Lower versus Traditional Treatment Threshold for Neonatal Hypoglycemia.

BACKGROUND: Worldwide, many newborns who are preterm, small or large for gestational age, or born to mothers with diabetes are screened for hypoglycemia, with a goal of preventing brain injury. However, there is no consensus on a treatment threshold that is safe but also avoids overtreatment. METHODS: In a multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial involving 689 otherwise healthy newborns born at 35 weeks of gestation or later and identified as being at risk for hypoglycemia, we compared two threshold values for treatment of asymptomatic moderate hypoglycemia. We sought to determine whether a management strategy that used a lower threshold (treatment administered at a glucose concentration of <36 mg per deciliter [2.0 mmol per liter]) would be noninferior to a traditional threshold (treatment at a glucose concentration of <47 mg per deciliter [2.6 mmol per liter]) with respect to psychomotor development at 18 months, assessed with the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, third edition, Dutch version (Bayley-III-NL; scores range from 50 to 150 [mean {±SD}, 100±15]), with higher scores indicating more advanced development and 7.5 points (one half the SD) representing a clinically important difference). The lower threshold would be considered noninferior if scores were less than 7.5 points lower than scores in the traditional-threshold group. RESULTS: Bayley-III-NL scores were assessed in 287 of the 348 children (82.5%) in the lower-threshold group and in 295 of the 341 children (86.5%) in the traditional-threshold group. Cognitive and motor outcome scores were similar in the two groups (mean scores [±SE], 102.9±0.7 [cognitive] and 104.6±0.7 [motor] in the lower-threshold group and 102.2±0.7 [cognitive] and 104.9±0.7 [motor] in the traditional-threshold group). The prespecified inferiority limit was not crossed. The mean glucose concentration was 57±0.4 mg per deciliter (3.2±0.02 mmol per liter) in the lower-threshold group and 61±0.5 mg per deciliter (3.4±0.03 mmol per liter) in the traditional-threshold group. Fewer and less severe hypoglycemic episodes occurred in the traditional-threshold group, but that group had more invasive diagnostic and treatment interventions. Serious adverse events in the lower-threshold group included convulsions (during normoglycemia) in one newborn and one death. CONCLUSIONS: In otherwise healthy newborns with asymptomatic moderate hypoglycemia, a lower glucose treatment threshold (36 mg per deciliter) was noninferior to a traditional threshold (47 mg per deciliter) with regard to psychomotor development at 18 months. (Funded by the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development; HypoEXIT Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN79705768.).

Stressful Life Events in Children With Functional Defecation Disorders.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence of stressful life events including (sexual) abuse in children with functional defecation disorders by performing a systematic review. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO for cohort, case-control and cross-sectional studies investigating the prevalence of stressful life events, including (sexual) abuse in children with functional defecation disorders. RESULTS: The search yielded 946 articles, of which 8 were included with data from 654 children with functional constipation and 1931 children with (constipation-associated) fecal incontinence (FI). Overall, children with functional defecation disorders had been significantly more exposed to stressful life events than healthy children, with prevalence rates ranging from 1.6% to 90.9%. Being bullied, being a relational victim, interruption of toilet training, punishment by parents during toilet training, and hospitalization were significantly related to FI, whereas separation from the best friend, failure in an examination, severe illness in a close family member, loss of job by a parent, frequent punishment, and living in a war-affected area were significantly related to constipation. Only 1 study measured the prevalence of child abuse, which reported a significantly higher prevalence of child (sexual) abuse in children with FI compared with controls. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of stressful life events, including (sexual) abuse is significantly higher in children with functional defecation disorders compared with healthy children. To gain more insight into the true prevalence of child (sexual) abuse in children with functional defecation disorders, more studies are clearly needed.

Diagnostic accuracy of tests in pediatric gastroesophageal reflux disease.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the literature evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of commonly used diagnostic tests over conventional history taking and physical examination in children ≤ 18 months and >18 months suspected of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). STUDY DESIGN: We searched Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane database for studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of pH-metry, pH-impedance, esophagogastroscopy, barium contrast study, scintigraphy, and empirical treatment as diagnostic tools. Quality was assessed according to Quality Assessment of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy Included in Systematic Reviews criteria. RESULTS: Of the 2178 studies found, 6 studies were included, containing 408 participants (age 1 month-13.6 years) and 145 controls (age 1 month-16.9 years). Studies included children with GERD symptoms; 1 included an atypical presentation. In all the studies, the diagnostic accuracy of pH-metry was investigated, and in 2 studies esophagogastroscopy was investigated as well. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated in 3 studies. The range of reported sensitivity and specificity was broad and unreliable because of poor methodological quality according to Quality Assessment of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy Included in Systematic Reviews criteria and inadequate study design. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic accuracy of tests in children suspected of GERD remains unclear and implications for practice are hard to give. There is an urgent need of well-designed randomized controlled trials where the effect of treatment according to specific signs and symptoms will be compared with the effect of treatment based on the results of additional diagnostic tests, for patient relevant outcomes.

Ciclesonide versus other inhaled corticosteroids for chronic asthma in children.

BACKGROUND: Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the cornerstone of asthma maintenance treatment in children. Particularly among parents, there is concern about the safety of ICS as studies in children have shown reduced growth. Small-particle-size ICS targeting the smaller airways have improved lung deposition and effective asthma control might be achieved at lower daily doses.Ciclesonide is a relatively new ICS. This small-particle ICS is a pro-drug that is converted in the airways to an active metabolite and therefore with potentially less local (throat infection) and systemic (reduced growth) side effects. It can be inhaled once daily, thereby possibly improving adherence. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and adverse effects of ciclesonide compared to other ICS in the management of chronic asthma in children. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Register of trials with pre-defined terms. Additional searches of MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE and Clinical study results.org were undertaken. Searches are up to date to 7 November 2012. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled parallel or cross-over studies were eligible for the review. We included studies comparing ciclesonide with other corticosteroids both at nominally equivalent doses or lower doses of ciclesonide. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Study authors were contacted for additional information. Adverse effects information was collected from the trials. MAIN RESULTS: Six studies were included in this review (3256 children, 4 to 17 years of age). Two studies were published as conference abstracts only. Ciclesonide was compared to budesonide and fluticasone.Ciclesonide compared to budesonide (dose ratio 1:2): asthma symptoms and adverse effect were similar in both groups. Pooled results showed no significant difference in children who experience an exacerbation (risk ratio (RR) 2.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75 to 6.43). Both studies reported that 24-hour urine cortisol levels showed a statistically significant decrease in the budesonide group compared to the ciclesonide group.Ciclesonide compared to fluticasone (dose ratio 1:1): no significant differences were found for the outcome asthma symptoms. Pooled results showed no significant differences in number of patients with exacerbations (RR 1.37, 95% CI 0.58 to 3.21) and data from a study that could not be pooled in the meta-analysis reported similar numbers of patients with exacerbations in both groups. None of the studies found a difference in adverse effects. No significant difference was found for 24-hour urine cortisol levels between the groups (mean difference 0.54 nmol/mmol, 95% CI -5.92 to 7.00).Ciclesonide versus fluticasone (dose ratio 1:2) was assessed in one study and showed similar results between the two corticosteroids for asthma symptoms. The number of children with exacerbations was significantly higher in the ciclesonide group (RR 3.57, 95% CI 1.35 to 9.47). No significant differences were found in adverse effects (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.14) and 24-hour urine cortisol levels (mean difference 1.15 nmol/mmol, 95% CI 0.07 to 2.23).The quality of evidence was judged 'low' for the outcomes asthma symptoms and adverse events and 'very low' for the outcome exacerbations for ciclesonide versus budesonide (dose ratio 1:1). The quality of evidence was graded 'moderate' for the outcome asthma symptoms, 'very low' for the outcome exacerbations and 'low' for the outcome adverse events for ciclesonide versus fluticasone (dose ratio 1:1). For ciclesonide versus fluticasone (dose ratio 1:2) the quality was rated 'low' for the outcome asthma symptoms and 'very low' for exacerbations and adverse events (dose ratio 1:2). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: An improvement in asthma symptoms, exacerbations and side effects of ciclesonide versus budesonide and fluticasone could be neither demonstrated nor refuted and the trade-off between benefits and harms of using ciclesonide instead of budesonide or fluticasone is unclear. The resource use or costs of different ICS should therefore also be considered in final decision making. Longer-term superiority trials are needed to identify the usefulness and safety of ciclesonide compared to other ICS. Additionally these studies should be powered for patient relevant outcomes (exacerbations, asthma symptoms, quality of life and side effects). There is a need for studies comparing ciclesonide once daily with other ICS twice daily to assess the advantages of ciclesonide being a pro-drug that can be administered once daily with possibly increased adherence leading to increased control of asthma and fewer side effects.

Value of abdominal radiography, colonic transit time, and rectal ultrasound scanning in the diagnosis of idiopathic constipation in children: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review evaluating the value of abdominal radiography, colonic transit time (CTT), and rectal ultrasound scanning in the diagnosis of idiopathic constipation in children. STUDY DESIGN: Eligible studies were those assessing diagnostic accuracy of abdominal radiography, CTT, or rectal ultrasound scanning in children suspected for idiopathic constipation. Methodological quality of the included studies was assessed with the Quality Assessment of studies of Diagnostic Accuracy included in Systematic reviews checklist. RESULTS: One systematic review summarized 6 studies on abdominal radiography until 2004. The additional 9 studies evaluated abdominal radiography (n = 2), CTT (n = 3), and ultrasound scanning (n = 4). All studies except two used a case-control study design, which will lead to overestimation of test accuracy. Furthermore, none of the studies interpreted the results of the abdominal radiography, ultrasound scanning, or CTT without knowledge of the clinical diagnosis of constipation. The sensitivity of abdominal radiography, as studied in 6 studies, ranged from 80% (95% CI, 65-90) to 60% (95% CI, 46-72), and its specificity ranged from 99% (95% CI, 95-100) to 43% (95% CI, 18-71). Only one study presented test characteristics of CTT, and two studies presented test characteristics of ultrasonography. CONCLUSION: We found insufficient evidence for a diagnostic association between clinical symptoms of constipation and fecal loading on abdominal radiographs, CTT, and rectal diameter on ultrasound scanning in children.

[Transparency in the body of evidence in medicine: developments of the GRADE method in the past ten years]. / Transparante wetenschappelijke onderbouwing van zorg.

GRADE ("Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation") provides a transparent framework to evaluate scientific evidence and to develop healthcare recommendations. The GRADE method has been further developed, its application has been significantly broadened and over 100 organizations have endorsed GRADE. In this article, we give an overview of the most important methodological developments and discuss the basic principles. The transparent approach to make it easier for users of evidence to assess the judgments behind recommendations is not only applicable to the EBM domains but also to other disciplines. The methods developments show that GRADE is still evolving, and is constantly being further developed based on the latest methodological insights and users perspective. GRADE is not an instrument to determine the "true" certainty of the evidence. The value of applying GRADE is that judgments about the quality of evidence and the considerations behind recommendations are structured, transparent and explicit.

Clinical practice : diagnosis and treatment of functional constipation.

UNLABELLED: Childhood functional constipation has an estimated prevalence of 3% in the Western world and is probably the most common gastrointestinal complaint in children. It is characterized by infrequent painful defecation, faecal incontinence and abdominal pain. Only less than 5% of children with constipation have an underlying disease. Only recently two evidence-based guidelines (the Netherlands and Great Britain) have been developed concerning the diagnostic and therapeutic approach for childhood constipation which we both discuss in this article. At present, a thorough medical history and complete physical exam are usually sufficient to confirm the diagnosis of functional constipation. Further laboratory or radiological investigations should only be performed in case of doubt, to exclude an underlying disease. Treatment of childhood constipation consists of four steps: (1) education, (2) disimpaction, (3) prevention of re-accumulation of faeces and (4) follow-up. Surprisingly, there is only limited evidence that laxative treatment is better than placebo in children with constipation. However, according to the available evidence, the Dutch guideline recommends lactulose for children <1 year as first-choice treatment. For children below the age of older than 1 year, both lactulose and polyethylene glycol (PEG) with or without electrolytes can be used as first-choice treatment. According to the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guideline, PEG plus electrolytes is the first-choice treatment for all ages. CONCLUSION: Children with functional constipation should be diagnosed and treated according to recently developed evidence-based guidelines.

Implementation of an evidence-based guideline on fluid resuscitation: lessons learnt for future guidelines.

INTRODUCTION: There is little experience with the nationwide implementation of an evidence-based pediatric guideline on first-choice fluid for resuscitation in hypovolemia. METHODS: We investigated fluid prescribing behavior at (1) guideline development, (2) after guideline development, and (3) after active implementation and identified potential barriers and facilitators for guideline implementation. In order to minimize costs and to optimize implementation effect, we continuously developed and adjusted implementation strategies according to identified barriers. Implementation success was evaluated using questionnaires, pharmaceutical data, and data from medical records. DISCUSSION: The most remarkable change occurred after guideline development and dissemination: Normal saline use by neonatologists increased from 22-89% to 100% and by pediatric intensivists from 43-71% to 88-100%, and synthetic colloid use by pediatric intensivists declined from 29-43% to 0-13% with a reduction in albumin use by neonatologists from 11-44% to 0%. After active guideline implementation, most of specialist's management behavior was according to the guideline. CONCLUSION: Stakeholders involved in the developmental process are of great importance in disseminating recommendations before active implementation. Therefore, to successfully implement guidelines and reduce costs of active implementation, any guideline development should consider implementation right from the beginning. Implementation strategies should target identified barriers and will therefore always be guideline specific.

Fluid resuscitation in neonatal and pediatric hypovolemic shock: a Dutch Pediatric Society evidence-based clinical practice guideline.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a clinical practice guideline that provides recommendations for the fluid, i.e. colloid or crystalloid, used for resuscitation in critically ill neonates and children up to the age of 18 years with hypovolemia. METHODS: The guideline was developed through a comprehensive search and analysis of the pediatric literature. Recommendations were formulated by a national multidisciplinary committee involving all stakeholders in neonatal and pediatric intensive care and were based on research evidence from the literature and, in areas where the evidence was insufficient or lacking, on consensus after discussions in the committee. RESULTS: Because of the lack of evidence in neonates and children, trials conducted in adults were considered. We found several recent meta-analyses that show excess mortality in albumin-treated groups, compared with crystalloid-treated groups, and one recent large randomized controlled trial that found evidence of no mortality difference. We found no evidence that synthetic colloids are superior to crystalloid solutions. CONCLUSIONS: Given the state of the evidence and taking all other considerations into account, the guideline-developing group and the multidisciplinary committee recommend that in neonates and children with hypovolemia the first-choice fluid for resuscitation should be isotonic saline.

[Guidelines are made more transparent with the GRADE method: considerations for recommendations are explicit in the new method]. / Richtlijnen worden transparanter met de GRADE-methode: nieuwe methode maakt overwegingen bij aanbevelingen expliciet.

GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) is a new method to represent the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in guidelines more transparently. In this article, we describe the benefits of GRADE as applied to a recommendation from the guideline "Treatment of asthma in children". A new feature of GRADE is that the relevant outcome criteria are specified in advance and that the quality of evidence is assessed per outcome criterion. The quality is adjusted downwards in the case of limitations in the study design and in the case of four additional factors: inconsistency, indirectness of evidence, imprecision and publication bias. The strength of the recommendation depends not only on the quality of evidence, but also on considerations such as the balance between benefits and adverse effects, patient preferences and costs. When using GRADE to formulate guidelines, these considerations are made explicit. Using GRADE can lead to different recommendations than older methods and to improved acceptance and implementation in clinical practice.

Assessment of controversial pediatric asthma management options using GRADE.

OBJECTIVES: To develop explicit and transparent recommendations on controversial asthma management issues in children and to illustrate the usefulness of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach in rating the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. METHODS: Health care questions were formulated for 3 controversies in clinical practice: what is the most effective treatment in asthma not under control with standard-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS; step 3), the use of leukotriene receptor antagonist for viral wheeze, and the role of extra fine particle aerosols. GRADE was used to rate the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations after performing systematic literature searches. We provide evidence profiles and considerations about benefit and harm, preferences and values, and resource use, all of which played a role in formulating final recommendations. RESULTS: By applying GRADE and focusing on outcomes that are important to patients and explicit other considerations, our recommendations differ from those in other international guidelines. We prefer to double the dose of ICS instead of adding a long-acting ß-agonist in step 3; ICS instead of leukotriene receptor antagonist are the first choice in preschool wheeze, and extra fine particle ICS formulations are not first-line treatment in children with asthma. Recommendations are weak and based on low-quality evidence for critical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: We provide systematically and transparently developed recommendations about controversial asthma management options. Using GRADE for guideline development may change recommendations, enhance guideline implementation, and define remaining research gaps.

[Guideline "Treatment of asthma in children": 3 controversial approaches to treatment]. / Richtlijn 'Behandeling van astma bij kinderen': 3 controversiële behandelopties.

In context of the development of evidence-based guidelines by the Dutch Paediatric Society, the three most important controversies in asthma treatment in children were investigated by systematic literature review and assessed based on the quality of evidence according to GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). Although the quality of evidence was low, this method did result in clear, although weak, recommendations, in which the considerations playing a role are made clear. In young children with severe and/or recurrent wheezing, maintenance treatment using an inhalation corticosteroid (ICS) is initially recommended. When inhalation technique is poor, a leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) can be given instead. Inhalation corticosteroids with ultrafine particles are not specifically recommended as first line treatment in young children. If asthma is not controlled despite use of ICS, it is advised to double the dose of ICS after unfavourable environmental factors have been excluded. If the result is insufficient, a combination of ICS and a long acting bronchodilator is prescribed in children older than 4- 6 years of age.

Nonpharmacologic treatments for childhood constipation: systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the evidence and assess the reported quality of studies concerning nonpharmacologic treatments for childhood constipation, including fiber, fluid, physical movement, prebiotics, probiotics, behavioral therapy, multidisciplinary treatment, and forms of alternative medicine. METHODS: We systematically searched 3 major electronic databases and reference lists of existing reviews. We included systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that reported on nonpharmacologic treatments. Two reviewers rated the methodologic quality independently. RESULTS: We included 9 studies with 640 children. Considerable heterogeneity across studies precluded meta-analysis. We found no RCTs for physical movement, multidisciplinary treatment, or alternative medicine. Some evidence shows that fiber may be more effective than placebo in improving both the frequency and consistency of stools and in reducing abdominal pain. Compared with normal fluid intake, we found no evidence that water intake increases or that hyperosmolar fluid treatment is more effective in increasing stool frequency or decreasing difficulty in passing stools. We found no evidence to recommend the use of prebiotics or probiotics. Behavioral therapy with laxatives is not more effective than laxatives alone. CONCLUSIONS: There is some evidence that fiber supplements are more effective than placebo. No evidence for any effect was found for fluid supplements, prebiotics, probiotics, or behavioral intervention. There is a lack of well-designed RCTs of high quality concerning nonpharmacologic treatments for children with functional constipation.

Constipation in children.

INTRODUCTION: Prevalence of childhood constipation has been estimated at 0.7% to 29.6% in the general population worldwide; most children have no obvious aetiological factors. One third of children with chronic constipation continue to have problems beyond puberty. Half of children with chronic faecal impaction and faecal incontinence have experienced an episode of painful defecation, and many children with chronic constipation exhibit withholding behaviour. METHODS AND OUTCOMES: We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of treatments for children with chronic constipation? What are the effects of treatments for clearing the bowel in children with faecal impaction? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to August 2009 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). RESULTS: We found 14 systematic reviews and RCTs that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions. CONCLUSIONS: In this systematic review, we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: anal dilatation, behavioural treatments (biofeedback, diaries, or toilet training), bulk-forming laxatives, enemas, faecal softeners, fibre, macrogols, oral fluids, osmotic laxatives, prebiotics, probiotics, stimulant laxatives, and surgical disimpaction.

[Treatment of children with asthma based on exhaled nitrogen monoxide: added value of nitrogen monoxide measurements has not yet been demonstrated]. / Behandeling kinderen met astma op geleide van stikstofmonoxide in de uitademingslucht: meerwaarde stikstofmonoxidemeting nog niet aangetoond.

There is controversy about the effectiveness of monitoring of asthma treatment based on the fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO). We performed a systematic review of the literature on the effectiveness of FeNO-guided asthma treatment in children. Up to the end of March 2009, four randomised controlled trials were published, but the results of the trials could not be pooled. Their methodological quality was moderate to high. There was no significant effect of FeNO-guided asthma treatment on the number of symptom-free days, asthma exacerbations, hospital admissions, pulmonary function history (except one trial) and quality of life. There was a moderate effect on prednisone use. Children receiving FeNO-guided treatment used prednisone less often than children whose treatment was based on symptoms. However, children receiving FeNO-guided treatment used higher doses of inhaled corticosteroids. At this moment, FeNO-guided asthma treatment cannot be recommended in general practice and paediatric care.

[Practice guideline 'Perinatal management of extremely preterm delivery']. / Richtlijn 'Perinataal beleid bij extreme vroeggeboorte'.

At the request of the State Secretary of the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport a national multidisciplinary workgroup developed an evidence-based practice guideline for the management of pregnant women with an imminent preterm delivery after a pregnancy of less than 26 weeks duration and for extremely preterm neonates. Active care measures are advised for neonates from a gestational age of 24 0/7 weeks onwards, unless there are serious arguments that justify a conservative management. In cases of imminent preterm delivery, intrauterine transport to a perinatological care centre is advised from a gestational age of 23 4/7 weeks onwards. In cases of imminent preterm delivery, glucocorticoids to enhance fetal lung maturity should be administered from a gestational age of 23 5/7 weeks onwards. From a gestational age of 24 0/7 weeks onwards a caesarean section may be considered if the fetal condition during spontaneous labour justifies this.

Determinants of knowledge gain in evidence-based medicine short courses: an international assessment.

BACKGROUND: Health care professionals worldwide attend courses and workshops to learn evidence-based medicine (EBM), but evidence regarding the impact of these educational interventions is conflicting and of low methodologic quality and lacks generalizability. Furthermore, little is known about determinants of success. We sought to measure the effect of EBM short courses and workshops on knowledge and to identify course and learner characteristics associated with knowledge acquisition. METHODS: Health care professionals with varying expertise in EBM participated in an international, multicentre before-after study. The intervention consisted of short courses and workshops on EBM offered in diverse settings, formats and intensities. The primary outcome measure was the score on the Berlin Questionnaire, a validated instrument measuring EBM knowledge that the participants completed before and after the course. RESULTS: A total of 15 centres participated in the study and 420 learners from North America and Europe completed the study. The baseline score across courses was 7.49 points (range 3.97-10.42 points) out of a possible 15 points. The average increase in score was 1.40 points (95% confidence interval 0.48-2.31 points), which corresponded with an effect size of 0.44 standard deviation units. Greater improvement in scores was associated (in order of greatest to least magnitude) with active participation required of the learners, a separate statistics session, fewer topics, less teaching time, fewer learners per tutor, larger overall course size and smaller group size. Clinicians and learners involved in medical publishing improved their score more than other types of learners; administrators and public health professionals improved their score less. Learners who perceived themselves to have an advanced knowledge of EBM and had prior experience as an EBM tutor also showed greater improvement than those who did not. INTERPRETATION: EBM course organizers who wish to optimize knowledge gain should require learners to actively participate in the course and should consider focusing on a small number of topics, giving particular attention to statistical concepts.

Usefulness of systematic review search strategies in finding child health systematic reviews in MEDLINE.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the sensitivity and precision of existing search strategies for retrieving child health systematic reviews in MEDLINE using PubMed. DESIGN: Filter (diagnostic) accuracy study. We identified existing search strategies for systematic reviews, combined them with a filter that identifies articles relevant to child health, and applied the combination in MEDLINE to a reference set of child health systematic reviews. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Total number of records retrieved, sensitivity, and precision. RESULTS: We tested 9 search filters. Sensitivity of the systematic review filters combined with the child filter ranged from 68% to 96%; sensitivity of the child filter alone was 98%. The number of records retrieved with PubMed (limited to January 1990-January 2006) by the systematic review filters combined with the child filter ranged from 7861 to 618 053. Precision for the combined filters ranged from 2% to 52%. Because of poor reporting of specific systematic review criteria in both titles and abstracts, in 25% of the records screened we were unsure whether the article concerned a systematic review according to our definition. CONCLUSIONS: The high numbers of records yielded by sensitive search strategies and the low precision threaten the use of systematic reviews for clinical decision making and guideline development. Reporting of specific systematic review criteria in titles and abstracts is poor, and reporting recommendations given by Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses (QUOROM) should be used more strictly. To make identification using MEDLINE easier, there is an urgent need to set minimal criteria that any review should fulfill for it to be indexed as a systematic review.