The microbial and quality properties of poultry carcasses treated with peracetic acid as an antimicrobial treatment.

Salmonella spp. and Campylobacter spp. continue to be prominent food safety concerns for the poultry industry and consumers alike. Peracetic acid (PAA) has been approved as an antimicrobial for use in poultry chillers. To validate its effectiveness, 100 poultry carcasses (per replication x 2) were inoculated with Salmonella (10(6) cfu) or Campylobacter (10(6) cfu) and were randomly allocated into chill water containing chlorine (0.003%) or PAA (0.0025%, 0.01%, or 0.02%). Results indicated that PAA concentrations as low as 0.0025% were effective in decreasing Salmonella spp., whereas PAA levels of 0.02% were effective in decreasing Campylobacter spp. when compared with the chlorine treatment. A sensory study was also conducted with another set of 500 carcasses (not inoculated). Birds were treated with water, chlorine (0.003%), or PAA (0.01%, 0.015%, or 0.02%). Sensory panels and microbial data were collected weekly on randomly sampled carcasses that were stored at 4 degrees C for 21 d. The PAA-treated carcasses at 0.015% and 0.02% had an extended shelf-life compared with those treated with water or chlorine. Specifically, on d 15, the only treatments that could be served to sensory panelists were the carcasses treated with 0.015% or 0.02% PAA. The carcasses treated with water, chlorine, or 0.01% PAA had off-colors, off-odors, and high microbial counts. These results suggest that PAA may be an effective antimicrobial when used in poultry chiller applications and greater levels (>or=0.015%) may extend product shelf-life.

Epidemiologic Investigation of Highly Pathogenic H5N2 Avian Influenza Among Upper Midwest U.S. Turkey Farms, 2015.

In 2015, an outbreak of H5N2 highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) occurred in the United States, severely impacting the turkey industry in the upper midwestern United States. Industry, government, and academic partners worked together to conduct a case-control investigation of the outbreak on turkey farms in the Upper Midwest. Case farms were confirmed to have HPAI-infected flocks, and control farms were farms with noninfected turkey flocks at a similar stage of production. Both case and control farms were affiliated with a large integrated turkey company. A questionnaire administered to farm managers and supervisors assessed farm biosecurity, litter handling, dead bird disposal, farm visitor and worker practices, and presence of wild birds on operations during the 2 wk prior to HPAI confirmation on case premises and the corresponding time frame for control premises. Sixty-three farms, including 37 case farms and 26 control farms were included in the analysis. We identified several factors significantly associated with the odds of H5N2 case farm status and that may have contributed to H5N2 transmission to and from operations. Factors associated with increased risk included close proximity to other turkey operations, soil disruption (e.g., tilling) in a nearby field within 14 days prior to the outbreak, and rendering of dead birds. Observation of wild mammals near turkey barns was associated with reduced risk. When analyses focused on farms identified with H5N2 infection before April 22 (Period 1), associations with H5N2-positive farm status included soil disruption in a nearby field within 14 days prior to the outbreak and a high level of visitor biosecurity. High level of worker biosecurity had a protective effect. During the study period after April 22 (Period 2), factors associated with HPAI-positive farm status included nonasphalt roads leading to the farm and use of a vehicle wash station or spray area. Presence of wild birds near dead bird disposal areas was associated with reduced risk. Study results indicated that the initial introduction and spread of H5N2 virus likely occurred by both environmental and between-farm pathways. Transmission dynamics appeared to change with progression of the outbreak. Despite enhanced biosecurity protocols, H5N2 transmission continued, highlighting the need to review geographic/topologic factors such as farm proximity and potential dust or air transmission associated with soil disruption. It is likely that biosecurity improvements will reduce the extent and speed of spread of future outbreaks, but our results suggest that environmental factors may also play a significant role in farms becoming infected with HPAI.