Role of ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in the management of radiologic-pathologic discordance: a retrospective single-centre study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of US-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy (US-VAB) in radiologic-pathologic (rad-path) discordance in women with suspicious breast lesions. METHODS: Two thousand three hundred and sixty patients with 2385 BI-RADS category 4 and 5 lesions underwent percutaneous US-guided CNB. Thirty-six lesions were classified as discordant benign and underwent second-line US-VAB. A 14-gauge needle was utilized for CNB and 10-gauge for US-VAB. Final pathology was the reference standard for women who underwent surgery, imaging follow-up in other cases. Rates of malignancy for US-VAB and subsequent surgery were evaluated. Lesions with upgrade and no upgrade to second-line VAB were compared in terms of patient's age, lesion type and characteristics, size and BI-RADS category. Positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) for BI-RADS categories and diagnostic performance for second-line US-VAB were calculated. p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant (t-test, Mann-Whitney, χ2). RESULTS: US-VAB identified 10 B2, 9 B3 and 17 B5 lesions with upgrade to malignancy of 47.2% (17/36). There were 8 invasive no special type, 7 ductal in situ, 1 invasive lobular carcinoma and 1 angiosarcoma, and their distribution among BI-RADS categories was: 2/2 in BI-RADS 5 (100%), 12/18 in BI-RADS 4C (67%) and 3/16 in BI-RADS 4B lesions (19%) (p = 0.006). Of the remaining 19 lesions, 6 underwent surgery and 2 were upgraded to ductal carcinoma in situ; 13 underwent radiological follow-up and one resulted malignant. False-negative rate for US-VAB was 15.8% (3/19) with final upgrade to malignancy of 55% (20/36). The univariate analysis revealed mass shape (p = 0.008) and BI-RADS categories (p = 0.006) to be associated with upgrade to malignancy. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy for US-VAB were 85, 100, 100, 84 and 92%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: US-VAB identified almost 50% of cancers missed by CNB, avoiding surgical biopsies and validating as an effective mini-invasive approach in rad-path discordance.

Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Versus MRI in the Evaluation of Neoadjuvant Therapy Response in Patients With Breast Cancer: A Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND. Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is rapidly expanding as a credible alternative to MRI in various clinical settings. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare CEM and MRI for neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) response assessment in patients with breast cancer. METHODS. This prospective study included 51 patients (mean age, 46 ± 11 [SD] years) with biopsy-proven breast cancer who were candidates for NAT from May 2015 to April 2018. Patients underwent both CEM and MRI before, during, and after NAT (pre-NAT, mid-NAT, and post-NAT, respectively). Post-NAT CEM included a 6-minute delayed acquisition. One breast radiologist with experience in CEM reviewed CEM examinations; one breast radiologist with experience in MRI reviewed MRI examinations. The radiologists assessed for the presence of an enhancing lesion; if an enhancing lesion was detected, its size was measured. RECIST version 1.1 response assessment categories were derived. Pathologic complete response (pCR) was defined as absence of both invasive cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). RESULTS. Of 51 patients, 16 achieved pCR. CEM yielded systematically lower size measurements compared with MRI (mean difference, -0.2 mm for pre-NAT, -0.7 mm for mid-NAT, and -0.3 mm for post-NAT). All post-NAT imaging tests yielded systematically larger size measurements compared with pathology (mean difference, 0.8 mm for CEM, 1.2 mm for MRI, and 1.9 mm for delayed CEM). Of 12 patients with residual DCIS, an enhancing lesion was detected in seven on post-NAT CEM, eight on post-NAT MRI, and nine on post-NAT delayed CEM. Agreement of RECIST response categories between CEM and MRI, expressed as kappa coefficient, was 0.791 at mid-NAT and 0.871 at post-NAT. For detecting pCR by post-NAT imaging, sensitivity and specificity were 81% and 83% for CEM, 100% and 86% for MRI, and 81% and 89% for delayed CEM. Sensitivity was significantly higher for MRI than CEM (p = .001) and delayed CEM (p = .002); remaining comparisons were not significant (p > .05). CONCLUSION. After NAT for breast cancer, CEM and MRI yielded comparable assessments of lesion size (both slightly overestimated vs pathology) and RECIST categories and showed no significant difference in specificity for pCR. MRI had higher sensitivity for pCR. Delayed CEM acquisition may help detect residual DCIS. CLINICAL IMPACT. Although MRI remains the preferred test for NAT response monitoring, the findings support CEM as a useful alternative when MRI is contraindicated or not tolerated.

Quantitative chest CT analysis in COVID-19 to predict the need for oxygenation support and intubation.

OBJECTIVE: Lombardy (Italy) was the epicentre of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020. The healthcare system suffered from a shortage of ICU beds and oxygenation support devices. In our Institution, most patients received chest CT at admission, only interpreted visually. Given the proven value of quantitative CT analysis (QCT) in the setting of ARDS, we tested QCT as an outcome predictor for COVID-19. METHODS: We performed a single-centre retrospective study on COVID-19 patients hospitalised from January 25, 2020, to April 28, 2020, who received CT at admission prompted by respiratory symptoms such as dyspnea or desaturation. QCT was performed using a semi-automated method (3D Slicer). Lungs were divided by Hounsfield unit intervals. Compromised lung (%CL) volume was the sum of poorly and non-aerated volumes (- 500, 100 HU). We collected patient's clinical data including oxygenation support throughout hospitalisation. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-two patients (163 males, median age 66, IQR 54-6) were included; 75% received oxygenation support (20% intubation rate). Compromised lung volume was the most accurate outcome predictor (logistic regression, p < 0.001). %CL values in the 6-23% range increased risk of oxygenation support; values above 23% were at risk for intubation. %CL showed a negative correlation with PaO2/FiO2 ratio (p < 0.001) and was a risk factor for in-hospital mortality (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: QCT provides new metrics of COVID-19. The compromised lung volume is accurate in predicting the need for oxygenation support and intubation and is a significant risk factor for in-hospital death. QCT may serve as a tool for the triaging process of COVID-19. KEY POINTS: • Quantitative computer-aided analysis of chest CT (QCT) provides new metrics of COVID-19. • The compromised lung volume measured in the - 500, 100 HU interval predicts oxygenation support and intubation and is a risk factor for in-hospital death. • Compromised lung values in the 6-23% range prompt oxygenation therapy; values above 23% increase the need for intubation.

Survival analysis of 230 patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma treated with bland transarterial embolization.

Locoregional therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) include endovascular treatments such as chemoembolization (TACE) and bland embolization (TAE). TACE is the most adopted technique, despite a lack of definitive evidence of superiority over TAE, which is less costly and better tolerated due to the absence of chemotherapy. However, few studies have reported data on TAE monotherapy for unresectable HCC. We report our results in a cohort of 230 patients with unresectable HCC treated with TAE (TAE with 40-100micron microparticles, TAE with microparticles plus n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate, TAE with Lipiodol) over the course of seven years. Thirty-seven patients (14%) were down-staged during observation and also received a percutaneous ablation. We observed 1-, 2-, 3-, 4- and 5-year rates of 84,8%, 58,7%, 38,3%, 28,3%, and 18,7%. Patients who also received percutaneous treatment performed best. Our results broaden the body of evidence for the use of TAE in advanced HCC.

Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma presenting both ALK rearrangement and PD-L1 high positivity: A case report on the therapeutic regimen.

RATIONALE: Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC) represents <1% of all lung cancers and is characterized by a very poor prognosis. The optimal therapeutic regimen remains unclear. We describe a rare case of PSC with both anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-arranged and high levels of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 46-year-old woman, nonsmoker, came to our attention due to uncontrolled pain in the lower left limb. DIAGNOSIS: PSC with both ALK rearrangement and high levels of PD-L1 expression. INTERVENTIONS: The patient started first-line systemic treatment with pembrolizumab reporting stable disease; at progression, she received second-line treatment with crizotinib. The treatment was not well-tolerated, and the patient then underwent 5 cycles of ceritinib treatment. OUTCOMES: The patient showed a partial response to targeted therapy. At progression, brigatinib was initiated, but the patients reported liver progression soon after the initiation of this therapy. LESSONS: Molecular-driven investigation is necessary in PSC for treatment selection.