Multimodal approaches for inequality in kidney care: turning social determinants of health into opportunities.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Kidney disease is associated with major health and economic burdens worldwide, disproportionately carried by people in low and middle socio-demographic index quintile countries and in underprivileged communities. Social determinants such as education, income and living and working conditions strongly influence kidney health outcomes. This review synthesised recent research into multimodal interventions to promote kidney health equity that focus on the social determinants of health. RECENT FINDINGS: Inequity in kidney healthcare commonly arises from nationality, race, sex, food insecurity, healthcare access and environmental conditions, and affects kidney health outcomes such as chronic kidney disease progression, dialysis and transplant access, morbidity and mortality. Multimodal approaches to addressing this inequity were identified, targeted to: patients, families and caregivers (nutrition, peer support, financial status, patient education and employment); healthcare teams (workforce, healthcare clinician education); health systems (data coding, technology); communities (community engagement); and health policy (clinical guidelines, policy, environment and research). SUMMARY: The engagement of diverse patients, families, caregivers and communities in healthcare research and implementation, as well as clinical care delivery, is vital to counteracting the deleterious effects of social determinants of kidney health.

"How to navigate this new area": Intensive care clinicians' perceptions of voluntary assisted dying in the intensive care unit: A multisite exploratory study.

BACKGROUND: There is growing momentum worldwide for assisted dying. In Australia, voluntary assisted dying may occur in any setting, including an intensive care unit (ICU). As the subject of much debate worldwide, exploring ICU clinicians' perceptions of assisted dying is essential. AIM: The aim of this study was to explore clinicians' perceptions of and preparedness for voluntary assisted dying in the ICU. METHOD: An exploratory qualitative descriptive design using individual interviews was used. Medical, nursing, and allied health clinicians from three ICUs were recruited. Interviews were conducted between Nov 2022 and Jan 2023, with a hypothetical scenario about voluntary assisted dying used to prompt discussion. Interviews were recorded, professionally transcribed, and analysed using inductive content analysis. FINDINGS: ICU registered nurses (n = 20), physicians (n = 2), and allied health clinicians (n = 4) participated with interviews lasting 18-45 min (mean: 28 min). Analysis revealed four themes: (i) purpose of ICU reflected that ICU care was not all about saving lives, yet recognising dying and changing priorities was challenging; (ii) dying in the ICU is complex due to difficulties in talking about dying, accepting death as the outcome and evaluating care efficacy; (iii) voluntary assisted dying is a lot of grey because of perceived clinical and ethicolegal challenges; and finally, (iv) respecting choice was about respecting patients' values, beliefs, and autonomy, as well as clinicians' beliefs and right to exercise autonomy through conscientious objection. CONCLUSION: Dying and death are inevitable, and views and perspectives about assisted dying will continue to evolve. Respecting patient choice is at the core of assisted dying, but respecting clinicians' perspectives and choice is equally important. With voluntary assisted dying now legal in all Australian states, ensuring ICU team and individual clinician preparedness through access to education, resources, and specialist support services is key to raising awareness and easing uncertainty about deaths through voluntary assisted dying.

Exploring the relationships between health literacy, social support, self-efficacy and self-management in adults with multiple chronic diseases.

BACKGROUND: Self-management in chronic diseases is essential to slowing disease progression and preventing complications. However, empirical research on the associations of critical factors, such as health literacy, social support, and self-efficacy with self-management in the context of multiple chronic diseases is scarce. This study aimed to investigate these associations and provides insights for healthcare providers to develop effective educational strategies for people with multiple chronic diseases. METHODS: Using a cross-sectional survey design, adults (n = 600) diagnosed with at least two chronic diseases were conveniently recruited. To measure health literacy, social support, self-efficacy, and chronic disease self-management behaviours, the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ), Medical Outcome Study - Social Support Survey, Self-efficacy in Managing Chronic Disease, and Self-management in Chronic Diseases instruments were utilized respectively. Comorbidity status was assessed using Age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (ACCI). A generalised linear regression model was used with a backward technique to identify variables associated with self-management. RESULTS: Participants' mean age was 61 years (SD = 15.3), 46% were female, and most had up to 12 years of education (82.3%). Mean scores for HLQ domains 1-5 varied from 2.61 to 3.24 (possible score 1-4); domains 6-9 from 3.29 to 3.65 (possible score 1-5). The mean scores were 52.7 (SD = 10.4, possible score 0-95), 5.46 (SD = 1.9, possible score 0-10) and 82.1 (SD = 12.4, possible score 30-120) for social support, self-efficacy, and self-management, respectively. Mean ACCI was 6.7 (SD = 2.1). Eight factors (age > 65 years, being female, 4 health literacy domains, greater social support, and higher self-efficacy levels) were significantly associated with greater self-management behaviours while comorbidity status was not. The factors that showed the strongest associations with self-management were critical health literacy domains: appraisal of health information, social support for health, and healthcare provider support. CONCLUSIONS: Developing critical health literacy abilities is a more effective way to enhance self-management behaviours than relying solely on self-confidence or social support, especially for people with multiple chronic diseases. By facilitating communication and patient education, healthcare providers can help patients improve their critical health literacy, which in turn can enhance their self-management behaviours.

Factors influencing health-related quality of life in people with chronic kidney disease: A structural equation modelling approach.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To test whether the revised Wilson and Cleary model could identify which factors contribute to health-related quality of life in chronic kidney disease. BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease affects a person's health-related quality of life detrimentally although nursing practice informed by theory is only beginning to emerge. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study reported using the STROBE guidelines. METHODS: About 886 participants with chronic kidney disease (varying grades) completed validated measures of symptoms (renal version of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale), and general health perceptions and health-related quality of life (European Quality of Life five-dimension three-level). Socio-demographic and renal characteristics were also collected. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and structural equation modelling. RESULTS: Biological function (decreased kidney function and haemoglobin and greater number of comorbidities), directly contributed to increased symptom burden. Symptoms demonstrated strong negative relationships with both general health perceptions and health-related quality of life. General health perceptions had a direct positive relationship with health-related quality of life. As age increased, health-related quality of life decreased. The only environmental characteristic of significance was the distance between home and hospital although it was not directly associated with health-related quality of life. Overall, the model explained approximately half of the deterioration in health-related quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: The model demonstrated how various factors influence alteration of health-related quality of life in people with chronic kidney disease. Early identification of these factors could assist nurses to introduce effective management strategies into patient care plans proactively. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Comprehensive symptom assessment needs to occur not only in kidney failure but in earlier chronic kidney disease grades to enable timely interventions targeted at improving people's wellbeing. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Validated interviewer administered questionnaires were completed by participants with chronic kidney disease in this study.

Kidney health for all: bridging the gap in kidney health education and literacy.

The high burden of kidney disease, global disparities in kidney care, and poor outcomes of kidney failure bring a concomitant growing burden to persons affected, their families, and carers, and the community at large. Health literacy is the degree to which persons and organizations have or equitably enable individuals to have the ability to find, understand, and use information and services to make informed health-related decisions and actions for themselves and others. Rather than viewing health literacy as a patient deficit, improving health literacy largely rests with health care providers communicating and educating effectively in codesigned partnership with those with kidney disease. For kidney policy makers, health literacy provides the imperative to shift organizations to a culture that places the person at the center of health care. The growing capability of and access to technology provides new opportunities to enhance education and awareness of kidney disease for all stakeholders. Advances in telecommunication, including social media platforms, can be leveraged to enhance persons' and providers' education; The World Kidney Day declares 2022 as the year of "Kidney Health for All" to promote global teamwork in advancing strategies in bridging the gap in kidney health education and literacy. Kidney organizations should work toward shifting the patient-deficit health literacy narrative to that of being the responsibility of health care providers and health policy makers. By engaging in and supporting kidney health-centered policy making, community health planning, and health literacy approaches for all, the kidney communities strive to prevent kidney diseases and enable living well with kidney disease.

Kidney Health for All: Bridging the Gap in Kidney Health Education and Literacy.

The high burden of kidney disease, global disparities in kidney care, and poor outcomes of kidney failure bring a concomitant growing burden to persons affected, their families, and carers, and the community at large. Health literacy is the degree to which persons and organizations have or equitably enable individuals to have the ability to find, understand, and use information and services to make informed health-related decisions and actions for themselves and others. Rather than viewing health literacy as a patient deficit, improving health literacy largely rests with health care providers communicating and educating effectively in codesigned partnership with those with kidney disease. For kidney policy makers, health literacy provides the imperative to shift organizations to a culture that places the person at the center of health care. The growing capability of and access to technology provides new opportunities to enhance education and awareness of kidney disease for all stakeholders. Advances in telecommunication, including social media platforms, can be leveraged to enhance persons' and providers' education; The World Kidney Day declares 2022 as the year of "Kidney Health for All" to promote global teamwork in advancing strategies in bridging the gap in kidney health education and literacy. Kidney organizations should work toward shifting the patient-deficit health literacy narrative to that of being the responsibility of health care providers and health policy makers. By engaging in and supporting kidney health-centered policy making, community health planning, and health literacy approaches for all, the kidney communities strive to prevent kidney diseases and enable living well with kidney disease.

Kidney health for all: bridging the gap in kidney health education and literacy.

The high burden of kidney disease, global disparities in kidney care and poor outcomes of kidney failure bring a concomitant growing burden to those affected, their families, caregivers and the community at large. Health literacy is the degree to which people and organizations have or equitably enable individuals to have the ability to find, understand and use information and services to make informed health-related decisions and actions for themselves and others. Rather than viewing health literacy as a patient deficit, improving health literacy largely rests with healthcare providers communicating and educating effectively in a co-designed partnership with those with kidney disease. For kidney policymakers, health literacy provides the imperative to shift organizations to a culture that places the person at the center of healthcare. The growing capability of and access to technology provides new opportunities to enhance education and awareness of kidney disease for all stakeholders. Advances in telecommunication, including social media platforms, can be leveraged to enhance people's and providers' education; the World Kidney Day declares 2022 as the year of 'Kidney Health for All' to promote global teamwork in advancing strategies in bridging the gap in kidney health education and literacy. Kidney organizations should work toward shifting the patient-deficit health literacy narrative to that of being the responsibility of healthcare providers and health policymakers. By engaging in and supporting kidney health-centered policymaking, community health planning and health literacy approaches for all, the kidney communities strive to prevent kidney diseases and enable living well with kidney disease.

Kidney health for all: bridging the gap in kidney health education and literacy.

The high burden of kidney disease, global disparities in kidney care, and poor outcomes of kidney failure bring a concomitant growing burden to persons affected, their families, and carers, and the community at large. Health literacy is the degree to which persons and organizations have or equitably enable individuals to have the ability to find, understand, and use information and services to make informed health-related decisions and actions for themselves and others. Rather than viewing health literacy as a patient deficit, improving health literacy largely rests with health care providers communicating and educating effectively in codesigned partnership with those with kidney disease. For kidney policy makers, health literacy provides the imperative to shift organizations to a culture that places the person at the center of health care. The growing capability of and access to technology provides new opportunities to enhance education and awareness of kidney disease for all stakeholders. Advances in telecommunication, including social media platforms, can be leveraged to enhance persons' and providers' education; The World Kidney Day declares 2022 as the year of "Kidney Health for All" to promote global teamwork in advancing strategies in bridging the gap in kidney health education and literacy. Kidney organizations should work toward shifting the patient-deficit health literacy narrative to that of being the responsibility of health care providers and health policy makers. By engaging in and supporting kidney health-centered policy making, community health planning, and health literacy approaches for all, the kidney communities strive to prevent kidney diseases and enable living well with kidney disease.

Chronic kidney disease in public renal practices in Queensland, Australia, 2011-2018.

AIM: To describe adults with (non-dialysis) chronic kidney disease (CKD) in nine public renal practice sites in the Australian state of Queensland. METHODS: 7,060 persons were recruited to a CKD Registry in May 2011 and until start of kidney replacement therapy (KRT), death without KRT or June 2018, for a median period of 3.4 years. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 7,060 persons, 52% males, with a median age of 68 yr; 85% had CKD stages 3A to 5, 45.4% were diabetic, 24.6% had diabetic nephropathy, and 51.7% were obese. Younger persons mostly had glomerulonephritis or genetic renal disease, while older persons mostly had diabetic nephropathy, renovascular disease and multiple diagnoses. Proportions of specific renal diagnoses varied >2-fold across sites. Over the first year, eGFR fell in 24% but was stable or improved in 76%. Over follow up, 10% started KRT, at a median age of 62 yr, most with CKD stages 4 and 5 at consent, while 18.8% died without KRT, at a median age of 80 yr. Indigenous people were younger at consent and more often had diabetes and diabetic kidney disease and had higher incidence rates of KRT. CONCLUSION: The spectrum of characteristics in CKD patients in renal practices is much broader than represented by the minority who ultimately start KRT. Variation in CKD by causes, age, site and Indigenous status, the prevalence of obesity, relative stability of kidney function in many persons over the short term, and differences between those who KRT and die without KRT are all important to explore.

Experiences of renal healthcare practitioners during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multi-methods approach.

BACKGROUND: Globally, renal healthcare practitioners provide intensive and protracted support to a highly complex multi-morbid patient population however knowledge about the impact of COVID-19 on these practitioners is extremely limited. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the experiences of COVID-19 with renal healthcare practitioners during the first global lockdown between June 2020 and September 2020. METHODS: A multi-methods approach was carried out including a quantitative survey and qualitative interviews. This was a multinational study of renal healthcare practitioners from 29 countries. Quantitative: A self-designed survey on COVID-19 experiences and standardised questionnaires (General Health Questionnaire-12; Maslach Burnout Inventory). Descriptive statistics were generated for numerical data. Qualitative: Online semi-structured interviews were conducted. Data was subjected to thematic analysis. Renal healthcare practitioners (n = 251) completed an online survey. Thirteen renal healthcare practitioners took part in semi-structured interviews (12 nurses and 1 dietician). RESULTS: The majority of participants surveyed were female (86.9 %; n = 218), nurses (86.9 %; n = 218) with an average 21.5 (SD = 11.1) years' experience since professional qualification, and 16.3 years (SD = 9.3) working in renal healthcare. Survey responses indicated a level of preparedness, training and satisfactory personal protective equipment during the pandemic however approximately 40.3 % experienced fear about attending work, and 49.8 % experienced mental health distress. The highest prevalence of burnout was emotional exhaustion (35.9 %). Three themes emerged from the qualitative analysis highlighting the holistic complexities in managing renal healthcare, a neglected specialist workforce, and the need for appropriate support at work during a pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: Results have highlighted the psychological impact, in terms of emotional exhaustion and mental health distress in our sample of renal healthcare practitioners. As the pandemic has continued, it is important to consider the long-term impact on an already stretched workforce including the risk of developing mental health disorders. Future research and interventions are required to understand and improve the provision of psychological support for specialist medical and nursing personnel.

A bundled phosphate control intervention (4Ds) for adults with end-stage kidney disease receiving haemodialysis: A cluster randomized controlled trial.

AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of a bundled self-management intervention (taking control of your phosphate with the 4Ds) to improve phosphate control among adults receiving haemodialysis. BACKGROUND: Hyperphosphataemia occurs in end-stage kidney disease and is managed by diet, drinks, drugs (phosphate binder medication), and dialysis (the 4Ds). Adherence to the 4Ds is challenging for patients. DESIGN: A pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial with repeated measures. METHODS: Participants were adults receiving haemodialysis with high serum phosphate (>1.6 mmol/L for at least 3 months) recruited between August 2017 -May 2018. Cluster randomization was according to haemodialysis treatment shifts. The 'teach-back' intervention was designed to improve phosphate control. Expected outcomes were reduced serum phosphate and increased knowledge of phosphate in end-stage kidney disease, self-efficacy and adherence to diet, drugs, and dialysis. RESULTS: There were no differences between groups at baseline. Both groups had similar mean serum phosphate over time; at three months, 46% of the intervention group achieved reductions that met the target serum phosphate level compared with 33% of the control group. There were significant improvements in knowledge of phosphate in end-stage kidney disease, self-efficacy and adherence to diet, drugs, and dialysis (missing) in the intervention group compared with control group. CONCLUSION: The 4Ds, a bundled self-management intervention, was effective in improving patient confidence and adherence to phosphate control methods. IMPACT: The 4Ds intervention bundles together four essential strategies for preventing and controlling hyperphosphataemia in end-stage kidney disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12617000703303 Registered 16/05/2017.

Chronic disease health literacy in First Nations people: A mixed methods study.

AIM: To explore chronic disease education, self-management and health literacy abilities from First Nations Australian adults with chronic disease through the integration of qualitative and quantitative findings. BACKGROUND: Chronic disease management requires good health literacy abilities to manage long-term health needs. First Nations people have a higher burden of chronic disease although little is known regarding chronic disease health literacy of First Nations people. DESIGN: A concurrent embedded mixed methods study reported using the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines. METHODS: Data were collected from First Nations people with one or more chronic diseases living in remote Australia between February-November 2017. Quantitative data (n = 200) were collected using the Health Literacy Questionnaire along with demographic and health data. Qualitative data (n = 20) were collected via face-to-face interviews to examine chronic disease education and self-management experiences. Data were analysed separately then integrated to develop meta-inferences. RESULTS: Poor communication from healthcare providers coupled with low health literacy abilities is a major barrier to both active and successful management of chronic disease. Communicating in medical jargon resulted in individuals being placed in a power differential causing lack of trust and relationship breakdowns with healthcare providers affecting active chronic disease self-management. The perception of inevitability and ambivalence towards chronic disease and the notion of futility towards self-management were concurred with the low level of active engagement in health care. CONCLUSIONS: Yarning is an important strategy used by First Nations people for communication. For nurses, understanding and developing skills in yarning will facilitate cultural safety, communication and understanding about chronic disease self-management in contexts where health literacy abilities are challenged. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Using yarning, and plain language visual aids, and teach-back will readdress the power differential experienced by First Nations people and may also improve understanding of chronic disease self-management.

Alterations in symptoms and health-related quality of life as kidney function deteriorates: A cross-sectional study.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To compare symptoms and health-related quality of life and to examine the relationship between these as kidney function deteriorates. BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease is a global health problem, and while knowledge of symptom burden and health-related quality of life is understood in kidney failure (previously end-stage kidney disease), there is limited understanding about symptoms and health-related quality of life across the chronic kidney disease trajectory. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design reported using the STROBE guidelines. METHODS: Eight hundred eighty-six adults with varying levels of kidney function (chronic kidney disease grades 3b-5 including those receiving dialysis) completed the renal version of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale and the Quality of Life Short Form-36 version 2. Socio-demographic and renal characteristics were also collected. Data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. RESULTS: Participants had a mean age of 57 years and were mostly male. Regardless of chronic kidney disease grade, pain, poor mobility, weakness, anxiety and depression were the most prevalent and severe symptoms reported. Health-related quality of life was significantly associated with physical and psychological symptom scores. As kidney function deteriorated, both physical and mental health-related quality of life decreased, and prevalence and severity of symptoms increased. CONCLUSIONS: There is substantial symptom burden irrespective of chronic kidney disease grade, which overwhelmingly affects health-related quality of life. Early identification by nurses would enable proactive management plans to be implemented. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Nurses, whether in specialist renal services or in primary healthcare, are ideally placed to regularly assess symptoms and health-related quality of life in those with chronic kidney disease. Timely assessment could assist in the targeting of earlier interventions designed to reduce symptom burden and to increase health-related quality of life.

Validation of the Australian version of the Chronic Kidney Disease Self-Management instrument.

AIM: The aim of this study is to evaluate the validity and reliability of the modified Chronic Kidney Disease Self-Management instrument in an English-speaking population. BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence that self-management behaviours can improve outcomes for people with chronic kidney disease. However, there are few suitable instruments available. DESIGN: The study was cross sectional, with a test-retest protocol. METHOD: Adults with chronic kidney disease attending a primary health care between June and December 2015 completed the Chronic Kidney Disease Self-Management instrument. Construct validity was determined using exploratory factor analysis, internal consistency and test-retest reliability using Cronbach's α and intraclass correlation. For convergent validity, the relationships between knowledge, self-efficacy and self-management were investigated. RESULTS: The Australian version of the Chronic Kidney Disease Self-Management instrument has 17 items grouped into four factors: self-integration, seeking social support, adherence to lifestyle modification and problem solving. The instrument demonstrated good reliability. Self-efficacy was positively correlated with self-management scores, although there was no correlation between chronic kidney disease knowledge and self-management. CONCLUSIONS: The Australian version of the Chronic Kidney Disease Self-Management instrument was found to be a valid and reliable patient-reported outcome measure. It can be used in clinical practice to support self-management, as well as future research.

Health literacy profiles of adults with multiple chronic diseases: A cross-sectional study using the Health Literacy Questionnaire.

Health literacy is multidimensional, comprising functional, communicative, and critical thinking dimensions. Understanding health literacy is crucial for clinicians to develop effective health education strategies. In this study, we examined the multiple dimensions of health literacy in Vietnamese adults with chronic comorbidities. A cross-sectional sample of 600 patients, aged ≥18 years with a diagnosis of at least two chronic diseases (cardiovascular conditions, chronic kidney disease, or diabetes), completed the Health Literacy Questionnaire, an instrument assessing nine distinct domains. Descriptive and parametric tests were performed to analyze the health literacy levels for various demographic characteristics. Generalized linear models using backward modelling explored factors associated with higher health literacy. The lowest scoring domains were "Healthcare provider support" and "Appraisal of health information." In multivariate models greater health literacy was associated with those <65 years, having a postsecondary degree or higher level of education, greater income, urban residence, being cared for by spouses/children, and having fewer comorbidities. To improve health literacy, clinicians in primary and acute healthcare settings should build supportive relationships with patients and assist them with understanding and appraising health information.

Health literacy in Indigenous people with chronic disease living in remote Australia.

BACKGROUND: Health literacy is strongly associated with health outcomes and is important for health policy and service delivery. Low health literacy was reported in 59% of Australian adults, however, there is no national data on the health literacy of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (ATSI) peoples. The ATSI population in Australia experience a notable gap in health outcomes compared with non-Indigenous Australians which is due, in part to a higher prevalence of chronic diseases. The health outcome gap is more pronounced in rural and remote locations. This study aims to establish the health literacy profile of ATSI adults with chronic disease living in remote North-West Queensland Australia, and to investigate associations between the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) domains and self-reported chronic disease and demographic characteristics. METHODS: Using a cross-sectional design, 200 ATSI adults with a diagnosis of chronic disease/s (cardiovascular disease, diabetes, respiratory disease and/or chronic kidney disease) were recruited from two sites with the assistance of Aboriginal Health Workers. Data were collected using the HLQ, a multidimensional 44 item instrument to assess nine domains of health literacy. Demographic and health data were also collected. Analysis of variance using backwards modelling was used to determine predictors of health literacy. RESULTS: Participants were mostly male (53.5%) and aged between 19 and 89 years. The most prevalent chronic disease was cardiovascular disease (74%) followed by diabetes (67.5%). More than half (62%) had two or more chronic diseases. There was at least one independent predicator for each of the nine health literacy domains. Age, number of chronic diseases, gender, and level of education were all highly significant predictors of health literacy. CONCLUSION: Improved health literacy will enable individuals to take an active role in their health. Understanding the health literacy of ATSI adults is a crucial first step. Our findings can assist Australian healthcare organisations to review their health literacy responsiveness and examine ways to improve patients' needs and health capabilities to better support people to engage in effective self-management for chronic diseases.

Correction to: Health literacy in indigenous people with chronic disease living in remote Australia.

In the original publication of this article [1], some values are missing in Table 3. Table 3 is revised in the updated figure below.

Effectiveness of self-management programme in people with chronic kidney disease: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

AIMS: To examine the effectiveness of a self-management intervention compared with usual care in adults with chronic kidney disease (CKD) on self-management, knowledge, self-efficacy, health-related quality of life, and blood pressure. DESIGN: A parallel group randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Patients aged ≥ 18 years with CKD stages 3-5 were recruited between November 2015 and June 2016. Participants were randomly allocated into either the intervention (N = 68) or control group (N = 67). The control group received usual care, while the intervention group received usual care plus a self-management programme from a nurse. The intervention was guided by social cognitive theory (SCT) and included a face-to-face educational session followed by telephone support. Both groups were followed for 16 weeks. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in self-management, knowledge, self-efficacy, health-related quality of life, and blood pressure between the two groups at baseline. At week 16, compared with the control group, large effect sizes for improved self-management, knowledge, and self-efficacy were detected. For health-related quality of life, the physical and mental health components significantly improved. However, no significant differences in either systolic or diastolic blood pressures were found. CONCLUSION: In earlier stages of CKD, a simple self-management education benefits patients. IMPACT: Effective self-management in the earlier stages of CKD contributes to slowing its progression, improving health outcomes and lowering the burden on healthcare systems. This study demonstrated that SCT increases CKD self-management by strengthening knowledge and self-efficacy. Nurses can give this education. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12616000038493.

A randomized controlled trial testing a decision support intervention for older patients with advanced kidney disease.

AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of a decision support intervention (OPTIONS) in facilitating the older person with advanced kidney disease to make a treatment choice. DESIGN: Pragmatic randomized controlled trial. METHODS: People aged ≥70 years with advanced kidney disease (eGFR ≤20 ml/min/1.73m2 ) who had not made a decision about treatment options and who were not eligible for a kidney transplant were recruited between March 2015 and March 2016. Participants were randomly allocated to receive the OPTIONS (N = 16) or standard care (N = 21). OPTIONS is a 4-week nurse-delivered intervention. Primary outcomes were decision conflict and decision regret, the secondary outcomes were knowledge of risk and benefits of dialysis and health-related quality of life. The usefulness of OPTIONS was also evaluated. RESULTS: There were no differences between the intervention and standard care groups at baseline. At T1, there were no significant differences in decision conflict and decision regret although the intervention group had lower decisional conflict at T2. The decision support intervention was able to significantly improve the participants' knowledge score in the intervention group. There were no observable differences between groups for health-related quality of life physical and mental health component summary scores. OPTIONS was helpful in preparing participants in making a treatment decision. CONCLUSION: OPTIONS, a decision support intervention, increased a person's knowledge of the benefits and risks of dialysis and can be used to facilitate shared decision-making with older adults with advanced stages of kidney disease. IMPACT: Strategies to improve shared decision-making between older people with advanced stages of kidney disease and their clinicians are crucial for patient autonomy in a population where this may not be common practice. The decision support intervention- OPTIONS demonstrated significant improvement in patient knowledge about different treatment pathways. OPTIONS provides a structured and evidence-based approach to support shared decision-making for this population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN 12614001090606 Registered 14/10/2014.

Psychometric evaluation of the culturally and linguistically translated Vietnamese chronic kidney disease self-management instrument.

AIMS: To translate and psychometrically test the modified chronic kidney disease self-management instrument in Vietnamese language. BACKGROUND: Research on chronic kidney disease self-management is increasing although few patient-reported outcome measures are available in other languages. DESIGN: This study involved instrument modification, translation, and cultural adaptation into Vietnamese followed by psychometric evaluation in a target population. METHODS: Following modification, the instrument was translated by bilingual independent translators, and then an expert panel assessed content face validity. Reliability of the instrument was assessed by internal consistency and test-retest reliability in a sample of 293 people with chronic kidney disease. Then exploratory factor analysis was used to evaluate construct validity of the Vietnamese version. RESULTS: The Vietnamese chronic kidney disease self-management instrument demonstrated excellent content face validity and internal consistency. The test-retest indicated good stability of the instrument over a 2-week period. Four factors were identified using exploratory factor analysis and were named understanding my kidney disease, taking action to manage my kidney disease, seeking social support, and adhering to a healthy diet. CONCLUSIONS: The translated and modified version is a valid, reliable, and feasible patient-reported outcome measure of self-management behaviour in Vietnamese-speaking populations.