Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 81(2): 213-21, 2007 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17259946

RESUMEN

Exploratory analyses of data pertaining to pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and disease progression are often referred to as the pharmacometrics (PM) analyses. The objective of the current report is to assess the role of PM, at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), in drug approval and labeling decisions. We surveyed the impact of PM analyses on New Drug Applications (NDAs) reviewed over 15 months in 2005-2006. The survey focused on both the approval and labeling decisions through four perspectives: clinical pharmacology primary reviewer, their team leader, the clinical team member, and the PM reviewer. A total of 31 NDAs included a PM review component. Review of NDAs involved independent quantitative evaluation by FDA pharmacometricians. PM analyses were ranked as important in regulatory decision making in over 85% of the 31 NDAs. Case studies are presented to demonstrate the applications of PM analysis.


Asunto(s)
Aprobación de Drogas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Etiquetado de Medicamentos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Farmacocinética , Farmacología Clínica , Benzazepinas/administración & dosificación , Benzazepinas/efectos adversos , Benzazepinas/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/métodos , Ciclosporinas/administración & dosificación , Ciclosporinas/efectos adversos , Ciclosporinas/uso terapéutico , Recolección de Datos , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Esquema de Medicación , Evaluación de Medicamentos/métodos , Equinocandinas , Everolimus , Humanos , Aplicación de Nuevas Drogas en Investigación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Aplicación de Nuevas Drogas en Investigación/estadística & datos numéricos , Lipopéptidos , Lipoproteínas/administración & dosificación , Lipoproteínas/efectos adversos , Lipoproteínas/uso terapéutico , Micafungina , Revisión por Pares , Péptidos Cíclicos/administración & dosificación , Péptidos Cíclicos/efectos adversos , Péptidos Cíclicos/uso terapéutico , Quinoxalinas/administración & dosificación , Quinoxalinas/efectos adversos , Quinoxalinas/uso terapéutico , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Sirolimus/administración & dosificación , Sirolimus/efectos adversos , Sirolimus/análogos & derivados , Sirolimus/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration/legislación & jurisprudencia , United States Food and Drug Administration/normas , Vareniclina
2.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 38(1): 43-50, 2000 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11025183

RESUMEN

Acinetobacter baumannii is becoming increasingly resistant to antibiotics, often requiring combination therapy. Numerous methods exist to detect the presence of in vitro synergy with the time-kill and checkerboard tests being widely used. The Epsilometer test (E test) is a new method that is less labor intensive, but has not been evaluated using a wide range of antimicrobials and organisms. We assessed synergy using the time-kill and checkerboard tests and compared the results to the E test method using 10 clinical isolates of A. baumannii. Antimicrobial combinations evaluated consisted of trovafloxacin or tobramycin in combination with cefepime or piperacillin. Synergy was detected with all combinations by either the checkerboard or time-kill method. Synergy was not detected by the Etest method. The agreement between the time-kill test and Etest method was 72% (range 42-97%); for the time-kill and checkerboard tests, agreement was 51% (range 30-67%). The Etest method appears promising although further testing should be performed with additional antimicrobial agents and organisms.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Acinetobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Acinetobacter/efectos de los fármacos , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antiinfecciosos/farmacología , Quimioterapia Combinada/farmacología , Fluoroquinolonas , Penicilinas/farmacología , Cefepima , Cefalosporinas/farmacología , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Naftiridinas/farmacología , Piperacilina/farmacología , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Tobramicina/farmacología
3.
Pharmacotherapy ; 19(5): 620-6, 1999 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10331825

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of constant-infusion ceftazidime (CTZ) with that of traditional intermittent dosing in a pilot trial. DESIGN: Prospective, crossover trial. SUBJECTS: Five adults with cystic fibrosis requiring intravenous antibiotic therapy for pulmonary exacerbations of the disease. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were initially treated with standard CTZ 2 g 3 times/day for 10 days. At the next hospitalization patients were crossed over and CTZ was administered as a constant infusion at a rate determined to achieve a serum concentration 6.6 times the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the least susceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolate. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of CTZ were determined, as were MICs for all P. aeruginosa isolates. Outcome parameters of interest were changes with therapy in white blood cell count, P aeruginosa density in sputum, and pulmonary function test results. Differences in these parameters for the two forms of administration were not significant. With the exception of one patient who received 6 g/day with both regimens, the average reduction in dosage with the constant infusion was 50%. CONCLUSION: These preliminary data suggest that constant-infusion CTZ may be as safe and efficacious as intermittent dosing.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Bronquiales/tratamiento farmacológico , Ceftazidima/administración & dosificación , Cefalosporinas/administración & dosificación , Fibrosis Quística/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Ceftazidima/farmacocinética , Cefalosporinas/farmacocinética , Estudios Cruzados , Femenino , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/aislamiento & purificación , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria
5.
Ann Pharmacother ; 31(7-8): 907-13, 1997.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9220055

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the usefulness of mesalamine and nicotine in the treatment of active ulcerative colitis and inactive Crohn's disease. DATA SOURCES: Citations were selected from the MEDLINE database. Only those involving human subjects, inflammatory bowel disease, and available in English were selected. STUDY SELECTION: Selection criteria of clinical trials and review articles assessing the effects of mesalamine and nicotine in active ulcerative colitis or inactive Crohn's disease and the utility of reducing steroid dependence or relapse rate. Less than 20% of the articles identified met the selection criteria. DATA SYNTHESIS: In patients with inactive Crohn's disease, mesalamine 2 g/d significantly reduced the risk of relapse in high-relapse-risk patients compared with placebo, reducing the relapse rate from 71% to 55%, but was ineffective in preventing recurrence of inactive Crohn's disease following surgical resection. Mesalamine 4 g/d was effective in decreasing weaning failure due to steroid dependence by 67%, although the relapse rate was not significant compared with placebo at the end of 12 months. Following surgical resection, mesalamine was unable to significantly reduce the incidence of recurrence compared with placebo at the end of 1 year. In patients with active ulcerative colitis, oral mesalamine 2 and 4 g/d was superior to placebo in inducing remission compared with placebo. Among patients with prior steroid of sulfasalazine treatment, rectal mesalamine 4 g hs achieved a remission rate of 78% in more than 12 weeks of therapy. Other studies have not found a dose-response relationship with lower dosages of mesalamine. Whereas nicotine 15-25 mg/d administered as a transdermal patch produced greater symptomatic improvement in active ulcerative colitis compared with placebo, nicotine 15 mg/16 h produced results no different from those with placebo in maintaining remission in active colitis. Nicotine appears to have an adverse effect on the course of Crohn's disease and is not recommended. CONCLUSIONS: Mesalamine has demonstrated clinical effectiveness as a therapeutic agent in the treatment of active ulcerative colitis and inactive Crohn's disease. Although its relationship to inflammatory bowel disease has been known for many years, the usefulness of nicotine for the treatment of active ulcerative colitis requires further exploration before it can be recommended as therapeutic agent.


Asunto(s)
Ácidos Aminosalicílicos/uso terapéutico , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Crohn/tratamiento farmacológico , Estimulantes Ganglionares/uso terapéutico , Nicotina/uso terapéutico , Administración Cutánea , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Estimulantes Ganglionares/efectos adversos , Humanos , Mesalamina , Nicotina/efectos adversos , Fumar/efectos adversos
7.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 43(12): 2848-54, 1999 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10582870

RESUMEN

The pharmacokinetics of cefepime following administration of a single 2-g dose were evaluated for 12 adult patients with thermal burn injury and suspected or documented infection. Serial blood and urine samples for cefepime concentration determination were obtained for 24 h following drug administration. Serum and urine cefepime concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography and serum concentrations were fit to a two-compartment pharmacokinetic model. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) age, actual body weight (ABW), percent total body surface area burned, and days postburn at the time of study were 41 (13) years, 84 (22) kg, 36 (17)%, and 9 (3) days, respectively. Mean (SD) measured creatinine clearance (CL(CR)), total clearance (CL(T)), renal clearance (CL(R)), alpha phase half-life, beta phase half-life, and volume of distribution at steady state (V(SS)) were 135 (31) ml/min, 8.8 (2.4) liters/h, 8.1 (2.0) liters/h, 0.33 (0.14) h, 2.8 (0.6) h, and 0.43 (0.10) liters/kg ABW, respectively. Cefepime CL(T) and CL(R) in burn patients were similar to previously reported values for healthy volunteers when normalized by CL(CR). Stepwise multiple regression was used to associate CL(T) with CL(CR) and days postburn (r(2) = 0.861), CL(R) with CL(CR) and days postburn (r(2) = 0.773), nonrenal clearance with percent third-degree (% 3 degrees ) burn and albumin concentration (r(2) = 0.550), and V(SS) only with % 3 degrees burn (r(2) = 0.624). Simulated steady-state serum concentrations obtained by using the patients' pharmacokinetic parameters exceeded the susceptibility interpretive standard (breakpoint) of cefepime for at least 60% of the dosing interval with dosing regimens of 1 g every 8 h (q8h), 2 g q8h, and 2 g q12h. Despite differences in pharmacokinetic parameters between our patients and healthy volunteers, it appears that these dosing regimens may be adequate in similar burn patients.


Asunto(s)
Quemaduras/metabolismo , Cefalosporinas/farmacocinética , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Infecciones Bacterianas/prevención & control , Quemaduras/complicaciones , Cefepima , Cefalosporinas/sangre , Cefalosporinas/uso terapéutico , Cromatografía Líquida de Alta Presión , Creatinina/sangre , Creatinina/metabolismo , Femenino , Semivida , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Espectrofotometría Ultravioleta
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA