Differential pulsatile secretagogue control of GH secretion in healthy men.

Pulsatile growth hormone (GH) secretion putatively reflects integrated regulation by GH-releasing hormone (GHRH), somatostatin (SST), and GH-releasing peptide (GHRP). GHRH and SST secretion is itself pulsatile. However, how GHRH and SST pulses act along with GHRP to jointly determine pulsatile GH secretion is unclear. Moreover, how testosterone (T) modulates such interactions is unknown. These queries were assessed in a prospectively randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind cohort comprising 26 healthy older men randomized to testosterone (T) vs. placebo supplementation. Pulses of GHRH, SST, or saline were infused intravenously at 90-min intervals for 13 h, along with either continuous saline or ghrelin analog (GHRP-2). The train of pulses was followed by a triple stimulus (combined l-arginine, GHRH, and GHRP-2) to estimate near-maximal GH secretion over a final 3 h. Testosterone vs. placebo supplementation doubled pulsatile GH secretion during GHRH pulses combined with continuous saline (GHRH/saline) (P < 0.01). Pulsatile GH secretion correlated positively with T concentrations (270-1,170 ng/dl) in the 26 men during saline pulses/saline (P = 0.015, R(2) = 0.24), GHRH pulses/saline (P = 0.020, R(2) = 0.22), and combined GHRH pulses/GHRP-2 (P = 0.016, R(2) = 0.25) infusions. Basal nonpulsatile GH secretion correlated with T during saline pulses/GHRP-2 drive (P = 0.020, R(2) = 0.16). By regression analysis, pulsatile GH secretion varied negatively with body mass index (BMI) during saline/GHRP-2 infusion (P = 0.001, R(2) = 0.36), as well as after the triple stimulus preceded by GHRH/GHRP-2 (P = 0.013, R(2) = 0.23). Mean (10-h) GH concentrations under GHRP-2 were predicted jointly by estradiol (positively) and BMI (negatively) (P < 0.001, R(2) = 0.520). These data indicate that estradiol, T, and BMI control pulsatile secretagogue-specific GH-regulatory mechanisms in older men.

Complex regulation of GH autofeedback under dual-peptide drive: studies under a pharmacological GH and sex steroid clamp.

To test the postulate that sex difference, sex steroids, and peptidyl secretagogues control GH autofeedback, 11 healthy postmenopausal women and 14 older men were each given 1) a single iv pulse of GH to enforce negative feedback and 2) continuous iv infusion of saline vs. combined GHRH/GHRP-2 to drive feedback escape during pharmacological estradiol (E(2); women) or testosterone (T; men) supplementation vs. placebo in a double-blind, prospectively randomized crossover design. By three-way ANCOVA, sex difference, sex hormone treatment, peptide stimulation, and placebo/saline responses (covariate) controlled total (integrated) GH recovery during feedback (each P < 0.001). Both sex steroid milieu (P = 0.019) and dual-peptide stimulation (P < 0.001) determined nadir (maximally feedback-suppressed) GH concentrations. E(2)/T exposure elevated nadir GH concentrations during saline infusion (P = 0.003), whereas dual-peptide infusion did so independently of T/E(2) and sex difference (P = 0.001). All three of sex difference (P = 0.001), sex steroid treatment (P = 0.005), and double-peptide stimulation (P < 0.001) augmented recovery of peak (maximally feedback-escaped) GH concentrations. Peak GH responses to dual-peptidyl agonists were greater in women than in men (P = 0.016). E(2)/T augmented peak GH recovery during saline infusion (P < 0.001). Approximate entropy analysis corroborated independent effects of sex steroid treatment (P = 0.012) and peptide infusion (P < 0.001) on GH regularity. In summary, sex difference, sex steroid supplementation, and combined peptide drive influence nadir, peak, and entropic measurements of GH release under controlled negative feedback. To the degree that the pharmacological sex steroid, GH, and dual-peptide clamps provide prephysiological regulatory insights, these outcomes suggest major determinants of pulsatile GH secretion in the feedback domain.

Regulated recovery of pulsatile growth hormone secretion from negative feedback: a preclinical investigation.

Although stimulatory (feedforward) and inhibitory (feedback) dynamics jointly control neurohormone secretion, the factors that supervise feedback restraint are poorly understood. To parse the regulation of growth hormone (GH) escape from negative feedback, 25 healthy men and women were studied eight times each during an experimental GH feedback clamp. The clamp comprised combined bolus infusion of GH or saline and continuous stimulation by saline GH-releasing hormone (GHRH), GHRP-2, or both peptides after randomly ordered supplementation with placebo (both sexes) vs. E(2) (estrogen; women) and T (testosterone; men). Endpoints were GH pulsatility and entropy (a model-free measure of feedback quenching). Gender determined recovery of pulsatile GH secretion from negative feedback in all four secretagog regimens (0.003 ≤ P ≤ 0.017 for women>men). Peptidyl secretagog controlled the mass, number, and duration of feedback-inhibited GH secretory bursts (each, P < 0.001). E(2)/T administration potentiated both pulsatile (P = 0.006) and entropic (P < 0.001) modes of GH recovery. IGF-I positively predicted the escape of GH secretory burst number and mode (P = 0.022), whereas body mass index negatively forecast GH secretory burst number and mass (P = 0.005). The composite of gender, body mass index, E(2), IGF-I, and peptidyl secretagog strongly regulates the escape of pulsatile and entropic GH secretion from autonegative feedback. The ensemble factors identified in this preclinical investigation enlarge the dynamic model of GH control in humans.

Somatotropic and gonadotropic axes linkages in infancy, childhood, and the puberty-adult transition.

Integrative neuroendocrine control of the gonadotropic and somatotropic axes in childhood, puberty, and young adulthood proceeds via multiple convergent and divergent pathways in the human and experimental animal. Emerging ensemble concepts are required to embody independent, parallel, and interacting mechanisms that subserve physiological adaptations and pathological disruption of reproduction and growth. Significant advances in systems biology will be needed to address these challenges.

Relative effects of estrogen, age, and visceral fat on pulsatile growth hormone secretion in healthy women.

Growth hormone (GH) secretion is subject to complex regulation. How pre- and postmenopausal age (PRE, POST), estradiol (E(2)) availability, and abdominal visceral fat (AVF) jointly affect peptidyl-secretagogue drive of GH secretion is not known. To this end, healthy PRE (n = 20) and POST (n = 22) women underwent a low- vs. high-E(2) clamp before receiving a continuous intravenous infusion of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) or GH-releasing peptide (GHRP-2). According to analysis of covariance, PRE and POST women achieved age-independent hypo- and euestrogenemia under respective low- and high-E(2) clamps. All four of age (P < 0.001), E(2) status (P = 0.006), secretagogue type (P < 0.001), and an age x peptide interaction (P = 0.014) controlled pulsatile GH secretion. Independently of E(2) status, POST women had lower GH responses to both GHRH (P = 0.028) and GHRP-2 (P < 0.001) than PRE women. Independently of age, GHRP-2 was more stimulatory than GHRH during low E(2) (P = 0.011) and high E(2) (P < 0.001). Stepwise forward-selection multivariate analysis revealed that computerized tomographic estimates of AVF explained 22% of the variability in GHRH action (P = 0.002), whereas age and E(2) together explained 60% of the variability in GHRP-2 drive (P < 0.001). These data establish that age, estrogen status, and AVF are triple covariates of continuous peptide-secretagogue drive of pulsatile GH secretion in women. Each factor must be controlled for to allow valid comparisons of GH-axis activity.

Endocrine control of body composition in infancy, childhood, and puberty.

Body composition exhibits marked variations across the early human lifetime. The precise physiological mechanisms that drive such developmental adaptations are difficult to establish. This clinical challenge reflects an array of potentially confounding factors, such as marked intersubject differences in tissue compartments; the incremental nature of longitudinal intrasubject variations in body composition; technical limitations in quantitating the unobserved mass of mineral, fat, water, and muscle ad seriatim; and the multifold contributions of genetic, dietary, environmental, hormonal, nutritional, and behavioral signals to physical and sexual maturation. From an endocrine perspective (reviewed here), gonadal sex steroids and GH/IGF-I constitute prime determinants of evolving body composition. The present critical review examines hormonal regulation of body composition in infancy, childhood, and puberty.

The effect of growth hormone releasing peptide-2 on upper gastrointestinal contractile activity and food intake in conscious dogs.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of growth hormone releasing peptide (GHRP)-2, a synthetic ligand for the growth hormone secretagogue receptor, on upper gastrointestinal motility and food intake. METHODS: Five neurally intact dogs and five dogs with vagotomy and pyloroplasty were equipped with strain gauge force transducers on the stomach, duodenum and jejunum. GHRP-2 (0.5-10 microg/kg) was administered intravenously in neurally intact dogs in the interdigestive state and after feeding. To study the mechanism of GHRP-2-induced inhibition on postprandial contractions, various antagonists were administered intravenously prior to GHRP-2. The effect of GHRP-2 on postprandial contractions was also studied in dogs with vagotomy. GHRP-2 was also administered immediately before feeding in each group, and its effect on food intake was assessed. RESULTS: GHRP-2 did not evoke gastrointestinal contractions in the interdigestive state. GHRP-2 induced contractile inhibition continuing for 2-3 min in neurally intact dogs and dogs with vagotomy. This inhibitory effect was reversed by the alpha- and alpha(2)-blockers. GHRP-2 increased food intake in neurally intact dogs, but not in dogs with vagotomy. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that in the upper gut GHRP-2 inhibits postprandial contractions via alpha(2)-receptors on the enteric nervous system, whereas an intact vagal nerve is necessary for a GHRP-2-induced increase in food intake.

Modulating Effects of Progesterone on Spontaneous Nocturnal and Ghrelin-Induced GH Secretion in Postmenopausal Women.

BACKGROUND: Oral administration of estradiol (E2) generally increases GH secretion in postmenopausal women. Oral administration of E2 is associated with a decrease in IGF-1, whereas parenteral or transdermally administered E2 may have no effect on GH. The effect of progesterone (P4) on GH secretion has rarely been studied. We hypothesized that moderately increased serum E2 levels stimulate GH and that P4 modulates E2-stimulated GH secretion. STUDY DESIGN: Four parallel groups of randomly assigned postmenopausal women (n = 40). Treatments were saline placebo and oral placebo, saline placebo and oral micronized P4 (3 × 200 mg/d IM), E2 (5 mg IM) and oral placebo, and E2 IM and oral micronized P4. Outcome measures were overnight GH secretion (10 hours), stimulated (ghrelin, 0.3 µg/kg IV bolus) GH secretion, and CT-estimated visceral fat. RESULTS: Intramuscular E2 administration did not alter nocturnal and ghrelin-stimulated GH secretion. Nocturnal GH secretion was not changed by P4 administration. However, P4 diminished ghrelin-stimulated pulsatile GH release with or without E2 (average, 7.20 ± 2.14 and 9.58 ± 1.97 µg/L/2 h, respectively; P = 0.045). Respective outcomes for mean GH concentrations and GH peak amplitudes were 0.97 ± 0.31 and 1.52 µg/L ± 0.29 (P = 0.025) and 2.76 ± 1.04 and 3.95 µg/L ± 0.90 (P = 0.031). Ghrelin-stimulated GH secretion correlated negatively with P4 concentration with or without correction for visceral fat area in the regression equation (R = 0.49, P = 0.04, ß = -0.040 ± 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Low-range physiological E2 concentrations do not affect spontaneous or ghrelin-stimulated pulsatile GH secretion. Conversely, P4 inhibits ghrelin-stimulated GH secretion in a concentration-dependent fashion. The mechanistic aspects and physiological significance of natural P4's regulation of ghrelin-evoked GH secretion require further study.

Pituitary and/or peripheral estrogen-receptor alpha regulates follicle-stimulating hormone secretion, whereas central estrogenic pathways direct growth hormone and prolactin secretion in postmenopausal women.

BACKGROUND: Estradiol (E(2)) stimulates GH and prolactin secretion and suppresses FSH secretion in postmenopausal women. Whether central nervous system (CNS) or pituitary mechanisms (or both) mediate such actions is not known. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to distinguish between hypothalamic and pituitary or peripheral (hepatic) actions of E2. SETTING: This study was performed in an academic medical center. DESIGN: This was a double-blind, prospectively randomized, placebo (Pl)-controlled study. METHODS: The capability of a selective, noncompetitive, non-CNS permeant estrogen receptor (ER)-alpha antagonist, fulvestrant (FUL) to antagonize the effects of transdermal E2 and Pl on GH, prolactin, and FSH secretion was assessed in 43 women (ages 50-80 yr) in a four parallel-cohort study. Each woman received four secretagogue infusions to stimulate GH secretion. IGF-I and its binding proteins were measured secondarily. RESULTS: Administration of Pl/E2 increased GH and prolactin concentrations by 100%, and suppressed FSH concentrations by more than 50% (each P

Twenty-four hour continuous ghrelin infusion augments physiologically pulsatile, nycthemeral, and entropic (feedback-regulated) modes of growth hormone secretion.

BACKGROUND: Ghrelin is a 28-amino acid acylated peptide that potentiates GHRH stimulation and opposes somatostatin inhibition acutely. Whether prolonged ghrelin administration can sustain physiological patterns of GH secretion remains unknown. HYPOTHESIS: Continuous delivery of ghrelin will amplify physiological patterns of GH secretion over 24 h. SUBJECTS: Men and women ages 29-69 yr, body mass indices 23-52 kg/m2, were included in the study. LOCATION: The study was performed at an academic medical center. METHODS: Twenty-four hour continuous sc infusion of saline vs. ghrelin (1 microg/kg.h) with frequent sampling was examined. Deconvolution and entropy analyses were performed. OUTCOMES: IGF-I concentrations were determined. Basal, pulsatile, nycthemeral, and entropic measures of GH secretion were calculated. RESULTS: Ghrelin infusion compared with saline infusion for 24 h elevated (median) acylated ghrelin, GH, and IGF-I concentrations by 8.1-fold (P < 0.001),11-fold (P < 0.001), and 1.4-fold (P = 0.002). GH secretory-burst mass and frequency increased by 6.6-fold (P = 0.004) and 1.7-fold (P < 0.001), respectively, resulting in a 12-fold increase in pulsatile GH secretion (P < 0.001). Interpulse variability decreased significantly (P = 0.046), whereas GH secretory-burst shape and half-life did not change. The amplitude of the nycthemeral GH rhythm increased by 3.4-fold (P < 0.001), and GH patterns became more irregular (higher approximate entropy P < 0.001). Combining GHRH with ghrelin was not an additive in driving GH secretion. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous ghrelin infusion for 24 h elevates acylated ghrelin, GH and IGF-I concentrations, and stimulates pulsatile, nycthemeral, and entropic modes of GH secretion. The consistency of outcomes in a heterogeneous cohort of adults suggests potentially broad utility of this physiological secretagogue in hyposomatotropic states.

Estrogen elevates the peak overnight production rate of acylated ghrelin.

CONTEXT: Acylated ghrelin is the putatively bioactive GH secretagogue. HYPOTHESIS: Estradiol (E2) stimulates the synthesis rather than inhibits the metabolic clearance of acylated ghrelin. SETTING: The study took place at an academic medical center. SUBJECTS: Healthy postmenopausal women participated. INTERVENTIONS: Interventions included prospectively randomized, double-blind separate-day iv infusions of saline or five graded doses of ghrelin in estrogen-deficient (n=12) and E2-supplemented (n=8) women. OUTCOMES: Metabolic clearance rate (MCR), volume of distribution, half-life, and secretion rate of acylated ghrelin were assessed. RESULTS: In pilot iv bolus ghrelin infusions, the median half-lives of acylated and total ghrelin were 21 and 36 min (P<0.01), MCRs 58 and 8.1 liters/kg.d (P<0.01), and volumes of distribution of 1.0 and 0.32 liters/kg (P<0.01), respectively. Transdermal E2 supplementation for 3 wk increased peak nighttime acylated ghrelin concentrations from 99+/-12 to 141+/-34 pg/ml (P=0.039). Exposure to E2 did not alter the linear relationships between 1) plasma acylated ghrelin concentration and ghrelin infusion rate (638+/-12 slope units), 2) MCR of acylated ghrelin and ghrelin infusion rate (10+/-2.5 slope units), and 3) MCR and plasma concentration of acylated ghrelin (0.017+/-0.004 slope units). These data predict peak nighttime production rates of acylated ghrelin of 3.8+/-0.9 (E2) and 1.9+/-0.2 (no E2) ng/kg.min (P=0.039). CONCLUSION: Acylated ghrelin has a multifold larger distribution volume and MCR than total ghrelin. An estrogenic milieu augments synthesis and/or acylation of ghrelin peptide without altering its MCR.

Estrogen supplementation selectively enhances hypothalamo-pituitary sensitivity to ghrelin in postmenopausal women.

CONTEXT: Sex-steroid hormones amplify pulsatile GH secretion by unknown mechanisms. Ghrelin is the most potent natural GH secretagogue discovered to date. A plausible unifying postulate is that estradiol (E(2)) enhances hypothalamo-pituitary sensitivity to ghrelin (a physiological effect). The hypothesis is relevant to understanding the basis of hyposomatotropism in aging and other relatively hypogonadal states. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to test the hypothesis that E(2) supplementation potentiates ghrelin's stimulation of pulsatile GH secretion. SETTING: The study was conducted at an academic medical center. SUBJECTS: Healthy postmenopausal women (n = 20) were included in the study. INTERVENTIONS: Separate-day iv infusions of saline vs. five graded doses of ghrelin were performed in volunteers prospectively randomly assigned to receive (n = 8) or not receive (n = 12) transdermal E(2) for 21 d were performed. MEASURES: GH secretion was estimated by deconvolution analysis and abdominal visceral fat mass determined by computerized axial tomography were calculated. RESULTS: E(2) supplementation augmented ghrelin's stimulation of basal (nonpulsatile) GH secretion by 3.6-fold (P = 0.022), increased GH responses to low-dose ghrelin by 2.9-fold (P = 0.035), did not alter ghrelin efficacy, and elicited more regular patterns of acylated ghrelin concentrations during saline infusion (P = 0.033). Abdominal visceral fat negatively determined responses to ghrelin (R = -0.346; P < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Transdermal E(2) supplementation potentiates GH secretion stimulated by physiological but not pharmacological concentrations of acylated ghrelin, and concomitantly regularizes patterns of bioactive ghrelin secretion in postmenopausal women. Accordingly, the estrogen milieu appears to control sensitivity of the hypothalamopituitary unit to acylated ghrelin.

Gonadal status and body mass index jointly determine growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone/GH-releasing peptide synergy in healthy men.

CONTEXT: Sex steroid hormones potentiate whereas increased body mass index (BMI) represses GH secretion. Whether sex steroids modify the negative effect of BMI on secretagogue-induced GH secretion in men is not known. The issue is important in designing GH-stimulation regimens that are relatively insensitive to both gonadal status and adiposity. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to compare the relationships between BMI and peptide-stimulated GH secretion in men with normal and reduced testosterone and estradiol availability. SETTING: The study was performed at an academic medical center. SUBJECTS: Healthy young men were included in the study. INTERVENTIONS: Randomized separate-day iv infusion of saline and/or maximally effective doses of L-arginine/GHRH, L-arginine/GH-releasing peptide (GHRP)-2, and GHRH/GHRP-2 in eugonadal (n=12) and experimentally hypogonadal (n=10) men was performed. OUTCOMES: Regression of paired secretagogue-induced GH responses on BMI was determined. RESULTS: In eugonadal men, peak GH concentrations correlated negatively with BMI. In particular, BMI accounted for only 38% of the response variability after L-arginine/GHRH (P=0.0165), but 62% after GHRH/GHRP-2 (P=0.0012) and 65% after L-arginine/GHRP-2 (P=0.00075). In contrast, in hypogonadal men, GH responses were uncorrelated with BMI. The negative effects of BMI on peak GH responses in eugonadal and hypogonadal states differed most markedly after stimulation with GHRH/GHRP-2 (P=0.0019). This contrast was corroborated using integrated GH responses (P=0.0007). CONCLUSIONS: Short-term experimental gonadal sex hormone depletion attenuates dual secretagogue-stimulated GH secretion in lean young men. The inhibitory effect of relative adiposity on GH secretion appears to predominate over that of acute sex steroid withdrawal.

Aromatized Estrogens Amplify Nocturnal Growth Hormone Secretion in Testosterone-Replaced Older Hypogonadal Men.

Context: Testosterone (T) increases GH secretion in older men with a relative lack of T, in hypogonadal men of all ages, and in patients undergoing sex reassignment. The role of estradiol (E2) in men is less well defined. Objective: To assess the contribution of aromatization of T to spontaneous nocturnal and stimulated GH secretion. Participants: Four groups of healthy older men (N = 74, age range 57 to 77 years) were studied. The gonadotropic axis was clamped with the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist degarelix. Three groups received T and one group placebo addback. Two T-replaced groups were treated with anastrozole (an aromatase inhibitor) and either placebo or E2 addback. Main Outcome Measures: Ten-minute GH concentration profiles were quantified by deconvolution analysis, after overnight (2200 to 0800 hours) sampling, and after combined IV injection of GHRH (0.3 µg/kg) and GHRH-2 (0.3 µg/kg) and withdrawal of a 2-hour somatostatin infusion (1 µg/kg/h). Results: E2 addback during aromatase inhibition increased basal (P = 0.046), pulsatile (P = 0.020), and total (P = 0.018) GH secretion by 60% to 70%. E2 did not potentiate GH secretory stimuli. Logarithmically transformed pulsatile GH secretion correlated strongly and positively with concurrent E2 concentrations overall (P = 0.028) and under anastrozole treatment (P = 0.005). Conclusion: E2 administration in older men transdermally stimulates overnight pulsatile GH secretion. The exact site of E2 action cannot be ascertained from these experiments but may include hypothalamic loci involved in GH regulation, especially because GH secretagogue effects on somatotrope pituitary cells were not affected.

Effects of Toremifene, a Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulator, on Spontaneous and Stimulated GH Secretion, IGF-I, and IGF-Binding Proteins in Healthy Elderly Subjects.

CONTEXT: Estrogens amplify spontaneous and stimulated growth hormone (GH) secretion, whereas they diminish GH-dependent insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I in a dose-dependent manner. Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), including tamoxifen and toremifene, are widely adjunctively used in breast and prostate cancer. Although some endocrine effects of tamoxifen are known, few data are available for toremifene. OBJECTIVE: To explore sex-dependent effects of toremifene on spontaneous 10-hour overnight GH secretion, followed by GH-releasing hormone-ghrelin stimulation. Additionally, effects on IGF-I, its binding proteins, and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) were quantified. PARTICIPANTS AND DESIGN: Twenty men and 20 women, within an allowable age range of 50 to 80 years, volunteered for this double-blind, placebo-controlled prospective crossover study. Ten-minute blood sampling was done for 10 hours overnight and then for 2 hours after combined GH-releasing hormone-ghrelin injection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pulsatile GH and stimulated GH secretion, and fasting levels of IGF-I, IGF-binding protein (IGFBP)1, IGFBP3, and SHBG. RESULTS: Toremifene did not enhance pulsatile or stimulated GH secretion, but decreased IGF-I by 20% in men and women. IGFBP3 was unchanged, whereas while IGFBP1 and SHBG increased in both sexes to a similar extent. CONCLUSIONS: The expected rise in spontaneous and stimulated GH secretion under the diminished negative feedback restraint of powered IGF-I favors a central inhibitory antiestrogenic effect of toremifene. Estrogenic effects of toremifene on the liver were present, as evidenced by increased IGFBP1 and SHBG levels. Men and women responded to this SERM comparably.

Putative somatostatin suppression potentiates adrenocorticotropin secretion driven by ghrelin and human corticotropin-releasing hormone.

CONTEXT: Ghrelin is a 28-amino-acid Ser(3)-octanoylated peptide, and CRH is a 41-amino-acid peptide, both of which stimulate ACTH secretion. In principle, actions of these agonists could be subject to inhibitory modulation by hypothalamic somatostatin (SS). OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to test the hypothesis that endogenous SS restrains ghrelin and CRH-stimulated ACTH secretion, thereby linking all three, ghrelin, CRH, and SS, with ACTH secretion. DESIGN AND SETTING: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover interventional study at an academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Ten healthy postmenopausal women participated in the study. INTERVENTIONS: Interventions included iv injection of saline, ghrelin, human CRH, or both after an infusion of saline vs. l-arginine to putatively inhibit SS outflow (eight visits per subject). OUTCOME MEASURES: ACTH concentrations quantified by repetitive blood sampling and immunochemiluminometry. RESULTS: Infusion of ghrelin induced peak ACTH concentrations [median (range)] of 21 (17-28) compared with 16 (11-20) ng/liter after saline (P = 0.037). CRH and l-arginine infusion evoked ACTH peaks of 23 (14-48) and 31 (21-286) ng/liter, respectively (P = 0.037 and P = 0.005 vs. saline). l-Arginine enhanced stimulation by ghrelin by 1.43-fold (P = 0.028) and that by CRH by 1.91-fold (P = 0.005). Triple stimulation with ghrelin, CRH, and l-arginine potentiated the effect of combined ghrelin/CRH by 1.45-fold (P = 0.028). Downstream cortisol responses mimicked those of ACTH but were time delayed. CONCLUSIONS: The present outcomes indicate that the peptide ensemble comprising ghrelin, CRH, and SS (inferred by l-arginine infusion) can regulate ACTH and cortisol secretion in healthy adults.

Tripartite control of growth hormone secretion in women during controlled estradiol repletion.

CONTEXT: Studies of how aging attenuates GH secretion are confounded by differences in sex-steroid milieus, abdominal visceral fat mass (AVF), and IGF-I concentrations and limited in interpretability by the use of pharmacological doses of secretagogues. HYPOTHESIS: In a controlled estrogenic milieu, near-physiological secretagogue drive will unmask distinct influences of age, AVF, and IGF-I on GH secretion. LOCATION: The study was conducted at an academic medical center. SUBJECTS: Subjects included 10 healthy pre- (PRE) and 10 postmenopausal (POST) women. PROCEDURE: In a defined estradiol (E(2)) milieu, we compared GH secretion after submaximal stimulation with GH-releasing peptide (GHRP)-2 (ghrelin analog), GHRH, and l-arginine (an inhibitor of somatostatin outflow). ANALYSIS: We related GH responses to age stratum (dichotomous variable) and AVF and IGF-I concentrations (continuous variables). RESULTS: In the face of comparable concentrations of E(2), testosterone, and SHBG: 1) age (P < 0.001) and secretagogue type (P < 0.001) independently determined GH secretion; 2) GH responses in POST subjects were only 26-33% of those in PRE (P < or = 0.002) across all secretagogues; 3) POST women lost the PRE order of secretagogue potency (GHRP-2 > GHRH = l-arginine); and 4) in the combined cohorts, higher AVF predicted reduced l-arginine-stimulated GH secretion (R(2) = 0.46, P = 0.0013), whereas higher IGF-I concentrations forecast increased GHRP-2 and GHRH drive (R(2) > or = 0.52, P < or = 0.013). CONCLUSION: A paradigm of near-physiological secretagogue drive in an E(2)-clamped milieu unmasks tripartite deficits in peptide-signaling pathways in healthy POST, compared with PRE, women. Post hoc analyses indicate that both greater visceral adiposity and lower IGF-I concentrations mark this triple regulatory defect.

Ghrelin potentiates growth hormone secretion driven by putative somatostatin withdrawal and resists inhibition by human corticotropin-releasing hormone.

CONTEXT: Ghrelin is a 28-amino acid, Ser(3)-octanoylated peptide that stimulates GH secretion in vivo and in vitro. Beyond the capability of ghrelin to synergize with GHRH, little is known about multipeptide modulation of ghrelin's actions in humans. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that ghrelin can stimulate GH secretion in the absence or presence of somatostatin withdrawal (induced by l-arginine infusion) and stress-like drive by CRH. DESIGN: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over interventional study. SETTING: This study was performed at an academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Nine healthy postmenopausal women not receiving sex hormones were studied. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were given an iv infusion of saline and/or l-arginine or human CRH, followed by a bolus iv injection of ghrelin. OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcome measures were pulsatile GH secretion quantified by repetitive blood sampling, immunochemiluminometry, and deconvolution analysis. RESULTS: Consecutive saline/ghrelin infusion increased pulsatile GH secretion from 2.7 +/- 1.0 (saline/saline; mean +/- sem) to 20 +/- 5.0 microg/liter.3 h (P < 0.01). The magnitude of the effect of l-arginine/saline was comparable at 20 +/- 4.5 microg/liter.3 h (P < 0.01). In contrast, sequential l-arginine/ghrelin evoked true synergy of GH release (93 +/- 14 microg/liter.3 h; P = 0.003 vs. l-arginine alone and P = 0.008 vs. ghrelin alone). Human CRH did not affect GH responses to saline/saline (3.9 +/- 1.1 microg/liter.3 h), saline/ghrelin (19 +/- 3.3 microg/liter.3 h), l-arginine/saline (16 +/- 2.7 microg/liter.3 h), or l-arginine/ghrelin (90 +/- 13 microg/liter.3 h). CONCLUSIONS: Assuming that l-arginine reduces somatostatin outflow, we infer that ghrelin can activate hypothalamo-pituitary pathways that are both dependent upon and independent of somatostatinergic restraint even in the face of a strong stress-related signal.

Estradiol potentiates ghrelin-stimulated pulsatile growth hormone secretion in postmenopausal women.

CONTEXT: Ghrelin and an estrogen-rich milieu individually amplify pulsatile GH secretion by increasing the amount of hormone released per burst. However, how these distinct agonists interact in controlling pulsatile GH output is not known. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to test the hypothesis that elevated estradiol (E(2)) concentrations potentiate hypothalamo-pituitary responses to a near-physiological ghrelin stimulus. DESIGN: This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, prospectively randomized, parallel-cohort study. SETTING: The study was conducted at an academic medical center. SUBJECTS: Twenty-one postmenopausal women participated in the study. INTERVENTIONS: Eleven subjects received placebo (Pl) and 10 others E(2) transdermally in escalating doses over 3 wk to mimic late follicular-phase E(2) concentrations. Saline or a submaximally stimulatory amount of ghrelin (0.3 microg/kg) was infused iv on separate randomly ordered mornings fasting after 17-21 d of Pl or E(2) administration. OUTCOMES: Outcomes included serum concentrations of E(2), ghrelin, GH, IGF-I, IGF binding protein (IGFBP)-1 and IGFBP-3, and the estimated mass and waveform of stimulated GH secretory bursts. RESULTS: Administration of E(2) yielded late follicular-phase E(2) concentrations. Compared with Pl, E(2) did not alter ghrelin concentrations but reduced IGF-I and IGFBP-3 and elevated IGFBP-1 concentrations. Compared with saline, ghrelin infusion amplified pulsatile GH secretion by 7.1-fold (P < 0.01). The effect of E(2) alone was 2.0-fold placebo and that of combined ghrelin/E(2) 10.4-fold (P < 0.01). Ghrelin and E(2) accelerated initial GH release individually but nonadditively by more than 2-fold (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Estrogen augments ghrelin's near-physiological stimulation of pulsatile GH secretion and mimics ghrelin's acceleration of initial GH release. Thus, we hypothesize that estrogen and a GH secretagogue act via independent as well as convergent mechanisms.

Joint mechanisms of impaired growth-hormone pulse renewal in aging men.

CONTEXT: Aging reduces the size (mass) of GH secretory bursts and thereby reduces total GH secretion. Experimental data indicate that high-amplitude GH pulses are evoked by reversible cycles of GH-induced negative feedback. Whether aging impairs autofeedback is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to assess whether age attenuates and IGF-I potentiates negative feedback by a near-physiological pulse of GH. DESIGN/SETTING/SUBJECTS: In a university setting, 17 healthy men ages 19-71 yr each underwent four randomly ordered infusion studies on separate mornings fasting. INTERVENTION: Intravenous injection of a pulse of: 1) saline or 2) recombinant human (rh) GH to impose controlled negative feedback, followed in 2 h by a bolus of 3) saline or (iv) the ghrelin analog GHRP-2 to overcome feedback inhibition. OUTCOME MEASURES: The impact of age and IGF-I concentrations on GH autofeedback was assessed by regression analysis. RESULTS: Percentage feedback inhibition correlated negatively with: 1) age after consecutive rh GH/saline infusion (R(2) = 0.42, P = 0.005) at any IGF-I concentration; and 2) total IGF-I concentrations after rh GH/GHRP-2 infusion (R(2) = 0.40, P = 0.009) at any age. In contrast, sex-steroid concentrations and body mass index were unrelated to degree of autoinhibition. CONCLUSIONS: Increased age in healthy men predicts impaired GH autofeedback, which may contribute to attenuated renewal of high-amplitude GH pulses. Conversely, higher IGF-I concentrations in young men forecast accentuated GH autoinhibition, which may drive prominent GH pulses.