Acromegaly management in the Nordic countries: A Delphi consensus survey.

OBJECTIVE: Acromegaly is associated with increased morbidity and mortality if left untreated. The therapeutic options include surgery, medical treatment, and radiotherapy. Several guidelines and recommendations on treatment algorithms and follow-up exist. However, not all recommendations are strictly evidence-based. To evaluate consensus on the treatment and follow-up of patients with acromegaly in the Nordic countries. METHODS: A Delphi process was used to map the landscape of acromegaly management in Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Finland, and Iceland. An expert panel developed 37 statements on the treatment and follow-up of patients with acromegaly. Dedicated endocrinologists (n = 47) from the Nordic countries were invited to rate their extent of agreement with the statements, using a Likert-type scale (1-7). Consensus was defined as ≥80% of panelists rating their agreement as ≥5 or ≤3 on the Likert-type scale. RESULTS: Consensus was reached in 41% (15/37) of the statements. Panelists agreed that pituitary surgery remains first line treatment. There was general agreement to recommend first-generation somatostatin analog (SSA) treatment after failed surgery and to consider repeat surgery. In addition, there was agreement to recommend combination therapy with first-generation SSA and pegvisomant as second- or third-line treatment. In more than 50% of the statements, consensus was not achieved. Considerable disagreement existed regarding pegvisomant monotherapy, and treatment with pasireotide and dopamine agonists. CONCLUSION: This consensus exploration study on the management of patients with acromegaly in the Nordic countries revealed a relatively large degree of disagreement among experts, which mirrors the complexity of the disease and the shortage of evidence-based data.

Unravelling pituitary tumours in medically treated patients with acromegaly: the impact of systematic MRI reassessment.

BACKGROUND: In acromegaly, the primary tumor is usually found during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pituitary gland. A remnant tumor after surgery is, however, harder to depict. When a tumor is missed, the remaining option is usually lifelong pharmacological treatment. PURPOSE: To identify tumors by reassessment of all available MRI scans in pharmacologically treated patients, operated or not, and to compare our results with the routine MRI reports. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Adult patients diagnosed with acromegaly and managed at a tertiary care center between 2005 and 2021 and currently on pharmacological treatment were included. MRI scans were evaluated in a standardized manner and classified independently by a radiologist and an endocrinologist into "certain," "suspected," or "no tumor." In case of disagreement, consensus was achieved with a senior neuroradiologist. The results were compared using the clinical radiologists' routine MRI reports. RESULTS: We identified certain and suspected tumors in 29/74 and 36/74 patients, respectively. No tumor was identified in nine patients. In five of these, no MRI contrast agent was given. Discrepancy between our results and the routine MRI reports was found in 31/74 patients (P = 0.01). In 22 patients, the routine reports described no tumor while we identified certain tumors in 2/22 patients and suspected tumors in 13/22 patients. CONCLUSION: In most patients with pharmacologically treated acromegaly, we identified a certain or suspected pituitary tumor. These findings were more frequent compared to the routine MRI reports. Based on our results, patients will be considered for a change in long-term treatment modality.

Long-term depot specific changes in adipose tissue after treatment of acromegaly.

CONTEXT: Patients with active acromegaly present a decreased adipose tissue (AT) mass, and short-term studies show that treatment leads to AT depot-specific gain. However, it remains unclear if the increase is persistent in the long-term perspective and/or is sex-dependent. DESIGN: To characterize the depot-specific changes of AT after treatment of acromegaly and identify contributing factors. METHODS: Adipose tissue, including visceral (VAT), subcutaneous (SAT), and total (TAT), and android to gynoid ratio (A/G ratio) were measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry at diagnosis (n = 62), and after treatment at short-term (median (IQR) 1.9 (1.5-2.3)) and long-term 5.5 (3.9-9.5) years, and correlated to clinical and biochemical measurements. Growth hormone (GH), insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), glucose and HbA1c levels, gonadal status, and the presence of diabetes mellitus were recorded. Remission status was assessed at the long-term visit (IGF-1/ULN ≤ 1.3). Differences in the temporal course of AT from baseline to short- and long-term follow-up according to sex, diabetes, gonadal, and remission status were evaluated by mixed model analysis, adjusted for age. RESULTS: Despite a stable body mass index, VAT and A/G ratio increased at both time points, whereas SAT mainly increased at short-term, plateauing afterwards (P < .05 for all). Visceral adipose tissue and A/G ratio were higher in men (P = .035 and P < .001), and the A/G ratio increased more than in women (P = .003). Glucose and HbA1c decreased short-term (P < .05) and remained stable at long-term. The increase in AT depots correlated with the decrease of disease activity at long-term. Remission status had no effect on changes in AT mass during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Treatment of acromegaly leads to an increase in AT mass in a depot- and sex-specific manner both at short-term and long-term follow-up. Glucose metabolism improves rapidly after disease control and persists.

Stem cell-associated transcription factors in non-functioning pituitary neuroendocrine tumours.

Background: Cells with stem cell features have been described in pituitary neuroendocrine tumours (PitNETs). Transcription factors SOX2 and SOX9 are stem cell-associated markers while the pituitary progenitor marker PROP1 is involved in anterior pituitary development. We characterised the presence of these markers known to be present in the human pituitary in non-functioning (NF) PitNETs. Methods: We investigated the pituitary transcription factors SOX2, SOX9 and PROP1 by immunohistochemistry (IHC) (N = 125) and RT-qPCR (N = 78) in a retrospective cohort of clinically NF-PitNETs. The markers were scored based on the percentage of immunolabeled cells. IHC staining scores were compared to reintervention rates for the whole cohort, and to expression of FSH, LH or ER in gonadotroph NF-PitNETs. Results: Most tumours showed no or few cells positive for SOX2, SOX9 and PROP1. More patients with SOX2-negative tumours went through reintervention (40 % vs 19 %, p = 0.03). SOX2, SOX9 and PROP1 staining correlated positively to each other (SOX2 and SOX9 rs = 0.666, SOX2 and PROP1 rs = 0.704, SOX9 and PROP1 rs = 0.570, and p < 0.001 for all). In gonadotroph NF-PitNETs, staining for SOX2 and PROP1 was positively associated to FSHß staining (p < 0.001 for both). Staining for SOX2, SOX9 and PROP1 was positively associated with gene expression of Estrogen Receptor 1 (ESR1) (p < 0.001, p = 0.004 and p < 0.001) and IHC staining for ERα (p = 0.001, p = 0.03 and p = 0.05, respectively). Conclusion: SOX2, SOX9 and PROP1 were present at low levels in NF-PitNETs. Absence of SOX2 staining was associated with a higher reintervention rate. The stem cell markers correlated positively with markers of gonadotroph differentiation in gonadotroph NF-PitNETs. SOX2 and SOX9 were frequently coexpressed and showed positivity in intratumoural cells with epithelial features, however without coexpression of pituitary transcription factors.

Trabecular Bone Score Improves Early After Successful Kidney Transplantation Irrespective of Antiresorptive Therapy and Changes in Bone Mineral Density.

Background: Trabecular bone score (TBS) is a new tool to assess trabecular bone microarchitecture based on standard dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of lumbar spine images. TBS may be important to assess bone quality and fracture susceptibility in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). This study aimed to investigate the effect of different bone therapies on TBS in KTRs. Methods: We reanalyzed DXA scans to assess TBS in 121 de novo KTRs at baseline, 10 wk, and 1 y. This cohort, between 2007 and 2009, participated in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial evaluating the effect of ibandronate versus placebo in addition to vitamin D and calcium. Results: Although bone mineral density (BMD) Z scores showed a subtle decrease in the first weeks, TBS Z scores increased from baseline to 10 wk for both treatment groups, followed by a slight decline at 12 mo. When comparing treatment groups and adjusting for baseline TBS, there were no differences found in TBS at 12 mo (P = 0.419). Correlation between TBS and BMD at baseline was weak (Spearman's ρ = 0.234, P = 0.010), and change in TBS was not correlated with changes in lumbar spine BMD in either of the groups (ρ = 0.003, P = 0.973). Conclusions: Treatment with ibandronate or vitamin D and calcium did not affect bone quality as measured by TBS in de novo KTRs, but TBS increased early, irrespective of intervention. Changes in TBS and BMD during the study period were not correlated, indicating that these measurements reflect different aspects of bone integrity. TBS may complement BMD assessment in identifying KTRs with a high fracture risk.

Consensus Statement on Vitamin D Status Assessment and Supplementation: Whys, Whens, and Hows.

The 6th International Conference, "Controversies in Vitamin D," was convened to discuss controversial topics, such as vitamin D metabolism, assessment, actions, and supplementation. Novel insights into vitamin D mechanisms of action suggest links with conditions that do not depend only on reduced solar exposure or diet intake and that can be detected with distinctive noncanonical vitamin D metabolites. Optimal 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels remain debated. Varying recommendations from different societies arise from evaluating different clinical or public health approaches. The lack of assay standardization also poses challenges in interpreting data from available studies, hindering rational data pooling and meta-analyses. Beyond the well-known skeletal features, interest in vitamin D's extraskeletal effects has led to clinical trials on cancer, cardiovascular risk, respiratory effects, autoimmune diseases, diabetes, and mortality. The initial negative results are likely due to enrollment of vitamin D-replete individuals. Subsequent post hoc analyses have suggested, nevertheless, potential benefits in reducing cancer incidence, autoimmune diseases, cardiovascular events, and diabetes. Oral administration of vitamin D is the preferred route. Parenteral administration is reserved for specific clinical situations. Cholecalciferol is favored due to safety and minimal monitoring requirements. Calcifediol may be used in certain conditions, while calcitriol should be limited to specific disorders in which the active metabolite is not readily produced in vivo. Further studies are needed to investigate vitamin D effects in relation to the different recommended 25(OH)D levels and the efficacy of the different supplementary formulations in achieving biochemical and clinical outcomes within the multifaced skeletal and extraskeletal potential effects of vitamin D.