An elevated progastrin-releasing peptide level in patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours indicates a primary tumour in the lung and predicts a shorter survival.

BACKGROUND: Progastrin-releasing peptide (proGRP) is a recently identified biomarker of small-cell lung cancer. In well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours (WDNETs), this study investigates the association between proGRP and tumour characteristics and the prognostic value of proGRP levels compared with chromogranin A (CgA) levels. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Serum samples were obtained in 282 patients with WDNET. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve technique was used to assess specificity and sensitivity in the identification of a primary tumour location. Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed to determine the association of patients' characteristics and tumour markers with survival. RESULTS: For proGRP, the ROC curve indicated a cut-off level of 90 ng/l (approximately twice the upper reference value), with a specificity of 99% and a sensitivity of 43% in distinguishing primary pulmonary tumours from other sites. In the multivariate Cox model, both proGRP and CgA were strongly associated with survival (P < 0.0001 for both variables). CONCLUSIONS: A high-risk proGRP level (more than twice the upper reference value) in patients with WDNETs is a strong indication for a primary tumour in the lung. Besides CgA, proGRP is a complementary tumour marker for prognosis and treatment monitoring in patients with neuroendocrine tumour.

Value of serum S-100B for prediction of distant relapse and survival in stage III B/C melanoma.

BACKGROUND: The biochemical marker serum S-100B has been proven to reflect the stage of melanoma and to be useful for disease monitoring and prediction of survival, mainly in stage IV disease. For stage III melanoma, limited data are available and its predictive value for relapse is unknown. Serum S-100B was evaluated prospectively for monitoring response and its predictive value for relapse and overall survival in stage IIIB/C melanoma patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Treatment consisted of one cycle of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemo(immuno)therapy, around surgery. S-100B was measured at enrollment and prior to and following surgery. The levels of S-100B in serum were compared to the pattern and intensity of the expression of S-100B in the melanoma tissue. RESULTS: Some patients with normal initial S-100B values (n=18) showed responses (3 complete remission and 2 partial remission), in contrast to patients with elevated S-100B values. Distant relapse within one year was found in 11/23 (48%) patients with increased S-100B versus 2/18 (11%) patients with a normal value (p=0.01). Overall survival was decreased in patients with increased S-100B compared to those with normal S-100B (p=0.02). Correlations between the pattern and intensity of S-100B expression in the tumor specimen and the value of serum the S-100B did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Serum S-100B is a valuable biomarker for the evaluation of response to treatment and prediction of early distant relapse and survival in stage IIIB/C melanoma. The marginal correlation between serum S-100B values and expression of S-100B in the tumor specimens needs further study.

Comparison of four different assays for determination of serum S-100B.

BACKGROUND: S-100B determination has been shown to be clinically useful in the management of melanoma patients. After the development of a test for determination of the isoforms S100-A1B and S100-BB in serum (S-100B), several sensitive assays for the detection of serum S-100B have become available. We compared four S-100B assays, two automated (LIAISON Sangtec 100 and Elecsys S100) and two manual ones (Sangtec 100 ELISA and CanAg S100 EIA), with respect to clinical data, reference values and correlation. METHODS: In a total of 280 samples from 155 melanoma patients and 98 healthy individuals S-100B values were measured simultaneously with the different assays. RESULTS: The inter and intra coefficients of variation were best for the automated assays. The functional sensitivity of both manual assays was 0.15 microg/L. Method comparison revealed satisfactory correlation coefficients of 0.9 or higher, but the slopes ranged from 0.29 to 3.36. Except for the Sangtec 100 ELISA, the linearity between the assays was acceptable. The overall sensitivity for melanoma ranged from 37% (Elecsys S100) to 47% (LIAISON Sangtec 100) and the sensitivity increased with stage. ROC curves showed the best accuracy for the LIAISON Sangtec 100 assay. CONCLUSIONS: All assays gave satisfactory results, but it is advisable to improve the performance of the manual assays for better sensitivity. Agreement about an international reference standard is needed.

[Faecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening: high quality for a good price]. / Ontlastingstest bevolkingsonderzoek darmkanker: goede kwaliteit tegen een goede prijs.

The Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) awarded the immunochemical faecal occult blood test (IFOBT) to FOB Gold of Sentinel following a European call for tenders. The contract-awarding procedure included the application of quality knock-out criteria, which were met by two suppliers. The decisive factor was the best price/quality ratio. A recent review indicated that, at present, no single IFOBT is better than any other. The decision to opt for a test manufactured by a different supplier than was used in the previous screening pilots made it necessary to re-determine the cut-off value. This value has now been set (88 ng/ml) and is confirmed by a laboratory test. Colonoscopy-related capacity planning, as well as its diagnostic yield, depends on numerous factors; therefore, the RIVM is currently monitoring the referral percentage and number of adenomas detected and is collaborating on quality terms. Any necessary adjustments are to be made during the introduction of the screening test.

Soluble epidermal growth factor receptor (sEGFR) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) concentration in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: correlation with survival after erlotinib and gefitinib treatment.

BACKGROUND: In patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a higher response rate can be achieved with epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) when selection for therapy is guided by mutation analysis or gene amplification. However, both tests are complex and require tumour tissue. Simple methods to identify responders prior to EGFR-TKI treatment are urgently needed. This study aimed to define the relation between serum sEGFR levels, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and survival in NSCLC patients treated with EGFR-TKIs. METHODS: Patients with stage III/IV NSCLC treated with gefitinib or erlotinib between July 2002 and December 2005 were reviewed. Levels of serum soluble EGFR (sEGFR) were determined by a sandwich quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. A chemiluminescence immunoassay was used for CEA. The relation between sEGFR and survival was investigated. RESULTS: One hundred and two NSCLC patients, mainly stage IV (80%), were identified. Mean sEGFR at baseline was 55.9 µg/l (range 35.3-74.5 µg/l). The median CEA level was 11.1 µg/l (range <1.0-2938.0 µg/l). Median overall survival was 5.2 months (range 1-52 months). Decreasing log CEA values (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.11-2.04, multivariate analysis) and increasing sEGFR values (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.93-0.99, multivariate analysis) were both independently associated with prolonged survival. Higher levels of pre-treatment sEGFR were associated with lower risk of progressive disease within three months (p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Both baseline sEGFR and CEA levels in NSCLC patients receiving EGFR-TKIs showed a significant correlation with survival. To distinguish whether these factors have a predictive or a prognostic value, validation is warranted in an independent patient series containing a control arm without EGFR-TKI treatment.

[Application of tumour markers in clinical practice]. / Toepassing van tumormarkers in de klinische praktijk.

Usefully requesting and applying serum tumour markers in diagnosis and treatment can be difficult. It should be noted that tumour markers are used for varying purposes: screening, diagnosis, staging and prognostic evaluation, detection of recurrence and treatment monitoring. Due to the poor sensitivity and specificity of current tumour markers, most are not suitable for screening an asymptomatic population. Further, the benefits of an improved prognosis by early detection should be weighed against a poorer quality of life and the cost of substantial over-diagnosis and over-treatment. Serum tumour markers are particularly applicable in treatment monitoring and detection of recurrence. Sometimes they can be used to support the diagnostic process and give useful prognostic information.

SELDI-TOF MS serum protein profiles in breast cancer: assessment of robustness and validity.

There is an urgent need for new serum markers that can be applied in e.g. the early detection of breast cancer. Following detection of new, potential biomarkers, such as those reported by Vlahou et al. (Clin Breast Cancer 2003;4:230-239) and Laronga et al. (Dis Markers 2003;19:229-238), assessment of both their robustness and validity is essential to confirm their clinical applicability. We therefore aimed to determine robustness and validity of biomarkers reported by the authors mentioned, by analysis of an independent sample set (breast cancer: n=47, normal women: n=45) in our laboratory, according to the methods described by both authors. Although all markers for the differentiation between breast cancer patients and normal women, discovered in the study of Vlahou et al., were recovered in our validation data set, none had sufficient performance to be applied as a classifier. The markers discovered by Laronga et al. in the differentiation between lymph node positive and -negative breast cancer patients were in part recovered from our validation data set, but were also not applicable as a classifier. In conclusion, although (part of) the proteins discovered and designated as markers by either author could be detected, their validity as biomarkers could not be confirmed by the current study. This finding stresses that, when reporting on a potential biomarker, confirmation of both robustness and validity is essential in obtaining its true clinical applicability.

Role of natriuretic peptides in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with carcinoid heart disease.

Carcinoid heart disease (CHD) occurs in 20-70% of the patients with metastatic well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours (NET). We evaluated whether natriuretic peptides (ANP or NT-proBNP) are useful in early detection of CHD. Blood samples from 32 patients with NET were compared with cardiac ultrasound follow-up. CHD was defined as thickening of the tricuspid valve in the presence of grade III-IV/IV tricuspid valve regurgitation. CHD was found in nine out of 32 patients (28%), all with symptoms of the carcinoid syndrome compared to 65% in the 23 patients without CHD (P=0.04). Median levels of NT-proBNP and 5-HIAA were significantly higher in patients with CHD (894 ng l(-1) and 815 micromol 24 h(-1)) compared to those without (89 and 206 ng l(-1), P<0.001 and P=0.007). No significant differences were detected in ANP levels (P=0.11). Dilatation of the right atrium and ventricle as well as thickening of the tricuspid valve and degree of regurgitation were statistically significant correlated with NT-proBNP levels. The accuracy of NT-proBNP in the diagnosis of CHD was higher than that of ANP. A significantly better survival was observed in case of normal NT-proBNP values. In conclusion, NT-proBNP is helpful as a simple marker in the diagnosis of CHD. Survival is better in patients with normal levels of NT-proBNP.

Prognostic value of baseline and serial carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19.9 measurements in patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei treated with cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Tumor markers are useful for diagnosis and follow-up. We studied the prognostic value of baseline and serial carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19.9 (CA19.9) measurements in patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). METHODS: Sixty-three patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei were treated with cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC. The tumor markers CEA and CA19.9 were collected before therapy and at 3-month intervals during follow-up. RESULTS: Preoperative CEA and CA19.9 levels were increased in, respectively, 75% and 58% of the patients. Baseline tumor marker values were related to the extent of tumor. Immediately after HIPEC, both tumor markers decreased markedly (P <.0001). CA19.9 was shown to be a more useful tumor marker than CEA for follow-up. During follow-up, a high absolute CA19.9 level (P =.0005) was predictive for imminent recurrence. Patients who never attained a normal CA19.9 level showed a higher recurrence rate at 1 year (53%; SE, 15%), in comparison to patients who did so (6%; SE 4%). The median lead time of increased CA19.9 to recurrence was 9 months. CONCLUSIONS: The measurement of the tumor marker CA19.9 is useful in evaluating therapy in patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei treated with cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC. CA19.9 is a prognostic factor for predicting recurrent disease.

Reactivity to human papillomavirus type 16 L1 virus-like particles in sera from patients with genital cancer and patients with carcinomas at five different extragenital sites.

A retrospective seroepidemiologic study was performed to examine the association between human papillomaviruses (HPV) 16 infection and carcinomas of the oropharynx, the oesophagus, penis and vagina. Sera were selected from the serum bank from the Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (Netherlands Cancer Institute) and the Slotervaart Hospital in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Presence of HPV 16 specific antibody was assessed using HPV 16 L1 capsids. Sera positive for HPV 16 capsid antibody were further tested for antibody against HPV 16 E7 peptides. Prevalence of antibody against HPV 16 L1 capsids among both the negative control group without cancer and the negative control group with gastric cancer was 18%, while seroprevalence among the control group of patients with HPV-associated cervical squamous cell carcinoma was 47% (P<0.001). Among the patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma seroprevalence was 38% (P<0.001), among patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma 33% (P=0.04) and among patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma 14% (P=0.7). The serological evidence for association between HPV 16 infection and both oropharyngeal carcinoma and penile carcinoma was established. The conclusion that no association was found between the presence of antibody against HPV 16 L1 capsids and oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma was in accordance with results of other studies carried out in the Netherlands using HPV DNA technology. In the subjects with HPV 16 L1 capsid antibody, no association was found between the antibody against HPV 16 E7 and clinical outcome.