Antibiotic Therapy for 6 or 12 Weeks for Prosthetic Joint Infection.

BACKGROUND: The management of prosthetic joint infection usually consists of a combination of surgery and antimicrobial therapy. The appropriate duration of antimicrobial therapy for this indication remains unclear. METHODS: We performed an open-label, randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial to compare 6 weeks with 12 weeks of antibiotic therapy in patients with microbiologically confirmed prosthetic joint infection that had been managed with an appropriate surgical procedure. The primary outcome was persistent infection (defined as the persistence or recurrence of infection with the initial causative bacteria, with an antibiotic susceptibility pattern that was phenotypically indistinguishable from that at enrollment) within 2 years after the completion of antibiotic therapy. Noninferiority of 6 weeks of therapy to 12 weeks of therapy would be shown if the upper boundary of the 95% confidence interval for the absolute between-group difference (the value in the 6-week group minus the value in the 12-week group) in the percentage of patients with persistent infection within 2 years was not greater than 10 percentage points. RESULTS: A total of 410 patients from 28 French centers were randomly assigned to receive antibiotic therapy for 6 weeks (205 patients) or for 12 weeks (205 patients). Six patients who withdrew consent were not included in the analysis. In the main analysis, 20 patients who died during follow-up were excluded, and missing outcomes for 6 patients who were lost to follow-up were considered to be persistent infection. Persistent infection occurred in 35 of 193 patients (18.1%) in the 6-week group and in 18 of 191 patients (9.4%) in the 12-week group (risk difference, 8.7 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, 1.8 to 15.6); thus, noninferiority was not shown. Noninferiority was also not shown in the per-protocol and sensitivity analyses. We found no evidence of between-group differences in the percentage of patients with treatment failure due to a new infection, probable treatment failure, or serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with microbiologically confirmed prosthetic joint infections that were managed with standard surgical procedures, antibiotic therapy for 6 weeks was not shown to be noninferior to antibiotic therapy for 12 weeks and resulted in a higher percentage of patients with unfavorable outcomes. (Funded by Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique, French Ministry of Health; DATIPO ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01816009.).

Antibiotic treatment for 6 weeks versus 12 weeks in patients with pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Duration of treatment for patients with vertebral osteomyelitis is mainly based on expert recommendation rather than evidence. We aimed to establish whether 6 weeks of antibiotic treatment is non-inferior to 12 weeks in patients with pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis. METHODS: In this open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial, we enrolled patients aged 18 years or older with microbiologically confirmed pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis and typical radiological features from 71 medical care centres across France. Patients were randomly assigned to either 6 weeks or 12 weeks of antibiotic treatment (physician's choice in accordance with French guidelines) by a computer-generated randomisation list of permuted blocks, stratified by centre. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who were classified as cured at 1 year by a masked independent validation committee, analysed by intention to treat. Non-inferiority would be declared if the proportion of cured patients assigned to 6 weeks of treatment was not less than the proportion of cured patients assigned to 12 weeks of treatment, within statistical variability, by an absolute margin of 10%. This trial is registered with EudraCT, number 2006-000951-18, and Clinical Trials.gov, number NCT00764114. FINDINGS: Between Nov 15, 2006, and March 15, 2011, 359 patients were randomly assigned, of whom six in the 6-week group and two in the 12-week group were excluded after randomisation. 176 patients assigned to the 6-week treatment regimen and 175 to the 12-week treatment regimen were analysed by intention to treat. 160 (90·9%) of 176 patients in the 6-week group and 159 (90·9%) of 175 of those in the 12-week group met the criteria for clinical cure. The difference between the groups (0·05%, 95% CI -6·2 to 6·3) showed the non-inferiority of the 6-week regimen when compared with the 12-week regimen. 50 patients in the 6-week group and 51 in the 12-week group had adverse events, the most common being death (14 [8%] in the 6-week group vs 12 [7%] in the 12-week group), antibiotic intolerance (12 [7%] vs 9 [5%]), cardiorespiratory failure (7 [4%] vs 12 [7%]), and neurological complications (7 [4%] vs 3 [2%]). INTERPRETATION: 6 weeks of antibiotic treatment is not inferior to 12 weeks of antibiotic treatment with respect to the proportion of patients with pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis cured at 1 year, which suggests that the standard antibiotic treatment duration for patients with this disease could be reduced to 6 weeks. FUNDING: French Ministry of Health.

Antibodies to tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis among healthy adults vaccinated according to the French vaccination recommendations.

In this sero-epidemiological study, we investigated humoral immunity to three vaccine-preventable diseases--tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis--among 331 adults (aged 18-60 years) attending vaccination centres for travellers and who had been vaccinated according to national recommendations in France. Serological results showed that the percentage of subjects with antibodies to diphtheria and tetanus decreases with age. Results also confirmed surveillance data on vaccination in France, with 7.6% of the study population (13.4% of those aged 18-29 years) having recently acquired a pertussis infection. These results confirm the importance of following French recommendations for regular boosters for tetanus and diphtheria among adults. They also indicate the need for better implementation of the current recommendations for pertussis-vaccine boosters in adults.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) genotype distribution in invasive cervical cancers in France: EDITH study.

Invasive cervical cancer (ICC) remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in France. Since human papillomavirus (HPV) is the necessary cause of ICC, the aim of this study was to assess the type-specific prevalence of HPV in ICC in France in order to locally evaluate the potential benefit of an HPV 16/18 L1 virus-like particles (VLP) vaccination. A total of 516 histological specimens collected in 15 centers were analyzed. Among them, 86% had a diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) whereas 14% were adenocarcinomas (ADC). HPV genotyping was performed using the INNO-LiPA assay allowing the specific detection of 24 HPV genotypes both high risk (HR) and low risk (LR). The overall HPV prevalence in ICC was 97%. The most prevalent genotypes were HPV 16 (73%) and HPV 18 (19%) followed by HPV 31 (7%), 33, 68, 45, 52 and 58 (4.1-2.3%). HPV 16 and/or 18 were associated with 82% of ICC, 10% being HPV 16 and 18 coinfections. While HPV 16 was the most prevalent type in both SCC (74%) and ADC (64%), HPV 18 was by far more prevalent in ADC (37%) compared to SCC (16%; p < 0.001). Multiple infections with at least two different HR HPV genotypes were observed in 22% of ICC. Given the high HPV 16/18 prevalence and taking into account possible production of crossneutralizing antibodies against other HPV types, HPV 16/18 L1 VLP vaccination would be expected to significantly reduce the burden of ICC in France.

Autoimmune hemolytic anemia and common variable immunodeficiency: a case-control study of 18 patients.

To describe the main characteristics and treatment of autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AHA) in patients with common variable immunodeficiency (CVID), we analyzed data from 18 patients, 4 from an earlier study and 14 from the French DEF-I cohort on adult patients with primary hypogammaglobulinemia. To be included, patients had to have CVID and a previous history of AHA with a hemoglobin level < or =90 g/L at onset. To determine whether AHA is associated with a particular clinical phenotype of CVID, we conducted a case-control study from the DEF-I cohort. The estimated frequency of AHA in CVID patients from the DEF-I cohort was 5.5% (14/252). Median age at AHA diagnosis was 26 years (range, 1-57 yr), and 27.5 years (range, 5-61 yr) at CVID diagnosis. CVID was diagnosed before the onset of AHA in only 2 patients (11%). CVID was diagnosed more than 6 months after AHA in 10 cases (55.5%), and the 2 conditions were diagnosed concomitantly in 6 cases. The 14 patients included in the DEF-I cohort were compared with 238 control patients with CVID but without AHA. Corticosteroids were used as initial treatment for all patients in the current study. An initial response was obtained in 15 of 18 (83%) patients. Overall, 9 of these (60%) achieved a lasting response with steroids alone (7 patients) or in combination with intravenous immunoglobulin (2 patients). Seven patients underwent splenectomy, and 5 additional splenectomies were performed for associated autoimmune thrombocytopenic purpura. After splenectomy, a lasting response was obtained in 3 of the 7 patients with AHA. However, 5 of the 12 splenectomized patients experienced life-threatening infection. Severe infection occurred in 2 of 4 patients receiving immunosuppressive drugs. At the end of follow-up, 13 of 18 (72%) patients were in treatment-free remission (13 complete responses), and 4 of 18 (22%) were in remission while on prednisone < or =20 mg/d. One patient had died, of cancer.

Relationship between levels of indinavir in hair and virologic response to highly active antiretroviral therapy.

BACKGROUND: Suboptimal levels of antiretroviral drugs result in virologic failure in HIV-infected patients treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship between levels of indinavir in hair and virologic outcome. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: 7 AIDS clinics in France. PATIENTS: 89 HIV-infected patients who received HAART that included indinavir. MEASUREMENTS: Patients were classified as responders or nonresponders on the basis of viremia at the time of hair collection. In nonresponders, levels of indinavir in hair and resistance mutations in the protease gene were assessed at baseline and at the time of indinavir measurement. RESULTS: Mean indinavir levels (+/-SD) were significantly higher in the 65 responders than in the 24 nonresponders (24.4 +/- 16 microg/g vs. 12.9 +/- 8.6 microg/g) (P < 0.001). Nonresponders with intermediate levels of indinavir in hair had more mutations in the protease gene than did nonresponders with low levels of indinavir in hair. CONCLUSION: Indinavir levels in hair are associated with virologic outcome in patients receiving HAART.

[Hypersensitive reaction to abacavir or syphilitic hepatitis?]. / Réaction d'hypersensibilité à l'abacavir ou hépatite syphilitique?

INTRODUCTION: Syphilis remains a current infection in France, with an increase in cases associated with the increase in sexual practices at risk. OBSERVATION: An HIV-seropositive homosexual male presented with a perturbed hepatic profile and roseola-like exanthema 15 days after starting treatment with Trizivir. Because of the combination of hepatitis and cutaneous eruption evoking hypersensitivity to abacavir, treatment was suspended, but no improvement was noted. The diagnosis of syphilitic hepatitis associated with roseola was made following a sero-conversion and improvement was obtained with benzathine-penicillin and the re-introduction of Trizivir without further problem. COMMENTS: This case report underlines the possibility of discovering syphilis when confronted with cholestatic and cytolytic hepatitis that regresses with penicillin and is isolated or associated with evocative cutaneous signs.

Assessment of individual vaccine status in a vaccinology experts' group.

RATIONALE: Worldwide, experts in vaccinology have promoted the broad annual coverage of health care workers with the influenza vaccine. Furthermore, pertussis vaccination is now recommended for young adults and health care workers working with newborns. AIM: To analyse the compliance with these guidelines among experts responsible for the development or dissemination of national immunization schedules. METHOD: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in a vaccinology workshop group of French experts, using a self-administered questionnaire. RESULTS: Among 44 experts, the average rate of influenza vaccination was 69.5% (95% confidence interval, 61.6% to 77.3%) between the 2003/04 and 2005/06 flu seasons, whereas the rate of pertussis vaccination during this period was only 30%. The main reasons that the experts gave for not being vaccinated were a lack of time or simply not remembering to do so. CONCLUSION: Experts had low coverage rates for influenza and pertussis vaccination. To improve these rates, a multifaceted intervention combining audit and feedback strategy with a vaccine day is planned.