eluting stent (DES) trials have excluded patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The efficacy of DES implantation in patients with CKD is therefore not known. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the outcomes with DES vs bare-metal stent (BMS) implantation in patients with CKD. METHODS AND RESULTS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were searched for studies including at least 100 patients with CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤60 mL/min/1.73 m² or on dialysis) treated with DES or BMS and followed for at least 1 month and reporting outcomes of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular (CV) mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), target-vessel revascularization (TVR), and stent thrombosis (ST). Thirty-one studies (5 randomized) with 91,817 participants (49,081 DES and 42,736 BMS) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. DES was associated with lower all-cause mortality (relative risk [RR], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71-0.84), CV mortality (RR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.38-0.70), MI (RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.86-0.95), TVR (RR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47-0.80), and numerically lower ST (RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.55-1.01) when compared with BMS. Analysis by study type (RCTs vs non-RCTs) showed similar results for most outcomes (Pinteraction>.05) except all-cause mortality, where there was no difference between DES vs BMS in RCTs (Pinteraction=.04). The effects were greater with 2nd-generation DES vs BMS (for example, ST: RR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.20-0.72). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with CKD, the available evidence, largely from observational studies, suggests significantly fewer events with DES vs BMS with even a lower ST rate with 2nd-generation DES. These findings should be tested in large, randomized trials.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Reestenosis Coronaria , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/instrumentación , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Stents , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/complicaciones , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Reestenosis Coronaria/epidemiología , Reestenosis Coronaria/etiología , Reestenosis Coronaria/mortalidad , Humanos , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodosRESUMEN
We represent a case of successful surgical treatment of a rare congenital heart disease: abnormal inflow of an additional superior vena cava into the left atrium, combined with atrial septal defect, mitral and tricuspid valve regurgitation, and abnormal inflow of the left hepatic vein into a roofless coronary sinus.
Asunto(s)
Anomalías Múltiples , Venas Hepáticas/anomalías , Malformaciones Vasculares/diagnóstico , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/métodos , Vena Cava Superior/anomalías , Angiografía , Ecocardiografía , Femenino , Venas Hepáticas/cirugía , Humanos , Tomografía Computarizada Multidetector , Malformaciones Vasculares/cirugía , Vena Cava Superior/cirugía , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Introduction: Our aim was to perform a comparative study of short-term cardiovascular autonomic control in cardiac surgery patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or surgical correction of valvular heart disease (SCVHD ). Methods: The synchronous 15 minutes records of heart rate variability (HRV) and finger's photoplethysmographic waveform variability (PPGV) were performed in 42 cardiac surgery patients (12 women) aged 61.8 ± 8.6 years (mean ± standard deviation), who underwent CABG, and 36 patients (16 women) aged 54.2 ± 14.9 years, who underwent SCVHD , before surgery and in 5-7 days after surgery. Conventional time and frequency domain measures of HRV and index S of synchronization between the slow oscillations in PPGV and HRV were analyzed. We also calculated personal dynamics of these indices after surgery. Results: We found no differences (Ð > 0.05) in all studied autonomic indices (preoperative and post-surgery) between studied patients' groups, except for the preoperative heart rate, which was higher in patients who underwent SCVHD (P = 0.013). We have shown a pronounced preoperative and post-surgery variability (magnitude of inter-quartile ranges) of all autonomic indices in studied patients. In the cluster analysis based on cardiovascular autonomic indices (preoperative and post-surgery), we divided all patients into two clusters (38 and 40 subjects) which did not differ in all clinical characteristics (except for the preoperative hematocrit, P = 0.038), index S, and all post-surgery HRV indices. First cluster (38 patients) had higher preoperative values of the HR, TP, HF, and HF%, and lower preoperative values of the LF% and LF/HF. Conclusion: The variability of cardiovascular autonomic indices in on-pump cardiac surgery patients (two characteristic clusters were identified based on preoperative indices) was not associated with their clinical characteristics and features of surgical procedure (including cardioplegia).
RESUMEN
Background: Awareness of Kawasaki disease (KD) is emerging in Russia but the diagnosis is still often missed. Methods: This is a retrospective study of 303 children with KD who received care at a single center in Moscow over the period from 2004 to 2016. Results: Overall, coronary artery aneurysms were documented in 91 (30,0%) of 303 patients and transient ectasia in 40 (13,2%). Intracoronary thrombi were found in 12 of 15 patients with giant aneurysms and in 3 patients with medium-sized aneurysms. Conclusion: The patients with KD in the Moscow region had typical features of the disease described in the literature but the proportion of patients with coronary artery aneurysms was higher than reported from other countries. We assume that this is due to delayed treatment, which has gradually improved over time. Increased awareness of KD in Russia is critical to ensure timely diagnosis and treatment.