A meta-analysis on the influence of partial biopsy of primary melanoma on disease recurrence and patient survival.

BACKGROUND: Complete surgical excision is the preferred biopsy type for suspicious melanocytic lesions. However, partial biopsy is sometimes used in special situations. Previous studies have explored the effect of partial biopsy of a primary melanoma on patient outcome with controversial results. OBJECTIVE: We performed a meta-analysis on the influence of the type of biopsy of a primary melanoma on recurrence-free survival (RFS) and melanoma-related survival (MRS). METHODS: Clinical trials, observational cohort studies and case-control studies reporting absolute number of recurrences and/or melanoma-related deaths in patients undergoing a partial or excisional biopsy of melanoma were included in the meta-analysis. RESULTS: In all, the five included studies reported 3249 patients, 1121 (34.5%) of them in the partial biopsy group and 2128 (65.5%) in the excisional biopsy group. Despite a trend in favour of excisional biopsy in reducing the risk for recurrences, the forest plot related to RFS failed to demonstrate significant differences among groups (RR: 1.27; 95% CI 0.97-1.67; P: 0.09; random effects; I2 : 55%). The forest plot showed no difference in the risk of dying for melanoma-related causes for patients undergoing partial biopsy vs. excisions biopsy (RR: 1.50; 95% CI 0.98-2.30; P: 0.06; random effects; I2 : 60%). LIMITATIONS: The majority of the studies were retrospective, and follow-up time was not uniform among studies and not always reported. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, a partial biopsy can be performed in special situations, such as large primary tumours located in surgically sensitive areas, without altering MRS and RFS.

Morphological and morphometric analysis of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa is a highly disabling genodermatosis characterized by skin and mucosal fragility and blistering. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is one of the most devastating complications, having a high morbidity and mortality rate. Patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa were reported to have up to a 70-fold higher risk of developing cSCC than unaffected individuals. Immune cells play a role in cancer evolution. OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to evaluate immunohistological differences between cSCC in patients with and without recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. METHODS: A retrospective study of 25 consecutive cases was performed; five were biopsies of cSCC taken from five patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa; as controls we analysed 10 cSCC in subjects without recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (5 primitive, 3 postburns and 2 postradiotherapy), 5 cSCC in renal transplant recipients and 5 cutaneous pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia in patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. RESULTS: A significant reduction of CD3+, CD4+ and CD68+ between the cSCC in patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa compared to primary cSCC and a significant reduction of CD3+, CD4+, CD8+ and CD20+ were observed in cSCC in patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa compared to secondary cSCC. On the contrary, there was no difference in CD3+, CD8+, CD20+ and CD68+ expression when comparing cSCC in patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa to cSCC in renal transplant recipients. No significant difference was found in size, histopathology, grading, number of mitoses and EGFR expression between the different groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show a reduction in immune cell peritumoral infiltration. Considering the well-known evolution of cSCC in patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa, as well as the younger age at diagnosis, it can be assumed that immune dysfunction might contribute to the cSCC aggressiveness in these patients.

Allergic contact dermatitis to acrylates.

Acrylates and methacrylates are a large group of chemically reactive monomers that are polymerized into acrylic plastics. These have very broad applications in glues, coatings and various plastic materials. Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) caused by acrylates can be occupational, mainly in dentistry workers during the manufacturing and implantation of dental prosthesis, and in nail technicians during the sculpturing and application of artificial nails. The clinical manifestations vary according to the location of the contact. In non-occupational ACD, hand eczema, pulpitis and stomatitis are more frequent. We conducted a study to investigate the frequency of sensitization to acrylates, determining the most frequently sensitizing acrylates and assessing the possible role of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (2-HEMA) as a screening allergen. From January 2013 to December 2014, 217 patients with a personal history and symptoms suggestive of contact dermatitis were patch tested with an extended series of acrylates at the Dermatology and Allergology Units of the University Hospital of Bari. Seven patients (3.2%) had positive reactions. The reactions were related to artificial nails in 2 patients (28.6%), both beauticians, and dental material in 5 patients (71.4%) with dental prosthesis. 2-HEMA detected 100%of sensitized patients to acrylates.

Spitz naevi and melanomas with similar dermoscopic patterns: can confocal microscopy differentiate?

BACKGROUND: Differentiating Spitz naevi from melanomas can be difficult both clinically and dermoscopically. Previous studies have reported the potential role of in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) in increasing diagnostic accuracy. OBJECTIVES: To define RCM criteria that can differentiate 'false twins', namely Spitz naevi and melanomas sharing similar dermoscopic appearance. METHODS: Lesions histopathologically diagnosed as Spitz naevi or melanomas were retrospectively retrieved. They were selected to cover all dermoscopic types and were put into couples sharing similar aspects. Lesions were classified into three main dermoscopic categories: globular and starburst pattern, spitzoid with dotted vessels, and multicomponent or aspecific pattern. RESULTS: RCM findings revealed that striking cell pleomorphism within the epidermis, widespread atypical cells at the dermoepidermal junction and marked pleomorphism within nests were significantly associated with the diagnosis of melanoma, while spindled cells and peripheral clefting were found exclusively with and pathognomonic of Spitz naevi. Furthermore, the analysis of a dermoscopic subgroup highlights the importance of striking pleomorphism and spindled cells as clues to differentiate 'false twins' with globular or starburst patterns. CONCLUSIONS: The current study highlights the role of RCM in discriminating 'false twins' of Spitz naevi and melanomas for lesions showing starburst and globular patterns on dermoscopy, whereas RCM is not useful in the other dermoscopic subgroups.

Clinical epidemiology of hand eczema in patients accessing dermatological reference centres: results from Italy.

BACKGROUND: Data on the epidemiological impact and clinical characteristics of chronic hand eczema in Southern Europe are lacking. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence of chronic hand eczema in its different stages of severity and refractoriness to standard therapy in patients accessing Italian dermatological reference centres, and to evaluate sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with each stage. METHODS: A cross-sectional multicentre study was conducted. Adult patients with hand eczema, consecutively accessing 14 centres over a 6-month period, were enrolled. Patients were classified according to disease duration, severity and response to standard therapy with potent topical corticosteroids. Logistical regression was performed to investigate the relationship between sociodemographic and clinical data with different stages of eczema. RESULTS: The total number of participants was 981. Hand eczema was chronic in 83·5% of patients; 21·3% had severe eczema, with 62·0% of these patients refractory to standard therapy. Food processing and related work, the health professions, craft and related trade works (building, plumbing, electrical), hairdressing/beauty and handicraft work were most frequently associated with chronic hand eczema. Severe chronic hand eczema was more likely to be seen in men, older patients and those with less education. Severe and refractory hand eczema was also more likely among the unemployed and patients with allergic rhinitis and/or atopic dermatitis. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic hand eczema is frequent among patients with hand eczema accessing dermatology centres. Many patients were severe and refractory to standard therapy. The appropriate identification of hand eczema is the first step in implementing effective and efficient treatments.

Fusidic acid in skin infections and infected atopic eczema.

Skin infections represent an important public health issue and cost-driver. Additionally, chronic skin lesions are sometimes colonized by Gram-negative species. Topical therapies are a key component in the management of mild-to-moderate skin infections. In such cases, topical antibiotics may be preferable to systemic treatment, since they maximize the effective doses at the site of infection while minimizing the systemic side effects of the drugs. However, the prevalence of resistant strains is steadily increasing and cases of sensitization are not uncommon. As a consequence, the ideal topical antibiotic should be selective (thus, minimizing cross-resistance), have weak sensitization potential, penetrate the skin efficiently, reach adequate local doses at the site of infection, and finally be available in different formulations matching patients' preferences and needs. Fusidic acid (FA) is a selective antibiotic available in several topical formulations. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies have shown that, contrary to other topical antibiotics such as gentamicin or mupirocin, FA reaches high antimicrobial concentration at deep skin layers after topical application either on intact or damaged epidermis. Several randomized controlled trials demonstrated that FA, in its various topical formulations, is very effective in treating skin infections, given its high bactericidal activity against S. aureus (including strains resistant to penicillin, methicillin, ampicillin, cloxacillin), S. epidermidis, Streptococcus pyogenes, Propionibacterium acnes, Corinebatteria, Clostridia. Additionally, FA presents a low risk of resistance even in methicillin-resistant S. aureus strains, a common pathogen implied in the etiology of skin infections and infected atopic eczema. Such feature makes FA particularly useful in the management of these medical conditions. Finally, possibly due to its large steric effect, FA has proved a very low risk of contact sensitization. Overall, data on FA efficacy, safety, sensitization potential, resistance profile and spectrum selectivity make it a first-choice option in the treatment of primary and secondary skin infection.

Photoallergic contact dermatitis.

Photoallergic contact dermatitis (PCD) is a delayed-type hypersensitivity cutaneous reaction in response to a photoantigen applied to the skin in subjects previously sensitized to the same substance. For the development of PCD, irradiation with ultraviolet (UV) radiations, usually UVA, is required to create a complete antigen, and the culprit substance needs to be within the skin at the time of UVA exposure. The incidence of PCD in the general population is unknown and is considered uncommon. Epidemiological data have been obtained from studies performed using photo-patch tests in patients with suspected photodermatoses in tertiary care outpatient units. Prevalence of PCD over time has been also dependent on prescription and/or usage patterns of potential photosensitizers, and was particularly high in the past, causing mini-epidemics in some countries because of the widespread use of halogenated salicylanilides and other photosensitizing compounds. Many topical substances with photosensitizing properties are currently available, with the most important ones being sunscreen agents and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. The diagnosis of PCD, in patients with a history of photosensitivity and especially with an eczematous form of photodermatosis, should be confirmed by photo-patch testing.